Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT02101294
Study Protocol for CTS and Keyboard Controlled Randomized Trial
A study testing Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface and Standard QWERTY keyboard in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Finger Relief at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study hypothesis is that there is a relationship between the keyboard layout and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Specifically, use of the standard QWERTY keyboard increases the risk of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface and Standard QWERTY keyboard
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 1997to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
- Completion of a nerve conduction velocity study (NCVS) within the past twelve months or a physician waiver of the NCVS
- Able to type using all fingers on the keyboard
Who cannot join
- Do not use all of their fingers when typing
- No active symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome
- Unable to type, or flex and extend the fingers, for whatever reason
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Use of pain relievers or medications during study sessions (potentially masking symptoms of median nerve entrapment)
- Unable to complete the typing activities before their symptoms (swelling associated with body ailments or metabolism) changed
Show all 12Show fewer
- Had inconsistent subjective and objective evaluations in the preactivity test
- Threaten or abuse the investigator
- Unable to perform the activity so as to meet the minimal use requirements
- Had such injury as they had no sensation in their hands (i.e. Late stage)
- May suffer further injury (as indicated by their medical history) by attempting the typing activity
- Had non CTS related metabolic problems and upper extremity neurologic conditions, current or past, which have similar symptoms to median nerve entrapment, but which were not due to median nerve entrapment in the carpal canal
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Study Protocol for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Typing Keyboard: Controlled Randomized Trial
The study hypothesis is that there is a relationship between the keyboard layout and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Specifically, use of the standard QWERTY keyboard increases the risk of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. The QWERTY keyboard requires more effort by the fingers than necessary to perform the required work, i.e. data or word entry; up to 200 percent more flexion and extension and 100 percent more distance traveled.
The purpose of the protocol is to evaluate two keyboard layouts for carpal tunnel syndrome therapy, and to see if the efficient keyboard, Finger Relief, can be used as an adjunctive tool to other treatments or therapy for CTS for typists. Subjects who had received a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome from their medical doctor and, where not contraindicated, had received confirmation of the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome with a nerve conduction velocity (NCV) study participated in four typing sessions to compare onset and severity of carpal tunnel symptoms. Testing sessions alternated between keyboards. The keyboard selected for the first typing session was determined by random assignment. Twenty subjects completed all four typing sessions. The test protocol consisted of a medical history, 3 tests of the subjective pain experience of the subject (visual analogue scale / verbal rating scale, and hand diagram), 2 clinical measures of physical manifestations of swelling associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (water volume/tape measure), and a measure of the length of time spent typing on each keyboard layout - QWERTY and TheOrdinals (the Finger Relief keyboard).
Read the detailed description
The current study is the first clinical study of a keyboard with patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. Previous research has compared the angular motion of the fingers in a comparison of QWERTY, Dvorak and Finger Relief keyboards (Robertson et al., 1995). However, in these studies the subjects had no diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
The typing test used typical English word combinations of letters which could be easily repeated for any layout. On the QWERTY keyboard, pressing the D and E flexes the middle finger. TheOrdinals letters (A D E H I L N O R S T) on QWERTY has 6 flexions, 1 each for the left middle; right middle, right ring, right index, 2 each left index fingers. TheOrdinals on Finger Relief keyboard have no flexions or extensions of the fingers The keystrokes were noted. The goal was to type to pain, change in feeling, numbness or tingling. The beginning and ending time was recorded manually with reference to a wristwatch or clock. Each of the four typing sessions ranged from 20 minutes (very little typing occurred) to more than an hour (extensive typing occurred without a report of symptoms). Pretyping measurement activities took about 10 minutes, including completing the analogue scaled self reporting test and water displacement test. Following this pretyping data collection, the subject was instructed to type until a change in pain was noticed. Post-typing measurement activities, including water displacement, a check for swelling, and self-report measures also took about 10 minutes.
The subject was then scheduled to return to the clinic no sooner than until an overnight had passed, or after any swelling has gone down. The protocol was repeated on a similar keyboard with only the letters rearranged. On the Finger Relief keyboard, pressing the D and E requires minimal flexion, as pressing the middle and index finger on the home row communicates the letters.
