Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNCT02089204
Hypoxia Imaging -Guided Radiotherapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Xuzhou Medical University.
Trial summary
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) differs from other head and neck malignancies in terms of its epidemiology, pathology, and treatment outcome . It is endemic in China and is one of the major public health problems. Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with NPC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- FMISO-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Between June 2010 to June 2015, patients from Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College.
Who may be able to join
- histologically confirmed NPC by biopsy,
- no evidence of distant metastasis,
- no previous treatment for NPC,
- Stages III~IVA (AJCC 7th Edition) of locally advanced ,
- adequate liver function (albumin ≥30 g/L),
- adequate renal function (creatinine ≤100μmol/L) ,
- adequate bone marrow function(white blood count ≥ 4.0×109/L, platelets ≥ 100×109/L),
- Karnofsky performance status≥70,
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 18,
- those with a prior (within 5 years) or synchronous malignancy were excluded.
- presence of distant metastases,
- pregnancy or lactation,
- other concomitant malignant disease.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Feasibility Study of Hypoxia Imaging -Guided IMRT on the Individualized Radiotherapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) differs from other head and neck malignancies in terms of its epidemiology, pathology, and treatment outcome . It is endemic in China and is one of the major public health problems. Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with NPC. Despite such aggressive treatment, many patients with locally advanced NPC still develop locally recurrent disease. Since local control is directly related to patient morbidity and mortality in NPC, there is a strong need to identify methods to further improve treatment outcome for NPC.
One strategy to improve local control is to escalate the dose of radiotherapy. This is because local control has been shown to be directly related to the radiotherapy dose. Several different techniques, including brachytherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and dose-painting intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), have been used to increase radiotherapy dose. However, due to the large number of critical anatomic structures near the nasopharynx, dose-escalation in NPC can also lead to increased toxicities. One technique that has achieved dose-escalation with minimal increase in toxicity is simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART). The main challenge for such treatment is to identify the appropriate tumor volume to receive the high-dose radiotherapy. Conventional dose-escalation is conducted using computed tomography (CT) to identify the gross tumor volume (GTV). However, recent progress with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in treatment planning allows more accurate tumor volume delineation. We hypothesize that the use of PET/CT in treatment planning can improve dose-escalation radiotherapy for NPC which in turn can improve therapeutic efficacy while reducing toxicity. PET/CT imaging of tissue hypoxia using [F-18]fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), the most widely used nitroimidazole imaging agent.Given that there has been no clinical trials directly comparing conventional chemoradiotherapy to CT-guided dose-escalation chemoradiotherapy or PET/CT guided dose-escalation chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NPC.This was a study to evaluate the role of FMISO-PET hypoxia imaging for predicting survival in NPC,our study aims to compare the local control, overall survival and toxicities of the three treatment regimens..
Read the detailed description
Study Design Patients with previously untreated Stages III~IVA (AJCC 6th Edition) of locally advanced NPC, Karnofsky performance status≥70, and good bone marrow, liver and kidney functions (white blood count ≥ 4.0×109/L, platelets ≥ 100×109/L, albumin ≥30 g/L , creatinine ≤100μmol/L) were enrolled on this study. Patients younger than 18, those with a prior (within 5 years) or synchronous malignancy were excluded. Pretreatment evaluations consisted of a history and physical, dental and laboratory studies. The clinical stage was determined based on all information provided by examinations including contrast enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of head and neck, Chest X-ray, liver sonography, bone scan, and 18F-FDG-PET. All tumors were histologically confirmed except those of distant sites.
Patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomized 1:1:1 into the three treatment arms: conventional chemoradiotherapy (group A), FDG PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy (group B) and FMISO PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy (group C). All patients were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy within two weeks of diagnosis. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) IMRT technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20mg / m2 ,iv, d1- 4) and docetaxel (75mg / m2, d1, d8) administered on the 1st and 4th week of treatment. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy that ranged from 2 to 4 cycles.
Follow-up and statistical analysis Planned patient assessment included physical examination and fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy every 3 months to 3 years starting at 4 weeks post-treatment. A contrast-enhanced CT or MRI of the head and neck is also obtained at each follow up. After 3 years, the patients were followed yearly thereafter. Suspected recurrences were histologically proven. To assess for distant metastasis, CT of the chest and bone scan were obtained every half a year. During every follow-up visit, treatment toxicity were assessed. Radiotherapy-related toxicities were graded according to the Acute and the Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Chemotherapy-related toxicities (except nausea or alopecia) were graded by the criteria of the WHO.
All events were measured from the date of randomization. OS was defined as the time from the date of radiotherapy to death or the latest date known to be alive. Durations were calculated from the end of treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the actuarial rates of local control, DFS and OS. The χ2 test was used for comparing incidence rates and categorical variables and Student's t-test was used for comparing the means of continuous variables.
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Being tested
- FMISO-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT
- Keywords
- Hypoxia Imaging -Guided Radiotherapy, PET/CT, simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART)
- Medical subject headings
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FMISO-PET/CTRadiation
Also called fluorine-18-labeled fluoromisonidazole
Fluorine-18-labeled fluoromisonidazole PET/CT-guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy (group C). Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Patients received concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy.
