AzTrials
AzTrials

Colon CancerNCT02079389

The Value of Laparoscopic Ultrasound in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Resection for Cancer of the Colon or Rectum

A study testing Lap+Lus in people with Colon Cancer and Rectum Cancer, run by Odense University Hospital at 4 sites in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The following project deals with a Danish multicenter trial that evaluates the value of Laparoscopic Ultrasound examination (LUS) in laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectum cancer (CRC). The project "The value of laparoscopic ultrasound in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colon and rectum cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colon Cancer, Rectum Cancer, Liver Metastases
What is being tested?
Lap+Lus
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
280 participants
Where
4 sitesDenmark
Study dates
May 2013to Apr 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with colon and rectum cancer without known metastasis
  • Patients who gives informed consent
  • Patients who are referral to laparoscopic surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are not able to give informed consent
  • Patients who are under 18 of age Patients with known metastasis.
  • Patients who are allergic to contrast agents
  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Denmark4 sites
  • Esbjerg Hospital

    Esbjerg, Esbjerg, 6700

  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense, Odense, 5000

  • Svendborg Hospital

    Svendborg, Svendborg, 5700

  • Lillebaelt Hospital

    Vejle, Vejle, 7100

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: The Value of Laparoscopic Ultrasound in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Resection for Cancer of the Colon or Rectum: A Prospective Randomized Trial

The following project deals with a Danish multicenter trial that evaluates the value of Laparoscopic Ultrasound examination (LUS) in laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectum cancer (CRC).

The project "The value of laparoscopic ultrasound in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for colon and rectum cancer. - A prospective randomized trial" is part of a ph.d- study at the University of Southern Denmark in collaboration with several surgical departments at hospitals in Southern Denmark.

Read more

The primary purpose is to investigate whether the use of laparoscopic ultrasound examination (LUS) will change the stage of the tumor, lymph node and metastasis (TNM stage) and the surgical approach in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC).

As a secondary objective; an evaluation of the use of LUS will change the treatment strategy for the individual patient with CRC.

As an other objective we wants to investigate whether the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound examination in connection with LUS procedure increases the number of detected liver metastases.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic surgery for cancer in the colon or rectum seems to be equal standing to open surgery with regards to the morbidity, mortality and the oncologic results (radicality and re-lapse frequency and long-term survival). Laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectum cancer is now a well-understood and well-established surgical method, but there are only few randomized trials dealing with the long-term results. The latest inventory work calls for better documentation of long-term results and calls for further randomized studies. Despite this, the number of laparoscopic operations for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Denmark is increasing, and laparoscopic surgery has partially become established as standard treatment for CRC.

Liver metastases are frequent in patients with CRC and about 15-20% of patients already have metastases at the diagnosis. Ultrasound examination during open surgery (IOUS) has shown to be an important diagnostic tool with high sensitivity (98%) and positive predictive value (86%) for detection liver metastases that are undiagnosed on preoperative computed tomography scan (CT) or Positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan (PET-CT). IOUS is considered as the gold standard for hepatic metastases within open surgery for CRC. In laparoscopic surgery this option disappears, but it is likely that Laparoscopic Ultrasound examination (LUS), may provide the same information as found by IOUS.

While laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound examination (LUS) is well established in the staging and treatment of upper gastrointestinal cancers, this method is only sparsely evaluated in the treatment of CRC. There are only very few and older data dealing with the use of LUS in the Tumor - lymph Node and Metastases (TNM) staging in patients with cancer in the colon and rectum. Several small studies have investigated the use of LUS to evaluate the M-stage in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and all studies show an increased detection of liver metastases. Overall, seems LUS to be better than the current pre-operative image modalities, and the LUS and the IOUS has also been found to be able to locate small tumors in the colon.

Based on the above, a recent review concluded that the data about the routine use of laparoscopy and LUS in patients with CRC are not sufficient, but that LUS probably could be used for assessment of the liver, liver-metastases and non-regional lymph nodes. There are no randomized studies dealing with the use of LUS in laparoscopic surgery for CRC.

It is not a standard routine to use LUS of the liver, tumor and retroperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery for CRC.

In prospective and blinded studies a percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination (CEUS) of the liver proved to be able to detect significantly more liver metastases from CRC than conventional percutaneous ultrasound.

With the new second-generation contrast agents CEUS seems to be equivalent to the contrast-enhanced CT and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection liver-metastases.

Liver metastases are frequent in patients with CRC and the use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) during open surgery for CRC, has previously been regarded as the gold standard. Contrast-enhanced IOUS (CE-IOUS) during open surgery for CRC is only sparsely evaluated, but has been shown to increase sensitivity for detection liver-metastases. There is on the other hand, not found literature that has been describing the use of laparoscopic CE-IOUS during laparoscopic surgery for CRC.

With this project we want to elucidate whether the use of LUS in laparoscopic surgery for CRC will alter the patient's TNM stage and surgical approach and whether potential changes have any clinical consequence for the individual patient. Furthermore, we wish to investigate whether contrast-enhanced LUS increases detection rate for liver metastases.

Method The study is designed as a prospective, randomized multicenter study and include 280 patients.

At the Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, they annually conducted around 150 laparoscopic resections for CRC, but the department has a selected patient material. To get a representative sample of patients with CRC, and to get included as many patients as possible within the given timeframe, the project will therefore be conducted as a multicenter study.

The participating centers perform all laparoscopic CRC surgery at a high level, and both the technical equipment and the necessary scanning competencies are available on the departments involved.

