PneumoniaPhase 4NCT02079701
Effectiveness of the Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Military Recruits
A Phase 4 study testing 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in people with Pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Disease, run by Naval Health Research Center at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective is to determine the clinical benefit of employing the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine among US military trainees. Secondary objectives include: determining the etiology of clinical pneumonia among U.S. military trainees; comparing the serotype distribution of S. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Disease
- What is being tested?
- 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 152,723 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2000to Jun 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- basic training recruits at 5 recruit training centers (in South Carolina, Missouri, Illinois, and California) were invited to participate during their first week of training from Oct 2000 through Jun 2003
Who cannot join
- positive pregnancy results
- having previously received the a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine during the previous 5 years or
- having a medical condition that either required or precluded pneumococcal vaccination
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Army Recruit Training Center
Fort Jackson, South Carolina
Army Recruit Training Center
Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri
Naval Recruit Training Center
Great Lakes, Illinois
Marine Recruit Training Center
Parris Island, South Carolina
Marine Recruit Training Center
San Diego, California
About this study
Official title: Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Effectiveness Trial of the 23-Valent Pneumococcal Vaccine Among Military Trainees At Increased Risk of Respiratory Disease
The primary objective is to determine the clinical benefit of employing the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine among US military trainees. Secondary objectives include:
- determining the etiology of clinical pneumonia among U.S. military trainees;
- comparing the serotype distribution of S. pneumoniae (Sp) isolates recovered from vaccinated and nonvaccinated trainees diagnosed with pneumonia; and
- comparing days lost from training due to pneumonia or acute respiratory disease for vaccinated and nonvaccinated subjects.
Read the detailed description
Study participants. Given their documented high rates of respiratory illness, US military trainees were selected for participation. A sample size of 166,744 person-years was calculated based on the following assumptions: 12% attrition from military training, clinical pneumonia attack rate of 11 cases per 1000 person-years, 20% of captured pneumonias caused by Sp, 90% of captured Sp pneumonias caused by a vaccine-covered Sp strain, and 70% vaccine efficacy.
Enrollment and follow-up. This study was approved by multiple Department of Defense (DoD) institutional review boards. Using an informed consent process, basic training recruits at 5 recruit training centers (in South Carolina, Missouri, Illinois, and California) were invited to participate during their first week of training. Pregnancy screening was performed on all women, and those with positive results were not enrolled. Exclusion criteria included having previously received the a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine during the previous 5 years or having a medical condition that either required or precluded pneumococcal vaccination. Study participants completed a study questionnaire and were administered a pre-packaged, blinded, and randomized injection containing either the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals or Merck \& Company, Inc.) or saline in a 1:1 ratio. Study injections were administered at the same time as other recruit in-processing vaccinations, which may have included vaccines against polio, measles-mumps-rubella, varicella, tetanus-diphtheria, hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus, meningococcal disease (A/C/Y/W135), and influenza. At the end of recruit training, a questionnaire was administered to capture symptoms and signs of illnesses which might have been missed captured by the active and passive surveillance.
As enrollment continued for more than two years, the person-year contributions of those first enrolled were greater than those enrolled near the trial's end. The original planned surveillance period was 1.7 years. This was later extended to 6.7 years from enrollment of the first participant, for continued monitoring of impact in this large double-blinded trial.
Specimen collection. During the active surveillance period, study participants with suspect pneumonia were identified by the attending physician. Study personnel obtained three throat swabs, blood cultures (aerobic and anaerobic), sputum sample (if producible), and acute serum samples from participants. Attempts were made to also capture a convalescent serum sample 2 weeks after the acute presentation on all radiographically-confirmed pneumonia cases. These attempts were not always successful. Barriers included: trainee discharge from military service, difficulty in obtaining access to the recruits when they were in field exercises, and recruits graduating and moving to new duty stations.
Laboratory methods. Specimens collected from study participants were examined using classic, molecular, and serologic laboratory methods at the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) Respiratory Disease Laboratory, a College of American Pathologist (CAP) accredited laboratory.
NHRC isolated adenovirus, influenza, parainfluenza, and respiratory syncytial virus from pharyngeal swabs using fluorescent antibody antigen tests. Adenovirus and influenza isolates were typed using standard viral identification techniques.
