AzTrials
AzTrials

Retinitis PigmentosaNCT02086890

Electro-acupuncture and Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation (TES) for Retinitis Pigmentosa

A study testing Electro-acupuncture, Laser Acupuncture and Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation in people with Retinitis Pigmentosa, run by Nova Southeastern University at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Measures of vision in RP patients receiving promising therapy using transcorneal electrical stimulation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Retinitis Pigmentosa
What is being tested?
Electro-acupuncture, Laser Acupuncture and Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Aug 2014to Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18+
  • Diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa (RP)
  • Best-corrected visual acuity better than 20/400 in at least one eye
  • More than 20% loss of Goldmann Visual Field area (III4e test target) in at least one eye
  • Able and willing to participate in all study visits for a ~4-6 month period
  • Provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Very severe vision losses in both eyes (e.g., hand motions or light perception only) with difficulty performing the proposed vision tests
  • Vision loss due to ocular diseases other than RP, cystoid macular edema, or cataracts
  • Schedules do not permit participation in all study visits
  • Previous acupuncture or TES treatment for RP
  • Inability to understand study procedures or communicate responses to visual stimuli in a consistent manner (cognitive impairment)
  • Dementia; Long or short-term memory loss
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Unable to read or speak English
  • Smoking, excessive alcohol, or illegal drug use
  • Receiving current psychiatric care (i.e. unstable emotional and mental health status)
  • History of excessive bleeding
  • Reduced general health and/or systemic medications that may diminish the potential response to the electroacupuncture treatments
  • Implanted cardiac pacemaker
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Nova Southeastern University; College of Optometry

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33328

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Modulating Ocular/Retinal Blood Flow and Visual Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa

Measures of vision in RP patients receiving promising therapy using transcorneal electrical stimulation.

Read the detailed description

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a slowly progressive retinal degeneration for which there is no proven treatment. Patients are interested in trying alternative therapies to try to reduce their vision loss, but only limited research evidence exists to support their use and potential benefit. The goal of this research project is to gain a better understanding of possible changes in ocular and retinal blood flow and measures of vision in RP patients receiving two promising therapies, electroacupuncture and transcorneal electrical stimulation. We are currently only doing transcorneal electrical stimulation.

Being tested
Electro-acupuncture, Laser Acupuncture, Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation, Sham Electro-acupuncture, Sham laser acupuncture
Keywords
retinitis pigmentosa, acupuncture, electroacupuncture, transcorneal electrical stimulation, microcurrent
Medical subject headings
Retinitis Pigmentosa

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electro-acupunctureDevice

  • Laser AcupunctureDevice

  • Transcorneal Electrical StimulationDevice

  • Sham Electro-acupunctureDevice

  • Sham laser acupunctureDevice

  • Sham transcorneal electrical stimulationDevice

Study groups in NCT02086890
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Electro-acupunctureExperimentalElectro-acupuncture applied to acupoints around the eye and traditional needle acupuncture applied to acupoints throughout the body at 10 half-hour sessions over 2 weeks
Receives: Device: Electro-acupuncture
Sham Electro-acupunctureSham comparatorNo electro-acupuncture applied to non-acupoints around the eye and traditional needle acupuncture applied to non-acupoints throughout the body; i.e., to locations not on the acupuncture meridians; at 10 half-hour sessions over 2 weeks
Receives: Device: Sham Electro-acupuncture
Laser acupunctureExperimentalLaser applied to acupoints throughout the body at 10 sessions each lasting 15 minutes over a 2 week period
Receives: Device: Laser Acupuncture
Sham Laser acupunctureSham comparatorAn inactive sham laser (red light only) applied to non-acupoints throughout the body; i.e., to locations not on the acupuncture meridians; at 10 sessions each lasting 15 minutes over a 2 week period
Receives: Device: Sham laser acupuncture
Transcorneal Electrical StimulationExperimentalTranscorneal Electrical Stimulation at 150% individual phosphene threshold applied to both eyes using DTL electrodes at 6 weekly 30 minute sessions
Receives: Device: Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation
Sham Transcorneal Electrical StimulationSham comparatorSham Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation at 0% individual phosphene threshold (no stimulation) applied to both eyes using DTL electrodes at 6 weekly 30 minute sessions
Receives: Device: Sham transcorneal electrical stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Significant changes from baseline in Goldmann visual field area in both eyes

    Using Haig-Streit Octopus perimeter

    Measured: twice at baseline, then 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention initiation

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Significant changes from baseline in best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity at both 2 weeks and 6 weeks post-intervention initiation

    Using Pelli-Robson visual acuity charts

    Measured: twice at baseline, then 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention initiation

  2. Changes in Macular edema Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Using Optical Coherence Tomography

    Measured: twice at baseline, then 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention initiation

  3. Significant changes from baseline in contrast sensitivity at both 2 weeks and 6 weeks post-intervention initiation

    Using Adaptive Sensory Technology Quick CSF

    Measured: twice at baseline, then 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention initiation

  4. Significant changes from baseline in Dark adaptation function at both 2 weeks and 6 weeks post-intervention initiation

    Using the AdaptDx by Maculogix

    Measured: twice at baseline, then 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention initiation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start13 Aug 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
21 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02086890
Sponsor's protocol ID
01311402F
Other IDs
R21EY023720
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
10 Mar 2014
Last updated
27 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Bittner AK, Gould JM, Rosenfarb A, Rozanski C, Dagnelie G. A pilot study of an acupuncture protocol to improve visual function in retinitis pigmentosa patients. Clin Exp Optom. 2014 May;97(3):240-7. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12117. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

    PubMed 24773463
  • Bittner AK, Seger K. Longevity of visual improvements following transcorneal electrical stimulation and efficacy of retreatment in three individuals with retinitis pigmentosa. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;256(2):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3858-8. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

    PubMed 29222719
  • Bittner AK, Seger K, Salveson R, Kayser S, Morrison N, Vargas P, Mendelsohn D, Han J, Bi H, Dagnelie G, Benavente A, Ramella-Roman J. Randomized controlled trial of electro-stimulation therapies to modulate retinal blood flow and visual function in retinitis pigmentosa. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 May;96(3):e366-e376. doi: 10.1111/aos.13581. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

    PubMed 29130647
  • Kayser S, Vargas P, Mendelsohn D, Han J, Bi H, Benavente A, Bittner AK. Reduced Central Retinal Artery Blood Flow Is Related to Impaired Central Visual Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients. Curr Eye Res. 2017 Nov;42(11):1503-1510. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1338350. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

    PubMed 28910168

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electro-acupuncture, Laser Acupuncture and Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation in people with Retinitis Pigmentosa, run by Nova Southeastern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Significant changes from baseline in Goldmann visual field area in both eyes (time frame: twice at baseline, then 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post-intervention initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02086890, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in