FDG-PET/CTRadiation
Also called fluorine-18 deoxyglucose
18F-FDG PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Patients received concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy.
contrast-enhanced CTRadiation
contrast-enhanced CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Patients received concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FMISO-PET/CT | 18F-MISO PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy. All patients were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy within two weeks of diagnosis. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) IMRT technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20mg / m2 ,iv, d1- 4) and docetaxel (75mg / m2, d1, d8) administered on the 1st and 4th week of treatment. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy that ranged from 2 to 4 cycles. Receives: Radiation: FMISO-PET/CT; Radiation: contrast-enhanced CT | |
| FDG-PET/CT | 18F-FDG PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy. All patients were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy within two weeks of diagnosis. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) IMRT technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20mg / m2 ,iv, d1- 4) and docetaxel (75mg / m2, d1, d8) administered on the 1st and 4th week of treatment. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy that ranged from 2 to 4 cycles. Receives: Radiation: FDG-PET/CT; Radiation: contrast-enhanced CT | |
| contrast-enhanced CT | contrast-enhanced CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy . GTVs were delineated based on fusing diagnostic CT images with simulation CT images.All patients were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy within two weeks of diagnosis. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) IMRT technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20mg / m2 ,iv, d1- 4) and docetaxel (75mg / m2, d1, d8) administered on the 1st and 4th week of treatment. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy that ranged from 2 to 4 cycles. Receives: Radiation: contrast-enhanced CT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
local progression-free (LPF) survival rates
LPF was defined as the time from the date of radiotherapy to local progression in the five years after treatment.Durations were calculated from the end of treatment.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
disease-free survival (DFS)
DFS was defined as the time from the date of radiotherapy to recurrence or local progression in the five years after treatment.Durations were calculated from the end of treatment.
Measured: 5 years
overall survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of radiotherapy to death or the latest date known to be alive. Durations were calculated from the end of treatment.
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionFeb 2014
- Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Xuzhou Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Longzhen Zhang, Xuzhou Medical University
- Investigators
- ZHANG Longzhen, MD, Study chair, Xuzhou Medical UniversityWang Andrew Z., MD and PHD, Study director, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAWang Jianshe, M.M., Principal investigator, Xuzhou Medical UniversityXin Yong, M.M., Principal investigator, Xuzhou Medical UniversityXu Kai, MD, Principal investigator, Xuzhou Medical UniversityTang Tianyou, M.M., Principal investigator, Xuzhou Medical UniversityDing Xin, M.M., Principal investigator, Xuzhou Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02089204
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H201021
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Wang J, Zheng J, Tang T, Zhu F, Yao Y, Xu J, Wang AZ, Zhang L. A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Position Emission Tomography (PET)-Guided Dose Escalation Radiotherapy to Conventional Radiotherapy in Chemoradiotherapy Treatment of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124018. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25915944
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Feasibility Study of Hypoxia Imaging -Guided IMRT on the Individualized Radiotherapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02089204
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H201021
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Hypoxia Imaging -Guided Radiotherapy, PET/CT, simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART)
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Xuzhou Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) differs from other head and neck malignancies in terms of its epidemiology, pathology, and treatment outcome . It is endemic in China and is one of the major public health problems. Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the primary treatment for patients with NPC. Despite such aggressive treatment, many patients with locally advanced NPC still develop locally recurrent disease. Since local control is directly related to patient morbidity and mortality in NPC, there is a strong need to identify methods to further improve treatment outcome for NPC.
One strategy to improve local control is to escalate the dose of radiotherapy. This is because local control has been shown to be directly related to the radiotherapy dose. Several different techniques, including brachytherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and dose-painting intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), have been used to increase radiotherapy dose. However, due to the large number of critical anatomic structures near the nasopharynx, dose-escalation in NPC can also lead to increased toxicities. One technique that has achieved dose-escalation with minimal increase in toxicity is simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART). The main challenge for such treatment is to identify the appropriate tumor volume to receive the high-dose radiotherapy. Conventional dose-escalation is conducted using computed tomography (CT) to identify the gross tumor volume (GTV). However, recent progress with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in treatment planning allows more accurate tumor volume delineation. We hypothesize that the use of PET/CT in treatment planning can improve dose-escalation radiotherapy for NPC which in turn can improve therapeutic efficacy while reducing toxicity. PET/CT imaging of tissue hypoxia using [F-18]fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), the most widely used nitroimidazole imaging agent.Given that there has been no clinical trials directly comparing conventional chemoradiotherapy to CT-guided dose-escalation chemoradiotherapy or PET/CT guided dose-escalation chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NPC.This was a study to evaluate the role of FMISO-PET hypoxia imaging for predicting survival in NPC,our study aims to compare the local control, overall survival and toxicities of the three treatment regimens..
