AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventilator-associated PneumoniaPhase 2VAPNCT02077920

Methods of Chlorhexidine Cleansing to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

A Phase 2 study testing Chlorhexidine, 0.9% sodium chloride injection and Endotracheal tube in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, and is associated with longer hospital stay, increased treatment costs, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Chlorhexidine, 0.9% sodium chloride injection and Endotracheal tube
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
192 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Mar 2014to Aug 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who are scheduled for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who underwent endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy before study enrollment.
  • Patients who underwent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation within 30 days before study enrollment.
  • Patients who require cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
  • Patients with a history of emesis and aspiration before endotracheal intubation.
  • Patients who are judged unsuitable for enrollment by clinicians.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region

    Shenyang, Liaoning, 110000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia by Oropharyngeal and Subglottic Decontamination Via Bronchoscopy

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, and is associated with longer hospital stay, increased treatment costs, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality . VAP is reported to occur in 8%-67% of mechanically ventilated patients (20%-28% in most reports) and has a mortality rate of 24%-50%, which is 2-3 times the mortality rate of mechanically ventilated patients without VAP. In patients infected by multi-resistant bacteria, the mortality rate may be as high as 76%. The diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of VAP are therefore important. Strategies for preventing VAP are crucial for reducing medical costs and increasing survival rates in critically ill patients. These strategies mainly involve a semi-reclining position with the head of the bed raised to at least 30°-45°, oral care, suctioning of subglottic secretions, selective decontamination of the digestive tract, proper hand washing, avoidance or reduction of proton pump inhibitors, avoidance of excessive sedation, and control of plasma glucose levels.

At our center, VAP is mainly caused by bacterial colonization of the upper respiratory tract via aspiration. This study will compare four interventions including oropharyngeal decontamination and subglottic suctioning by bronchoscopy, with the aim of developing a prevention strategy to minimize the development of VAP during mechanical ventilation.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be assessed as follows:

CABDC ABBAA BCDDA CCCDB CACBA BBABC BAAAD DCDAC CDBAA DACDD AAACB CDBCB ACCDB BBAAD BCACC DDBCA ADCAD DABCD CBAAB DDDCD AABAB ACBCD BCCBA ADCDB CBCAB CDDCA CDDDD ABCDA ABDCB CBADD ADDBA BBCCD ABBBD DCDAC BBCCB DADBB CDBDA DBBAC AC

Adverse Events:

Adverse events that occur after endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, oral cleansing with chlorhexidine, and suctioning of oropharyngeal secretions by bronchoscopy will be recorded. All adverse events including laboratory abnormalities will be recorded, even if they are thought to be unrelated to medical interventions. The severity of adverse events and any correlations with experimental drugs will be carefully recorded on the case report form.

The relationships between adverse events and drug resistance will be categorized as certainly relevant, probably relevant, possibly relevant, possibly irrelevant, or certainly irrelevant. The proportions of adverse events that are categorized as certainly relevant, probably relevant, and possibly relevant will be calculated. Severe adverse events will be recorded in a table and reported to the director of the unit and the sponsor within 24 hours.

Severity Assessment:

The severity of adverse events will be categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. A mild adverse event is defined as an event with signs and symptoms that are easy to tolerate such as nausea, vomiting, or transient localized pain. A moderate adverse event is defined as an event resulting in persistent pain. A severe adverse event is defined as an event resulting in prolonged hospitalization, disability, reduced ability to work, risk of death, or congenital malformation.

The outcomes of all adverse events will be recorded. Patients who withdraw from the trial because of adverse events will be followed up until complete resolution of the events. The investigators will judge whether the adverse events are related to the administration of experimental drugs, and will record the justification for each decision.

Data Management:

Completed case report forms will be collected by the clinical coordinator and the data will be entered into the database. After checking for accuracy, the data will be locked. After unblinding, the data will be categorized according to the four groups of patients.

Statistical Analysis:

Numerical data will be described as percentages, and measurement data as mean ± standard deviation. Abnormally distributed data will be described as median and interquartile range (25th-75th percentile).

Comparisons of Baseline Data:

Numerical data will be compared between groups using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Measurement data with normal distributions will be analyzed by single- or multi-factor analysis of variance. Data with high heterogeneity will be compared using a non-parametric test such as Tamhane's T2 test. Measurement data with non-normal distributions will be compared using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. Groups will be compared at baseline and at different time points after enrollment.

Comparisons of Efficacy:

Analgesic and sedative effects will be compared among groups using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. For factors showing significant differences among groups, pairwise comparisons will be analyzed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Mean values will be compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test.

