Colorectal NeoplasmsPhase 2ROCKETNCT02096354
A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label Study of RRx-001 vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing RRx-001, Regorafenib and Irinotecan in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by EpicentRx, Inc. at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study. Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- RRx-001, Regorafenib and Irinotecan
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2014to 8 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histological or cytological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum;
- Subject must have received at least oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens with bevacizumab and with, cetuximab or panitumumab if KRAS wildtype and are refractory to irinotecan;
- Subject has measurable disease by radiographic techniques (computerized tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]);
- Subjects with a history of brain metastasis are eligible for the study as long as they meet all the following criteria: their brain metastases have been treated, they have no evidence of progression or hemorrhage after treatment, have been off dexamethasone for 4 weeks prior to first study drug administration, and have no ongoing requirement for dexamethasone or anti-epileptic drugs;
- Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
- Subject's Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status is 0 or 1;
- Adequate organ function
- Fertile subjects must use effective contraception during the course of the study and for 30 days following withdrawal from the study;
Who cannot join
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
- Unresolved toxicity higher attributed to any prior therapy/procedure excluding alopecia, hypothyroidism and oxaliplatin- induced neurotoxicity ≤ Grade 2 for at least 14 days;
- Evidence or history of tendency or predisposition to active bleeding. Any hemorrhage or bleeding event of Grade 3 or higher within 4 weeks of start of study medication;
- Symptoms or signs of active brain metastases;
- History of an allergic reaction or intolerance to irinotecan
- Hepatic encephalopathy
Show all 12Show fewer
- Cholangitis that required treatment or intervention within 4 weeks of study enrollment
- Concurrent anticancer therapy or any cytotoxic therapy within 1 month prior to Day 1. Corticosteroid therapy is not allowed except on dosing days;
- Subject has previously received regorafenib;
- Clear contraindication for systemic corticosteroids (diabetes mellitus is not per se a clear contraindication);
- Severe hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3.0 g/dL);
- Subjects who are pregnant or lactating or who are planning to become pregnant during the course of the study are excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889
Kaiser Permanete
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819
UCSD Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093
Aquilino Cancer Center, Maryland Oncology and Hematology PA
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study.
Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. If patients qualify to participate in this study, they will be randomly assigned to the 'interventional arm' where patients will receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib.
Read more
On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study and receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab.
Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned.
Read the detailed description
Purpose This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study.
Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. Qualifying patients will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to the 'interventional arm' and receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients will have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib.
On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab.
Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned.
Background Oxygen is vital to life, we need it to breathe, for example, but at the same time it gives rise to byproducts that are toxic called free radicals. Free radicals are defined as "oxidants". Similarly, substances that interact with and neutralize free radicals, thus preventing them from causing damage, are called "antioxidants". Examples of recognizable antioxidants are Vitamin E, Vitamin C and beta-carotene. Antioxidants are also known as "free radical scavengers." When free radicals are present in excess of antioxidants damage may occur.
A free radical is an unstable molecule with an unpaired electron, an electrically charged particle, which seeks out another electron to return to a state of balance. An example of a free radical is hydrogen peroxide, recognizable as the household product that "bubbles" when it's poured on wounds. These bubbles come from oxygen free radicals, which are toxic to bacteria and all living cells, including cancer. The fact that these free radicals are toxic has to do with how reactive they are-imagine free radicals as high-speed ball bearings that smash into other molecules in order to "steal" back an electron and end their radical state, which sets off a chain reaction that transforms once stable compounds into a string of reactive radicals.
As new free radicals are created in this chain reaction, they randomly slam into whatever molecules they are closest to and steal their electrons, corroding them, like a biological form of rust. This process is repeated over and over, picking up speed, until an antioxidant can "neutralize" the free radicals and put a stop to the snowball effect. In the same way that this free radical bombardment can damage not only bacteria but also healthy tissues in the body, it is also capable of destroying cancer cells.
The current consensus is that compared to normal tissue tumor cells may accumulate elevated levels of free radicals, which contribute to the development of cancer. This is potentially a fatal weakness, a form of biological "Kryptonite", which can be used to advantage since the addition of even a small amount of free radicals may push the tumor over the edge, past the tipping point, above tolerable thresholds, breaking the camel's back. Similar to the expression "live by the sword, die by the sword", free radicals may lead to the development of cancer but they also are capable of harming it when present in excess.
