AzTrials
AzTrials

ViabilityEmbryoscopeNCT02081859

Use of Time-lapse Morphological Kinetics in the Selection of Blastocysts

A study testing Embryoscope and Conventional Criteria in people with Viability, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized controlled observational trial to determine if data obtained from the embryoscope is helpful in determining which blastocysts to transfer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Viability
What is being tested?
Embryoscope and Conventional Criteria
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2014to Jan 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients undergoing an IVF cycle between the age of 18-45 at the Cleveland Clinic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility clinic with the plan for transfer of embryo(s) will be offered the opportunity to participate in this study.

Who cannot join

  • The only patients excluded will be those undergoing pre-implantation genetic testing and/or chromosome screening.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic Beachwood Family Health Center

    Beachwood, Ohio, 44122

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Does Use of Time-lapse Morphological Kinetics in the Selection of Blastocysts for Transfer Improve Pregnancy Rates?

This is a randomized controlled observational trial to determine if data obtained from the embryoscope is helpful in determining which blastocysts to transfer.

Read the detailed description

Materials and Methods:

Patient Selection:

Patients undergoing an IVF cycle at the Cleveland Clinic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility clinic with the plan for transfer of embryo(s) will be offered the opportunity to participate in this study. We would like a total enrollment 300 patients with 150 in each group. The only patients excluded will be those undergoing pre-implantation genetic testing and/or chromosome screening.

Study Design This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial where all patients who agree to participate will be randomized to having embryo selection for transfer based solely on conventional criteria or alternatively conventional criteria in conjunction with morphokinetic criteria.

Enrollment:

Patients will be enrolled at the Beachwood IVF center by the REI physicians at the time of the IVF consultation. They will sign the informed consent for the study at the time that they sign the consent for IVF treatment, which is done by the IVF nurses. Informed consent for the study will be kept in the patient chart in the Beachwood IVF center along with the IVF consent.

Randomization:

Patients will be randomized 1:1 to Conventional embryo selection vs. Embryoscope selection using a computer generated random number sequence. Group assignment will be written on a piece of paper and placed in consecutively numbered opaque envelopes by research personnel not involved in embryo selection. Each patient randomized will be assigned the next consecutive number and the embryo selection criteria will be revealed at time of oocyte retrieval. Patients, REI physicians and staff, and sonographers will be blinded as to how embryos are selected. Only the embryologist and the lab staff will be aware of which group the patients are randomized into. This will be ensured by not placing the group in the computerized medical record or the clinical chart, but only in the laboratory chart and the research database.

Sample Size Justification Little published data is available on time-lapse imaging and human embryo selection for transfer. No publications of randomized controlled trials are available on the EmbryoScope. Statistician Benjamin Nutter was consulted for sample size estimation. Initially, based on the 2012 outcomes there was a pregnancy rate of 49%. For a power of 80%, in order to detect an increase to 55% pregnancy rates under the new selection guidelines, we would need to randomize 1088 patients. To see an increase to 60% pregnancy rates, we would need to randomize 320 patients.

In this study, we will be focusing on those patients who have blastocysts available for transfer since blastocysts are the embryos that we need the most assistance with selection. The pregnancy rate in this subset of patients is currently 70% and to detect an increase to 80% would require randomization of 231 patients. Based on these numbers we feel it is reasonable to start with a goal of 300 patients in this study as there will be some patients that do not make it to retrieval, some that have no fertilization and some that have no embryos progress to transfer. Starting with a goal of 300 patients will hopefully give us a large enough sampling to do a preliminary analysis of embryos resulting in a clinically evident pregnancy as defined by positive fetal heart rate.

Given that the outcome of this study is pregnancy rate we will assess the data collected after six months to evaluate if there is a clear difference between groups. If there is a significant difference at that time, the study may be terminated to allow for all patients to have the benefit of the superior method.

Research Procedure The basic IVF laboratory protocols utilized will be the same as that used for all patients. Oocytes will be recovered by transvaginal aspiration of follicles under ultrasound guidance. Oocytes will be inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection or co-incubation with sperm. The next morning, normally fertilized oocytes will be identified and moved to individual wells in a slide chamber and placed in the EmbryoScope.

Those randomized to classic evaluation will have their embryos graded based on conventional daily evaluation at specified daily time points. These criteria encompass timely development to specific benchmarks at 20, 26, 44, 68, 92, 116 and 140 hours post-insemination.

The images will be from the EmbryoScope, but will be static in time and will not span across a time range. Embryos will be graded and selected for transfer according to the laboratory's conventional criteria. Those randomized to classic evaluation plus morphokinetic parameters will have embryo evaluation performed at the same defined intervals but using the data analysis software and the captured time-lapse images to include timing of mitotic intervals, cleavage planes, timing of compaction and cavitation in embryos leading to blastocyst formation.

Patients electing not to participate in the study would still have their embryos cultured in the EmbryoScope and conventional embryo selection criteria would be applied to identify embryos fro transfer.

Conditions
Viability
Being tested
Embryoscope, Conventional Criteria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EmbryoscopeDevice

    The embryoscope is a microscope that allows for continuous time-lapse monitoring.

  • Conventional CriteriaOther

Study groups in NCT02081859
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional gradingPlacebo comparatorEmbryos will be scored based on conventional criteria.
Receives: Other: Conventional Criteria
Embryoscope dataActive comparatorEmbryos will be scored based on both conventional rating and embryoscope data.
Receives: Device: Embryoscope

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical Pregnancy Rate

    Patients will have a ultrasound to document fetal heart rate approximately 6 weeks after start of IVF cycle.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Implantation Rate

    Percent of embryos implanted assessed at time of ultrasound

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2014
  3. Primary completionJan 2016
  4. Study completionJan 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02081859
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-090
Acronym
Embryoscope
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
5 Mar 2014
Last updated
8 Jun 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Goodman LR, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Austin C, Desai N. Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):275-85.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

    PubMed 26522611

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Embryoscope and Conventional Criteria in people with Viability, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical Pregnancy Rate (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02081859, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in