HypersalivationNCT02102542
Efficacy of Intravenous Glyco-P® in Patients Undergoing Procedure That Require Anesthesia Service
An observational study of Hypersalivation and Prevention of Drooling, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.
Trial summary
This observational study was designed to prove clinical efficacy of the well known "glycopyrrolate" which is considered an orphan drug in Thailand. Since the medication has never been officially used in Thai people and this particular brand "Glyco-P" which was made in India has never been officially proven of its… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypersalivation, Prevention of Drooling, Bradycardia
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThailand
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Apr 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants:- 100 adult male or female patients, over 18 year old who consent to the study. Exclusion Criteria : Children < 18 yo, pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients, patients who refused or unable to give consent, patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm
Who may be able to join
- adult over 18 years of age, undergoing procedure that require anesthesia service.
- meet criteria for prevention of drooling, hypersalivation or bradycardia or require reversal of muscle relaxants.
Who cannot join
- children < 18 years old,
- pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients,
- patients who refused or unable to give consent,
- patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion (i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis),
- patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Thailand1 site
Anesthesiology Department Siriraj Hospital
Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700
About this study
This observational study was designed to prove clinical efficacy of the well known "glycopyrrolate" which is considered an orphan drug in Thailand. Since the medication has never been officially used in Thai people and this particular brand "Glyco-P" which was made in India has never been officially proven of its efficacy in Thai people. The study was aimed to prove if this Glyco-P can modestly increase patient's heart rate, decrease secretion and safely used in combination with neostigmine for reversal of non-depo muscle relaxant drugs.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale Glycopyrrolate has been long used since it's first discovery in 19602. The medication is generally available in both oral and injectable form. The uses of glycopyrrolate in anesthesia are mainly for reduction of salivation and secretion3, which plays significant role when airway instrumentation required. The widespread uses of neostigmine for reversal of muscle relaxant effects caused by non-depolarizing muscle relaxant also mandate the co-administration of anti-muscarinic4,5,6. Without availability of glycopyrrolate, atropine was used in Thailand, which results in excessive tachycardia and salivation7,8,9. Glycopyrrolate can also be used when mild bradycardia is encountered but the effects on heart rate is less dominant than atropine10,11.
Glycopyrrolate is considered an orphan drugs in Thailand. There was simply no availability until recently. The local company named "Masu" has decided to market and import the drug from India (Glyco-P®). The formulary has been approved by Thai Food and Drug Administration1. The preparation has also been tested in laboratory by third party well-known pharmacy institute, which proved the existence of an active ingredient. However, the uses of this medication officially have not been made and the appropriate action is to obtain IRB approval at local institution and consent the patients prior to drug administration. The appropriate record of clinical effect should also been made.
Objective
- Evaluate the clinical efficacy of glycopyrrolate on heart rate, anti-sialagogue effects and when used in conjunction with neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
- Evaluate the timing, onset and duration of glycopyrrolate injection at different dose.
Materials, participants and study method The study requires
- 100 patients who scheduled to undergo procedure or operation that require anesthesia service who meet criteria for the uses of glycopyrrolate which includes - requirement of anti-sialogogue, mild bradycardia and in whom receiving neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents.
- Glyco-P injection
- Monitorings that capable of HR, BP measurement
- Suctioning equipment with volumetric measurement
- Clinician evaluating the effects of medication
- Timer Participants:- 100 adult male or female patients, over 18 year old who consent to the study.
Exclusion Criteria : Children < 18 yo, pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients, patients who refused or unable to give consent, patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm Study method
- The patient who meet inclusion criteria will be consent to receive medications.
- The medications will be administered only 1 of these criteria are met
- To increase heart rate modestly
- For reduction of secretion or salivation
- To co-administration with neostigmine
- The medications will be given in the following fashion
- Glyco-P 4 mcg/kg IV, repeatedly if no effects. Halt if HR > 100 bpm
- Glyco-P 0.2 mg per each mg of neostigmine used
- The clinical effects i.e. heart rate, blood pressure, amount of secretion removed will be recorded along with timing of onset and offset.
- Collected data will be analyzed by statistician with appropriate statistical methods.
Data analysis
- Demographic data or each participants
- Dose and indication of treatment of studied drugs
- Timing of clinical effects
- Changes in heart rate and blood pressure
- Efficacy of reduction of saliva and secretion
Duration of study 3 months Benefit of the study Confirmation of clinical efficacy of this Indian made glycopyrrolate - Glyco-P® in Thai patients.
Other institutions participation None
- Keywords
- glycopyrrolate, efficacy, antisialagogue
- Medical subject headings
- Sialorrhea, Bradycardia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Antisialagouge | A group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P for reduction of secretions. | |
| Bradycardia | A group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P for modest increase of heart rate. | |
| For reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents | Group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P when used in combination with neostigmine to reserve neuromuscular blocking agents. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of Glyco-P as an antisialagogue
Examine efficacy of Glyco-P for reduction of secretion and also for prevention of secretion. The secretions score ranges from 0-5 was evaluated by a person who was blinded to treatment before and after treatment.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionMar 2013
- Study completionApr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypersalivationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mahidol UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mahidol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prasert Sawasdiwipachai, Mahidol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02102542
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 185/2555(EC3)
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 30 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Salem MG, Richardson JC, Meadows GA, Lamplugh G, Lai KM. Comparison between glycopyrrolate and atropine in a mixture with neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Studies in patients following open heart surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1985 Feb;57(2):184-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.2.184.
