Resistant Hypertensive PatientsPhase 4ENSURENCT02102126
Effect of Renal deNervation on Arterial Stiffness and Haemodynamics in Patients With UncontRolled hypErtension (ENSURE)
A Phase 4 study testing Renal denervation in people with Resistant Hypertensive Patients, run by Shanghai 10th People's Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The ENSURE study is a multi-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study of the effect of renal denervation on arterial stiffness and haemodynamics in subjects with uncontrolled hypertension. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Resistant Hypertensive Patients
- What is being tested?
- Renal denervation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Individual is ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old at time of randomization.
- Individual is receiving a stable medication regimen including full tolerated doses of 3 or more anti-hypertensive medications of different classes, of which one must be a diuretic (with no changes for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to screening) that is expected to be maintained without changes for at least 6 months.
- Individual has an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥ 160 mmHg based on an average of 3 blood pressure readings measured at both an initial screening visit and a confirmatory screening visit
Who cannot join
- Individual has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2
- Individual has an Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) 24 hour average SBP < 135 mmHg
- Individual has type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Individual requires chronic oxygen support or mechanical ventilation (e.g., tracheostomy, CPAP, BiPAP) other than nocturnal respiratory support for sleep apnea.
- Individual has primary pulmonary hypertension.
- Individual is pregnant, nursing or planning to be pregnant.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200072
Yawei Xu, Professor of medicine
About this study
The ENSURE study is a multi-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study of the effect of renal denervation on arterial stiffness and haemodynamics in subjects with uncontrolled hypertension. Bilateral renal denervation will be performed using the catheter, delivering radiofrequency energy through the luminal surface of the renal artery.
Read the detailed description
Biomarkers to identify responder It is known that about one fifth of patients have a systolic BP reduction less than 10 mmHg after the renal denervation, and the failure of the HTN-3 study may be partly attributable to this point. Therefore, it is critical to identify a biomarker in order to screen patients who would benefit from this catheter-based therapy. Some investigators indicated that impaired cardiac baroreflex sensitivity may predict response to renal denervation therapy [13]. In addition, we also have several other candidates.
- Arterial stiffness As indicated by Mitchell GF, it was proven that, in the Framingham study, arterial stiffness is a major contributor to the onset and development of high BP, but not the consequence [14]. Furthermore, from a physiological viewpoint, age-related arterial remodeling was closely associated with elevation in sympathetic activity [15], and it was reported that renal denervation lead to a decrease in patients' arterial stiffness [16]. However, it remains unclear whether patients with severe arterial stiffening would better benefit from this treatment.
- Endocrinic biomarker Theoretically, renal denervation decreased patients' BP mainly through decreasing local and systematical sympathetic tone and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAS) activity. However, it remains unclear if patients with high renin level or other biomarkers would have improved response from this novel therapy.
Other BP-related parameters Based on the published data from the HTN-1/2 and considering the worldwide marketing of this catheter-based device, clinical investigations need to be continued and not limited to efficacy on BP reduction or its safety. Several BP-related parameters are of great interest to be investigated with the novel denervation therapy.
- Blood pressure variability In 2010, Rothwell and colleagues indicated that increased BP variability was significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality and stroke [17]. We found in the XCELLENT study that, rather than other antihypertensive agents, amlodipine was the only agent significantly decreasing patients' BP variability in both 24-hour and beat-to-beat settings, partly through ameliorating the autonomic nervous system (ANS) [18,19]. Renal denervation therapy is to denervate sympathetic nerve surrounding bilateral renal arteries by radiofrequency, so theoretically, this treatment many potentially have impact on patient's ANS, and further on patients' BP variability. With the development of 24-hour aortic ABPM named MOBIL-O-GRAPH, which is now commercially available and validated by invasive methods [20], we may investigate the impact of renal denervation not only on 24-hour brachial BP variability but also on 24-hour aortic BP variability.