RRx-001 is a completely new type of drug that comes from the U.S. aerospace or rocket science industry. It is activated to deliver free radicals to tissues that have low levels of oxygen. Compared to normal tissues, which have higher levels of oxygen, most, if not all, tumors exist in a low-oxygen environment, perhaps to prevent oxidation. In this way the free radicals delivered by RRx-001 to cancer cells under low oxygen conditions are able, in theory, to cause their targeted destruction without harming normal cells.
In general, colorectal tumors have low levels of antioxidants and, without this antioxidant protection, these tumors are more likely to be harmed by free radicals, so a treatment like RRx-001, which is able to increase the free radicals in the tumor, may benefit patients with colorectal cancer; this is a reason for studying RRx-001 in colorectal cancer. So far, in a Phase 1 study, 25 men and women with advanced, incurable cancer have received RRx-001 for different lengths of time and at doses that ranged from 10 mg/m2 to 83 mg/m2 once a week.
Regorafenib is a drug approved by the FDA to treat colon cancer after previous chemotherapy is no longer effective. It belongs to a class of targeted drugs known as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Tyrosine kinases, which play a key role in many cell functions including cell growth and division, are commonly mutated or changed in cancer cells, becoming super-active and producing cells that have uncontrolled growth, and, therefore, blocking them with drugs like regorafenib may keep the cancer cells from growing.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- RRx-001, Regorafenib, Irinotecan
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RRx-001Drug
RegorafenibDrug
Also called Stivarga
IrinotecanDrug
Also called With or without bevacizumab
To be dosed after RRx-001 or regorafenib
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RRx-001 followed by irinotecan | Experimental | Once-weekly intravenous RRx-001 at a dose of 4 mg on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab) Receives: Drug: RRx-001; Drug: Irinotecan |
| Regorafenib followed by irinotecan | Active comparator | Regorafenib daily on Days 1- 21 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab) Receives: Drug: Regorafenib; Drug: Irinotecan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 47 months
Measured: From date of enrollment until death or censorship.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Progression Free Survival
Progression-free survival (PFS) will be defined as the elapsed time from the from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 77 months
Measured: Baseline, every 6-8 weeks while on study.
Number of Adverse Events
Incidence of related Adverse Events (AEs). SAEs and all other non-serious AEs are located in the Reported Adverse Event Module. National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 is used to grade adverse events.
Measured: Baseline through end of treatment (28 days after last dose of study drug). Approximately 24 weeks.
Objective Response Rate
Percentage of participants with ORR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target and non-target disease. PR applied only to participants with at least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30 % decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions.
Measured: Up to 2 years
Clinical Benefit Rate
The period from study entry through Disease Control. Disease Control Rate (DCR) also correlates to Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR or SD relative to the total number of treated subjects
Measured: Up to 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completion13 Apr 2018
- Study completion8 Oct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- EpicentRx, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bryan Oronsky, MD, Study director, EpicentRx, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02096354
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RRx001-21-02
- Acronym
- ROCKET
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Oronsky B, Scribner C, Aggarwal R, Cabrales P. RRx-001 protects normal tissues but not tumors via Nrf2 induction and Bcl-2 inhibition. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug;145(8):2045-2050. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02958-4. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
PubMed 31250159Scicinski J, Fisher G, Carter C, Cho-Phan C, Kunz P, Ning S, Knox S, Oronsky B, Caroen S, Parker C, Fanger G, Reid T. The Development Of RRx-001, A Novel Nitric-Oxide-Mediated Epigenetically Active Anticancer Agent. Redox Biol. 2015 Aug;5:422. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
PubMed 28162292Reid TR, Abrouk N, Caroen S, Oronsky B, Stirn M, Larson C, Beale K, Knox SJ, Fisher G. ROCKET: Phase II Randomized, Active-controlled, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of RRx-001 + Irinotecan vs. Single-agent Regorafenib in Third/Fourth Line Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2023 Mar;22(1):92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
PubMed 36529613Reid T, Dad S, Korn R, Oronsky B, Knox S, Scicinski J. Two Case Reports of Resensitization to Previous Chemotherapy with the Novel Hypoxia-Activated Hypomethylating Anticancer Agent RRx-001 in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. Case Rep Oncol. 2014 Jan 24;7(1):79-85. doi: 10.1159/000358382. eCollection 2014 Jan.
