AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO)Phase 3NCT02073279

Efficacy and Safety Study of Satralizumab (SA237) as Monotherapy to Treat Participants With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

A Phase 3 study testing Satralizumab in people with Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and NMO Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD), run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 58 sites in 15 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and immunogenic profiles of satralizumab in participants with NMO and NMOSD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 74 years
What is being tested?
Satralizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
95 participants
Where
58 sitesin 15 countries
Study dates
5 Aug 2014to 31 Jan 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 74 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants must be diagnosed as having either neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD), defined as the following:
  • NMO as defined by Wingerchuk et al. 2006 criteria (requires all of the following 3 criteria: I. Optic neuritis, II. Acute myelitis, III. At least two of three supportive criteria: Contiguous spinal cord lesion identified on a magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] scan extending over 3 vertebral segments; Brain MRI not meeting diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis [MS]; NMO-IgG seropositive status)
  • NMOSD as defined by either of following criteria with anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody seropositive status at screening: i. Idiopathic single or recurrent events of longitudinally extensive myelitis (≥3 vertebral segment spinal cord MRI lesion); ii. Optic neuritis, single, recurrent or simultaneous bilateral
  • Clinical evidence of at least 1 documented relapse (including first attack) in last 12 months prior to screening
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score from 0 to 6.5 inclusive at screening
  • Age 18 to 74 years, inclusive at the time of informed consent
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of the protocol

Who cannot join

  • Clinical relapse onset (including first attack) within 30 days prior to baseline
  • Exclusion Criteria Related to Previous or Concomitant Therapy:
  • Any previous treatment with interleukin 6 (IL-6) inhibitory therapy (e.g., tocilizumab), alemtuzumab, total body irradiation or bone marrow transplantation at any time
  • Any previous treatment with anti-CD20, eculizumab, anti-BLyS monoclonal antibody (e.g., belimumab), any other treatment for prevention of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse (e.g., interferon, natalizumab, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, teriflunomide or dimethyl fumarate) within 6 months prior to baseline
  • Any previous treatment with anti-CD4, cladribine, cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone within 2 years prior to baseline
  • Treatment with any investigational agent within 3 months prior to baseline
Show all 30Show fewer
  • Exclusions for General Safety:
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • For participants of reproductive potential, a positive result from a serum pregnancy test at screening, or not willing to use reliable means of contraception (physical barrier [participants or partner] in conjunction with a spermicidal product, contraceptive pill, patch, injectables, intrauterine device or intrauterine system) during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug
  • Any surgical procedure (except for minor surgeries) within 4 weeks prior to baseline
  • Evidence of other demyelinating disease or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
  • Evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant diseases that may preclude participant participation, as described; Other nervous system disease, cardiovascular disease, hematologic/hematopoiesis disease, respiratory disease, muscular disease, endocrine disease, renal/urologic disease, digestive system disease, congenital or acquired severe immunodeficiency
  • Known active infection (excluding fungal infections of nail beds or caries dentium) within 4 weeks prior to baseline
  • Evidence of chronic active hepatitis B or C
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse within 1 year prior to baseline
  • History of diverticulitis that, in the Investigator's opinion, may lead to increased risk of complications such as lower gastrointestinal perforation
  • Evidence of active tuberculosis (excluding participants receiving chemoprophylaxis for latent tuberculosis infection)
  • Evidence of active interstitial lung disease
  • Receipt of any live or live attenuated vaccine within 6 weeks prior to baseline
  • History of malignancy within the last 5 years, including solid tumors, hematologic malignancies and in situ carcinoma (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri that have been completely excised and cured)
  • History of severe allergic reaction to a biologic agent (e.g., shock, anaphylactic reactions)
  • Active suicidal ideation within 6 months prior to screening, or history of suicide attempt within 3 years prior to screening
  • History of Stevens-Johnson syndrome
  • Following laboratory abnormalities at screening*.
  • White blood cells <3.0 x10^3/microliter (μL)
  • Absolute neutrophil count <2.0 x 10^3 /μL
  • Absolute lymphocyte count <0.5 x 10^3 /μL
  • Platelet count <10 x 10^4 /μL
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
  • If retest is conducted, the last value of retest before randomization must meet study criteria.

Trial locations and contacts

58 sites in 15 countries.