- Aortic blood pressure Several investigations indicated the superiority of central BP to brachial BP in the association with target organ damage [21,22], so it is interesting to investigate the efficacy of renal denervation not only on brachial BP but also on central BP. Some investigations indicated that renal denervation also reduced patients' aortic BP and augmentation index [15,23]. However, with the development of 24-hour aortic ABPM as mentioned before, it makes more sense to investigate the influence of renal denervation on ambulatory aortic BP.
- Asymptomatic target organ damage As indicated by the HTN-1/2, even evaluated by 24-hour ABPM, the renal denervation therapy decreased patients' BP by 20/12 mmHg for systolic/diastolic BP, respectively [6]. Many asymptomatic target organ damages (TOD) were actually BP-related, so if this novel treatment would have impact on patients' TOD, including pulse wave velocity (PWV), echocardiograph-diagnosed and electrocardiograph-diagnosed left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque, and microalbuminuria, is still unknown, or even involving some not established target organ damage, such as cardiac remodeling or left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Some investigators indicted the effect of renal denervation on PWV [16], left ventricular mass and diastolic dysfunction [24], but a systematic investigation on the efficacy of renal denervation on those BP-related target organ damage is still warranted.
REFERENCE 13. Zuern CS, Eick C, Rizas KD, Bauer S, Langer H, Gawaz M, Bauer A. Impaired cardiac baroreflex sensitivity predicts response to renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013. In press.
- Kaess BM, Rong J, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Vasan RS, Mitchell GF. Aortic stiffness, blood pressure progression, and incident hypertension. JAMA 2012; 308: 875-881.
- Dinenno FA, Jones PP, Seals DR, Tanaka H. Age-associated arterial wall thickening is related to elevations in sympathetic activity in healthy humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000; 278: H1205-H1210.
- Brandt MC, Reda S, Mahfoud F, Lenski M, Böhm M, Hoppe UC. Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1956-1965.
- Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010; 375: 895-905.
- Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Blacher J, Safar ME. Effect of antihypertensive agents on blood pressure variability: the X-CELLENT study. Hypertension 2011; 58: 155-160.
- Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Blacher J, Safar ME. Blood pressure variability in relation to autonomic nervous system dysregulation: the X-CELLENT study. Hypertens Res 2012; 35: 399-403.
- Weber T, Wassertheurer S, Rammer M, Maurer E, Hametner B, Mayer CC, Kropf J, Eber B. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure. Hypertension 2011; 58: 825-832.
- Zhang Y, Li Y, Ding FH, Sheng CS, Huang QF, Wang JG. Cardiac structure and function in relation to central blood pressure components in Chinese. J Hypertens 2011; 29: 2462-2468.
- Roman MJ, Okin PM, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Howard BV, Devereux RB. Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry: the Strong Heart Study. J Hypertens 2010; 28: 384-388.
- Hering D, Lambert EA, Marusic P, Ika-Sari C, Walton AS, Krum H, Sobotka PA, Mahfoud F, Böhm M, Lambert GW, Esler MD, Schlaich MP. Renal nerve ablation reduces augmentation index in patients with resistant hypertension. J Hypertens 2013; 31: 1893-1900.
- Brandt MC, Mahfoud F, Reda S, Schirmer SH, Erdmann E, Bohm M, Hoppe UC. Renal sympathetic denervation reduces left ventricular hypertrophy and improves cardiac function in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 901-909.
- Conditions
- Resistant Hypertensive Patients
- Being tested
- Renal denervation
- Keywords
- Renal denervation therapy, Aortic blood pressure, Blood pressure variability, Arterial stiffness, Target organ damage, Biomarker
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Renal denervationProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Renal denervation | Experimental | Subjects are treated with the renal denervation procedure after randomization and are maintained on baseline anti-hypertensive medications Receives: Procedure: Renal denervation |
| Control group | No intervention | Subjects are maintained on baseline anti-hypertensive medications. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in 24-hour ambulatory aortic and brachial blood pressure and blood pressure variability
Composite outcomes
Measured: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence of Major Adverse Events through 1 month post-randomization
Measured: Baseline to 1 month post-randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionSep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Resistant Hypertensive PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ya-Wei Xu, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02102126
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ENSURE
- Acronym
- ENSURE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Renal deNervation on Arterial Stiffness and Haemodynamics in Patients With UncontRolled hypErtension (ENSURE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02102126
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENSURE / ENSURE
- Conditions
- Resistant Hypertensive Patients
- Keywords
- Renal denervation therapy, Aortic blood pressure, Blood pressure variability, Arterial stiffness, Target organ damage, Biomarker
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai 10th People's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The ENSURE study is a multi-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study of the effect of renal denervation on arterial stiffness and haemodynamics in subjects with uncontrolled hypertension. Bilateral renal denervation will be performed using the catheter, delivering radiofrequency energy through the luminal surface of the renal artery.
