AzTrials
AzTrials

Unstable CorneasPhase 3NCT02095730

Corneal Cross-Linking Comparing Variables

A Phase 3 study testing Epithelium-On Riboflavin, Epithelium-Off Riboflavin and UV Light - Continuous Beam in people with Unstable Corneas, run by Crowd Health Research, LTD at 16 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Corneal Cross Linking in a Continuous Beam versus Pulsed Treatments across epithelium on and epithelium off surfaces. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Unstable Corneas
What is being tested?
Epithelium-On Riboflavin, Epithelium-Off Riboflavin and UV Light - Continuous Beam
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
500 participants
Where
16 sitesUnited States
Study dates
May 2014to May 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 12 years of age or older
  • Having a clinical diagnosis of progressive keratoconus consistent with:
  • An increase of ≥ 1.00 D in the steepest keratometry value
  • An increase of ≥ 1.00 D in astigmatism manifest refraction
  • A myopic shift (decrease in the spherical equivalent) of ≥ 0.50 D on subjective manifest refraction
  • Presence of central or inferior steepening on the topography map.
Show all 28Show fewer
  • Axial topography consistent with keratoconus
  • Steepest keratometry (Kmax) value ≥ 47.00 D
  • Signed written informed consent
  • Willingness and ability to comply with schedule for follow-up visits
  • Contact lens removal prior to evaluation and treatment
  • History of having undergone a keratorefractive procedure and:
  • Steepening by topography
  • Thinning of cornea
  • Shift in the position of thinnest portion of cornea
  • Change in refraction with increasing myopia
  • Development of myopic astigmatism
  • Development of irregular astigmatism
  • Loss of Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity
  • At least two of the above criteria must be present.
  • Should the patient have undergone prior Intacs or other intra-corneal ring segment surgery for keratoconus or post-surgical ectasia at least 6 months prior, and is also experiencing at least two of the above ectasia symptoms, they can be included in the study.
  • These patients would have the choice of ring explant before Cross-Linking.
  • Cross-Linking may still be performed if the patient wishes to retain the rings.
  • Should a patient's situation due to factors such as significantly high myopia or astigmatism should warrant simultaneous placement of Intacs and cross-linking in the investigators opinion, then this option can be offered to the patient. Such interventions would be tracked as a different arm of the study.
  • History of having undergone radial keratotomy (RK) and or astigmatic keratotomy (AK) surgery.
  • Expressing complaints about difficulties due to vision changing during the same day.
  • A difference in their Manifest Refraction (MRx) of greater than 0.75 D measured on the same day, at least 6 hours apart.
  • Intacs surgery will not be considered in patients with RK/AK.

Who cannot join

  • Eyes classified as either normal, atypical normal,
  • Corneal pachymetry ≤ 350 microns at the thinnest point measured by Orbscan, Pentacam, or ultrasound in the eye to be treated
  • A history of chemical injury or delayed epithelial healing in the eye to be treated.
  • A known sensitivity to study medications
  • Patients with significant nystagmus or any other condition that would prevent a steady gaze during the treatment
  • Inability to cooperate with diagnostic tests.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients with a current condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with or prolong epithelial healing.
  • Taking Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) supplements within 1 week of the cross-linking treatment.
  • Patients who are unable to remain comfortable and stable, and tolerate a lid speculum for the appointed period of time for the procedure.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

