Uterine Cervical IncompetenceNCT02098382
Dilapan-S Osmotic Dilator in Pre-induction of Labor
An observational study of Uterine Cervical Incompetence, run by Medicem International CR s.r.o. at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
Non-interventional prospective data collection designed to evaluate clinical outcome on the efficacy of the use of Dilapan-S in the indication of labor pre-induction in women with/without a history of Caesarean section. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Uterine Cervical Incompetence
- What is being tested?
- Dilapan-S
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 125 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- May 2013to Oct 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients indicated in the centres involved in data collection for pre-induction of labor with Dilapan-S who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the above period, the Investigator will include consecutive patients in such a manner that the numbers of those with and without a history of Caesarean section be balanced.
Who may be able to join
- Single pregnancy
- Pregnancy more than 36 weeks
- Vertex presentation of the fetus
- Cervix Score less than 4 points
Who cannot join
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
- Pathological fetal station
- States after uterine body surgery - except for Caesarean section
- Clinical signs of uterine, vaginal or vulvar infection
- Fetus hypoxia (KTG recording evaluated as pathological prior to pre-induction initiation)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Czechia1 site
Clinic of Gynecology&Obstetrics, University hospital in Brno and Masaryk University Medical School
Brno, 625 00
About this study
Official title: Prospective Collection of Data About the Use of the Dilapan-S Osmotic Dilator in Pre-induction of Labor in Women With/Without Caesarean Section in Their History
Non-interventional prospective data collection designed to evaluate clinical outcome on the efficacy of the use of Dilapan-S in the indication of labor pre-induction in women with/without a history of Caesarean section. The evaluation will be based on prospective data collection in at least four obstetrics centers in the Czech Republic.
Read the detailed description
Nowadays there is a rising need for non-pharmacological cervical ripening methods as the use of prostaglandins is frequently limited by various contraindications. Dilapan-S is a hygroscopic uterine neck dilator. Its mode of action consists in the hydrophilic properties of the device absorbing fluids from surrounding tissue structures, thus expanding the volume of Dilapan-S sticks which subsequently exert radial pressure on the surrounding structures (uterine neck) to dilate progressively. Endocervical pressure on the uterine neck results not only in its mechanical dilatation but pressure on endocervical structures also stimulates the production of endogenous prostaglandins, which promote cervical ripening through its collagenolytic action. Although Dilapan-S is widely used in labor pre-induction, published study data comparing its clinical efficacy and safety in females with/without caesarean section in medical history are lacking.
- Conditions
- Uterine Cervical Incompetence
- Being tested
- Dilapan-S
- Keywords
- Cervical ripening
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Incompetence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dilapan-SDevice
Also called synthetic osmotic dilator
Dilapan-S synthetic osmotic dilator for cervical ripening prior to labor induction
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dilapan-S | 125 Patients with / without caesarean section in their medical history Receives: Device: Dilapan-S |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cervix (Bishop) score
To evaluate, based on the value obtained in the Cervix Score, the efficacy of use of the Dilapan-S device in the indication labor pre-induction, and to compare outcomes in patients with/without a history of Caesarean section.
Measured: Before pre-induction of labor performance and up to 24 h after pre-induction of labor
Secondary outcomes (7)
Total duration of pre-induction
To compare these outcomes in patients with and without a history of Caesarean section.
Measured: From Dilapan-S rods insertion up to 24 hours
Number of dilators inserted
Expected the insertion from 2 to 5 Dilapan-S rods. To compare these results in patients with/without Cesarean section in their medical history.
Measured: At the moment of Dilapan-S insertion up to 24 hours until their removal
Uterine contractions
To compare these results in patients with/without Caesearean section in their medical history. Uterine hypertonus is diagnosed, when the number of uterine contractions is higher than 5 within 10 minutes (during pre-induction).
Measured: From Dilapan-S rods insertion up to 24 h during pre-induction of labor phase
The course of delivery (vaginally or Caesarean section)
To compare the rate of vaginal delivery/Caesarean sections in patients with/without Caesarean section in their medical history.
Measured: From active phase of labor up to 1 day after delivery
Apgar score
To compare these results in patients with/without Caesarean section in their medical history.
Measured: At 1st, 5th and 10th minute after delivery
pH of the fetus
To compare the results in patients with/without caesarean section in their medical history. The rate of ceses with pH below 7,1.
Measured: Up to 10 minutes after delivery
Infection complications of mother / fetus
Clinical signs of infection are defined as follows:
- CRP levels > 8 mg/l
- Leukocyte count > 18 x 109/l
- Body temperature > 37.5°C
Measured: Up to 5 days from the birth
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2013
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionOct 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Uterine Cervical IncompetenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medicem International CR s.r.o.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ondrej Simetka, AssProf,PhD, Principal investigator, Clinic of gynecology and obstetrics, University hospital of Ostrava, Czech RepublicLukas Hruban, M.D., Principal investigator, Clinic of gynecology and obstetrics, University hospital of Brno, Czech RepublicIgor Michalec, M.D., Principal investigator, Clinic of gynecology and obstetrics, University hospital of Ostrava, Czech RepublicRadovan Vlk, M.D., Principal investigator, Clinic of gynecology and obstetrics, University hospital of II. Medicine college of Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02098382
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DIS2013-002
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Serhal P, Ranieri DM, Khadum I, Wakim RA. Cervical dilatation with hygroscopic rods prior to ovarian stimulation facilitates embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003 Dec;18(12):2618-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg477.