The study population was those who had been diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. The FDA asked that the reference group consist of 20 individuals (no restrictions for the number of men and women). There were no minimum or maximum requirements of age, subjects were only required to have a history of carpal tunnel syndrome or similar problems when performing typing activities prior to study enrollment. Each subject confirmed a history of carpal tunnel syndrome, presumably causing difficulties in performing typing activities. However typing problems were not required for participation.
A total of 64 subjects responded to the study advertisements. Thirty-three of these subjects did not enter the study. Many were missing either the NCVS or a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome from a doctor (14). Several did not respond to attempts to schedule study sessions (8). A few moved away from the area prior to study participation (4) or were too ill to participate (2). The remainder had insufficient interest to commit to participate in four testing sessions (3); were looking for treatment options, rather than a CTS study (1); or were advised by an attorney to decline participation in a CTS study, pending litigation that the subject was pursuing (1).
Thirty-one subjects completed the all steps before beginning the typing exercises, which included a medical history, informed consent, CTS diagnosis, and NCVS confirming the CTS diagnosis. Eleven withdrew or left the testing incomplete. Ten of the eleven dropouts were employed at office work, the other was employed as a registered nurse. Five withdrew prior to initiating study sessions. Six withdrew after beginning a study session but before completing the remaining sessions and did not respond to efforts to schedule the remaining tests. Four dropouts started with the QWERTY layout. Two started with Finger Relief. Four dropouts completed only one study session (three started with QWERTY, one began with Finger Relief). Two dropouts completed two study sessions (one began with QWERTY, one started with Finger Relief). Twenty subjects completed all 4 study sessions and are included in the analyses described in later sections of this application.
Swelling is a hallmark of CTS, because the median nerve must be compressed. Prior to this study, it was unknown whether swelling could be externally measurable in the least severe cases. Although the literature suggests that there is some swelling in all stages (1, 2 or 3) of CTS cases, the literature did not designate swelling by stage. Classic inflammation is measured by fever (rise in temperature), color (redness), swelling and pain. Only swelling and pain are externally measurable, without invasive procedures. The pre typing hand and wrist volume were the base line from which swelling was measured. Assuming typing causes measurable swelling, before the subsequent typing sessions, a sufficient time had to have passed for the swelling to return to base line. Thus, base line was defined as a return of external parameters (pain and swelling) to that which was measured before the first typing test session.
Swelling was measured by comparing the increase in hand volume before and after the activity as measured by the water displacement method. Water displacement was measured to determine if an increased amount of water from the hand and wrist measurement was displaced after typing on QWERTY keyboard as compared with typing on the TheOrdinals (the Finger Relief keyboard) keyboard. It was hypothesized that there would be a significant relationship between the increased amount of water and the use of the QWERTY keyboard.
The data were analyzed using a personal computer and statistical software. Calculations between the differences of means of swelling and pain, between the QWERTY and TheOrdinals (the Finger Relief keyboard) keyboards were completed. Regression techniques were used to estimate the differential impact of typing with each keyboard on swelling and pain. Means differences and regression techniques were also used to examine the effect of keyboard type on duration of typing.
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Being tested
- Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface, Standard QWERTY keyboard
- Keywords
- carpal tunnel syndrome, repetitive stress disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interossei Lumbricals Neuro InterfaceDevice
Also called Finger Relief, Interossei Lumbricals Neuromuscular Technology Interface
Finger Relief's keyboard home row layout [actual home row placement order: asdeihotlrn], plus substitutions on the upper row [qwfgjyuk;p] and bottom row [zxcvb'm,.] moves or shifts finger and thumb movement from the elbow muscles to the finger muscles. The movement of finger bending toward the palm is shifted to the interosseous and lumbrical muscles of the hand and fingers from the full flexion and extension muscle control to reduce contraction and expansion of tendons and the movement in the carpal canal adjacent to the median nerve and reduces pressure on the median nerve. Pressure on the median nerve compromises the nerve leading to symptoms of the carpal tunnel syndrome of pain, tingling, and numbness.
