AzTrials
AzTrials

Tachycardia, VentricularNCT02072707

Efficacy and Safety of Epicardial VT Ablation Using Contact Force Irrigated Tip Catheter - Pilot Study

A study testing Epicardial VT ablation and Endocardial VT Ablation in people with Tachycardia, Ventricular, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators hypothesized that combined endocardial and epicardial VT ablation using contact sensor irrigated catheter is safe and achieves a lower recurrence rate than endocardial only ablation in ischemic and non-ischemic patients, for this the investigators will randomize 20 patients in two groups, one with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tachycardia, Ventricular
What is being tested?
Epicardial VT ablation and Endocardial VT Ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Apr 2014to 21 Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sustained monomorphic VT requiring cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug administration with ≥4 episodes in the previous 6 months despite an ICD or antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
  • Patients without ICD were eligible after 2 episodes of sustained VT.

Who cannot join

  • Creatinine level >2.5mg/dL
  • LV ejection fraction <10%
  • NYHA Class IV
  • Mobile thrombus on LV
  • Absence of vascular access to the LV
  • Life-expectancy of less than 12 months
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Previous open-chest cardiac surgical procedure
  • Unstable angina; myocardial infarction in the last 2 months
  • Severe aortic stenosis
  • Severe mitral regurgitation secondary to leaflet or chordae rupture
  • Pregnancy and age of less than 18 years old.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Arrhythmia Clinical Unit - Instituto do Coração - HCFMUSP

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Prospective and Randomized Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Using Contact Force Sensor Irrigated Tip Catheter - Pilot Study

The investigators hypothesized that combined endocardial and epicardial VT ablation using contact sensor irrigated catheter is safe and achieves a lower recurrence rate than endocardial only ablation in ischemic and non-ischemic patients, for this the investigators will randomize 20 patients in two groups, one with endocardial only ablation and other with combined endocardial and epicardial ablation.

Read the detailed description

Pilot Study Design The investigators will select 20 ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with scar related Ventricular tachycardia with indication of VT ablation. After informed consent, these patients will be randomized to endocardial only (Control Group) or combined endocardial and epicardial ablation (Treatment Group).

Inclusion Criteria Patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent sustained monomorphic VT requiring cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drug administration with ≥4 episodes in the previous 6 months despite an ICD or antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Patients without ICD were eligible after 2 episodes of sustained VT.

Exclusion Criteria Creatinine level >2.5mg/dL; LV ejection fraction <10%; NYHA Class IV; mobile thrombus on LV; absence of vascular access to the LV; life-expectancy of less than 12 months; previous open-chest cardiac surgical procedure; unstable angina; myocardial infarction in the last 2 months; severe aortic stenosis; severe mitral regurgitation secondary to leaflet or chordae rupture; pregnancy and age of less than 18 years old.

Ablation Technique In the patients randomized for combined epicardial and endocardial ablation, subxyphoid puncture will be performed according to previously described technique. Following successful epicardial access on the combined epi and endocardial ablation and following the venous puncture on the endocardial only group, a puncture of femoral artery will be performed. If the patient has peripheral artery disease, the catheter will be positioned on the left ventricle through transeptal puncture.

Electroanatomic voltage map will be constructed of the endocardial and epicardial surface. After map construction, programmed ventricular stimulation of the apex of the RV with S4 extrastimuli will be performed aiming for VT inducibility. If the induced VT is well tolerated, activation mapping of the VT will be constructed in addition to entrainment mapping. If the VT is not hemodynamically tolerated, it will be reverted either by Burst or electrical cardioversion, than substrate modification in the scar combined with pace-mapping and local abnormal electrograms (late potentials) ablation will be performed. In the patients in the endocardial only group, only the endocardial surface of the right or left ventricle will be ablated.

In the combined epicardial and endocardial group, the choice of the surface to be ablated will be guided by the tachycardia mapping (mesodiastolic and pre-systolic potentials), extension of the scar, pace-mapping in both surfaces. ECG criteria suggesting epicardial surface will also be considered to define the epi or endo surface to be ablated.

Following ablation, a repeated programmed ventricular stimulation with S4 will be performed to evaluated reinducibility of the VT. Additional RF applications can be performed according to clinical criteria, and the procedure will be considered terminate when no VT is inducible or by clinical criteria. In the endo only group that endocardial scar could not be observed or following extensive endocardial ablation the clinical VT still remain inducible, and the ECG criteria suggests epicardial VT will underwent epicardial mapping and ablation and this will be considered as a Cross-over.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome:

Safety: The investigators will evaluate the rate of complications related to irrigated tip catheter use on epicardial surface. It is expected that the combined epicardial and endocardial ablation group do not present an increase in the rate of catheter-related complications.

Efficacy: The investigators will evaluate if the procedure was succeeded. The investigators consider success as follows: (1) Complete Success: prevention of induction of any VT following ablation; (2) Partial Success: prevention of induction of the clinical VT, remaining the induction of at least one non-clinical faster VT; (3) Failure: Remaining the induction of the clinical or initially induced VT.

Secondary Outcome:

Safety: The investigators will evaluate the rate of complications related to the epicardial access. It is expected a rate of hemopericardium of no more than 20%, with less than 5% rate of major complications as procedure related death, cardiac surgery due to cardiac perforation or blood cell transfusion.

Being tested
Epicardial VT ablation, Endocardial VT Ablation
Keywords
Ventricular Tachycardia, RF ablation, Epicardial Access, Contact Sensor Irrigated tip catheter
Medical subject headings
Tachycardia, Ventricular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epicardial VT ablationProcedure or surgery

    Combined Epicardial and Endocardial VT Ablation

  • Endocardial VT AblationProcedure or surgery

    Endocardial Only VT ablation

Study groups in NCT02072707
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Epicardial VT ablationActive comparatorPatients will underwent combined epicardial and endocardial mapping and ablation
Receives: Procedure: Epicardial VT ablation
Endocardial VT AblationActive comparatorPatients will underwent endocardial only VT mapping and ablation
Receives: Procedure: Endocardial VT Ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy of epicardial ablation

    We will evaluate if the procedure was succeeded according to reinducibility of ventricular tachycardia. We consider success as follows: (1) Complete Success: prevention of induction of any VT following ablation; (2) Partial Success: prevention of induction of the clinical VT, remaining the induction of at least one non-clinical faster VT; (3) Failure: Remaining the induction of the clinical or initially induced VT.

    Measured: Programed ventricular stimulation performed 5 minutes after complete ablation

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Safety of epicardial access

    We will evaluate the rate of complications related to the epicardial access.

    Measured: 24 hours after the procedure

  2. Safety of epicardial ablation using irrigated contact sensor catheter

    We will evaluate the rate of complications related to irrigated tip catheter use on epicardial surface.

    Measured: At the end of the procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2014
  3. Primary completion21 Jul 2017
  4. Study completion21 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02072707
Sponsor's protocol ID
Arrit-Incor-1
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
20 Feb 2014
Last updated
21 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Pisani CF, Romero J, Lara S, Hardy C, Chokr M, Sacilotto L, Wu TC, Darrieux F, Hachul D, Kalil-Filho R, Di Biase L, Scanavacca M. Efficacy and safety of combined endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in Chagas disease: A randomized controlled study. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1510-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

    PubMed 32087356

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Epicardial VT ablation and Endocardial VT Ablation in people with Tachycardia, Ventricular, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy of epicardial ablation (time frame: Programed ventricular stimulation performed 5 minutes after complete ablation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02072707, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in