Prior to the start of the project, the surgeons of the included departments will be trained in the LUS method, so that assessment and description of the intra-abdominal findings are standardized.

They included patients randomly assigned either to the department's standard laparoscopic surgery or standard laparoscopic surgery plus a LUS examination.

In the standard arm the conditions at the abdomen is only assessed by laparoscopy immediately prior to the resection.

In the second group the intra-abdominal conditions are also assessed by laparoscopy, but then supplemented with a LUS examination of the primary tumor, liver and retroperitoneum.

Both laparoscopy and LUS will take place just prior in to the operation itself and will not require further intervention or additional portholes.

If there at the LUS examination is found undiagnosed liver metastases or lymph nodes outside the planned operation field, then the patient is sent to the Department of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, for a multidisciplinary tumor conference.

In cases where the LUS examination suspects liver metastases and / or remove lymph node metastases in patients who are included in the project at the Department of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, then a intraoperative LUS-guided fine-needle aspirations- biopsy (FNA) or tru-cut biopsy will be performed and marked with a little silver pin. The latter is used for follow-up after pretreatment and to locate potential rest tumor.

All other patients follow the Departments usual routines for adjuvant therapy.

Those patients who are selected for laparoscopic resection at the Department A, University Hospital also offers to participate in a contrast-enhanced laparoscopic Ultrasound examination during surgery. A specialist with skills in contrast-enhanced ultrasound will perform the examination.

Before the contrast study is performed the surgeon notes the findings after conventional LUS, so that the patients examined at University Hospital also is part of the total material on an equal footing with those scanned in the other departments.

All patients included in the project will undergo a three-phase control computed tomography (CT) scan 3 months after surgery. This is to evaluate whether there might be overlooked metastases in the laparoscopy and LUS evaluation.

All the information about the patients are entered and recorded in a database. Information on death will be deducted from the Civil Registration and local administrative databases.

After completion of the inclusion of patients, the two arms will be compared with account of changes in the TNM-stage and surgical approach in relation to the pre-operative assessment.

The possible changes are evaluated from strict, predefined criteria and are assessed whatever they have clinical relevancy, and finally the potential effect of contrast-enhanced LUS compared to LUS alone is assessed.

Being tested
Lap+Lus
Keywords
colon cancer, rectum cancer, laparoscopic ultrasound, LUS, Contrast enhanced ultrasound, CEUS, Peroperative TNM staging, screening for liver metastases
Medical subject headings
Colonic Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lap+LusDevice

    Also called BK medicals, ultrasound solutions

    In the standard arm (Lap) the conditions at the abdomen is only assessed by laparoscopy immediately prior to the resection. In the intervention arm the intra-abdominal conditions are also assessed by laparoscopy, but then supplemented with a laparoscopic ultrasound examination of the primary tumor, liver and retroperitoneum.

    All patients are given an CT scan of the abdomen after 3 months.

Study groups in NCT02079389
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lap+LusActive comparatorThe included patients randomly assigned either to the department's standard laparoscopic (Lap) surgery or standard laparoscopic surgery (lap) plus a LUS examination. In the intervention arm the intra-abdominal conditions are also assessed by laparoscopy, but then supplemented with a LUS examination of the primary tumor, liver and retroperitoneum. All the included patients are getting a CT scan of the abdomen after 3 months.
Receives: Device: Lap+Lus
laparoscopic examination (Lap)No interventionThe included patients randomly assigned either to the department's standard laparoscopic (Lap) surgery or standard laparoscopic surgery (lap) plus a LUS examination. In the standard arm (Lap) the conditions at the abdomen is only assessed by laparoscopy immediately prior to the resection. All the included patients are getting a CT scan of the abdomen after 3 months.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. A change in the stage of Tumor, lymph Node and metastases (TNM-stage)

    When using laparoscopic ultrasound examination (LUS) during laparoscopic resection for colon and rectum cancer, it is possible to scan the tumor, lymph nodes around the tumor, retroperitoneum and the liver. Thereby it is possible to make a preoperative TNM staging. Will the use of LUS change the stage of Tumor lymph Node and Metastases (TNM stage) compared to the preoperative TNM evaluation. The procedure LUS takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes. Tree months after surgery the patients will get a CT scan of the liver to ensure that the LUS did not miss any metastasis.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. A change in the postoperative treatment strategy

    Will the use of laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) during laparoscopic resection for colon and rectum cancer make af change in the patients treatment strategy. While using LUS during laparoscopic resection for colon and rectum cancer the tumor, lymph nodes, retroperitoneum and the liver is scanned with ultrasound and a peroperative TNM staging are done. If there are any differences in the peroperative TNM stage compared to the preoperative TNM stage, will it then have a consequence for the patient. For example: It could be a biopsy from a potential metastasis or enlarged lymph node ect. Will the changes alter the primary treatment strategy for the patient.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionApr 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
280 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02079389
Sponsor's protocol ID
20110135
Status last verified
May 2013
First submitted
10 Feb 2014
Last updated
5 May 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Ellebaek SB, Fristrup CW, Hovendal C, Qvist N, Bundgaard L, Salomon S, Stovring J, Mortensen MB. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic ultrasonography before laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2017 Oct;104(11):1462-1469. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10636.

    PubMed 28895143

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lap+Lus in people with Colon Cancer and Rectum Cancer, run by Odense University Hospital at 4 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

A change in the stage of Tumor, lymph Node and metastases (TNM-stage) (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02079389, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in