Detailed description
Biomarkers to identify responder It is known that about one fifth of patients have a systolic BP reduction less than 10 mmHg after the renal denervation, and the failure of the HTN-3 study may be partly attributable to this point. Therefore, it is critical to identify a biomarker in order to screen patients who would benefit from this catheter-based therapy. Some investigators indicated that impaired cardiac baroreflex sensitivity may predict response to renal denervation therapy [13]. In addition, we also have several other candidates.
- Arterial stiffness As indicated by Mitchell GF, it was proven that, in the Framingham study, arterial stiffness is a major contributor to the onset and development of high BP, but not the consequence [14]. Furthermore, from a physiological viewpoint, age-related arterial remodeling was closely associated with elevation in sympathetic activity [15], and it was reported that renal denervation lead to a decrease in patients' arterial stiffness [16]. However, it remains unclear whether patients with severe arterial stiffening would better benefit from this treatment.
- Endocrinic biomarker Theoretically, renal denervation decreased patients' BP mainly through decreasing local and systematical sympathetic tone and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAS) activity. However, it remains unclear if patients with high renin level or other biomarkers would have improved response from this novel therapy.
Other BP-related parameters Based on the published data from the HTN-1/2 and considering the worldwide marketing of this catheter-based device, clinical investigations need to be continued and not limited to efficacy on BP reduction or its safety. Several BP-related parameters are of great interest to be investigated with the novel denervation therapy.
- Blood pressure variability In 2010, Rothwell and colleagues indicated that increased BP variability was significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality and stroke [17]. We found in the XCELLENT study that, rather than other antihypertensive agents, amlodipine was the only agent significantly decreasing patients' BP variability in both 24-hour and beat-to-beat settings, partly through ameliorating the autonomic nervous system (ANS) [18,19]. Renal denervation therapy is to denervate sympathetic nerve surrounding bilateral renal arteries by radiofrequency, so theoretically, this treatment many potentially have impact on patient's ANS, and further on patients' BP variability. With the development of 24-hour aortic ABPM named MOBIL-O-GRAPH, which is now commercially available and validated by invasive methods [20], we may investigate the impact of renal denervation not only on 24-hour brachial BP variability but also on 24-hour aortic BP variability.
- Aortic blood pressure Several investigations indicated the superiority of central BP to brachial BP in the association with target organ damage [21,22], so it is interesting to investigate the efficacy of renal denervation not only on brachial BP but also on central BP. Some investigations indicated that renal denervation also reduced patients' aortic BP and augmentation index [15,23]. However, with the development of 24-hour aortic ABPM as mentioned before, it makes more sense to investigate the influence of renal denervation on ambulatory aortic BP.
- Asymptomatic target organ damage As indicated by the HTN-1/2, even evaluated by 24-hour ABPM, the renal denervation therapy decreased patients' BP by 20/12 mmHg for systolic/diastolic BP, respectively [6]. Many asymptomatic target organ damages (TOD) were actually BP-related, so if this novel treatment would have impact on patients' TOD, including pulse wave velocity (PWV), echocardiograph-diagnosed and electrocardiograph-diagnosed left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque, and microalbuminuria, is still unknown, or even involving some not established target organ damage, such as cardiac remodeling or left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Some investigators indicted the effect of renal denervation on PWV [16], left ventricular mass and diastolic dysfunction [24], but a systematic investigation on the efficacy of renal denervation on those BP-related target organ damage is still warranted.