Standard QWERTY keyboardDevice
Report of onset and severity symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome when typing with QWERTY keyboard and the Finger Relief device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface | Experimental | Comparison of report of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome when typing with standard QWERTY keyboard to report of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome when typing with Interossei Lumbricals Neuromuscular Technology Interface Therapy device. Receives: Device: Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface; Device: Standard QWERTY keyboard |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of Time Typing QWERTY Prior to Experiencing Symptoms of CTS (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome)
Subjects were instructed to type until they experienced a change in symptoms, the length of time that the subjected typed until experiencing symptoms was recorded as this outcome measure. Length of time typing at each QWERTY session was averaged across the two sessions to determine Length of time typing QWERTY.
Measured: Participants will be assessed at each study of 4 sessions, two typing with the traditional QWERTY keyboard and two typing with the experimental device, each typing session will be separated by approximately one week to allow CTS symptoms to subside
Length of Time Typing FingerRelief Prior to Experiencing Symptoms of CTS
Subjects were instructed to type until they experienced a change in symptoms, the length of time that the subjected typed until experiencing symptoms was recorded as this outcome measure, averaged across the two typing sessions that were FingerRelief.
Measured: Participants will be assessed at each study of 4 sessions, two typing with the traditional QWERTY keyboard and two typing with the experimental device, each typing session will be separated by approximately one week to allow CTS symptoms to subside
Secondary outcomes (2)
Measurement of Wrist Swelling Following Cessation of QWERTY Typing
Before and after typing, the subject's wrists were measured with a tape measure. The change score is reported here.
Measured: Participants will be assessed at each study of 4 sessions, two typing with the traditional QWERTY keyboard and two typing with the experimental device, each typing session will be separated by approximately one week to allow CTS symptoms to subside
Measurement of Increase in Wrist Swelling Following FingerRelief Typing
Before and after the typing session, the subject's wrist was measured. The mean change score of all participants is reported here.
Measured: Pre and Post
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 1997
- Primary completionJul 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (76)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carpal Tunnel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Finger Relief
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John I Choate, J.D., Study chair, Association of Repetitive Motion Syndromes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02101294
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1997-01
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Katz RT. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a practical review. Am Fam Physician. 1994 May 1;49(6):1371-9, 1385-6.
PubMed 7880220Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release by Chow in Arthroscopic Surgery, The Wrist, Whipple Ed. J. P. Lippincott Co. Philadelphia, 157 et seq
CTS: relief at hand, School of Public Health, Vol. 11:4, UC Berkeley Wellness Letter, Jan. 1995, p. 7
The Care of Minor Hand Injuries, Examination of the injured hand, p. 31-37, by Flatt, 4th ed. C.V. Mosby Com. St. Louis.
Century of the Typewriter, by Beeching, Director, British Typewriter Museum, St. Martin's Press: New York, 1974, 28-43.
1994 Compton's Encyclopedia & fact-Index, Typewriter, at 342.
Wood MB, Dobyns JH. Sports-related extraarticular wrist syndromes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Jan;(202):93-102.
PubMed 3006958Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Upper extremity tendinitis and overuse syndromes in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 1992 Jan;11(1):39-55.
PubMed 1544186Weinstein SM, Herring SA. Nerve problems and compartment syndromes in the hand, wrist, and forearm. Clin Sports Med. 1992 Jan;11(1):161-88.
PubMed 1544180Van Handel PJ. The preparticipation fitness test. Clin Sports Med. 1991 Jan;10(1):1-18.
PubMed 2015635Herring SA, Nilson KL. Introduction to overuse injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1987 Apr;6(2):225-39.
PubMed 3319201Hunter SC, Poole RM. The chronically inflamed tendon. Clin Sports Med. 1987 Apr;6(2):371-88.