Sputum specimens were inoculated for Sp culture using standard techniques. When Sp species were identified, capsular serotyping was performed, and standard antimicrobial sensitivities were assessed. Paired acute and convalescent sera were assessed for IgM and IgG titers to pneumolysin. Sera were tested with an enzyme immunoassay using a procedure such as described by Kalin, M, et al.
For Chlamydophila pneumoniae polymerase chain reaction (PCR) study, throat swabs were collected from patients diagnosed with pneumonia, immediately placed in Chlamydia transport media, and transported on ice. The throat swabs were used in a direct PCR method, such as the procedure described by Campbell et al. Amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel by standard methods. Sample preparation, PCR amplification, and analysis of amplification products were performed in separate rooms.
To assess M. pneumoniae, a throat swab was collected and immediately placed into 2.0 ml of M. pneumoniae transport media (SP-4 broth). Culturing, sub-culturing, and molecular testing was performed as per previously published protocols.
Capturing disease outcomes. Outcome measures included any cause pneumonia, any cause respiratory disease, recruit training clinical pneumonia (radiographically-confirmed during the recruit training period), or days lost from training. Active surveillance was conducted for radiographically-confirmed pneumonias only during the recruit training period (Marines-12 weeks, Navy-8 weeks, Army-9 weeks). Passive electronic monitoring of health care encounters for outcomes other than recruit training clinical pneumonia took place during recruit training and at the subsequent duty stations using the DoD comprehensive electronic databases of outpatient healthcare encounters (SADR), inpatient encounters (SIDR), and encounters at civilian facilities billed to the DoD (HCSR). ICD-9-CM codes 480 through -486 and 487 were monitored for these outcomes throughout the entire study period. Meningitis cases (ICD-9-CM codes 320 through -320.2, 320.9, and 322.9) were also captured through these electronic databases.
Statistical analysis. After descriptive investigation of population characteristics, univariate analyses were performed to assess the significance of associations between demographic variables with acute respiratory infection, pneumonia, and radiographically-confirmed pneumonia.
Active surveillance time was calculated from the participant's enrollment date to the projected completion of training, or diagnosis with radiographically-confirmed pneumonia. Passive surveillance was calculated from the date of enrollment to June 01 2007, diagnosis with pneumonia or acute respiratory infection, or separation from active duty service, whichever occurred first.
Using regression diagnostics, collinearity among variables was investigated. Cox's proportional hazard time-to-event modeling was used to evaluate outcomes among study participants, while adjusting for differences in population characteristics between treatment arms and accounting for different enrollment dates and active and passive surveillance periods. The saturated Cox regression model was reduced by a manual backward stepwise elimination approach removing those variables that were insignificant at α = 0.05 level and not confounding the other measures of association. Additionally, cumulative probabilities of outcomes from enrollments through end of follow-up periods were graphed. Statistical modeling to produce adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (Version 9.0, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
Crude vaccine effectiveness measures for each outcome were calculated for all participants and for each branch of service using a 1-relative risk x 100% estimate.
Days lost from training were estimated using a survey administered at the end of training to a convenience sample of 71,692 study participants. Differences between treatment arms were evaluated using ANOVA.
- Conditions
- Pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Disease
- Being tested
- 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, Placebo
- Keywords
- pneumonia, pneumococcus, vaccine, 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, military recruits
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
23-valent pneumococcal vaccineBiological
Also called Pnu-Imune, Pneumovax 23
randomization, based upon a random-number (block design) double-blind enrollment sequence. 1:1 ratio.
PlaceboBiological
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine | Experimental | single dose, 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, 0.5ml, intramuscular (IM) Receives: Biological: 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | 0.5 ml injectible saline, IM Receives: Biological: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Radiologically confirmed all-cause pneumonia
During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), study participants with suspect pneumonia were identified by the attending physician. Study staff followed up on the results of chest xray to identify all radiographically-confirmed pneumonia cases.
Measured: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization
Acute respiratory disease
Passive electronic monitoring of health care encounters for outcomes other than recruit training clinical and radiographically-confirmed pneumonia took place during recruit training and at the subsequent duty stations using the DoD comprehensive electronic databases of outpatient healthcare encounters (SADR), inpatient encounters (SIDR), and encounters at civilian facilities billed to the DoD (HCSR). ICD-9-CM codes 480 through -486 and 487 were monitored for these outcomes throughout the entire study period.