United States16 sites
  • Eye Consultants of Atlanta

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30339

    Teresa Long, 404-351-2220, teresa_long@eyeconsultants.net

    W. Barry Lee, MD

  • Icon Lasik

    Denver, Colorado, 80210

    Richard Anderson, OD, 720-524-1001, ra@icondenver.com

    Douglas Campbell, DO

  • Midwest Center for Sight

    Des Plaines, Illinois, 60016

    James Katz, MD, 847-824-3127, jamesakatz@aol.com

    James Katz, MD

  • James Lewis MD PC

    Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, 19027

    James Lewis, MD, 215-886-9090, jslewis@jameslewis.com

    James Lewis, MD

  • Loden Vision Centers

    Goodlettsville, Tennessee, 37072

    Katie Lambeth, 615-859-3937, klamberth@lodenvision.com

    James Loden, MD

  • Memorial Eye Institute

    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17112

    Sherrie Reed, 717-657-2020, crosslinkstudy@memorialeye.com

    Bennett Chotiner, MD

  • Southern Eye Center

    Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39402

    Cameron Griffith, MD, 318-464-0306, csgriff1@earthlink.net

    Cameron Griffith, MD

  • Gulani Vision Institute

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32216

    Arun Gulani, MD, 904-296-7393, gulanivision@gulani.com

    Arun Gulani, MD

  • LASIK of Nevada

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123

    Valerie Serett, 702-636-2010, vserette@yahoo.com

    Richard Rothman, MD

  • Discover Vision Center

    Leawood, Kansas, 66211

    Misty Robe, Associate's, 816-478-1230, mrobe@discovervision.com

    John Doane, MD

  • Carolina Eye Care

    Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464

    Helga Sandoval, MD, 843-881-3937, helga.sandoval@carolinaeyecare.com

    Kerry Solomon, MD

  • Bond Eye Associates

    Pekin, Illinois, 61554

    William Bond, MD, 309-353-6660, pekineye@yahoo.com

    William Bond, MD

  • Parkhurst NuVision

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

    Amy Ford, 210-428-6788, nuvision.amy@gmail.com

    Gregory D Parkhurst, MD

  • LaserVue Eye

    Santa Rosa, California, 95403

    Jay Bansal, MD, 707-522-6200, bansal@laservue.com

    Jay Bansal, MD

  • Mercy Clinic Eye Specialists

    Springfield, Missouri, 65807

    Stephanie Sekscinski, 417-820-9393, stephanie.sekscinski@mercy.net

    Shachar Tauber, MD

  • Liberty Laser Eye Center

    Vienna, Virginia, 22182

    Travis A Johnson, Bachelor's, 571-234-5678 ext. 104, tjohnson@libertylasereye.com

    Nancy A Tanchel, MD

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Study of Safety and Efficacy of Photochemically Induced Collagen Cross-Linking at an Irradiance of 18 mW/cm2 as Constant or Pulsed Treatment in Eyes With Unstable Corneas Due to Keratoconus, Ectasia, or Post-Incisional Refractive Surgery

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Corneal Cross Linking in a Continuous Beam versus Pulsed Treatments across epithelium on and epithelium off surfaces.

Being tested
Epithelium-On Riboflavin, Epithelium-Off Riboflavin, UV Light - Continuous Beam, UV Pulsed Beam
Keywords
crosslinking, cornea, keratoconus, ectasia, irradiance, riboflavin
Medical subject headings
Corneal Diseases, Keratoconus, Dilatation, Pathologic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epithelium-On RiboflavinDrug

    Also called Vitamin B2

    Riboflavin 0.1% Phosphate Sodium solution with Benzalkonium Chloride Preservative

  • Epithelium-Off RiboflavinDrug

    Also called Vitamin B2

    Riboflavin 0.1% Phosphate Sodium solution

  • UV Light - Continuous BeamDevice

    Also called Peschke Vario CCL-365 UV system

    5 minutes of constant UV exposure to saturated cornea

  • UV Pulsed BeamDevice

    Also called Peschke Vario CCL-365 UV system

    5 minutes of UV exposure to saturated cornea, alternating 1 minute of treatment with 1 minute rest for a total time of 10 minutes

Study groups in NCT02095730
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Epi-On ContinuousActive comparatorContinuous beam of UV light treating cornea with surface epithelium present
Receives: Drug: Epithelium-On Riboflavin; Device: UV Light - Continuous Beam
Epi-Off ContinuousActive comparatorContinuous beam of UV light treating cornea without surface epithelium present
Receives: Drug: Epithelium-Off Riboflavin; Device: UV Light - Continuous Beam
Epi-On PulsedActive comparatorPulsed beam of UV light treating cornea with surface epithelium present
Receives: Drug: Epithelium-On Riboflavin; Device: UV Pulsed Beam
Epi-Off PulsedActive comparatorPulsed beam of UV light treating cornea without surface epithelium present
Receives: Drug: Epithelium-Off Riboflavin; Device: UV Pulsed Beam

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Acuity

    Uncorrected visual acuity

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionMay 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02095730
Sponsor's protocol ID
CXL-CHR 1
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
20 Mar 2014
Last updated
26 Mar 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Epithelium-On Riboflavin, Epithelium-Off Riboflavin and UV Light - Continuous Beam in people with Unstable Corneas, run by Crowd Health Research, LTD at 16 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 28 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Travis A Johnson, Bachelor's (571-234-5678 ext. 104, tjohnson@libertylasereye.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Acuity (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in