PubMed 3319206Common Hand Injuries and Infections, A practical approach to early treatment, by Carter, W. B Saunders, Co. Philadelphia et al, 1983, at pp. 170-175
The Hand, Surgical and Non-surgical Treatment, by Kilgore and Graham, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1977.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, The Johns Hopkins Medical Handbook, The 100 Major medical Disorders of People Over the Age of 50, by Margolis and Moses, Ed. The Johns Hopkins Medical Letter Health After 50, Rebus, New York, 382.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study Protocol for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Typing Keyboard: Controlled Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02101294
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1997-01
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Keywords
- carpal tunnel syndrome, repetitive stress disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Finger ReliefUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 1997
- Primary completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Sep 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study hypothesis is that there is a relationship between the keyboard layout and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Specifically, use of the standard QWERTY keyboard increases the risk of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. The QWERTY keyboard requires more effort by the fingers than necessary to perform the required work, i.e. data or word entry; up to 200 percent more flexion and extension and 100 percent more distance traveled.
The purpose of the protocol is to evaluate two keyboard layouts for carpal tunnel syndrome therapy, and to see if the efficient keyboard, Finger Relief, can be used as an adjunctive tool to other treatments or therapy for CTS for typists. Subjects who had received a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome from their medical doctor and, where not contraindicated, had received confirmation of the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome with a nerve conduction velocity (NCV) study participated in four typing sessions to compare onset and severity of carpal tunnel symptoms. Testing sessions alternated between keyboards. The keyboard selected for the first typing session was determined by random assignment. Twenty subjects completed all four typing sessions. The test protocol consisted of a medical history, 3 tests of the subjective pain experience of the subject (visual analogue scale / verbal rating scale, and hand diagram), 2 clinical measures of physical manifestations of swelling associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (water volume/tape measure), and a measure of the length of time spent typing on each keyboard layout - QWERTY and TheOrdinals (the Finger Relief keyboard).
Detailed description
The current study is the first clinical study of a keyboard with patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. Previous research has compared the angular motion of the fingers in a comparison of QWERTY, Dvorak and Finger Relief keyboards (Robertson et al., 1995). However, in these studies the subjects had no diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
The typing test used typical English word combinations of letters which could be easily repeated for any layout. On the QWERTY keyboard, pressing the D and E flexes the middle finger. TheOrdinals letters (A D E H I L N O R S T) on QWERTY has 6 flexions, 1 each for the left middle; right middle, right ring, right index, 2 each left index fingers. TheOrdinals on Finger Relief keyboard have no flexions or extensions of the fingers The keystrokes were noted. The goal was to type to pain, change in feeling, numbness or tingling. The beginning and ending time was recorded manually with reference to a wristwatch or clock. Each of the four typing sessions ranged from 20 minutes (very little typing occurred) to more than an hour (extensive typing occurred without a report of symptoms). Pretyping measurement activities took about 10 minutes, including completing the analogue scaled self reporting test and water displacement test. Following this pretyping data collection, the subject was instructed to type until a change in pain was noticed. Post-typing measurement activities, including water displacement, a check for swelling, and self-report measures also took about 10 minutes.
The subject was then scheduled to return to the clinic no sooner than until an overnight had passed, or after any swelling has gone down. The protocol was repeated on a similar keyboard with only the letters rearranged. On the Finger Relief keyboard, pressing the D and E requires minimal flexion, as pressing the middle and index finger on the home row communicates the letters.
The study population was those who had been diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. The FDA asked that the reference group consist of 20 individuals (no restrictions for the number of men and women). There were no minimum or maximum requirements of age, subjects were only required to have a history of carpal tunnel syndrome or similar problems when performing typing activities prior to study enrollment. Each subject confirmed a history of carpal tunnel syndrome, presumably causing difficulties in performing typing activities. However typing problems were not required for participation.
A total of 64 subjects responded to the study advertisements. Thirty-three of these subjects did not enter the study. Many were missing either the NCVS or a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome from a doctor (14). Several did not respond to attempts to schedule study sessions (8). A few moved away from the area prior to study participation (4) or were too ill to participate (2). The remainder had insufficient interest to commit to participate in four testing sessions (3); were looking for treatment options, rather than a CTS study (1); or were advised by an attorney to decline participation in a CTS study, pending litigation that the subject was pursuing (1).
