Type 2 DiabetesNCT02098746
Pioglitazone/Glimepiride (Sonias) Combination Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Survey in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Respond Poorly to Pioglitazone
An observational study of Type 2 Diabetes, run by Takeda.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets (Sonias Combination Tablets LD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who respond poorly to pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy (pioglitazone at 15 mg/day) in the routine clinical… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Pioglitazone/glimepiride
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 294 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Type 2 diabetes
Who may be able to join
- Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for whom treatment with pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy (pioglitazone at 15 mg/day) is considered inefficacious as per physician's assessment and for whom long-term treatment with pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets is considered necessary
Who cannot join
- (1) Patients with cardiac failure or a history of cardiac failure (2) Patients with serious hepatic or renal impairment (3) Patients with severe ketosis, diabetic coma or precoma, or type 1 diabetes mellitus (4) Patients with severe infection, severe trauma, or pre- and post-operative patients (5) Patients with gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhea and vomiting (6) Pregnant or potentially pregnant women (7) Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the ingredients in Sonias Combination Tablets or sulfonamides
About this study
Official title: Sonias Combination Tablets LD Special Drug Use Surveillance Survey in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Respond Poorly to Pioglitazone
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets (Sonias Combination Tablets LD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who respond poorly to pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy (pioglitazone at 15 mg/day) in the routine clinical setting.
Read the detailed description
This is a special drug use surveillance on long-term use of pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets (Sonias Combination Tablets LD) designed to investigate the frequency of adverse drug reactions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who respond poorly to pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy (pioglitazone at 15 mg/day).
The usual adult dosage is one tablet (15 mg/1 mg of pioglitazone/glimepiride) administered orally once daily before or after breakfast.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- Pioglitazone/glimepiride
- Keywords
- Pharmacological therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pioglitazone/glimepirideDrug
Also called Sonias combination tablets LD
Pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pioglitazone/glimepiride | Pioglitazone/glimepiride 15 mg/1 mg, orally once daily before or after breakfast. Receives: Drug: Pioglitazone/glimepiride |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions
Frequency of adverse drug reactions is defined as the number of participants with adverse drug reactions. Frequency, seriousness, and time to onset of adverse drug reactions were tabulated by each symptom. Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. Among these, events which are considered possibly associated with a medicinal product are defined as adverse drug reactions.
Measured: 12 months
Frequency of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions
Frequency of serious adverse drug reactions is defined at the number of participants with serious adverse drug reactions. Frequency of serious adverse drug reactions were tabulated by each symptom. Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Among these, events which are considered possibly associated with a medicinal product are defined as adverse drug reactions.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Tabulation of HbA1c values and the changes from Baseline at each test time point (test value at each test time point after Baseline - test value at Baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose Level
Tabulation of fasting blood glucose level and the changes from Baseline at each test time point (test value at each test time point after Baseline - test value at Baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Tabulation of fasting insulin level and the changes from Baseline at each test time point (test value at each test time point after Baseline - test value at Baseline). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Type 2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TakedaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 294 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Takeda
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Postmarketing Group Manager, Study chair, Takeda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02098746
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 097-012
- Other IDs
- JapicCTI-142445, JapicCTI-R150762
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sonias Combination Tablets LD Special Drug Use Surveillance Survey in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Respond Poorly to Pioglitazone
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02098746
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 097-012
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Pharmacological therapy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 294 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TakedaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets (Sonias Combination Tablets LD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who respond poorly to pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy (pioglitazone at 15 mg/day) in the routine clinical setting.
Detailed description
This is a special drug use surveillance on long-term use of pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets (Sonias Combination Tablets LD) designed to investigate the frequency of adverse drug reactions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who respond poorly to pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy (pioglitazone at 15 mg/day).
The usual adult dosage is one tablet (15 mg/1 mg of pioglitazone/glimepiride) administered orally once daily before or after breakfast.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pioglitazone/glimepiride | – | Drug: Pioglitazone/glimepiridePioglitazone/glimepiride 15 mg/1 mg, orally once daily before or after breakfast. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Type 2 diabetes
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for whom treatment with pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy (pioglitazone at 15 mg/day) is considered inefficacious as per physician's assessment and for whom long-term treatment with pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets is considered necessary
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- (1) Patients with cardiac failure or a history of cardiac failure (2) Patients with serious hepatic or renal impairment (3) Patients with severe ketosis, diabetic coma or precoma, or type 1 diabetes mellitus (4) Patients with severe infection, severe trauma, or pre- and post-operative patients (5) Patients with gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhea and vomiting (6) Pregnant or potentially pregnant women (7) Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the ingredients in Sonias Combination Tablets or sulfonamides
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pioglitazone/glimepirideAlso: Sonias combination tablets LDPioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablets | Drug | Pioglitazone/glimepiride |
Primary outcome
Frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions
Time frame: 12 months
Frequency of adverse drug reactions is defined as the number of participants with adverse drug reactions. Frequency, seriousness, and time to onset of adverse drug reactions were tabulated by each symptom. Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. Among these, events which are considered possibly associated with a medicinal product are defined as adverse drug reactions.
Frequency of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions
Time frame: 12 months
Frequency of serious adverse drug reactions is defined at the number of participants with serious adverse drug reactions. Frequency of serious adverse drug reactions were tabulated by each symptom. Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Among these, events which are considered possibly associated with a medicinal product are defined as adverse drug reactions.
3 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose Level
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and at Final assessment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Postmarketing Group Manager study chair
Takeda
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Type 2 Diabetes, run by Takeda.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2016.