Data Processing:

All statistical analyses will be performed using SAS software. Two-sided P values will be calculated. For Fisher's exact test, the P value will be calculated directly. A value of P <0.05 is considered significant, and P <0.01 is considered highly significant.

Quality Assurance:

This study will have one principal investigator, one research investigator, and four other investigators. The clinical protocol will be strictly implemented. An independent inspector will be appointed to monitor the clinical trial.

Quality Control of the Parameters Measured:

The parameters recorded will be measured according to standard operating and quality control procedures, using standard national units of measurement. Test report forms will be fully completed including the date, parameters tested, test results, and normal ranges.

Ethical Standards:

The investigators or investigator-authorized personnel will explain the benefits and risks of participating in the clinical trial to each patient, or to the patient's legal representative. Written informed consent will be obtained prior to study entry (before performance of tests and administration of drugs). The original consent forms will be stored by the investigators.

Data Retention:

The investigators will be responsible for maintaining the database and keeping the data locked for future analysis. In accordance with the principles of good clinical practice in China, the data will be kept for at least 5 years.

Being tested
Chlorhexidine, 0.9% sodium chloride injection, Endotracheal tube, Fiber bronchoscope
Keywords
Ventilator-associated pneumonia VAP, Chlorhexidine, Oropharyngeal decontamination, Subglottic secretion drainage
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ChlorhexidineDrug

    SFDA Approval No. H21020748; Jinzhou Jiu Tai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China

    Drug administration and preparation:

    • Drug administration: oropharyngeal rinsing and suctioning of subglottic secretions
    • Drug preparation: 0.12% chlorhexidine solution prepared with distilled water that has been sterilized by autoclaving
  • 0.9% sodium chloride injectionDrug

    SFDA Approval No. H20045252; Shenyang Zhiying Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China

  • Endotracheal tubeDevice

    Type 5-10115; size 7.0 mm, 7.5 mm, or 8.0 mm; purchased from Teleflex Medical (USA).

  • Fiber bronchoscopeDevice

    For suctioning of subglottic secretions. BF-P30 (Olympus, Japan); BF-1T20 (Olympus, Japan); or FB-18BS (Pentax, Japan).

Study groups in NCT02077920
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Chlorhexidine before intubationExperimentalGroup A: Oropharyngeal decontamination with chlorhexidine before intubation, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed before endotracheal intubation, and every 6 hours after intubation.
Receives: Drug: Chlorhexidine; Device: Endotracheal tube
Chlorhexidine after intubationExperimentalGroup B: Oropharyngeal decontamination with chlorhexidine after intubation, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed every 6 hours after endotracheal intubation.
Receives: Drug: Chlorhexidine; Device: Endotracheal tube
Subglottic secretion drainageExperimentalGroup C: Suctioning of subglottic secretions, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed before endotracheal intubation and every 6 hours after intubation, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided suctioning of subglottic secretions will be performed at 10:00 a.m. every day. The procedure will be as follows: 1. Routine cleaning of the bronchoscope. 2. Oral or nasal insertion of the bronchoscope (according to the decision of the attending physician based on the patient's condition). Rinsing of the subglottic region with 5-20 mL of chlorhexidine solution followed by suctioning. The rinsing procedure will be repeated 3-5 times. 3. Routine cleaning of the bronchoscope. The patient will be monitored during all procedures.
Receives: Drug: Chlorhexidine; Device: Fiber bronchoscope
0.9% sodium chloride injectionExperimentalGroup D: 0.9% sodium chloride injection, n=48. After endotracheal intubation, oral cleansing with normal saline will be performed every 6 hours.
Receives: Drug: 0.9% sodium chloride injection; Device: Endotracheal tube

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia

    Percentage of patients who develop VAP after endotracheal intubation

    Measured: an expected average of 30 days

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Length of stay

    Number of days of hospitalization

    Measured: Until discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days

  2. Length of intensive care unit stay

    Number of days in the intensive care unit

    Measured: an expected average of 30 days

  3. Duration of mechanical ventilation

    Influence of interventions on the duration of mechanical ventilation.

    Measured: Until the last day of mouthpiece ventilation, an expected average of 30 days

  4. Hospital costs

    Total costs incurred during hospitalization.

    Measured: During entire hospitalization, an expected average of 30 days

  5. 30-day mortality

    Percentage of patients who die.

    Measured: An expected average of 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2019
  4. Study completionAug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
192 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02077920
Sponsor's protocol ID
GHS-RCU-001
Acronym
VAP
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
27 Feb 2014
Last updated
14 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Chlorhexidine, 0.9% sodium chloride injection and Endotracheal tube in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (time frame: an expected average of 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in