AzTrials
AzTrials

Soft Tissue InfectionsPhase 4NCT02097615

Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gluconate 0.125 % Compared With Sterile Deionized Water

A Phase 4 study testing chlorhexidine gluconate and deionized water in people with Soft Tissue Infections, run by Universidad de Guanajuato at 1 site in Mexico.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

At present research has generated controversy regarding the utility of antiseptics in wound management for diabetic foot ulcers syndrome. However, these studies have been done in tissues and animal models. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Soft Tissue Infections
What is being tested?
chlorhexidine gluconate and deionized water
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
May 2014to Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Indistinct gender
  • Patients over 18 years with Diabetes Mellitus and
  • Submit ulcer from diabetic foot syndrome not involving tendon , capsule or bone.
  • With proper state of vascular perfusion.

Who cannot join

  • Ulcers in patients with interdigital or difficult to measure the affected surface areas.
  • Patients not be located at follow-up or wish to stop participating in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mexico1 site
  • Hospital General Leon

    León, Guanajuato, 37320

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gluconate 0.125 % Compared With Sterile Deionized Water in the Closure of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Syndrome.

At present research has generated controversy regarding the utility of antiseptics in wound management for diabetic foot ulcers syndrome. However, these studies have been done in tissues and animal models. This study involves the best presently antiseptic for residual effect and low toxicity in an approach to eliminate microorganisms promoters formation of biofilm, contributing to the treatment for accelerated closure the diabetic foot ulcers syndrome .

So it is necessary to determine if irrigation ulcer diabetic foot syndrome with chlorhexidine 0.125 % aqueous solution determines the decrease of the surface to a greater extent than the standard treatment using irrigation with sterile deionized water .

Read the detailed description

The present study be made performed at the Hospital General Leon.

Population:

People with Diabetes Mellitus state of Guanajuato.

Universe:

People with diabetes mellitus and diabetic foot syndrome Guanajuato state . sample: Will be evaluated in patients with diabetes mellitus presenting loss of continuity of the skin of the lower limbs and coming to the clinic wound´s of the León General Hospital . This clinic provides services to patients in the state of Guanajuato with diabetic foot syndrome, including them within a multidisciplinary management program .

Calculation of Sample :

72 patients; more eight for lost estimates, 40 patients for each group are required to have a 80 % chance of detecting , with a significance level of 5%, an increase in the primary outcome measure of 5% in the control group and 6 % in group experimental .

Alpha: 5 % Power : 80 %

Inclusion Criteria:

Indistinct gender Patients over 18 years with Diabetes Mellitus and submit ulcer from diabetic foot syndrome not involving tendon , capsule or bone.

With proper state of vascular perfusion.

Exclusion Criteria :

Ulcers in patients with interdigital or difficult to measure the affected surface areas.

Patients not be located at follow-up or wish to stop participating in the study.

Methodology:

Will be invited to participate in the study patients with diabetes mellitus consecutive presented with ulcers plantar to IA or IB grade classification system ulcers , University of Texas, in the area of Clinical wound´s of the Hospital General Leon between Abril and November 2014.

After explaining the study information and check which is understandable , they provide the sheet to be signed informed consent.

Subsequently selected patients will be given a vascular ultrasound to measure the ankle brachial index and determine the absence of vascular compromise.

They carry out their medical history with emphasis on analyzing clinical data , including the characteristics of the ulcer (type of exudate , measured surface area affected , type of tissue involved in the ulcer to its depth ) and biochemical parameters .

Be weighed and measured at the first visit and not having biochemical data are requested to collect this information in subsequent follow-up visit .

