AzTrials
AzTrials

Lupus ErythematosusPhase 1/2NCT02080195

Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation for Patients With Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

A Phase 1/2 study testing Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine and Tacrolimus in people with Lupus Erythematosus and Graft-versus-host Disease, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main goal of the study is to determine if bone marrow transplant (BMT) from a less specific pool of donors in combination with high dose cyclophosphamide can induce remission of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine and Tacrolimus
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Sep 2016to 29 Mar 2017
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Four or more American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of SLE or 4 or more of the SLICE criteria
  • Involvement of one or more of the following organ systems: renal, neurologic, hematologic, cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal
  • A lack of response to corticosteroids in moderate-to-high doses, and to either an equivalent degree of immunosuppression with azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, belimumab, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and/or appropriate other treatment
  • Patients should be eligible for transplantation according to the BMT Policy Manual

Who cannot join

  • Age less than 18 years and over 75 years
  • Any risk of pregnancy
  • Patients who are preterminal or moribund

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase I/II Study of Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and Transplantation of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-Matched, Partially HLA-mismatched, HLA-haploidentical or Matched Unrelated Bone Marrow for Patients With Refractory SLE

The main goal of the study is to determine if bone marrow transplant (BMT) from a less specific pool of donors in combination with high dose cyclophosphamide can induce remission of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus.

Read the detailed description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a devastating systemic autoimmune disease that predominantly affects young women, is more common in African-Americans than in whites, and results in poor quality of life. Lupus has no cure, and up to 90% of patients require corticosteroids for disease control. More than half of patients with lupus have permanent organ damage, much of which is either directly due to or increased by corticosteroids. To satisfactorily manage moderate-to-severe SLE, the investigators need effective treatments that will allow corticosteroid-sparing.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous BMT or peripheral blood progenitor transplantation (PBSCT) has been proposed as a novel approach to treat severe autoimmune diseases. Allogeneic BMT is not currently utilized for the routine treatment of SLE because of the significant morbidity (GVHD) and mortality associated with the procedure.

The investigators have recently developed an approach to BMT using post-transplant cyclophosphamide that allows us to safely perform allogeneic BMT from matched, mismatched, unrelated or haploidentical donors. Transplant-related mortality, graft-failure and risk of GVHD have been very low with this approach. Furthermore, this approach allows us to greatly expand the donor pool since any patient shares exactly one HLA haplotype with each biological parent or child and half of siblings, an eligible haploidentical donor can be identified rapidly in nearly all cases.

This trial will employ a fludarabine + cyclophosphamide conditioning along with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide on for patients with refractory SLE. The purpose of this trial is to improve the salvage rate for patients with refractory SLE through a reformatting of the immune system.

Being tested
Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine, Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Rabbit antithymocyte globulin
Medical subject headings
Graft vs Host Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called Cytoxan, Cy

    14.5 mg/kg/day on Days -6 and -5. 50 mg/kg/day on Days 3 and 4.

  • FludarabineDrug

    Also called Fludara

    30 mg/m^2/day on Days -6 through -2.

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Also called FK-506, Prograf

    Starting on Day 5. Dose will be adjusted according to blood levels.

  • Mycophenolate MofetilDrug

    Also called Cellcept, MMF

    15 mg/kg three times per day from Day 5 to Day 35.

  • Rabbit antithymocyte globulinDrug

    Also called Thymoglobulin

    0.5 mg/kg on Day -9. 2 mg/kg/day on Days -8 and -7.

  • Total body irradiationRadiation

    200 centigray on Day -1.

  • Allogeneic bone marrow transplantBiological

    Also called BMT

    Infusion on Day 0.

Study groups in NCT02080195
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nonmyeloablative Conditioning and BMTExperimentalNonmyeloablative conditioning with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and total body irradiation. Allogeneic bone marrow transplant on Day 0. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus.
Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Fludarabine; Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil; Drug: Rabbit antithymocyte globulin; Radiation: Total body irradiation; Biological: Allogeneic bone marrow transplant

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Feasibility of the Conditioning Regimen and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Refractory SLE Patients With Donors Having Various Degrees of Matching

    Number of participants who were alive at 1 year after transplant and who had not suffered graft rejection, acute or chronic GVHD, or Grade 3 or higher (CTCAE V4.0) adverse events.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. RIFLE Score

    Change in Responder Index for Systemic Lupus Erythematosis (RIFLE) assessment. This is a qualitative assessment of organ function. The 12 month response will be assessed as:

    complete= complete or partial resolution in more than one organ, partial= complete or partial resolution in at least one organ, the same= no change or no worsening in any organ, worse= worsening in any organ

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Survival

    Number of patients alive and alive without relapse, respectively.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Graft Failure

    Number of participants with primary and/or secondary graft failure.

    Measured: 60 days

  4. Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

    Percentage of participants who developed grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD. Acute GVHD is defined by the Przepiorka criteria, which stages the degree of organ involvement in the skin, liver, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract, based on severity, with Stage 1+ being least severe and stage 4+ being the most severe. Grading of acute GVHD is as follows: Grade I (skin involvement stages 1+ to 2+, with no liver or GI involvement), Grade II (skin involvement stages 1+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 1+), Grade III (skin involvement stages 2+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 2+ to 4+), Grade IV (skin involvement stages 4+, Liver 4+).

    Measured: Up to 2 years

  5. Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

    Percentage of participants who developed chronic GVHD as defined by the NIH consensus criteria. This system gives scores from 0 to 3 for Karnofsky performance score, skin, mouth, eyes, gastrointestinal, liver, lungs, joints, and genitals, as well as an overall severity (mild, moderate, or severe).

    Mild chronic GVHD involves only 1 or 2 organs or sites (except the lung), with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum of score 1 in all affected organs or sites).

    Moderate chronic GVHD involves 1) at least 1 organ or site with clinically significant but no major disability (maximum score of 2 in any affected organ or site) OR 2) 3 or more organs or sites with no clinically significant functional impairment (maximum score of 1 in all affected organs or sites).

    Severe chronic GVHD indicates major disability caused by chronic GVHD (score of 3 in any organ or site).

    Measured: Up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start13 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion28 Mar 2017
  4. Study completion29 Mar 2017

Why it stopped: Study was unable to accrue subjects

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02080195
Sponsor's protocol ID
J13134
Other IDs
NA_00082453
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
28 Feb 2014
Last updated
2 Oct 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine and Tacrolimus in people with Lupus Erythematosus and Graft-versus-host Disease, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Feasibility of the Conditioning Regimen and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Refractory SLE Patients With Donors Having Various Degrees of Matching (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in