Diabetes MellitusPhase 2GLUCIMAG2NCT02102737
Comparison of A New Technique of Measure of the Insulin Resistance By Scintigraphy With the Reference Technique
A Phase 2 study testing 6-DIG and clamp in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Insulin Resistance, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Insulin resistance is closely associated with apparition of type 2 diabetes mellitus; it is an independent risk factor and predicts future cardiovascular events. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp is a validated method to assessment of insulin resistance and It is also the gold standard technique. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Resistance, Glucose Metabolism Disorders
- What is being tested?
- 6-DIG and clamp
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 13 May 2014to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Insulin sensible patients
- Body mass index < 25 HOMA <= 2.5
- Waist measurement < 94 cm for men and < 80 cm for women
- HDL cholesterol 1,03 mmol/L for men and > 1,29 mmol/L for women
- Triglyceride level ≤ 1,69 mmol/ L
- For women not menopausal since at last one year or not surgically sterilised:
Show all 15Show fewer
- On-going contraception, physical or hormonal, excepted local methods (spermicidal, diaphragm, condom, cape)
- Insulin resistant patients
- For women not menopausal since at last one year or not surgically sterilised:
- On-going contraception, physical or hormonal, excepted local methods (spermicidal, diaphragm, condom, cape)
- HOMA > 2.5
- Body mass index > 25
- Waist measurement > 94 cm for men and > 80 cm for women
- HDL cholesterol < 1,03 mmol/L et for men and ≤ 1,29 mmol/L for women
- Triglyceride level > 1,69 mmol/ L
Who cannot join
- • Instable cardiomyopathy
- Severe hypertension defined by par SAP > 180 mmHg and/or DAP > 110 mmHg
- Psychiatric illness, needing a chronic treatment
- Previous history of stroke, epilepsy, cranial trauma, pituitary surgery, disease likely to reduce the ability of absorption, diffusion or excretion of the radiotracer.
- Allergy to one of the components of the products used during the study
- Treatment likely to interfere with glucose metabolism
Show all 11Show fewer
- Alcohol or drug intoxication
- Vegetarian or restrictive low-calory diet,
- Participation in other biomedical research at the same time or exclusion period under another biomedical research
- Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding women,
- Inappropriate way of life
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparaison d'Une Nouvelle Technique de Mesure de l'insulinorésistance Par Scintigraphie Avec la Technique de référence : Utilisation du 6-DIG Comme Marqueur du Transport du Glucose.
Insulin resistance is closely associated with apparition of type 2 diabetes mellitus; it is an independent risk factor and predicts future cardiovascular events.
Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp is a validated method to assessment of insulin resistance and It is also the gold standard technique. However, the complexity and length of this technique render it unsuitable for routine clinical use.
Read more
In this study, the investigators use a new technique to provide precise, objective, fast and automated quantification of insulin resistance with camera SPECT.
They compare the results with those of the measurement of hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in population with or without insulin resistance.
The proposed study is to validate this new non-invasive imaging technique for evaluation of insulin resistance in patients with or without insulin resistance with a comparison with hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.
Read the detailed description
Currently, type II diabetes mellitus, has reached epidemic levels in the world. Moreover, the prediction for the year 2030 is even more alarming. Insulin resistance, characterized by a depressed cellular sensitivity to insulin in insulin-sensitive organs, is a central feature of the metabolic syndrome and a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Its appearance may precede the diagnosis of true diabetes several years. Insulin resistance results in decreased membrane translocation of GLUT-4, whole the molecular mechanism remains unclear. Currently, there is no simple tool to measure insulin resistance. The gold standard technique remains the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. However, the complexity and length of this technique render it unsuitable for routine clinical use. Many methods or index have been proposed to assess insulin resistance in human, but none have shown enough relevance to be used in clinical use. Moreover, all these clinical measurements focus on whole-body glucose uptake, however an accurate and convenient procedure for insulin resistance measurement by organ would be interesting. Indeed there are increasingly evidences to insulin resistance as a primary etiologic factor in the development of nonischemic heart failure (HF), another growing public health problem.
