AzTrials
AzTrials

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNCT02094612

Effectiveness of the Quotient® ADHD Assessment in a System of Care

A study testing Quotient® and Usual Clinic ADHD Care in people with Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders and Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity, run by Kaiser Permanente at 3 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study goal is to examine whether the use of an objective computerized neuroassessment (the Quotient System) for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is related to improved outcomes among pediatric patients being assessed and treated for ADHD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 12 years
What is being tested?
Quotient® and Usual Clinic ADHD Care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
207 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2014to Aug 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • All patients within the specified age range who are English speaking and who are presenting for ADHD assessment are eligible. An additional criterion is consent to be randomized.

Who cannot join

  • Non English speaking
  • Refusal to participate

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Kaiser Permanente, Folsom

    Folsom, California, 95630

  • Kaiser Permanente, Roseville

    Roseville, California, 95661

  • Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek Medical Center

    Walnut Creek, California, 94596

Other trials in United States

About this study

The study goal is to examine whether the use of an objective computerized neuroassessment (the Quotient System) for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is related to improved outcomes among pediatric patients being assessed and treated for ADHD.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized, controlled trial using a 2-phase data collection. The first phase is the initial assessment for ADHD and includes all patients eligible to be assessed for ADHD as determined by their clinician in the course of usual care. The baseline measurements will be used to compare groups at baseline, and also for longitudinal analyses of medication management. Patients are randomized at this point. Patients in both treatment arms who then receive an ADHD diagnosis and who start medication for ADHD will be eligible for the second phase of the study: three follow-up assessments over six months. Patients who do not have an ADHD diagnosis will not continue in the study, and will be treated by their clinician as usual.

Being tested
Quotient®, Usual Clinic ADHD Care
Keywords
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Pediatrics, Patient Outcome Assessment
Medical subject headings
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quotient®Device

    Also called OpTAX

    Patients will be randomized once at the time of ADHD assessment to either usual clinic ADHD care or usual clinic ADHD care plus the Quotient using computer-generated random numbers.

  • Usual Clinic ADHD CareBehavioural

    Usual ADHD care as provided by the clinic

Study groups in NCT02094612
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual CareActive comparatorUsual clinic ADHD care
Receives: Behavioral: Usual Clinic ADHD Care
Usual Care plus AssessmentExperimentalUsual clinic ADHD care plus the Quotient®
Receives: Device: Quotient®

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With 25% Reduction in SNAP Scores

    Outcome measure reported is the number of participants with at least one 25% reduction in SNAP between visits. In treatment of ADHD, the therapeutic dose is defined as a 25% reduction in SNAP IV score between consecutive clinic visits. SNAP is itemized rating scale (Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham-IV Questionnaire) designed to measure ADHD symptoms and severity on a 4 point scale. It is based on DSM IV criteria, and is designed to measure attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms in children and young adults ages 6-18.

    Measured: One month, 3 month and six month follow ups

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. ADHD Symptomatology

    Outcomes reported are average SNAP IV scores at baseline and 6 monhts. ADHD symptomatology is measured by the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Teacher and Parent Rating Scale (SNAP-IV), developed by James Swanson, Edith Nolan and William Pelham. We used the 18-item self-report inventory designed to measure attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children and young adults. Each question measures the frequency of a variety of symptoms or behaviors.The subscales measure Inattention (9 items) and Hyperactivity/impulsivity (9 items), using 0-3 rating, 0="not at all", 1="just a little", 2="quite a bit", or 3="very much. Each 9-item subscale results in a score in range 0-27. The two subscale scores were averaged to create a single score for the 18-item SNAP.

    Measured: 6 months post baseline

  2. Academic Performance

    Academic performance will be measured by student report cards, and converted to a standardized scale

    Measured: Baseline and Six Months

  3. Persistence in Care

    Update: Outcome measure reported is the # of participants who attended all study follow-up visits.

    Use of pediatric health care services

    Measured: Baseline to Six Months

  4. Medication Adherence

    Update: Outcome reported is number of participants taking medication as prescribed at all study follow up visits.

    Sustained use of ADHD medication

    Measured: Baseline to six months

  5. Satisfaction With Care

    Update: Outcome measure reported is number of participants who responded "very satisfied" with their ADHD care on 5-point Likert scale.

    Likert scale single item measure of how satisfied the pediatric patient's parent was with care received

    Measured: Six months

  6. Other Health Services Use

    Update: Outcome measure reported is number of psychiatric and ED visits during the 6 month follow up period.

    Use of healthcare services outside of pediatrics, including the emergency room and psychiatric services.

    Measured: Baseline to six months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionAug 2015
  4. Study completionAug 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
207 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02094612
Sponsor's protocol ID
CN-13-1692-H
Other IDs
Quotient ADHD
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
13 Mar 2014
Last updated
17 Jul 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Chinchilli VM, Fisher L, Craig TJ. Statistical issues in clinical trials that involve the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Mar;115(3):592-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.01.008.

    PubMed 15753909
  • Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and evaluation of the child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2000 May;105(5):1158-70. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.5.1158.

    PubMed 10836893
  • Foy JM, Earls MF. A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.

    PubMed 15629972
  • Herrerias CT, Perrin JM, Stein MT. The child with ADHD: using the AAP Clinical Practice Guideline. American Academy of Pediatrics. Am Fam Physician. 2001 May 1;63(9):1803-10.

    PubMed 11352293
  • Jensen PS, Garcia JA, Glied S, Crowe M, Foster M, Schlander M, Hinshaw S, Vitiello B, Arnold LE, Elliott G, Hechtman L, Newcorn JH, Pelham WE, Swanson J, Wells K. Cost-effectiveness of ADHD treatments: findings from the multimodal treatment study of children with ADHD. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;162(9):1628-36. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1628.

    PubMed 16135621
  • Lachin JM, Foulkes MA. Evaluation of sample size and power for analyses of survival with allowance for nonuniform patient entry, losses to follow-up, noncompliance, and stratification. Biometrics. 1986 Sep;42(3):507-19.

    PubMed 3567285
  • Langberg JM, Froehlich TE, Loren RE, Martin JE, Epstein JN. Assessing children with ADHD in primary care settings. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 Apr;8(4):627-41. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.4.627.

    PubMed 18416664
  • Leslie LK, Weckerly J, Plemmons D, Landsverk J, Eastman S. Implementing the American Academy of Pediatrics attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnostic guidelines in primary care settings. Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):129-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.129.

    PubMed 15231919
  • Leslie LK, Wolraich ML. ADHD service use patterns in youth. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Jul;32(6):695-710. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm023. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

    PubMed 17556401
  • Shaw M, Hodgkins P, Caci H, Young S, Kahle J, Woods AG, Arnold LE. A systematic review and analysis of long-term outcomes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of treatment and non-treatment. BMC Med. 2012 Sep 4;10:99. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-99.

    PubMed 22947230
  • Pelham WE, Foster EM, Robb JA. The economic impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Jul;32(6):711-27. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm022. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

    PubMed 17556402
  • Schoenfeld DA. Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics. 1983 Jun;39(2):499-503.

    PubMed 6354290
  • Xie H, McHugo G, Drake R, Sengupta A. Using discrete-time survival analysis to examine patterns of remission from substance use disorder among persons with severe mental illness. Ment Health Serv Res. 2003 Mar;5(1):55-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1021759509176.

    PubMed 12602646

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Quotient® and Usual Clinic ADHD Care in people with Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders and Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity, run by Kaiser Permanente at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With 25% Reduction in SNAP Scores (time frame: One month, 3 month and six month follow ups). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02094612, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in