Thirty-one subjects completed the all steps before beginning the typing exercises, which included a medical history, informed consent, CTS diagnosis, and NCVS confirming the CTS diagnosis. Eleven withdrew or left the testing incomplete. Ten of the eleven dropouts were employed at office work, the other was employed as a registered nurse. Five withdrew prior to initiating study sessions. Six withdrew after beginning a study session but before completing the remaining sessions and did not respond to efforts to schedule the remaining tests. Four dropouts started with the QWERTY layout. Two started with Finger Relief. Four dropouts completed only one study session (three started with QWERTY, one began with Finger Relief). Two dropouts completed two study sessions (one began with QWERTY, one started with Finger Relief). Twenty subjects completed all 4 study sessions and are included in the analyses described in later sections of this application.
Swelling is a hallmark of CTS, because the median nerve must be compressed. Prior to this study, it was unknown whether swelling could be externally measurable in the least severe cases. Although the literature suggests that there is some swelling in all stages (1, 2 or 3) of CTS cases, the literature did not designate swelling by stage. Classic inflammation is measured by fever (rise in temperature), color (redness), swelling and pain. Only swelling and pain are externally measurable, without invasive procedures. The pre typing hand and wrist volume were the base line from which swelling was measured. Assuming typing causes measurable swelling, before the subsequent typing sessions, a sufficient time had to have passed for the swelling to return to base line. Thus, base line was defined as a return of external parameters (pain and swelling) to that which was measured before the first typing test session.
Swelling was measured by comparing the increase in hand volume before and after the activity as measured by the water displacement method. Water displacement was measured to determine if an increased amount of water from the hand and wrist measurement was displaced after typing on QWERTY keyboard as compared with typing on the TheOrdinals (the Finger Relief keyboard) keyboard. It was hypothesized that there would be a significant relationship between the increased amount of water and the use of the QWERTY keyboard.
The data were analyzed using a personal computer and statistical software. Calculations between the differences of means of swelling and pain, between the QWERTY and TheOrdinals (the Finger Relief keyboard) keyboards were completed. Regression techniques were used to estimate the differential impact of typing with each keyboard on swelling and pain. Means differences and regression techniques were also used to examine the effect of keyboard type on duration of typing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface | Experimental | Device: Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface, Device: Standard QWERTY keyboardComparison of report of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome when typing with standard QWERTY keyboard to report of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome when typing with Interossei Lumbricals Neuromuscular Technology Interface Therapy device. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
- Completion of a nerve conduction velocity study (NCVS) within the past twelve months or a physician waiver of the NCVS
- Able to type using all fingers on the keyboard
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Do not use all of their fingers when typing
- No active symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome
- Unable to type, or flex and extend the fingers, for whatever reason
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Use of pain relievers or medications during study sessions (potentially masking symptoms of median nerve entrapment)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interossei Lumbricals Neuro InterfaceAlso: Finger Relief, Interossei Lumbricals Neuromuscular Technology InterfaceFinger Relief's keyboard home row layout [actual home row placement order: asdeihotlrn], plus substitutions on the upper row [qwfgjyuk;p] and bottom row [zxcvb'm,.] moves or shifts finger and thumb movement from the elbow muscles to the finger muscles. The movement of finger bending toward the palm is shifted to the interosseous and lumbrical muscles of the hand and fingers from the full flexion and extension muscle control to reduce contraction and expansion of tendons and the movement in the carpal canal adjacent to the median nerve and reduces pressure on the median nerve. Pressure on the median nerve compromises the nerve leading to symptoms of the carpal tunnel syndrome of pain, tingling, and numbness. | Device | Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface |
| Standard QWERTY keyboardReport of onset and severity symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome when typing with QWERTY keyboard and the Finger Relief device. | Device | Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface |
Primary outcome
Length of Time Typing QWERTY Prior to Experiencing Symptoms of CTS (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome)
Time frame: Participants will be assessed at each study of 4 sessions, two typing with the traditional QWERTY keyboard and two typing with the experimental device, each typing session will be separated by approximately one week to allow CTS symptoms to subside
Subjects were instructed to type until they experienced a change in symptoms, the length of time that the subjected typed until experiencing symptoms was recorded as this outcome measure. Length of time typing at each QWERTY session was averaged across the two sessions to determine Length of time typing QWERTY.