They were then treated with the principles of the standard treatment, under the following criteria :

  • Remove the ulcer exudate by spraying one of the two ingredients making mechanical drive for 5 minutes, or until completely negative to the visual evidence of exudate.
  • Completely remove hyperkeratosis and devitalized tissue from the periphery of the ulcer with cutting material dissection with sterile dressing and drag , until visually eliminate the exudate.
  • The treated area is dry and sore
  • Two photographs at a distance of 20 cm perpendicular to the ulcer will be taken, covering a 1 square centimeter reference for measuring the area affected by diabetic foot ulcer syndrome.
  • The solution so blinded to the ulcer and covered with sterile dressing will be applied for 24 hours .
  • The patient will be instructed to continue treatment every 24 hours as follows :
  • Sterile dressing will be removed and continuously irrigate for 5 seconds with the ingredient that was assigned .
  • Undiscovered for 24 hours , until the next day irrigation dressing area will be placed . Also need to avoid contact with any surface over the affected area until the next assessment .
  • Perform the same strategy for 24 hours , and on day 7 will go to the wound clinic to clinical evaluation.
  • Every 7 days until complete 6 views, clinical evaluation are performed, irrigation with the selected ingredient and it will take 2 pictures at a distance of 20 cm perpendicular to the boil again , covering a reference of 1 square centimeter to measure the area affected by the diabetic foot ulcer syndrome.
  • Every 7 days of initiation of therapy in the clinic consultation wounds measured and circulation and comment the following:
  • Ulcer area in square millimeters .
  • Coloring of the ulcer .
  • Type of exudate ; turbid serous .
  • Type of tissue involved in the ulcer to its depth. If any patients have increased intensity of the signs and symptoms of diabetic foot syndrome, classified as a major step on the scale of ulcers Classification System of the University of Texas, perform analysis and comprehensive treatment will be redefined according to the suggestions of ulcer classification system of the University of Texas.

Material cleaning the ulcer :

Ingredient 1: Preparation of spray application of chlorhexidine gluconate 0.125% .

Ingredient 2: Preparation of spray application of sterile deionized water .

Method of application of ingredients as described previously .

Method of randomization : is effected by assigning random numbers balanced computer, the code will be assigned to each of the ingredients which have identical presentations , they will balance to the sample size . The code will not be known by the patient, observer and analyst. Only be known by one of the advisors.

Statistical methods :

The description of the data, in the case of non-numerical variables will be performed by reporting proportions and confidence interval of 95 % (95 %) in the case of numerical variables, the description will be made based on averages and standard deviation or medians and Q1- Q3 range , depending on the result of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to evaluate the Gaussian distribution of the data.

Comparison of numerical variables were not performed by Chi square test . Comparison of the rates of reduction in the size of ulcers of diabetic foot syndrome for both treatments will be based on the t test for independent samples or by Kruskal- Wallis test , depending on data distribution .

In all cases be considered as the significance level alpha value <0.05 .

Being tested
chlorhexidine gluconate, deionized water
Keywords
soft, tissue, infections
Medical subject headings
Soft Tissue Infections, Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • chlorhexidine gluconateProcedure or surgery

    chlorhexidine gluconate spray of 0.125% . Application in the area of the ulcer every 24 hours for six weeks

  • deionized waterOther

    application every 24 hours six weeks

Study groups in NCT02097615
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
chlorhexidine gluconateExperimentalapplication every 24 hours, six weeks
Receives: Procedure: chlorhexidine gluconate
Other: deionized waterOtherapplication every 24 hours, six weeks
Receives: Other: deionized water

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Unlike the ultimate determinations for the initial surface of the ulcer obtained in square millimeters.

    Total ulcer area shall be measured by drawing software AUTOCAD LT 2014 , which defines the edges of the ulcer surface area in each of the two photographs , to take an average of the measure and get a value to be analyzed, that value is checked against the reference area of 1 square centimeter to increase measurement accuracy .

    Measured: 15 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02097615
Sponsor's protocol ID
GTSSA02101-298
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
24 Mar 2014
Last updated
19 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing chlorhexidine gluconate and deionized water in people with Soft Tissue Infections, run by Universidad de Guanajuato at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Unlike the ultimate determinations for the initial surface of the ulcer obtained in square millimeters. (time frame: 15 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in