Nuclear imaging provides interesting methods to measure insulin resistance using Positron Emission Tomographic (PET) tracer. Two glucose analogs [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and [11Cl-30methyl-n-glucose (3-OMG) have been used to evaluate noninvasively the cellular uptake of glucose using PET techniques for several organs like heart, skeletal muscle blood-brain barrier, and liver. [18F] 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), the most commonly used to study glucose metabolism in humans, allows the estimation of glucose transport and its phosphorylation. A number of kinetic modeling approaches have been used for the quantitation of glucose utilization rates using FDG. FDG is transported and phosphorylated as native glucose, but calculation of glucose uptake and metabolism requires the use of correction factors for each process merged into a lumped constant. The major limitation of these approaches is that quantification of glucose metabolism requires the knowledge of the lumped constant, a factor, which relates the kinetic behavior of FDG to naturally occurring glucose in terms of the relative affinity of each molecule for the trans-sarcolemmal transporter and for hexokinase. Unfortunately, the value of the lumped constant in humans under different physiological and pathophysiological conditions varies, and metabolic imaging with PET need standardization of metabolic conditions by hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. 3-OMG appears as an ideal glucose analog to probe transmembrane transport. However, due to the short half-life of the 11C (t1/2 = 20 min), this analog can be used only in clinical institutions in close proximity of a cyclotron and which have access to PET devices.
According to these knowledge, the investigators have developed an original compound, [123I] 6-deoxy-6-iodo-D-glucose (6DIG), as a tracer of glucose transport equivalent to 3-OMG, the reference tracer. 6-DIG has previously been exploited to measure IR in vivo and the investigators transfer to human this measurement technique, perfectly validated in animal. Previous, they have reported the first use a potential single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracer to study basal and insulin-stimulated glucose transport non-invasively. In a phase I of development, they use a new nuclear probe using an iodinated tracer of glucose transport for clinical application and specific imaging processing to assess cardiac insulinoresistance in healthy or diabetic subjects. The results in human subjects show that this technique rapidly provides insulinoresistance index (ratio scintigraphy measurement of glucose transport in heart before and after infusion of insulin) in a simple procedure, opening up new opportunities for screening for pre-diabetic patients.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Resistance, Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Metabolic Diseases, Endocrine System Diseases
- Being tested
- 6-DIG, clamp
- Keywords
- insulin resistance, Scintigraphy, Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Resistance, Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Metabolic Diseases, Endocrine System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
6-DIGDrug
injection of 6-DIG
clampProcedure or surgery
hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 6-DIG and clamp | Experimental | injection of 6-DIG and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp Receives: Drug: 6-DIG; Procedure: clamp |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation between measure of insulin resistance measurement by scintigraphy and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp
Correlation between measure of insulin resistance measurement by scintigraphy (insulin resistance index: ratio scintigraphy measurement of glucose transport in heart before and after infusion of insulin) and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (Glucose Infusion Rate and sensibility index Clamp)
Measured: DAY 1 AND DAY 2
Secondary outcomes (9)
SAFETY
A systematic collection of adverse events
Measured: visit 2, visit 3 and visit 4
Reproducibility
Reproducibility inter and intra operator of Insulin resistance index
Measured: day 2 and day 3
Left ventricule ejection fraction
Measured: day 2
left ventricle volume
Measured: day 2
cardiac mass
Measured: day 2
diastolic function
Measured: day 2
cardiac output
Measured: day 2
pulmonary pressure and right ventricular function
Measured: day 2
strain by speckle tracking echocardiography
Measured: day 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study start13 May 2014
- Primary completionMar 2018
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gilles Barone-Rochette, PHU, Principal investigator, Hopital Michalon , CHU de Grenoble
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02102737
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C13-14
- Other IDs
- 2013-003526-92
- Acronym
- GLUCIMAG2
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 26 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparaison d'Une Nouvelle Technique de Mesure de l'insulinorésistance Par Scintigraphie Avec la Technique de référence : Utilisation du 6-DIG Comme Marqueur du Transport du Glucose.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02102737
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GLUCIMAG2 / C13-14
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Resistance, Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Metabolic Diseases, Endocrine System Diseases
- Keywords
- insulin resistance, Scintigraphy, Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceOther government
- Study start
- 13 May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Insulin resistance is closely associated with apparition of type 2 diabetes mellitus; it is an independent risk factor and predicts future cardiovascular events.
Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp is a validated method to assessment of insulin resistance and It is also the gold standard technique. However, the complexity and length of this technique render it unsuitable for routine clinical use.
In this study, the investigators use a new technique to provide precise, objective, fast and automated quantification of insulin resistance with camera SPECT.
They compare the results with those of the measurement of hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in population with or without insulin resistance.
The proposed study is to validate this new non-invasive imaging technique for evaluation of insulin resistance in patients with or without insulin resistance with a comparison with hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.
