Tachycardia, VentricularNCT02072707
Efficacy and Safety of Epicardial VT Ablation Using Contact Force Irrigated Tip Catheter - Pilot Study
A study testing Epicardial VT ablation and Endocardial VT Ablation in people with Tachycardia, Ventricular, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The investigators hypothesized that combined endocardial and epicardial VT ablation using contact sensor irrigated catheter is safe and achieves a lower recurrence rate than endocardial only ablation in ischemic and non-ischemic patients, for this the investigators will randomize 20 patients in two groups, one with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tachycardia, Ventricular
- What is being tested?
- Epicardial VT ablation and Endocardial VT Ablation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to 21 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sustained monomorphic VT requiring cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug administration with ≥4 episodes in the previous 6 months despite an ICD or antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
- Patients without ICD were eligible after 2 episodes of sustained VT.
Who cannot join
- Creatinine level >2.5mg/dL
- LV ejection fraction <10%
- NYHA Class IV
- Mobile thrombus on LV
- Absence of vascular access to the LV
- Life-expectancy of less than 12 months
Show all 11Show fewer
- Previous open-chest cardiac surgical procedure
- Unstable angina; myocardial infarction in the last 2 months
- Severe aortic stenosis
- Severe mitral regurgitation secondary to leaflet or chordae rupture
- Pregnancy and age of less than 18 years old.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Arrhythmia Clinical Unit - Instituto do Coração - HCFMUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000
About this study
Official title: Prospective and Randomized Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Using Contact Force Sensor Irrigated Tip Catheter - Pilot Study
The investigators hypothesized that combined endocardial and epicardial VT ablation using contact sensor irrigated catheter is safe and achieves a lower recurrence rate than endocardial only ablation in ischemic and non-ischemic patients, for this the investigators will randomize 20 patients in two groups, one with endocardial only ablation and other with combined endocardial and epicardial ablation.
Read the detailed description
Pilot Study Design The investigators will select 20 ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with scar related Ventricular tachycardia with indication of VT ablation. After informed consent, these patients will be randomized to endocardial only (Control Group) or combined endocardial and epicardial ablation (Treatment Group).
Inclusion Criteria Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sustained monomorphic VT requiring cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug administration with ≥4 episodes in the previous 6 months despite an ICD or antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Patients without ICD were eligible after 2 episodes of sustained VT.
Exclusion Criteria Creatinine level >2.5mg/dL; LV ejection fraction <10%; NYHA Class IV; mobile thrombus on LV; absence of vascular access to the LV; life-expectancy of less than 12 months; previous open-chest cardiac surgical procedure; unstable angina; myocardial infarction in the last 2 months; severe aortic stenosis; severe mitral regurgitation secondary to leaflet or chordae rupture; pregnancy and age of less than 18 years old.
Ablation Technique In the patients randomized for combined epicardial and endocardial ablation, subxyphoid puncture will be performed according to previously described technique. Following successful epicardial access on the combined epi and endocardial ablation and following the venous puncture on the endocardial only group, a puncture of femoral artery will be performed. If the patient has peripheral artery disease, the catheter will be positioned on the left ventricle through transeptal puncture.
Electroanatomic voltage map will be constructed of the endocardial and epicardial surface. After map construction, programmed ventricular stimulation of the apex of the RV with S4 extrastimuli will be performed aiming for VT inducibility. If the induced VT is well tolerated, activation mapping of the VT will be constructed in addition to entrainment mapping. If the VT is not hemodynamically tolerated, it will be reverted either by Burst or electrical cardioversion, than substrate modification in the scar combined with pace-mapping and local abnormal electrograms (late potentials) ablation will be performed. In the patients in the endocardial only group, only the endocardial surface of the right or left ventricle will be ablated.
In the combined epicardial and endocardial group, the choice of the surface to be ablated will be guided by the tachycardia mapping (mesodiastolic and pre-systolic potentials), extension of the scar, pace-mapping in both surfaces. ECG criteria suggesting epicardial surface will also be considered to define the epi or endo surface to be ablated.
Following ablation, a repeated programmed ventricular stimulation with S4 will be performed to evaluated reinducibility of the VT. Additional RF applications can be performed according to clinical criteria, and the procedure will be considered terminate when no VT is inducible or by clinical criteria. In the endo only group that endocardial scar could not be observed or following extensive endocardial ablation the clinical VT still remain inducible, and the ECG criteria suggests epicardial VT will underwent epicardial mapping and ablation and this will be considered as a Cross-over.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome:
Safety: The investigators will evaluate the rate of complications related to irrigated tip catheter use on epicardial surface. It is expected that the combined epicardial and endocardial ablation group do not present an increase in the rate of catheter-related complications.