PubMed 2857570
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Intravenous Glyco-P® in Patients Undergoing Procedure That Require Anesthesia Service
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02102542
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 185/2555(EC3)
- Keywords
- glycopyrrolate, efficacy, antisialagogue
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mahidol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This observational study was designed to prove clinical efficacy of the well known "glycopyrrolate" which is considered an orphan drug in Thailand. Since the medication has never been officially used in Thai people and this particular brand "Glyco-P" which was made in India has never been officially proven of its efficacy in Thai people. The study was aimed to prove if this Glyco-P can modestly increase patient's heart rate, decrease secretion and safely used in combination with neostigmine for reversal of non-depo muscle relaxant drugs.
Detailed description
Background and rationale Glycopyrrolate has been long used since it's first discovery in 19602. The medication is generally available in both oral and injectable form. The uses of glycopyrrolate in anesthesia are mainly for reduction of salivation and secretion3, which plays significant role when airway instrumentation required. The widespread uses of neostigmine for reversal of muscle relaxant effects caused by non-depolarizing muscle relaxant also mandate the co-administration of anti-muscarinic4,5,6. Without availability of glycopyrrolate, atropine was used in Thailand, which results in excessive tachycardia and salivation7,8,9. Glycopyrrolate can also be used when mild bradycardia is encountered but the effects on heart rate is less dominant than atropine10,11.
Glycopyrrolate is considered an orphan drugs in Thailand. There was simply no availability until recently. The local company named "Masu" has decided to market and import the drug from India (Glyco-P®). The formulary has been approved by Thai Food and Drug Administration1. The preparation has also been tested in laboratory by third party well-known pharmacy institute, which proved the existence of an active ingredient. However, the uses of this medication officially have not been made and the appropriate action is to obtain IRB approval at local institution and consent the patients prior to drug administration. The appropriate record of clinical effect should also been made.
Objective
- Evaluate the clinical efficacy of glycopyrrolate on heart rate, anti-sialagogue effects and when used in conjunction with neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade.
- Evaluate the timing, onset and duration of glycopyrrolate injection at different dose.
Materials, participants and study method The study requires
- 100 patients who scheduled to undergo procedure or operation that require anesthesia service who meet criteria for the uses of glycopyrrolate which includes - requirement of anti-sialogogue, mild bradycardia and in whom receiving neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents.
- Glyco-P injection
- Monitorings that capable of HR, BP measurement
- Suctioning equipment with volumetric measurement
- Clinician evaluating the effects of medication
- Timer Participants:- 100 adult male or female patients, over 18 year old who consent to the study.
Exclusion Criteria : Children < 18 yo, pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients, patients who refused or unable to give consent, patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm Study method
- The patient who meet inclusion criteria will be consent to receive medications.
- The medications will be administered only 1 of these criteria are met
- To increase heart rate modestly
- For reduction of secretion or salivation
- To co-administration with neostigmine
- The medications will be given in the following fashion
- Glyco-P 4 mcg/kg IV, repeatedly if no effects. Halt if HR > 100 bpm
- Glyco-P 0.2 mg per each mg of neostigmine used
- The clinical effects i.e. heart rate, blood pressure, amount of secretion removed will be recorded along with timing of onset and offset.
- Collected data will be analyzed by statistician with appropriate statistical methods.
Data analysis
- Demographic data or each participants
- Dose and indication of treatment of studied drugs
- Timing of clinical effects
- Changes in heart rate and blood pressure
- Efficacy of reduction of saliva and secretion
Duration of study 3 months Benefit of the study Confirmation of clinical efficacy of this Indian made glycopyrrolate - Glyco-P® in Thai patients.
Other institutions participation None
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Antisialagouge | – | –A group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P for reduction of secretions. |
| Bradycardia | – | –A group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P for modest increase of heart rate. |
| For reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents | – | –Group of patients enrolled to prove efficacy of Glyco-P when used in combination with neostigmine to reserve neuromuscular blocking agents. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants:- 100 adult male or female patients, over 18 year old who consent to the study. Exclusion Criteria : Children < 18 yo, pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients, patients who refused or unable to give consent, patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- adult over 18 years of age, undergoing procedure that require anesthesia service.
- meet criteria for prevention of drooling, hypersalivation or bradycardia or require reversal of muscle relaxants.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- children < 18 years old,
- pregnant or parturient of breast feeding patients,
- patients who refused or unable to give consent,
- patients who has co-existing problems with dry secretion (i.e. Sjögren's syndrome, glaucoma, myasthenia gravis),
- patient whom baseline heart rate is > 100 bpm
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Efficacy of Glyco-P as an antisialagogue
Time frame: 3 months
Examine efficacy of Glyco-P for reduction of secretion and also for prevention of secretion. The secretions score ranges from 0-5 was evaluated by a person who was blinded to treatment before and after treatment.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2014.
- Background: PubMed 2857570Salem MG, Richardson JC, Meadows GA, Lamplugh G, Lai KM. Comparison between glycopyrrolate and atropine in a mixture with neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Studies in patients following open heart surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1985 Feb;57(2):184-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.2.184.
Related trials for Hypersalivation
Active, not recruiting
Local Vibration for Drooling in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP)
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Parkinson´s Disease
Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation (tVNS), Parkinson Disease (PD)
Recruiting
Application of Neuro-electrostimulation as a Treatment for Patients With Dry Mouth
Saliva Altered
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Added to Oral Motor Therapy in Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP), Drooling
Active, not recruiting
Effect of SCS Technique on Oromotor Skills in Children With CP
Sialorrhea, Spastic Cerebral Palsy (sCP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hypersalivation and Prevention of Drooling, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of Glyco-P as an antisialagogue (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02102542, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2014.