Detailed description
Study Design Patients with previously untreated Stages III~IVA (AJCC 6th Edition) of locally advanced NPC, Karnofsky performance status≥70, and good bone marrow, liver and kidney functions (white blood count ≥ 4.0×109/L, platelets ≥ 100×109/L, albumin ≥30 g/L , creatinine ≤100μmol/L) were enrolled on this study. Patients younger than 18, those with a prior (within 5 years) or synchronous malignancy were excluded. Pretreatment evaluations consisted of a history and physical, dental and laboratory studies. The clinical stage was determined based on all information provided by examinations including contrast enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of head and neck, Chest X-ray, liver sonography, bone scan, and 18F-FDG-PET. All tumors were histologically confirmed except those of distant sites.
Patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomized 1:1:1 into the three treatment arms: conventional chemoradiotherapy (group A), FDG PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy (group B) and FMISO PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy (group C). All patients were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy within two weeks of diagnosis. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) IMRT technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20mg / m2 ,iv, d1- 4) and docetaxel (75mg / m2, d1, d8) administered on the 1st and 4th week of treatment. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy that ranged from 2 to 4 cycles.
Follow-up and statistical analysis Planned patient assessment included physical examination and fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy every 3 months to 3 years starting at 4 weeks post-treatment. A contrast-enhanced CT or MRI of the head and neck is also obtained at each follow up. After 3 years, the patients were followed yearly thereafter. Suspected recurrences were histologically proven. To assess for distant metastasis, CT of the chest and bone scan were obtained every half a year. During every follow-up visit, treatment toxicity were assessed. Radiotherapy-related toxicities were graded according to the Acute and the Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Chemotherapy-related toxicities (except nausea or alopecia) were graded by the criteria of the WHO.
All events were measured from the date of randomization. OS was defined as the time from the date of radiotherapy to death or the latest date known to be alive. Durations were calculated from the end of treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the actuarial rates of local control, DFS and OS. The χ2 test was used for comparing incidence rates and categorical variables and Student's t-test was used for comparing the means of continuous variables.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FMISO-PET/CT | – | Radiation: FMISO-PET/CT, Radiation: contrast-enhanced CT18F-MISO PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy. All patients were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy within two weeks of diagnosis. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) IMRT technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20mg / m2 ,iv, d1- 4) and docetaxel (75mg / m2, d1, d8) administered on the 1st and 4th week of treatment. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy that ranged from 2 to 4 cycles. |
| FDG-PET/CT | – | Radiation: FDG-PET/CT, Radiation: contrast-enhanced CT18F-FDG PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy. All patients were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy within two weeks of diagnosis. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) IMRT technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20mg / m2 ,iv, d1- 4) and docetaxel (75mg / m2, d1, d8) administered on the 1st and 4th week of treatment. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy that ranged from 2 to 4 cycles. |
| contrast-enhanced CT | – | Radiation: contrast-enhanced CTcontrast-enhanced CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy . GTVs were delineated based on fusing diagnostic CT images with simulation CT images.All patients were given concurrent chemoradiotherapy within two weeks of diagnosis. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) IMRT technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (20mg / m2 ,iv, d1- 4) and docetaxel (75mg / m2, d1, d8) administered on the 1st and 4th week of treatment. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy that ranged from 2 to 4 cycles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Between June 2010 to June 2015, patients from Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- histologically confirmed NPC by biopsy,
- no evidence of distant metastasis,
- no previous treatment for NPC,
- Stages III~IVA (AJCC 7th Edition) of locally advanced ,
- adequate liver function (albumin ≥30 g/L),
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients younger than 18,
- those with a prior (within 5 years) or synchronous malignancy were excluded.
- presence of distant metastases,
- pregnancy or lactation,
- other concomitant malignant disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FMISO-PET/CTAlso: fluorine-18-labeled fluoromisonidazoleFluorine-18-labeled fluoromisonidazole PET/CT-guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy (group C). Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Patients received concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy. | Radiation | FMISO-PET/CT |
| FDG-PET/CTAlso: fluorine-18 deoxyglucose18F-FDG PET/CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Patients received concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy. | Radiation | FDG-PET/CT |
| contrast-enhanced CTcontrast-enhanced CT -guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Patients received concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy | Radiation | FDG-PET/CT, FMISO-PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT |
Primary outcome
local progression-free (LPF) survival rates
Time frame: 5 years
LPF was defined as the time from the date of radiotherapy to local progression in the five years after treatment.Durations were calculated from the end of treatment.
2 secondary outcomes
disease-free survival (DFS)
Time frame: 5 years
overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25915944Wang J, Zheng J, Tang T, Zhu F, Yao Y, Xu J, Wang AZ, Zhang L. A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Position Emission Tomography (PET)-Guided Dose Escalation Radiotherapy to Conventional Radiotherapy in Chemoradiotherapy Treatment of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124018. eCollection 2015.
Related trials for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of BMS-986016 (Relatlimab) to the Usual Immunotherapy After Initial Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
P-MUC1C-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Biopsy Decision Model for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Serological Markers and Endoscopic Features
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
Head and Neck Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ZHANG Longzhen, MD study chair
Xuzhou Medical University
Wang Andrew Z., MD and PHD study director
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
Wang Jianshe, M.M. principal investigator
Xuzhou Medical University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Xuzhou Medical University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
local progression-free (LPF) survival rates (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02089204, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2014.