Efficacy: The investigators will evaluate if the procedure was succeeded. The investigators consider success as follows: (1) Complete Success: prevention of induction of any VT following ablation; (2) Partial Success: prevention of induction of the clinical VT, remaining the induction of at least one non-clinical faster VT; (3) Failure: Remaining the induction of the clinical or initially induced VT.
Secondary Outcome:
Safety: The investigators will evaluate the rate of complications related to the epicardial access. It is expected a rate of hemopericardium of no more than 20%, with less than 5% rate of major complications as procedure related death, cardiac surgery due to cardiac perforation or blood cell transfusion.
- Conditions
- Tachycardia, Ventricular
- Being tested
- Epicardial VT ablation, Endocardial VT Ablation
- Keywords
- Ventricular Tachycardia, RF ablation, Epicardial Access, Contact Sensor Irrigated tip catheter
- Medical subject headings
- Tachycardia, Ventricular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Epicardial VT ablationProcedure or surgery
Combined Epicardial and Endocardial VT Ablation
Endocardial VT AblationProcedure or surgery
Endocardial Only VT ablation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Epicardial VT ablation | Active comparator | Patients will underwent combined epicardial and endocardial mapping and ablation Receives: Procedure: Epicardial VT ablation |
| Endocardial VT Ablation | Active comparator | Patients will underwent endocardial only VT mapping and ablation Receives: Procedure: Endocardial VT Ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of epicardial ablation
We will evaluate if the procedure was succeeded according to reinducibility of ventricular tachycardia. We consider success as follows: (1) Complete Success: prevention of induction of any VT following ablation; (2) Partial Success: prevention of induction of the clinical VT, remaining the induction of at least one non-clinical faster VT; (3) Failure: Remaining the induction of the clinical or initially induced VT.
Measured: Programed ventricular stimulation performed 5 minutes after complete ablation
Secondary outcomes (2)
Safety of epicardial access
We will evaluate the rate of complications related to the epicardial access.
Measured: 24 hours after the procedure
Safety of epicardial ablation using irrigated contact sensor catheter
We will evaluate the rate of complications related to irrigated tip catheter use on epicardial surface.
Measured: At the end of the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completion21 Jul 2017
- Study completion21 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Tachycardia, VentricularStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao Paulo General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biosense Webster, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Investigators
- Maurício Scanavacca, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Instituto do coração - HC/FMUSP
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02072707
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Arrit-Incor-1
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Pisani CF, Romero J, Lara S, Hardy C, Chokr M, Sacilotto L, Wu TC, Darrieux F, Hachul D, Kalil-Filho R, Di Biase L, Scanavacca M. Efficacy and safety of combined endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in Chagas disease: A randomized controlled study. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1510-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
PubMed 32087356
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective and Randomized Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Using Contact Force Sensor Irrigated Tip Catheter - Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02072707
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Arrit-Incor-1
- Conditions
- Tachycardia, Ventricular
- Keywords
- Ventricular Tachycardia, RF ablation, Epicardial Access, Contact Sensor Irrigated tip catheter
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biosense Webster, Inc.
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators hypothesized that combined endocardial and epicardial VT ablation using contact sensor irrigated catheter is safe and achieves a lower recurrence rate than endocardial only ablation in ischemic and non-ischemic patients, for this the investigators will randomize 20 patients in two groups, one with endocardial only ablation and other with combined endocardial and epicardial ablation.
Detailed description
Pilot Study Design The investigators will select 20 ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with scar related Ventricular tachycardia with indication of VT ablation. After informed consent, these patients will be randomized to endocardial only (Control Group) or combined endocardial and epicardial ablation (Treatment Group).
Inclusion Criteria Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sustained monomorphic VT requiring cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug administration with ≥4 episodes in the previous 6 months despite an ICD or antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Patients without ICD were eligible after 2 episodes of sustained VT.
Exclusion Criteria Creatinine level >2.5mg/dL; LV ejection fraction <10%; NYHA Class IV; mobile thrombus on LV; absence of vascular access to the LV; life-expectancy of less than 12 months; previous open-chest cardiac surgical procedure; unstable angina; myocardial infarction in the last 2 months; severe aortic stenosis; severe mitral regurgitation secondary to leaflet or chordae rupture; pregnancy and age of less than 18 years old.
Ablation Technique In the patients randomized for combined epicardial and endocardial ablation, subxyphoid puncture will be performed according to previously described technique. Following successful epicardial access on the combined epi and endocardial ablation and following the venous puncture on the endocardial only group, a puncture of femoral artery will be performed. If the patient has peripheral artery disease, the catheter will be positioned on the left ventricle through transeptal puncture.