PubMed 24575021
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label Study of RRx-001 vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02096354
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROCKET / RRx001-21-02
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EpicentRx, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2014
- Primary completion
- 13 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study.
Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. If patients qualify to participate in this study, they will be randomly assigned to the 'interventional arm' where patients will receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib.
On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study and receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab.
Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned.
Detailed description
Purpose This two-stage study is designed to compare the safety and activity between RRx-001 against regorafenib followed by irinotecan-based therapies in a parallel comparative study.
Patients who are suffering from advanced or metastatic (meaning the disease has spread) colorectal cancer are invited to participate in this study. There will be two groups of patients (Randomized, open label study), one of these will receive RRx-001 and the other one will receive regorafenib. Qualifying patients will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to the 'interventional arm' and receive the experimental drug, RRx-001, or the 'control arm' where they will receive the current standard-of-care, Regorafenib. Patients will have a 66% chance (2 out of 3) of receiving RRx-001 and a 33 % chance (1 out of 3) of receiving regorafenib.
On progression in the first part of the study, provided ECOG performance status is adequate, and if clinically appropriate i.e. there are no absolute or relative contraindications in the opinion of the Investigator, all subjects will enter the second part of the study receive irinotecan plus bevacizumab.
Whether patients are given RRx-001 or regorafenib, they will also receive best supportive care, which includes treatments to help manage side effects and symptoms of cancer. This is an open label study, which means patients will know to which of these treatments, RRx-001 or regorafenib, they are assigned.
Background Oxygen is vital to life, we need it to breathe, for example, but at the same time it gives rise to byproducts that are toxic called free radicals. Free radicals are defined as "oxidants". Similarly, substances that interact with and neutralize free radicals, thus preventing them from causing damage, are called "antioxidants". Examples of recognizable antioxidants are Vitamin E, Vitamin C and beta-carotene. Antioxidants are also known as "free radical scavengers." When free radicals are present in excess of antioxidants damage may occur.
A free radical is an unstable molecule with an unpaired electron, an electrically charged particle, which seeks out another electron to return to a state of balance. An example of a free radical is hydrogen peroxide, recognizable as the household product that "bubbles" when it's poured on wounds. These bubbles come from oxygen free radicals, which are toxic to bacteria and all living cells, including cancer. The fact that these free radicals are toxic has to do with how reactive they are-imagine free radicals as high-speed ball bearings that smash into other molecules in order to "steal" back an electron and end their radical state, which sets off a chain reaction that transforms once stable compounds into a string of reactive radicals.
As new free radicals are created in this chain reaction, they randomly slam into whatever molecules they are closest to and steal their electrons, corroding them, like a biological form of rust. This process is repeated over and over, picking up speed, until an antioxidant can "neutralize" the free radicals and put a stop to the snowball effect. In the same way that this free radical bombardment can damage not only bacteria but also healthy tissues in the body, it is also capable of destroying cancer cells.
The current consensus is that compared to normal tissue tumor cells may accumulate elevated levels of free radicals, which contribute to the development of cancer. This is potentially a fatal weakness, a form of biological "Kryptonite", which can be used to advantage since the addition of even a small amount of free radicals may push the tumor over the edge, past the tipping point, above tolerable thresholds, breaking the camel's back. Similar to the expression "live by the sword, die by the sword", free radicals may lead to the development of cancer but they also are capable of harming it when present in excess.
RRx-001 is a completely new type of drug that comes from the U.S. aerospace or rocket science industry. It is activated to deliver free radicals to tissues that have low levels of oxygen. Compared to normal tissues, which have higher levels of oxygen, most, if not all, tumors exist in a low-oxygen environment, perhaps to prevent oxidation. In this way the free radicals delivered by RRx-001 to cancer cells under low oxygen conditions are able, in theory, to cause their targeted destruction without harming normal cells.
In general, colorectal tumors have low levels of antioxidants and, without this antioxidant protection, these tumors are more likely to be harmed by free radicals, so a treatment like RRx-001, which is able to increase the free radicals in the tumor, may benefit patients with colorectal cancer; this is a reason for studying RRx-001 in colorectal cancer. So far, in a Phase 1 study, 25 men and women with advanced, incurable cancer have received RRx-001 for different lengths of time and at doses that ranged from 10 mg/m2 to 83 mg/m2 once a week.