Length of Time Typing FingerRelief Prior to Experiencing Symptoms of CTS
Time frame: Participants will be assessed at each study of 4 sessions, two typing with the traditional QWERTY keyboard and two typing with the experimental device, each typing session will be separated by approximately one week to allow CTS symptoms to subside
Subjects were instructed to type until they experienced a change in symptoms, the length of time that the subjected typed until experiencing symptoms was recorded as this outcome measure, averaged across the two typing sessions that were FingerRelief.
2 secondary outcomes
Measurement of Wrist Swelling Following Cessation of QWERTY Typing
Time frame: Participants will be assessed at each study of 4 sessions, two typing with the traditional QWERTY keyboard and two typing with the experimental device, each typing session will be separated by approximately one week to allow CTS symptoms to subside
Measurement of Increase in Wrist Swelling Following FingerRelief Typing
Time frame: Pre and Post
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 7880220Katz RT. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a practical review. Am Fam Physician. 1994 May 1;49(6):1371-9, 1385-6.
- BackgroundEndoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release by Chow in Arthroscopic Surgery, The Wrist, Whipple Ed. J. P. Lippincott Co. Philadelphia, 157 et seq
- BackgroundCTS: relief at hand, School of Public Health, Vol. 11:4, UC Berkeley Wellness Letter, Jan. 1995, p. 7
- BackgroundThe Care of Minor Hand Injuries, Examination of the injured hand, p. 31-37, by Flatt, 4th ed. C.V. Mosby Com. St. Louis.
- BackgroundCentury of the Typewriter, by Beeching, Director, British Typewriter Museum, St. Martin's Press: New York, 1974, 28-43.
- Background1994 Compton's Encyclopedia & fact-Index, Typewriter, at 342.
- Background: PubMed 3006958Wood MB, Dobyns JH. Sports-related extraarticular wrist syndromes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Jan;(202):93-102.
- Background: PubMed 1544186Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Upper extremity tendinitis and overuse syndromes in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 1992 Jan;11(1):39-55.
- Background: PubMed 1544180Weinstein SM, Herring SA. Nerve problems and compartment syndromes in the hand, wrist, and forearm. Clin Sports Med. 1992 Jan;11(1):161-88.
- Background: PubMed 2015635Van Handel PJ. The preparticipation fitness test. Clin Sports Med. 1991 Jan;10(1):1-18.
- Background: PubMed 3319201Herring SA, Nilson KL. Introduction to overuse injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1987 Apr;6(2):225-39.
- Background: PubMed 3319206Hunter SC, Poole RM. The chronically inflamed tendon. Clin Sports Med. 1987 Apr;6(2):371-88.
Related trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Symptom Recovery Time After the Phalen Test in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Recruiting
Effect of Night-time and Full-time Splinting for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Recruiting
Finnish Carpal Tunnel Surgery Study
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Recruiting
Effects of Peripheral Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Individuals With Elbow or Wrist Chronic Pain
Tennis Elbow Syndrome, Golfer's Elbow
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Measurement of Muscle Strength Using a Manual Muscle Tester in Women With Electrophysiologically Confirmed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John I Choate, J.D. study chair
Association of Repetitive Motion Syndromes
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interossei Lumbricals Neuro Interface and Standard QWERTY keyboard in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Finger Relief at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of Time Typing QWERTY Prior to Experiencing Symptoms of CTS (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome) (time frame: Participants will be assessed at each study of 4 sessions, two typing with the traditional QWERTY keyboard and two typing with the experimental device, each typing session will be separated by approximately one week to allow CTS symptoms to subside). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02101294, which also lists 76 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.