Electroanatomic voltage map will be constructed of the endocardial and epicardial surface. After map construction, programmed ventricular stimulation of the apex of the RV with S4 extrastimuli will be performed aiming for VT inducibility. If the induced VT is well tolerated, activation mapping of the VT will be constructed in addition to entrainment mapping. If the VT is not hemodynamically tolerated, it will be reverted either by Burst or electrical cardioversion, than substrate modification in the scar combined with pace-mapping and local abnormal electrograms (late potentials) ablation will be performed. In the patients in the endocardial only group, only the endocardial surface of the right or left ventricle will be ablated.
In the combined epicardial and endocardial group, the choice of the surface to be ablated will be guided by the tachycardia mapping (mesodiastolic and pre-systolic potentials), extension of the scar, pace-mapping in both surfaces. ECG criteria suggesting epicardial surface will also be considered to define the epi or endo surface to be ablated.
Following ablation, a repeated programmed ventricular stimulation with S4 will be performed to evaluated reinducibility of the VT. Additional RF applications can be performed according to clinical criteria, and the procedure will be considered terminate when no VT is inducible or by clinical criteria. In the endo only group that endocardial scar could not be observed or following extensive endocardial ablation the clinical VT still remain inducible, and the ECG criteria suggests epicardial VT will underwent epicardial mapping and ablation and this will be considered as a Cross-over.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome:
Safety: The investigators will evaluate the rate of complications related to irrigated tip catheter use on epicardial surface. It is expected that the combined epicardial and endocardial ablation group do not present an increase in the rate of catheter-related complications.
Efficacy: The investigators will evaluate if the procedure was succeeded. The investigators consider success as follows: (1) Complete Success: prevention of induction of any VT following ablation; (2) Partial Success: prevention of induction of the clinical VT, remaining the induction of at least one non-clinical faster VT; (3) Failure: Remaining the induction of the clinical or initially induced VT.
Secondary Outcome:
Safety: The investigators will evaluate the rate of complications related to the epicardial access. It is expected a rate of hemopericardium of no more than 20%, with less than 5% rate of major complications as procedure related death, cardiac surgery due to cardiac perforation or blood cell transfusion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Epicardial VT ablation | Active comparator | Procedure: Epicardial VT ablationPatients will underwent combined epicardial and endocardial mapping and ablation |
| Endocardial VT Ablation | Active comparator | Procedure: Endocardial VT AblationPatients will underwent endocardial only VT mapping and ablation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sustained monomorphic VT requiring cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug administration with ≥4 episodes in the previous 6 months despite an ICD or antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
- Patients without ICD were eligible after 2 episodes of sustained VT.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Creatinine level >2.5mg/dL
- LV ejection fraction <10%
- NYHA Class IV
- Mobile thrombus on LV
- Absence of vascular access to the LV
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Epicardial VT ablationCombined Epicardial and Endocardial VT Ablation | Procedure or surgery | Epicardial VT ablation |
| Endocardial VT AblationEndocardial Only VT ablation | Procedure or surgery | Endocardial VT Ablation |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of epicardial ablation
Time frame: Programed ventricular stimulation performed 5 minutes after complete ablation
We will evaluate if the procedure was succeeded according to reinducibility of ventricular tachycardia. We consider success as follows: (1) Complete Success: prevention of induction of any VT following ablation; (2) Partial Success: prevention of induction of the clinical VT, remaining the induction of at least one non-clinical faster VT; (3) Failure: Remaining the induction of the clinical or initially induced VT.
2 secondary outcomes
Safety of epicardial access
Time frame: 24 hours after the procedure
Safety of epicardial ablation using irrigated contact sensor catheter
Time frame: At the end of the procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 32087356Pisani CF, Romero J, Lara S, Hardy C, Chokr M, Sacilotto L, Wu TC, Darrieux F, Hachul D, Kalil-Filho R, Di Biase L, Scanavacca M. Efficacy and safety of combined endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in Chagas disease: A randomized controlled study. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1510-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Tachycardia, Ventricular
Enrolling by invitation
VINTAGE (Ventricular Intramyocardial Navigation for Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Electrograms) Using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Catheters
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Markers of Cardiovascular Disease in Epilepsy
Epilepsy, Seizures
Recruiting
Cardiac RADIoablation Versus Repeat Catheter Ablation: a Pivotal Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy for Patients With High-risk Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia (RADIATE-VT)
Tachycardia, Ventricular
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maurício Scanavacca, MD, PhD principal investigator
Instituto do coração - HC/FMUSP
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Epicardial VT ablation and Endocardial VT Ablation in people with Tachycardia, Ventricular, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of epicardial ablation (time frame: Programed ventricular stimulation performed 5 minutes after complete ablation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02072707, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2020.