Measured: Participants will be followed as long on active duty, up to June 2007, which is up to 6.7 years, depending upon when they entered the study
Secondary outcomes (3)
Etiology of radiographically-confirmed pneumonias
During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), those with radiographically-confirmed pneumonia will be sampled for etiologic agent as comprehensively described in the study design section.
Measured: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization
Serotype distribution of S. pneumoniae isolates recovered from participants with pneumonia
During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), those with radiographically-confirmed pneumonia will be sampled for etiologic agent and any S.p. isolates identified to serotype as comprehensively described in the study design section.
Measured: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization
Days lost from recruit training
During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), participants will be monitored for days lost from training as comprehensively described in the study design section.
Measured: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2000
- Primary completionJun 2003
- Study completionJun 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 152,723 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Naval Health Research Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kevin Russell, Naval Health Research Center
- Investigators
- Kevin L Russell, MD, MTM&H, Principal investigator, Naval Health Research Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02079701
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DAMD17-00-2-0013
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 3 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Plouffe JF, Breiman RF, Facklam RR. Bacteremia with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Implications for therapy and prevention. Franklin County Pneumonia Study Group. JAMA. 1996 Jan 17;275(3):194-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.3.194.
PubMed 8604171Gray GC, Mitchell BS, Tueller JE, Cross ER, Amundson DE. Pneumonia hospitalizations in the US Navy and Marine Corps: rates and risk factors for 6,522 admissions, 1981-1991. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Apr 15;139(8):793-802. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117076.
PubMed 8178792McMillan A, Pattman RS. Evaluation of urethral culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the routine investigation of men attending a STD clinic. Br J Vener Dis. 1979 Aug;55(4):271-3. doi: 10.1136/sti.55.4.271.
PubMed 114197Gray GC, Callahan JD, Hawksworth AW, Fisher CA, Gaydos JC. Respiratory diseases among U.S. military personnel: countering emerging threats. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 May-Jun;5(3):379-85. doi: 10.3201/eid0503.990308.
PubMed 10341174Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA, Meffe F, Sankey SS, Weissfeld LA, Detsky AS, Kapoor WN. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Dec 12-26;154(23):2666-77. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420230051007.
PubMed 7993150Russell KL, Baker CI, Hansen C, Poland GA, Ryan MA, Merrill MM, Gray GC. Lack of effectiveness of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in reducing all-cause pneumonias among healthy young military recruits: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine. 2015 Feb 25;33(9):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.058. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
PubMed 25579777
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Effectiveness Trial of the 23-Valent Pneumococcal Vaccine Among Military Trainees At Increased Risk of Respiratory Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02079701
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DAMD17-00-2-0013
- Conditions
- Pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Disease
- Keywords
- pneumonia, pneumococcus, vaccine, 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, military recruits
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 152,723 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Naval Health Research CenterUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
- Study start
- Oct 2000
- Primary completion
- Jun 2003 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective is to determine the clinical benefit of employing the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine among US military trainees. Secondary objectives include:
- determining the etiology of clinical pneumonia among U.S. military trainees;
- comparing the serotype distribution of S. pneumoniae (Sp) isolates recovered from vaccinated and nonvaccinated trainees diagnosed with pneumonia; and
- comparing days lost from training due to pneumonia or acute respiratory disease for vaccinated and nonvaccinated subjects.
Detailed description
Study participants. Given their documented high rates of respiratory illness, US military trainees were selected for participation. A sample size of 166,744 person-years was calculated based on the following assumptions: 12% attrition from military training, clinical pneumonia attack rate of 11 cases per 1000 person-years, 20% of captured pneumonias caused by Sp, 90% of captured Sp pneumonias caused by a vaccine-covered Sp strain, and 70% vaccine efficacy.