Regorafenib is a drug approved by the FDA to treat colon cancer after previous chemotherapy is no longer effective. It belongs to a class of targeted drugs known as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Tyrosine kinases, which play a key role in many cell functions including cell growth and division, are commonly mutated or changed in cancer cells, becoming super-active and producing cells that have uncontrolled growth, and, therefore, blocking them with drugs like regorafenib may keep the cancer cells from growing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RRx-001 followed by irinotecan | Experimental | Drug: RRx-001, Drug: IrinotecanOnce-weekly intravenous RRx-001 at a dose of 4 mg on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab) |
| Regorafenib followed by irinotecan | Active comparator | Drug: Regorafenib, Drug: IrinotecanRegorafenib daily on Days 1- 21 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Histological or cytological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum;
- Subject must have received at least oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens with bevacizumab and with, cetuximab or panitumumab if KRAS wildtype and are refractory to irinotecan;
- Subject has measurable disease by radiographic techniques (computerized tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]);
- Subjects with a history of brain metastasis are eligible for the study as long as they meet all the following criteria: their brain metastases have been treated, they have no evidence of progression or hemorrhage after treatment, have been off dexamethasone for 4 weeks prior to first study drug administration, and have no ongoing requirement for dexamethasone or anti-epileptic drugs;
- Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
- Unresolved toxicity higher attributed to any prior therapy/procedure excluding alopecia, hypothyroidism and oxaliplatin- induced neurotoxicity ≤ Grade 2 for at least 14 days;
- Evidence or history of tendency or predisposition to active bleeding. Any hemorrhage or bleeding event of Grade 3 or higher within 4 weeks of start of study medication;
- Symptoms or signs of active brain metastases;
- History of an allergic reaction or intolerance to irinotecan
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RRx-001 | Drug | RRx-001 followed by irinotecan |
| RegorafenibAlso: Stivarga | Drug | Regorafenib followed by irinotecan |
| IrinotecanAlso: With or without bevacizumabTo be dosed after RRx-001 or regorafenib | Drug | RRx-001 followed by irinotecan, Regorafenib followed by irinotecan |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: From date of enrollment until death or censorship.
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 47 months
4 secondary outcomes
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: Baseline, every 6-8 weeks while on study.
Number of Adverse Events
Time frame: Baseline through end of treatment (28 days after last dose of study drug). Approximately 24 weeks.
Objective Response Rate
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Clinical Benefit Rate
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 31250159Oronsky B, Scribner C, Aggarwal R, Cabrales P. RRx-001 protects normal tissues but not tumors via Nrf2 induction and Bcl-2 inhibition. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug;145(8):2045-2050. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02958-4. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 28162292Scicinski J, Fisher G, Carter C, Cho-Phan C, Kunz P, Ning S, Knox S, Oronsky B, Caroen S, Parker C, Fanger G, Reid T. The Development Of RRx-001, A Novel Nitric-Oxide-Mediated Epigenetically Active Anticancer Agent. Redox Biol. 2015 Aug;5:422. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 36529613Reid TR, Abrouk N, Caroen S, Oronsky B, Stirn M, Larson C, Beale K, Knox SJ, Fisher G. ROCKET: Phase II Randomized, Active-controlled, Multicenter Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of RRx-001 + Irinotecan vs. Single-agent Regorafenib in Third/Fourth Line Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2023 Mar;22(1):92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 24575021Reid T, Dad S, Korn R, Oronsky B, Knox S, Scicinski J. Two Case Reports of Resensitization to Previous Chemotherapy with the Novel Hypoxia-Activated Hypomethylating Anticancer Agent RRx-001 in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. Case Rep Oncol. 2014 Jan 24;7(1):79-85. doi: 10.1159/000358382. eCollection 2014 Jan.
- EpicentRx, Inc Home page.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Colorectal Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of MGC030 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Urothelial Cancer, GastroEsophageal Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The IMPACT Study - Identification of Men With a Genetic Predisposition to ProstAte Cancer
Prostate Cancer, BRCA Mutation
RecruitingObservational study
ABCSG R07 Rectal Cancer Registry
Rectal Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of Rectum
Recruiting
Mainstreaming Genetics: Evaluation of a Digital Application to Scale and Spread Oncologist-initiated Genetic Testing
Cancer, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bryan Oronsky, MD study director
EpicentRx, Inc.
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing RRx-001, Regorafenib and Irinotecan in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by EpicentRx, Inc. at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: From date of enrollment until death or censorship.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02096354, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2024.