58 sites in 15 countries

United States20 sites
  • University of Michigan Health System

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0666

  • University of Colorado Denver -; Neurology

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • The Neurological Institute PA

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • University of Chicago; Neurology

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Columbus Research and Wellness

    Columbus, Georgia, 31909

  • OhioHealth Research Institute

    Columbus, Ohio, 43214

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Wayne State University - Comp Clinic and MS. Center

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • University of Miami UHealth Professional Arts Center

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare - St. Francis Outpatient Center; Center for Neurological Disorders

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215

  • Consultants in Neurology Ltd

    Northbrook, Illinois, 60062

  • OSF Saint Francis Medical Center

    Peoria, Illinois, 64637

  • Thomas Jefferson University

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

  • MidAmerica Neuroscience Institute

    Prairie Village, Kansas, 66206

  • Virginia Commonwealth University

    Richmond, Virginia, 23219-1901

  • Central Texas Neurology Consultants

    Round Rock, Texas, 78681

  • UT Medicine San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • The MS Center of Vero Beach

    Vero Beach, Florida, 32962

Other trials in United States

Ukraine9 sites
  • Miska Klinichna Likarnia №16

    Dnipropetrovsk, Tavria Okruha, 49100

  • Ivano-Frankivska oblasna klinichna likarnia

    Ivano-Frankivsk, KIEV Governorate, 76008

  • Ivano-Frankivska miska klinichna likarnia №1

    Ivano-Frankivsk, KIEV Governorate, 76018

  • Kiev National Medical University

    Kiev, KIEV Governorate, 3110

  • Municipal Foundation of Kyiv Regional Council " Kyiv Region

    Kyiv, KIEV Governorate, 4107

  • KU "Odeskyi oblasnyi medychnyi tsentr psykhichnoho zdorovia"

    Odesa, Tavria Okruha, 65006

  • Reginal clinical psyconeurological hospital

    Ternopil, KIEV Governorate, 46014

  • Vinnytskyi natsionalnyi medychnyi universytet imeni M.I. Pyr

    Vinnytsia, Poltava Governorate, 21005

  • Municipal Establishment "City Clinical Hospital #2; Neurology

    Zaporozhya, Poltava Governorate, 69068

Other trials in Ukraine

Bulgaria5 sites
  • Medical Help Center EOOD

    Dobrich, 9300

  • MMA-MHAT Pleven - Clinic for Neurology

    Pleven, 5800

  • UMHAT 'Dr. Georgi Stranski', EAD

    Pleven, 5800

  • MHATNP Sveti Naum EAD

    Sofia, 1113

  • UMHAT Alexandrovska, EAD

    Sofia, 1431

Other trials in Bulgaria

South Korea4 sites
  • Korea University Anam Hospital - Neurology

    Seoul, 02841

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

  • Severance Hospital - Yonsei University Health System - Neurology

    Seoul, 3722

Other trials in South Korea

Canada3 sites
  • Recherche Sepmus Inc.

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2J2

  • Centre hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9

  • MS Clinical Trials Group

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3

Other trials in Canada

Georgia3 sites
  • LTD Helsicore

    Tbilisi, 0112

  • Pineo Medical Ecosystem LTD

    Tbilisi, 0114

  • S.Khechinashvili Tbilisi State Medical University Clinic Ne

    Tbilisi, 0179

Other trials in Georgia

Taiwan3 sites
  • China Medical University Healthcare System

    Taichung, 40447

  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital; Neurology

    Tainan, 704

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital-Neurology

    Taipei, 11217

Other trials in Taiwan

Malaysia2 sites
  • Hospital Kuala Lumpur

    Kuala Lumpur, 50586

  • Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia [Neurology]

    Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, 16150

Other trials in Malaysia

Poland2 sites
  • NZOZ Wielospecjalistyczna Poradnia Lekarska SYNAPSIS

    Katowice, 40-123

  • Miedzyleski Szpital Specjalistyczny w Warszawie

    Warsaw, 04-749

Other trials in Poland

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Bilim University Medical Faculty Florence Nightingale Hospital

    Istanbul, 34333

  • Ondokuz Mayis Univ. Med. Fac.

    Samsun, 55139

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Croatia1 site
  • Klinicki bolnicki centar Osijek

    Osijek, 31000

Other trials in Croatia

Italy1 site
  • PO G.Rodolico, AOU Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele Catania

    Catania, Sicily, 95123

Other trials in Italy

Philippines1 site
  • Philippine General Hospital

    Manila, 1000

Other trials in Philippines

Puerto Rico1 site
  • San Juan MS Center

    Guaynabo, 00968

Other trials in Puerto Rico

Romania1 site
  • SC Clubul Sanatatii SRL

    Campulung Muscel, 115100

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Satralizumab (SA237) as Monotherapy in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and immunogenic profiles of satralizumab in participants with NMO and NMOSD.