PubMed 14645181Chen FC, Bergann A, Krosse J, Merholz A, David M. Isosorbide mononitrate vaginal gel versus misoprostol vaginal gel versus Dilapan-S for cervical ripening before first trimester curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jun;138(2):176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
PubMed 17980952Allen RH, Goldberg AB; Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation). SFP Guideline 20071. Contraception. 2007 Aug;76(2):139-56. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
PubMed 17656184Samuel MI, Parsons JH. Hygroscopic dilator (Dilapan-S) and misoprostol combination for the early first-trimester termination of pregnancy: a pilot study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009 Jan;35(1):45-7. doi: 10.1783/147118909787072234.
PubMed 19126319Wilson LC, Meyn LA, Creinin MD. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion between 12 and 18 weeks of gestation using vaginal misoprostol and Dilapan-S. Contraception. 2011 Jun;83(6):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
PubMed 21570547Chambers DG, Willcourt RJ, Laver AR, Baird JK, Herbert WY. Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:347-52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S25551. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
PubMed 22114527Lyus R, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Morroni C. Outcomes with same-day cervical preparation with Dilapan-S osmotic dilators and vaginal misoprostol before dilatation and evacuation at 18 to 21+6 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
PubMed 22898362Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
PubMed 24331860Bartz D, Maurer R, Allen RH, Fortin J, Kuang B, Goldberg AB. Buccal misoprostol compared with synthetic osmotic cervical dilator before surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182983889.
PubMed 23743471Borgatta L, Roncari D, Sonalkar S, Mark A, Hou MY, Finneseth M, Vragovic O. Mifepristone vs. osmotic dilator insertion for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 14-16 weeks: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2012 Nov;86(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
PubMed 22682721Borgatta L, Lopatinsky I, Shaw FM. Overcoming unsatisfactory colposcopy. Use of osmotic dilators. J Reprod Med. 1997 May;42(5):271-5.
PubMed 9172116Newmann SJ, Sokoloff A, Tharyil M, Illangasekare T, Steinauer JE, Drey EA. Same-day synthetic osmotic dilators compared with overnight laminaria before abortion at 14-18 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):271-278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000080.
PubMed 24402587Roztocil A, Pilka L, Jelinek J, Koudelka M, Miklica J. A comparison of three preinduction cervical priming methods: prostaglandin E2 gel, Dilapan S rods and Estradiol gel. Ceska Gynekol. 1998 Feb;63(1):3-9.
PubMed 9650373
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Collection of Data About the Use of the Dilapan-S Osmotic Dilator in Pre-induction of Labor in Women With/Without Caesarean Section in Their History
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02098382
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DIS2013-002
- Conditions
- Uterine Cervical Incompetence
- Keywords
- Cervical ripening
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medicem International CR s.r.o.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2013
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Non-interventional prospective data collection designed to evaluate clinical outcome on the efficacy of the use of Dilapan-S in the indication of labor pre-induction in women with/without a history of Caesarean section. The evaluation will be based on prospective data collection in at least four obstetrics centers in the Czech Republic.
Detailed description
Nowadays there is a rising need for non-pharmacological cervical ripening methods as the use of prostaglandins is frequently limited by various contraindications. Dilapan-S is a hygroscopic uterine neck dilator. Its mode of action consists in the hydrophilic properties of the device absorbing fluids from surrounding tissue structures, thus expanding the volume of Dilapan-S sticks which subsequently exert radial pressure on the surrounding structures (uterine neck) to dilate progressively. Endocervical pressure on the uterine neck results not only in its mechanical dilatation but pressure on endocervical structures also stimulates the production of endogenous prostaglandins, which promote cervical ripening through its collagenolytic action. Although Dilapan-S is widely used in labor pre-induction, published study data comparing its clinical efficacy and safety in females with/without caesarean section in medical history are lacking.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dilapan-S | – | Device: Dilapan-S125 Patients with / without caesarean section in their medical history |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients indicated in the centres involved in data collection for pre-induction of labor with Dilapan-S who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the above period, the Investigator will include consecutive patients in such a manner that the numbers of those with and without a history of Caesarean section be balanced.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Single pregnancy
- Pregnancy more than 36 weeks
- Vertex presentation of the fetus
- Cervix Score less than 4 points
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
- Pathological fetal station
- States after uterine body surgery - except for Caesarean section
- Clinical signs of uterine, vaginal or vulvar infection
- Fetus hypoxia (KTG recording evaluated as pathological prior to pre-induction initiation)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dilapan-SAlso: synthetic osmotic dilatorDilapan-S synthetic osmotic dilator for cervical ripening prior to labor induction | Device | Dilapan-S |
Primary outcome
Cervix (Bishop) score
Time frame: Before pre-induction of labor performance and up to 24 h after pre-induction of labor
To evaluate, based on the value obtained in the Cervix Score, the efficacy of use of the Dilapan-S device in the indication labor pre-induction, and to compare outcomes in patients with/without a history of Caesarean section.