REFERENCE 13. Zuern CS, Eick C, Rizas KD, Bauer S, Langer H, Gawaz M, Bauer A. Impaired cardiac baroreflex sensitivity predicts response to renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013. In press.
- Kaess BM, Rong J, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Vasan RS, Mitchell GF. Aortic stiffness, blood pressure progression, and incident hypertension. JAMA 2012; 308: 875-881.
- Dinenno FA, Jones PP, Seals DR, Tanaka H. Age-associated arterial wall thickening is related to elevations in sympathetic activity in healthy humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000; 278: H1205-H1210.
- Brandt MC, Reda S, Mahfoud F, Lenski M, Böhm M, Hoppe UC. Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1956-1965.
- Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010; 375: 895-905.
- Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Blacher J, Safar ME. Effect of antihypertensive agents on blood pressure variability: the X-CELLENT study. Hypertension 2011; 58: 155-160.
- Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Blacher J, Safar ME. Blood pressure variability in relation to autonomic nervous system dysregulation: the X-CELLENT study. Hypertens Res 2012; 35: 399-403.
- Weber T, Wassertheurer S, Rammer M, Maurer E, Hametner B, Mayer CC, Kropf J, Eber B. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure. Hypertension 2011; 58: 825-832.
- Zhang Y, Li Y, Ding FH, Sheng CS, Huang QF, Wang JG. Cardiac structure and function in relation to central blood pressure components in Chinese. J Hypertens 2011; 29: 2462-2468.
- Roman MJ, Okin PM, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Howard BV, Devereux RB. Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry: the Strong Heart Study. J Hypertens 2010; 28: 384-388.
- Hering D, Lambert EA, Marusic P, Ika-Sari C, Walton AS, Krum H, Sobotka PA, Mahfoud F, Böhm M, Lambert GW, Esler MD, Schlaich MP. Renal nerve ablation reduces augmentation index in patients with resistant hypertension. J Hypertens 2013; 31: 1893-1900.
- Brandt MC, Mahfoud F, Reda S, Schirmer SH, Erdmann E, Bohm M, Hoppe UC. Renal sympathetic denervation reduces left ventricular hypertrophy and improves cardiac function in patients with resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 901-909.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Renal denervation | Experimental | Procedure: Renal denervationSubjects are treated with the renal denervation procedure after randomization and are maintained on baseline anti-hypertensive medications |
| Control group | No intervention | –Subjects are maintained on baseline anti-hypertensive medications. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Individual is ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old at time of randomization.
- Individual is receiving a stable medication regimen including full tolerated doses of 3 or more anti-hypertensive medications of different classes, of which one must be a diuretic (with no changes for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to screening) that is expected to be maintained without changes for at least 6 months.
- Individual has an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥ 160 mmHg based on an average of 3 blood pressure readings measured at both an initial screening visit and a confirmatory screening visit
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Individual has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2
- Individual has an Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) 24 hour average SBP < 135 mmHg
- Individual has type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Individual requires chronic oxygen support or mechanical ventilation (e.g., tracheostomy, CPAP, BiPAP) other than nocturnal respiratory support for sleep apnea.
- Individual has primary pulmonary hypertension.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Renal denervation | Procedure or surgery | Renal denervation |
Primary outcome
Change in 24-hour ambulatory aortic and brachial blood pressure and blood pressure variability
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization
Composite outcomes
1 secondary outcome
Incidence of Major Adverse Events through 1 month post-randomization
Time frame: Baseline to 1 month post-randomization
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2014.
Related trials for Resistant Hypertensive Patients
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Renal Denervation in Patients With Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Study Design and Rationale
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, Resistant Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Renal denervation in people with Resistant Hypertensive Patients, run by Shanghai 10th People's Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yawei Xu, Professor of medicine (+86-21-66300588, yizshcn@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in 24-hour ambulatory aortic and brachial blood pressure and blood pressure variability (time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2014.