Being tested
Satralizumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Neuromyelitis Optica

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SatralizumabDrug

    Also called SA237, RG6168

    Satralizumab will be administered subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, and thereafter once every 4 weeks (Q4W).

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo will be administered subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, and thereafter once every 4 weeks (Q4W).

Study groups in NCT02073279
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SatralizumabExperimentalParticipants randomized to this arm for the double-blind period will receive satralizumab monotherapy. The double-blind period for the participant ends either when the participant experiences a Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) confirmed protocol-defined relapse, the total number of CEC confirmed protocol-defined relapses reaches 44, or 1.5 years after the last patient was randomized. In the open-label extension period, the participant will receive satralizumab SC injection at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, and Q4W thereafter, up to the end of the study.
Receives: Drug: Satralizumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants randomized to this arm for the double-blind period will receive placebo monotherapy. The double-blind period for the participant ends either when the participant experiences a Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) confirmed protocol-defined relapse, the total number of CEC confirmed protocol-defined relapses reaches 44, or 1.5 years after the last patient was randomized.. In the open-label extension period, the participant will receive satralizumab SC injection at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, and Q4W thereafter, up to the end of the study.
Receives: Drug: Satralizumab; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) Period

    TFR was defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of relapse in the DB period. Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Symptoms had to persist for >24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred < 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (i.e., if 2 relapses had onset days that were 30 days of one another, they were counted only as 1 relapse), and onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.

    Measured: Up to Week 216

Secondary outcomes (31)
  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB Period

    The VAS is a subjective measure of pain consisting of a 100 mm line with two endpoints representing 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "pain as bad as it could be". Participants rated their pain by placing a mark on the line corresponding to their current level of pain. The distance along the line from the "no pain" marker was measured with a ruler giving a pain score out of 100. A higher score indicated more pain and lower scores reflected a better health state. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. ANCOVA was used for analysis to report the adjusted mean and standard error (SE).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB Period

    The FACIT Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the past 7 days. As each of the 13 items of the scale ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores was computed using FACIT scoring algorithm as 0-52, where 0 is the worst possible score and 52 the best which indicated less fatigue. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  3. Relapse-Free Rate During the DB Period

    Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Symptoms had to persist for >24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred < 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (i.e., if 2 relapses had onsets within 30 days of one another, they were counted as 1), and onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.

    Measured: Up to Week 216

  4. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the DB Period

    The ARR is calculated as the total number of participants with adjudicated PDRs experienced divided by the patient-years at risk. Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological NMO or NMOSD. Symptoms had to persist for >24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred < 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (2 relapses with onset days in 30 days of one another was counted as 1 relapse), onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.

    Measured: Up to Week 216

  5. Change From Baseline in Short Form Generic Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  6. Change From Baseline in SF-36 General Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  7. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  8. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  9. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Role-Emotional Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  10. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Role-Physical Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  11. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Social Role Functioning Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  12. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  13. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The component scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher score indicates better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  14. Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The component scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher score indicates better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  15. Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Index Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The EQ-5D is a participant-answered questionnaire measuring 5 dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression with 3 possible response categories: 1) no problems; 2) some problems; 3) severe problems. The scores from 5 dimensions are used as input to generate EQ-5D index score using scoring algorithm. The EQ-5D index score is scored on a scale of -0.2 to 1. A higher score reflects a better health state. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  16. Change From Baseline in Speed of Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25W) at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The T25W is an assessment of walking ability. The time (in seconds) that the participant took to walk 25 feet was measured. Speed is calculated as 1/Timed 25-Foot Walk where time is measured in seconds. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  17. Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The mRS is a 7-point disability scale that assesses the degree of disability in participants with neurological impairment. Possible scores range from 0 (no symptoms at all) up to 6 (death). Higher scores reflect increased disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  18. Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The ZBI is the measurement to assess caregiver burden. The 22 items ask for the strain caregivers perceive. Responses range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always). The overall ZBI score ranges from 0 to 88. The higher the total score, the heavier the perceived burden. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 120

  19. Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The EDSS is an ordinal scale with values from 0 points (normal neurological examination) to 10 points (death) increasing in half-point increments once an EDSS of 1.0 has been reached. Higher scores represent increased disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  20. Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Snellen Chart) at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    Visual acuity was measured using Snellen 20-foot wall chart and then converted to logMAR visual acuity scoring. Lower values indicate better visual acuity. Data are reported for right eye (OD) and left eye (OS). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  21. Change From Baseline in Visual Function (Low-Contrast Sloan Letter Chart [LCSLC]) Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period

    The LCSLC evaluates the visual function and captures the minimum size at which individuals can perceive letters of a particular contrast level. The change in binocular visual acuity, as assessed by the number of letters read correctly from a distance of 2 meters on 100%, 2.5% and 1.25% contrast level Sloan letter charts, was analyzed. The LCSLC is scored on a scale of 0-60. Higher scores indicate better visual function. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 216

  22. Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event in the DB Period

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Pre-existing conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.

