AzTrials
AzTrials

Female InfertilityNCT02108665

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Hysterosalpingography Versus Radiographic Hysterosalpingography in Female Infertility

A study testing Radiographic hysterosalpingography and Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography in people with Female Infertility, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of this study is to compare the data of Hystérosalpingo-MRI with intra cavitary injection of diluted gadolinium salts with the classic hysterography, which allows to realize at once with no irradiating examination, a complete assessment of the female infertility. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Female Infertility
What is being tested?
Radiographic hysterosalpingography and Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jan 2013to Aug 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient who a pelvic MRI and an Hysterography, part of an infertility assessment, have been prescribed by a gynecologist physician in Nice University Hospital.
  • Informed consent signed Patient with social insurance Age > 18

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography Contraindication to radiographic hysterosalpingography

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Service d'imagerie médicale Hôpital Archet II

    Nice, 06000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Hysterosalpingography Versus Radiographic Hysterosalpingography in Female Infertility

The main objective of this study is to compare the data of Hystérosalpingo-MRI with intra cavitary injection of diluted gadolinium salts with the classic hysterography, which allows to realize at once with no irradiating examination, a complete assessment of the female infertility.

Read the detailed description

Infertility is a disease which affects around 15% of couples (one union of seven) and has been increasing for 10 years. Therefore, and due to the development of methods of medically assisted procreation, demand for infertility evaluation is steadily increasing.

The infertility evaluation always begins with an accurate history, coupled with a physical examination of both partners. Indeed, infertility of a couple is due to the female partner in about two thirds of cases, the male partner in the remaining third of cases. In women, the main observed causes are ovulatory function disorders (10 to 20%), tubal causes by proximal or distal occlusion (10%), uterine causes involving intra-uterine synechiae, leiomyomas, adenomyosis, mucosal polyps (5 %), inadequate cervical mucus or cervical stenosis , and peritoneal causes such as endometriosis and post-infectious or post-surgical peritubo-ovarian adhesions (20 %).

Medical imaging is one of the key methods to identify the different etiologies in men as in women. It will serve to clarify the etiology in question and assess the likelihood of subsequent pregnancy. The initial imaging assessment for infertility in any woman includes an endovaginal ultrasound examination and a hysterosalpingography (HSG) . The use of MRI is considered as a second line in the absence of definitive diagnosis or to establish a definitive diagnosis before considering a targeted therapy. Indeed the performance of MRI for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis or fibroids mapping are well established.

HSG is the imaging technique of choice to evaluate the morphology of the uterine cavity and tubal patency. But it has several important limitations. Firstly it is an imaging method that uses x-rays and therefore delivers irradiation to the gynecological organs. Moreover, it does not allow a precise exploration of the entire abdomen and pelvis: therefore, the physician cannot have a complete assessment of the etiologies of infertility with HSG. Finally, it has a very good specificity but a relatively low sensitivity.

Being tested
Radiographic hysterosalpingography, Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography
Medical subject headings
Infertility, Female

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radiographic hysterosalpingographyRadiation

  • Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingographyRadiation

Study groups in NCT02108665
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radiographic hysterosalpingographyOtherRealisation in first: radiographic hysterosalpingographyresonance then imaging hysterosalpingography
Receives: Radiation: Radiographic hysterosalpingography; Radiation: Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography
Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingographyOtherRealisation in first : magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography then a radiographic hysterosalpingography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic performance of hystérosalpingo-MRI

    To assess the diagnostic performance of hystérosalpingo-MRI by its sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value.

    To determine uterine cavity abnormality by the presence of the following abnormalities: synechiae, polyp, intra cavitary myoma, adenomyosis, uterine malformation.

    Measured: one day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2016
  4. Study completionAug 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02108665
Sponsor's protocol ID
11AOI07
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
7 Apr 2014
Last updated
31 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Volondat M, Fontas E, Delotte J, Fatfouta I, Chevallier P, Chassang M. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study. Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb;29(2):501-508. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5572-2. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

    PubMed 29974219

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radiographic hysterosalpingography and Magnetic resonance imaging hysterosalpingography in people with Female Infertility, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic performance of hystérosalpingo-MRI (time frame: one day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02108665, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in