7 secondary outcomes
Total duration of pre-induction
Time frame: From Dilapan-S rods insertion up to 24 hours
Number of dilators inserted
Time frame: At the moment of Dilapan-S insertion up to 24 hours until their removal
Uterine contractions
Time frame: From Dilapan-S rods insertion up to 24 h during pre-induction of labor phase
The course of delivery (vaginally or Caesarean section)
Time frame: From active phase of labor up to 1 day after delivery
Apgar score
Time frame: At 1st, 5th and 10th minute after delivery
pH of the fetus
Time frame: Up to 10 minutes after delivery
Infection complications of mother / fetus
Time frame: Up to 5 days from the birth
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2015.
- Background: PubMed 14645181Serhal P, Ranieri DM, Khadum I, Wakim RA. Cervical dilatation with hygroscopic rods prior to ovarian stimulation facilitates embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003 Dec;18(12):2618-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg477.
- Background: PubMed 17980952Chen FC, Bergann A, Krosse J, Merholz A, David M. Isosorbide mononitrate vaginal gel versus misoprostol vaginal gel versus Dilapan-S for cervical ripening before first trimester curettage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jun;138(2):176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 17656184Allen RH, Goldberg AB; Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks' gestation). SFP Guideline 20071. Contraception. 2007 Aug;76(2):139-56. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
- Background: PubMed 19126319Samuel MI, Parsons JH. Hygroscopic dilator (Dilapan-S) and misoprostol combination for the early first-trimester termination of pregnancy: a pilot study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2009 Jan;35(1):45-7. doi: 10.1783/147118909787072234.
- Background: PubMed 21570547Wilson LC, Meyn LA, Creinin MD. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion between 12 and 18 weeks of gestation using vaginal misoprostol and Dilapan-S. Contraception. 2011 Jun;83(6):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 22114527Chambers DG, Willcourt RJ, Laver AR, Baird JK, Herbert WY. Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:347-52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S25551. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
- Background: PubMed 22898362Lyus R, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Morroni C. Outcomes with same-day cervical preparation with Dilapan-S osmotic dilators and vaginal misoprostol before dilatation and evacuation at 18 to 21+6 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
- Background: PubMed 24331860Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
- Background: PubMed 23743471Bartz D, Maurer R, Allen RH, Fortin J, Kuang B, Goldberg AB. Buccal misoprostol compared with synthetic osmotic cervical dilator before surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182983889.
- Background: PubMed 22682721Borgatta L, Roncari D, Sonalkar S, Mark A, Hou MY, Finneseth M, Vragovic O. Mifepristone vs. osmotic dilator insertion for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 14-16 weeks: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2012 Nov;86(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 9172116Borgatta L, Lopatinsky I, Shaw FM. Overcoming unsatisfactory colposcopy. Use of osmotic dilators. J Reprod Med. 1997 May;42(5):271-5.
- Background: PubMed 24402587Newmann SJ, Sokoloff A, Tharyil M, Illangasekare T, Steinauer JE, Drey EA. Same-day synthetic osmotic dilators compared with overnight laminaria before abortion at 14-18 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):271-278. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000080.
Related trials for Uterine Cervical Incompetence
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cervical Length Reference Range at 28-34 Weeks in Singleton Pregnancies
Preterm Birth, Cervical Length
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Azithromycin for Cerclage Prophylaxis
Cervical Insufficiency
Not yet recruiting
Personalized Care for Prenatal Stress Reduction & Prevention of Preterm Birth (PTB) Disparities
Preterm Birth Complication, Preterm Birth
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Veliparib, Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Solid Tumors That Are Metastatic or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery and Liver or Kidney Dysfunction
Breast Carcinoma, Carcinoma of Unknown Primary
Not yet recruiting
Bed Rest With a Short Cervix on Preterm Birth
Preterm Birth, Cervical Insufficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ondrej Simetka, AssProf,PhD principal investigator
Clinic of gynecology and obstetrics, University hospital of Ostrava, Czech Republic
Lukas Hruban, M.D. principal investigator
Clinic of gynecology and obstetrics, University hospital of Brno, Czech Republic
Igor Michalec, M.D. principal investigator
Clinic of gynecology and obstetrics, University hospital of Ostrava, Czech Republic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Uterine Cervical Incompetence, run by Medicem International CR s.r.o. at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cervix (Bishop) score (time frame: Before pre-induction of labor performance and up to 24 h after pre-induction of labor). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02098382, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2015.