Diabetes MellitusPhase 3iNew TrendNCT02073188
Comparative Study of a Smartphone-Linked Self-Monitoring System Versus a Traditional One for Improving Metabolic Control and Compliance to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose
A Phase 3 study testing iBGStar and Traditional Glucometer in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of iBGstar as a component of the diabetes treatment vs. traditional blood glucose self-monitoring system for improving glycemic control after 6 months in young patients with type 1 diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 24 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- iBGStar and Traditional Glucometer
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 186 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jun 2012to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 24 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 1 diabetes
- Males and females
- Age between 14-24 years
- Any diabetes duration
- Cared for by the diabetes center for at least 1 year
- HbA1c ≥ 8%
Show all 9Show fewer
- Basal bolus treatment (any insulin)
- Poor compliance with Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (less than 30% of the recommended Blood Glucose measurements recorded in the glucose meter in the two previous weeks, i.e. <16 Blood Glucose measurements in the last two weeks)
- Written informed consent obtained from patient or legal representative (for minor)
Who cannot join
- Treatment with other insulin regimen or Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
- Refusal or inability to give informed consent to participate in the study
- Patients with short life expectancy
- Patients with conditions/concomitant diseases making them non evaluable for the primary efficacy endpoint according to physician's judgment
- Requirement for concomitant treatment that could bias primary evaluation
- Patients with high likelihood of being unavailable for 6 and/or 12 months visits
Show all 12Show fewer
- Subject is the investigator, sub-investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other study site staff or relative of study site staff thus considered directly involved in the conduct of the study
- Current addition/abuse of alcohol or drugs
- Severe visual or dexterity impairment
- Patients with any mental condition rendering them unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Subjects unlikely or unable to comply with the Protocol requirements
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparative Efficacy of iBGStar Glucose Meter vs. Traditional Glucose Monitoring in Improving Metabolic Control and Compliance Towards Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of iBGstar as a component of the diabetes treatment vs. traditional blood glucose self-monitoring system for improving glycemic control after 6 months in young patients with type 1 diabetes. The study is intended also to demonstrate the superiority of iBGStar as a component of the diabetes treatment vs. usual blood glucose self-monitoring system for improving the compliance to self monitoring of blood glucose after 6 months.
Read the detailed description
The planned study duration will be 20 months (5 quarters) with screening/enrollment of 7 months, followed by 2-3 weeks of a qualification phase, a 6 month experimental phase, plus a 6 month follow-up in the post-trial observational phase.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- iBGStar, Traditional Glucometer
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iBGStarDevice
Traditional GlucometerDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| iBGStar (Group A) | Experimental | Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with iBGStar and iBGStar Diabetes Manager Application (App) uploaded on iPhone for all duration of the study (6 months of experimental phase plus 6-months of observational phase). In the first 3 months, the patients in Group A will send their glycemic test values and notes by mail to the physician through Diabetes Manager App every 2 weeks. Afterwards until the visit V2 (six months), the patients in Group A will send their glycemic test values and notes by mail monthly. 9 reports in total. Receives: Device: iBGStar |
| Traditional Glucometer (Group B) | Active comparator | Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with a traditional glucometer according to usual care for the first 6 months (experimental phase). In the 6 months post-trial follow-up (observational phase), Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with iBGStar and iBGStar Diabetes Manager App. Receives: Device: Traditional Glucometer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in HbA1c levels from baseline
Measured: baseline to six months
Proportion of participants performing at least 30% of the recommended Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose tests after 6 months from randomization
Measured: at 6 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤7.5%
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Average number of recommended Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose tests daily, weekly, and monthly
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial glucose (PPG)
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Mean Glycemic Variability
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Average Insulin Dose
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Number of Daily Injections
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Number of Insulin Dose Adjustments
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Quality of life: Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQOL) (young adults 18-24 years)
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL-Y) (adolescents 14-17 years)
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Participants satisfaction with SMBG meter assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Measured: at 6 months and 12 months
Number overall contacts between centers and participants
Measured: up to 12 months
Type of overall contacts between centers and participants
Measured: up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2012
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02073188
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IBGST_L_05971
- Acronym
- iNew Trend
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Di Bartolo P, Nicolucci A, Cherubini V, Iafusco D, Scardapane M, Rossi MC. Young patients with type 1 diabetes poorly controlled and poorly compliant with self-monitoring of blood glucose: can technology help? Results of the i-NewTrend randomized clinical trial. Acta Diabetol. 2017 Apr;54(4):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s00592-017-0963-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
PubMed 28138788
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Efficacy of iBGStar Glucose Meter vs. Traditional Glucose Monitoring in Improving Metabolic Control and Compliance Towards Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02073188
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iNew Trend / IBGST_L_05971
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 186 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2012
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of iBGstar as a component of the diabetes treatment vs. traditional blood glucose self-monitoring system for improving glycemic control after 6 months in young patients with type 1 diabetes. The study is intended also to demonstrate the superiority of iBGStar as a component of the diabetes treatment vs. usual blood glucose self-monitoring system for improving the compliance to self monitoring of blood glucose after 6 months.