    Measured: Up to Week 216

  23. Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event in the DB Period

    A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above.

    Measured: Up to Week 216

  24. Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest in the DB Period

    Non-serious adverse events of special interest for this study included:

    1. cases of an elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, 2) suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study treatment.

    Measured: Up to Week 216

  25. Number of Participants With Selected Adverse Events in the DB Period

    Selected adverse events for this study included:

    1. all infections, 2) serious infections, 3) potential opportunistic infections, 4) injection-related reactions (IRRs; an AE which occured within 24 hours after study treatment injection except where the event was not considered an allergic reaction), 5) psychiatric disorders and 6) anaphylaxis (an acute allergic/hypersensitivity reaction).

    Measured: Up to Week 216

  26. Number of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and Ideations Collected by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale in the DB Period

    The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is an assessment tool to evaluate suicidal ideation and behavior. Categories have binary responses (yes/no) and include: Wish to be Dead; Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts; Active Suicidal Ideation with Any Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act; Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan; Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent, Preparatory Acts and Behavior; Aborted Attempt; Interrupted Attempt; Actual Attempt (non-fatal); Completed Suicide. Suicidal ideation or behavior is indicated by a "yes" answer to any of the listed categories. A score of 0 is assigned if no suicide risk is present. A score of 1 or higher indicates suicidal ideation or behavior.

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Baseline (up to Week 216)

  27. Serum Satralizumab Concentration During the DB Period

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 204

  28. Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Concentration During the DB Period

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 216

  29. Serum Soluble IL-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentration During the DB Period

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 216

  30. Serum High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Concentration During the DB Period

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 216

  31. Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies to Satralizumab in the DB Period

    Reported here is the percentage of participants with at least one positive anti-drug antibody measurement during the DB period.

    Measured: Up to approximately Week 216

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start5 Aug 2014
  3. Primary completion12 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
95 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02073279
Sponsor's protocol ID
BN40900
Other IDs
SA-309JG, 2015-005431-41, 2015
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
25 Feb 2014
Last updated
1 Mar 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Bennett JL, Fujihara K, Saiz A, Traboulsee AL, Greenberg BM, Weinshenker BG, Patti F, Kleiter I, Palace J, De Seze J, Evans R, Blondeau K, Klingelschmitt G, Vodopivec I, Rahim M, Yamamura T. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Satralizumab in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder From the SAkuraMoon Open-Label Extension Study. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2025 Sep;12(5):e200450. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200450. Epub 2025 Jul 31.

    PubMed 40743487
  • Greenberg BM, Fujihara K, Weinshenker B, Patti F, Kleiter I, Bennett JL, Palace J, Blondeau K, Burdeska A, Ngwa I, Klingelschmitt G, Triyatni M, Yamamura T. Analysis of infection rates in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Comparing satralizumab treatment in SAkuraMoon, post-marketing, and US-based health claims data. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2025 Jul;99:106444. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2025.106444. Epub 2025 Apr 19.

    PubMed 40288333
  • Kleiter I, Traboulsee A, Palace J, Yamamura T, Fujihara K, Saiz A, Javed A, Mayes D, Budingen HV, Klingelschmitt G, Stokmaier D, Bennett JL. Long-term Efficacy of Satralizumab in AQP4-IgG-Seropositive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder From SAkuraSky and SAkuraStar. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022 Dec 8;10(1):e200071. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200071. Print 2023 Jan.

    PubMed 36724181
  • Yamamura T, Weinshenker B, Yeaman MR, De Seze J, Patti F, Lobo P, von Budingen HC, Kou X, Weber K, Greenberg B. Long-term safety of satralizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from SAkuraSky and SAkuraStar. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Oct;66:104025. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104025. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

    PubMed 36007339
  • Traboulsee A, Greenberg BM, Bennett JL, Szczechowski L, Fox E, Shkrobot S, Yamamura T, Terada Y, Kawata Y, Wright P, Gianella-Borradori A, Garren H, Weinshenker BG. Safety and efficacy of satralizumab monotherapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 May;19(5):402-412. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30078-8.

    PubMed 32333898

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Satralizumab in people with Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and NMO Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD), run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 58 sites in 15 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 58 sites in United States, Ukraine, Bulgaria, South Korea, Canada and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) Period (time frame: Up to Week 216). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02073279, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in