AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary CatheterNCT02074852

Comparison of Immediate Versus Delayed Removal of Urinary Catheter Following Elective Cesarean Section

An observational study of Urinary Catheter and Cesarean Section, run by Akmal El-Mazny at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective this trial is to compare immediate and 12 hours postoperative removal of urinary catheter after elective cesarean section; and whether early removal is associated with lower risk of urinary infection compared with delayed catheter removal. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 40 years, women only
What is being tested?
Foley urethral catheter
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Nov 2012to Dec 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: Women admitted to the prenatal wards for primary or repeat elective cesarean section

Who may be able to join

  • Women admitted to the prenatal wards for primary or repeat elective cesarean section

Who cannot join

  • urinary infection (assessed clinically and by midstream urinalysis),
  • significant vaginal bleeding,
  • severe pre-eclampsia or eclampsia and/or any other conditions requiring postoperative monitoring of urinary output, and
  • contraindications for general anesthesia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

The objective this trial is to compare immediate and 12 hours postoperative removal of urinary catheter after elective cesarean section; and whether early removal is associated with lower risk of urinary infection compared with delayed catheter removal.

Being tested
Foley urethral catheter
Medical subject headings
Urinary Tract Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Foley urethral catheterOther

Study groups in NCT02074852
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Immediate catheter removalThe catheter was removed immediately after the CS
Receives: Other: Foley urethral catheter
Delayed catheter removalThe catheter was removed 12 hours postoperatively
Receives: Other: Foley urethral catheter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of cases with significant bacteriuria and urinary symptoms

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02074852
Sponsor's protocol ID
urinary catheter following CS
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
24 Feb 2014
Last updated
4 Mar 2014
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Urinary Catheter and Cesarean Section, run by Akmal El-Mazny at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of cases with significant bacteriuria and urinary symptoms (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in