Enrollment and follow-up. This study was approved by multiple Department of Defense (DoD) institutional review boards. Using an informed consent process, basic training recruits at 5 recruit training centers (in South Carolina, Missouri, Illinois, and California) were invited to participate during their first week of training. Pregnancy screening was performed on all women, and those with positive results were not enrolled. Exclusion criteria included having previously received the a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine during the previous 5 years or having a medical condition that either required or precluded pneumococcal vaccination. Study participants completed a study questionnaire and were administered a pre-packaged, blinded, and randomized injection containing either the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals or Merck \& Company, Inc.) or saline in a 1:1 ratio. Study injections were administered at the same time as other recruit in-processing vaccinations, which may have included vaccines against polio, measles-mumps-rubella, varicella, tetanus-diphtheria, hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus, meningococcal disease (A/C/Y/W135), and influenza. At the end of recruit training, a questionnaire was administered to capture symptoms and signs of illnesses which might have been missed captured by the active and passive surveillance.
As enrollment continued for more than two years, the person-year contributions of those first enrolled were greater than those enrolled near the trial's end. The original planned surveillance period was 1.7 years. This was later extended to 6.7 years from enrollment of the first participant, for continued monitoring of impact in this large double-blinded trial.
Specimen collection. During the active surveillance period, study participants with suspect pneumonia were identified by the attending physician. Study personnel obtained three throat swabs, blood cultures (aerobic and anaerobic), sputum sample (if producible), and acute serum samples from participants. Attempts were made to also capture a convalescent serum sample 2 weeks after the acute presentation on all radiographically-confirmed pneumonia cases. These attempts were not always successful. Barriers included: trainee discharge from military service, difficulty in obtaining access to the recruits when they were in field exercises, and recruits graduating and moving to new duty stations.
Laboratory methods. Specimens collected from study participants were examined using classic, molecular, and serologic laboratory methods at the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) Respiratory Disease Laboratory, a College of American Pathologist (CAP) accredited laboratory.
NHRC isolated adenovirus, influenza, parainfluenza, and respiratory syncytial virus from pharyngeal swabs using fluorescent antibody antigen tests. Adenovirus and influenza isolates were typed using standard viral identification techniques.
Sputum specimens were inoculated for Sp culture using standard techniques. When Sp species were identified, capsular serotyping was performed, and standard antimicrobial sensitivities were assessed. Paired acute and convalescent sera were assessed for IgM and IgG titers to pneumolysin. Sera were tested with an enzyme immunoassay using a procedure such as described by Kalin, M, et al.
For Chlamydophila pneumoniae polymerase chain reaction (PCR) study, throat swabs were collected from patients diagnosed with pneumonia, immediately placed in Chlamydia transport media, and transported on ice. The throat swabs were used in a direct PCR method, such as the procedure described by Campbell et al. Amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel by standard methods. Sample preparation, PCR amplification, and analysis of amplification products were performed in separate rooms.
To assess M. pneumoniae, a throat swab was collected and immediately placed into 2.0 ml of M. pneumoniae transport media (SP-4 broth). Culturing, sub-culturing, and molecular testing was performed as per previously published protocols.
Capturing disease outcomes. Outcome measures included any cause pneumonia, any cause respiratory disease, recruit training clinical pneumonia (radiographically-confirmed during the recruit training period), or days lost from training. Active surveillance was conducted for radiographically-confirmed pneumonias only during the recruit training period (Marines-12 weeks, Navy-8 weeks, Army-9 weeks). Passive electronic monitoring of health care encounters for outcomes other than recruit training clinical pneumonia took place during recruit training and at the subsequent duty stations using the DoD comprehensive electronic databases of outpatient healthcare encounters (SADR), inpatient encounters (SIDR), and encounters at civilian facilities billed to the DoD (HCSR). ICD-9-CM codes 480 through -486 and 487 were monitored for these outcomes throughout the entire study period. Meningitis cases (ICD-9-CM codes 320 through -320.2, 320.9, and 322.9) were also captured through these electronic databases.
Statistical analysis. After descriptive investigation of population characteristics, univariate analyses were performed to assess the significance of associations between demographic variables with acute respiratory infection, pneumonia, and radiographically-confirmed pneumonia.
Active surveillance time was calculated from the participant's enrollment date to the projected completion of training, or diagnosis with radiographically-confirmed pneumonia. Passive surveillance was calculated from the date of enrollment to June 01 2007, diagnosis with pneumonia or acute respiratory infection, or separation from active duty service, whichever occurred first.