Detailed description
The planned study duration will be 20 months (5 quarters) with screening/enrollment of 7 months, followed by 2-3 weeks of a qualification phase, a 6 month experimental phase, plus a 6 month follow-up in the post-trial observational phase.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| iBGStar (Group A) | Experimental | Device: iBGStarSelf-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with iBGStar and iBGStar Diabetes Manager Application (App) uploaded on iPhone for all duration of the study (6 months of experimental phase plus 6-months of observational phase). In the first 3 months, the patients in Group A will send their glycemic test values and notes by mail to the physician through Diabetes Manager App every 2 weeks. Afterwards until the visit V2 (six months), the patients in Group A will send their glycemic test values and notes by mail monthly. 9 reports in total. |
| Traditional Glucometer (Group B) | Active comparator | Device: Traditional GlucometerSelf-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with a traditional glucometer according to usual care for the first 6 months (experimental phase). In the 6 months post-trial follow-up (observational phase), Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with iBGStar and iBGStar Diabetes Manager App. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 24 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Type 1 diabetes
- Males and females
- Age between 14-24 years
- Any diabetes duration
- Cared for by the diabetes center for at least 1 year
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Treatment with other insulin regimen or Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
- Refusal or inability to give informed consent to participate in the study
- Patients with short life expectancy
- Patients with conditions/concomitant diseases making them non evaluable for the primary efficacy endpoint according to physician's judgment
- Requirement for concomitant treatment that could bias primary evaluation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iBGStar | Device | iBGStar (Group A) |
| Traditional Glucometer | Device | Traditional Glucometer (Group B) |
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c levels from baseline
Time frame: baseline to six months
Proportion of participants performing at least 30% of the recommended Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose tests after 6 months from randomization
Time frame: at 6 months
12 secondary outcomes
Percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤7.5%
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Average number of recommended Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose tests daily, weekly, and monthly
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial glucose (PPG)
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Mean Glycemic Variability
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Average Insulin Dose
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Number of Daily Injections
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Number of Insulin Dose Adjustments
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Quality of life: Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQOL) (young adults 18-24 years)
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL-Y) (adolescents 14-17 years)
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Participants satisfaction with SMBG meter assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: at 6 months and 12 months
Number overall contacts between centers and participants
Time frame: up to 12 months
Type of overall contacts between centers and participants
Time frame: up to 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28138788Di Bartolo P, Nicolucci A, Cherubini V, Iafusco D, Scardapane M, Rossi MC. Young patients with type 1 diabetes poorly controlled and poorly compliant with self-monitoring of blood glucose: can technology help? Results of the i-NewTrend randomized clinical trial. Acta Diabetol. 2017 Apr;54(4):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s00592-017-0963-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing iBGStar and Traditional Glucometer in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sanofi at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in HbA1c levels from baseline (time frame: baseline to six months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02073188, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2016.