AzTrials
AzTrials

DialysisNCT02085486

Ultrasound Assisted Puncture of AV Fistulas in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

A study testing Ultrasound-assisted puncture and Standard in people with Dialysis and Fistula, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The puncture of the vascular access in hemodialysis patients remains challenging even in the hands of experienced dialysis nurses. Unsuccessful punctures are associated with resource wastage, traumatism of the AV shunts, shortening of the effective dialysis time and poor patient satisfaction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dialysis, Fistula
What is being tested?
Ultrasound-assisted puncture and Standard
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2017to May 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Forearm or upper arm AV-shunt (native, mixed, graft)
  • Patients with recognized difficult vascular access at any time (potentially each patient)
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Recent AV-shunt surgery (< 48 h)
  • Presence of large bandages or severe skin lesions in the area of interest
  • Inability to understand the aim of the study and to give a written informed consent
  • Single needle

About this study

Official title: Ultrasound Assisted Puncture of AV Fistulas in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients After a Short Learning Program in Bed-side Ultrasound for Hemodialysis Nurses by an Index Nurse - an Outcome Study

The puncture of the vascular access in hemodialysis patients remains challenging even in the hands of experienced dialysis nurses. Unsuccessful punctures are associated with resource wastage, traumatism of the AV shunts, shortening of the effective dialysis time and poor patient satisfaction.

The use of ultrasound by emergency department nurses and technicians without prior ultrasound experience in patients with difficult intravenous access showed in several studies to be very efficient. The investigators expect to achieve similar results in cannulation of AV shunts by the dialysis nurse staff after a short learning program.

To show this, the investigators aim to conduct a trail where standard cannulation technique (inspection, palpation) will be compared with the ultrasound-assisted method in terms of efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

Background

The vascular access plays a central role in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic hemodialysis. It is well documented from various previous studies that the confection of the dialysis access and subsequent complications represent a major cause of morbidity, hospitalization and additional costs in chronic dialysis patients.

In European countries most patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis use an arterio-venous fistula as permanent vascular access. Because of the anatomical differences of each individual and the accompanying chronic diseases affecting patients' vessels, cannulation of arterio-venous fistulas can be very challenging for the nursing personal and puncture failures necessitating repeated attempts are not so rare. The latter are often time-consuming and result in a loss of effective dialysis' time and reduced proceeded total blood volume, are associated with a higher rate of local complications due to repeated traumatisms of the vascular wall and can lead to severe pain with reduced patient satisfaction.

In the investigators' dialysis unit, when a dialysis nurse is not able to puncture a fistula she refers to an experienced nurse who tries to cannulate the fistula after thorough visual and palpatory evaluation. In case of another failure, the nursing team refers to the dialysis physician, who performs a short diagnostic bed-side ultrasound of the vascular access to rule out the presence of thrombosis or large hematoma. Using ultrasound-guidance provided by the physician or after being informed about the localization and depth of the ideal puncture site, the dialysis nurse tries then to puncture the fistula again. This often leads to a greater loss of time with reduced effective dialysis dose, increased need for human resources and low patient satisfaction.

The use of ultrasound by emergency department nurses and technicians without prior ultrasound experience in patients with difficult intravenous access showed in several studies to be very efficient. The method was safe, the procedure rapid, the patients more satisfied, the success rate as high as this from ultrasound trained emergency physicians and the need for physician intervention reduced. The achievement of similar results in AV fistula cannulation in hemodialysis patients would be very suitable.

The use of ultrasound in patients with recognized difficult fistulas by dialysis nurses after a short ultrasound learning program provided by an index nurse will enable to achieve a higher rate of satisfactory double-needle punctures, usual blood flow rates and full dialysis length with less time loss and increased patient satisfaction.

With this study prospective, single-centre, randomized, controlled study the investigators aim to show that the use of ultrasound by dialysis nurses in patients with difficult fistulas makes the punction of the fistulas easier than when assessing the fistula visually and manually.

Objective

The use of ultrasound in patients with recognized difficult fistulas by dialysis nurses after a short ultrasound learning program provided by an index nurse will enable to achieve a higher rate of satisfactory double-needle punctures, usual blood flow rates and full dialysis length with less time loss and increased patient satisfaction. With a prospective, controlled trail the investigators want to demonstrate this hypothesis.

Methods

A portable ultrasound device will be used by the nursing staff after a short learning program. Precise location of AV shunt segments and depth will be assessed in the case of a difficult shunt. This procedure will be compared with the standard inspection and palpation method.

Conditions
Dialysis, Fistula
Being tested
Ultrasound-assisted puncture, Standard
Keywords
dialysis, av shunt, cannulation, ultrasound, outcome
Medical subject headings
Fistula, Arteriovenous Fistula

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound-assisted punctureDevice

    Portable ultrasound device

  • StandardOther

    Standard inspection, palpation.

Study groups in NCT02085486
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound-assisted punctureExperimentalUltrasound-assisted puncture by the nursing staff of patients with difficult AV-shunts.
Receives: Device: Ultrasound-assisted puncture
StandardOtherClassical method wtih inspection and palpation
Receives: Other: Standard

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of successful cannulations of an AV-fistula

    Satisfactory puncture of the fistula defined as the ability to achieve a full length dialysis (max. 10% reduction of the usual dialysis time), double-needle, and the usual blood flow rate (max. 15% reduction of the usual blood flow)

    Measured: Immediately after the cannulation, expected to be after 10 minutes on average

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Effective dialysis time

    Measured in minutes

    Measured: Directly after the treatment, expected to be after 3 to 4.5 hours

  2. Processed volume

    Measured: Directly after the treatment, expected to be after 3 to 4.5 hours

  3. Number of patients with late complications

    Measured: At the following dialysis session, expected to be after 2-3 days

  4. Patient satisfaction

    Measured by questionnaire

    Measured: Immediately after the canulation, expected to be after 10 minutes on average, and at the following dialysis session, expected to be after 2-3 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2017 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMay 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2018 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Lack of scientific interest

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02085486
Sponsor's protocol ID
SNCTP000000515
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
3 Mar 2014
Last updated
30 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Feldman HI, Kobrin S, Wasserstein A. Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Apr;7(4):523-35. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V74523.

    PubMed 8724885
  • Hakim R, Himmelfarb J. Hemodialysis access failure: a call to action. Kidney Int. 1998 Oct;54(4):1029-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00122.x.

    PubMed 9767519
  • Saudan P, Kossovsky M, Halabi G, Martin PY, Perneger TV; Western Switzerland Dialysis Study Group. Quality of care and survival of haemodialysed patients in western Switzerland. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Jun;23(6):1975-81. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm915. Epub 2007 Dec 22.

    PubMed 18156654
  • Brannam L, Blaivas M, Lyon M, Flake M. Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1361-3. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.027.

    PubMed 15576530
  • Bauman M, Braude D, Crandall C. Ultrasound-guidance vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;27(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.005.

    PubMed 19371518

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound-assisted puncture and Standard in people with Dialysis and Fistula, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of successful cannulations of an AV-fistula (time frame: Immediately after the cannulation, expected to be after 10 minutes on average). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02085486, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in