Using regression diagnostics, collinearity among variables was investigated. Cox's proportional hazard time-to-event modeling was used to evaluate outcomes among study participants, while adjusting for differences in population characteristics between treatment arms and accounting for different enrollment dates and active and passive surveillance periods. The saturated Cox regression model was reduced by a manual backward stepwise elimination approach removing those variables that were insignificant at α = 0.05 level and not confounding the other measures of association. Additionally, cumulative probabilities of outcomes from enrollments through end of follow-up periods were graphed. Statistical modeling to produce adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (Version 9.0, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
Crude vaccine effectiveness measures for each outcome were calculated for all participants and for each branch of service using a 1-relative risk x 100% estimate.
Days lost from training were estimated using a survey administered at the end of training to a convenience sample of 71,692 study participants. Differences between treatment arms were evaluated using ANOVA.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine | Experimental | Biological: 23-valent pneumococcal vaccinesingle dose, 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, 0.5ml, intramuscular (IM) |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: Placebo0.5 ml injectible saline, IM |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- basic training recruits at 5 recruit training centers (in South Carolina, Missouri, Illinois, and California) were invited to participate during their first week of training from Oct 2000 through Jun 2003
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- positive pregnancy results
- having previously received the a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine during the previous 5 years or
- having a medical condition that either required or precluded pneumococcal vaccination
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 23-valent pneumococcal vaccineAlso: Pnu-Imune, Pneumovax 23randomization, based upon a random-number (block design) double-blind enrollment sequence. 1:1 ratio. | Biological | 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine |
| Placebo | Biological | placebo |
Primary outcome
Radiologically confirmed all-cause pneumonia
Time frame: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization
During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), study participants with suspect pneumonia were identified by the attending physician. Study staff followed up on the results of chest xray to identify all radiographically-confirmed pneumonia cases.
Acute respiratory disease
Time frame: Participants will be followed as long on active duty, up to June 2007, which is up to 6.7 years, depending upon when they entered the study
Passive electronic monitoring of health care encounters for outcomes other than recruit training clinical and radiographically-confirmed pneumonia took place during recruit training and at the subsequent duty stations using the DoD comprehensive electronic databases of outpatient healthcare encounters (SADR), inpatient encounters (SIDR), and encounters at civilian facilities billed to the DoD (HCSR). ICD-9-CM codes 480 through -486 and 487 were monitored for these outcomes throughout the entire study period.
3 secondary outcomes
Etiology of radiographically-confirmed pneumonias
Time frame: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization
Serotype distribution of S. pneumoniae isolates recovered from participants with pneumonia
Time frame: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization
Days lost from recruit training
Time frame: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2014.
- Background: PubMed 8604171Plouffe JF, Breiman RF, Facklam RR. Bacteremia with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Implications for therapy and prevention. Franklin County Pneumonia Study Group. JAMA. 1996 Jan 17;275(3):194-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.3.194.
- Background: PubMed 8178792Gray GC, Mitchell BS, Tueller JE, Cross ER, Amundson DE. Pneumonia hospitalizations in the US Navy and Marine Corps: rates and risk factors for 6,522 admissions, 1981-1991. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Apr 15;139(8):793-802. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117076.
- Background: PubMed 114197McMillan A, Pattman RS. Evaluation of urethral culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the routine investigation of men attending a STD clinic. Br J Vener Dis. 1979 Aug;55(4):271-3. doi: 10.1136/sti.55.4.271.
- Background: PubMed 10341174Gray GC, Callahan JD, Hawksworth AW, Fisher CA, Gaydos JC. Respiratory diseases among U.S. military personnel: countering emerging threats. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 May-Jun;5(3):379-85. doi: 10.3201/eid0503.990308.
- Background: PubMed 7993150Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA, Meffe F, Sankey SS, Weissfeld LA, Detsky AS, Kapoor WN. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Dec 12-26;154(23):2666-77. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420230051007.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25579777Russell KL, Baker CI, Hansen C, Poland GA, Ryan MA, Merrill MM, Gray GC. Lack of effectiveness of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in reducing all-cause pneumonias among healthy young military recruits: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine. 2015 Feb 25;33(9):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.058. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
Related trials for Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruiting
Expanded Diagnostic Strategy in Older Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Infection
Acute Respiratory Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin L Russell, MD, MTM&H principal investigator
Naval Health Research Center
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in people with Pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Disease, run by Naval Health Research Center at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Radiologically confirmed all-cause pneumonia (time frame: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02079701, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2014.