Detailed description
Currently, type II diabetes mellitus, has reached epidemic levels in the world. Moreover, the prediction for the year 2030 is even more alarming. Insulin resistance, characterized by a depressed cellular sensitivity to insulin in insulin-sensitive organs, is a central feature of the metabolic syndrome and a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Its appearance may precede the diagnosis of true diabetes several years. Insulin resistance results in decreased membrane translocation of GLUT-4, whole the molecular mechanism remains unclear. Currently, there is no simple tool to measure insulin resistance. The gold standard technique remains the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. However, the complexity and length of this technique render it unsuitable for routine clinical use. Many methods or index have been proposed to assess insulin resistance in human, but none have shown enough relevance to be used in clinical use. Moreover, all these clinical measurements focus on whole-body glucose uptake, however an accurate and convenient procedure for insulin resistance measurement by organ would be interesting. Indeed there are increasingly evidences to insulin resistance as a primary etiologic factor in the development of nonischemic heart failure (HF), another growing public health problem.
Nuclear imaging provides interesting methods to measure insulin resistance using Positron Emission Tomographic (PET) tracer. Two glucose analogs [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and [11Cl-30methyl-n-glucose (3-OMG) have been used to evaluate noninvasively the cellular uptake of glucose using PET techniques for several organs like heart, skeletal muscle blood-brain barrier, and liver. [18F] 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), the most commonly used to study glucose metabolism in humans, allows the estimation of glucose transport and its phosphorylation. A number of kinetic modeling approaches have been used for the quantitation of glucose utilization rates using FDG. FDG is transported and phosphorylated as native glucose, but calculation of glucose uptake and metabolism requires the use of correction factors for each process merged into a lumped constant. The major limitation of these approaches is that quantification of glucose metabolism requires the knowledge of the lumped constant, a factor, which relates the kinetic behavior of FDG to naturally occurring glucose in terms of the relative affinity of each molecule for the trans-sarcolemmal transporter and for hexokinase. Unfortunately, the value of the lumped constant in humans under different physiological and pathophysiological conditions varies, and metabolic imaging with PET need standardization of metabolic conditions by hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. 3-OMG appears as an ideal glucose analog to probe transmembrane transport. However, due to the short half-life of the 11C (t1/2 = 20 min), this analog can be used only in clinical institutions in close proximity of a cyclotron and which have access to PET devices.
According to these knowledge, the investigators have developed an original compound, [123I] 6-deoxy-6-iodo-D-glucose (6DIG), as a tracer of glucose transport equivalent to 3-OMG, the reference tracer. 6-DIG has previously been exploited to measure IR in vivo and the investigators transfer to human this measurement technique, perfectly validated in animal. Previous, they have reported the first use a potential single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracer to study basal and insulin-stimulated glucose transport non-invasively. In a phase I of development, they use a new nuclear probe using an iodinated tracer of glucose transport for clinical application and specific imaging processing to assess cardiac insulinoresistance in healthy or diabetic subjects. The results in human subjects show that this technique rapidly provides insulinoresistance index (ratio scintigraphy measurement of glucose transport in heart before and after infusion of insulin) in a simple procedure, opening up new opportunities for screening for pre-diabetic patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 6-DIG and clamp | Experimental | Drug: 6-DIG, Procedure: clampinjection of 6-DIG and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Insulin sensible patients
- On-going contraception, physical or hormonal, excepted local methods (spermicidal, diaphragm, condom, cape)
- Insulin resistant patients
- For women not menopausal since at last one year or not surgically sterilised:
- On-going contraception, physical or hormonal, excepted local methods (spermicidal, diaphragm, condom, cape)
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- • Instable cardiomyopathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 6-DIGinjection of 6-DIG | Drug | 6-DIG and clamp |
| clamphyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp | Procedure or surgery | 6-DIG and clamp |
Primary outcome
Correlation between measure of insulin resistance measurement by scintigraphy and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp
Time frame: DAY 1 AND DAY 2
Correlation between measure of insulin resistance measurement by scintigraphy (insulin resistance index: ratio scintigraphy measurement of glucose transport in heart before and after infusion of insulin) and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (Glucose Infusion Rate and sensibility index Clamp)
9 secondary outcomes
SAFETY
Time frame: visit 2, visit 3 and visit 4
Reproducibility
Time frame: day 2 and day 3
Left ventricule ejection fraction
Time frame: day 2
left ventricle volume
Time frame: day 2
cardiac mass
Time frame: day 2
diastolic function
Time frame: day 2
cardiac output
Time frame: day 2
pulmonary pressure and right ventricular function
Time frame: day 2
strain by speckle tracking echocardiography
Time frame: day 2
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Aug 2021.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gilles Barone-Rochette, PHU principal investigator
Hopital Michalon , CHU de Grenoble
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing 6-DIG and clamp in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Insulin Resistance, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation between measure of insulin resistance measurement by scintigraphy and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (time frame: DAY 1 AND DAY 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2021.