AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaPhase 4NCT02113436

Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate(FP)/ Salmeterol Xinafoate (SLM) Hydro Fluoro Alkane (HFA) Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) in Pediatric Patients With Bronchial Asthma

A Phase 4 study testing FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 mcg and FP HFA MDI 50 mcg in people with Asthma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 69 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a multicenter, stratified, randomized, active control, double-blinded, parallel-group comparative study with an open-label extension period. The study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 microgram (mcg) one or two inhalation twice daily (BID) for 8 weeks in comparison… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 months to 4 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 mcg and FP HFA MDI 50 mcg
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
69 sitesJapan
Study dates
1 May 2014to 1 Oct 2016
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 months to 4 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • The written informed consent must be obtained from his/her parent or legally acceptable representative. If the investigator can get the oral consent from the patient, the investigator should record so in the informed consent which is signed by his/her parent or legally acceptable representative.
  • Ethnic origin is Japanese
  • Aged >=6 months and <=4 years at Visit 1.
  • Male and pre-menarchial female. Pre-menarchial females are defined as any female who has yet to begin menses.
  • Patient: outpatient
  • Diagnosis as a pediatric asthma has been made by reference to JPGL 2012 and the document which is of help as evidence should be kept as source document. As for <2 years old, children are going to be diagnosed according to an instruction as follows in JPGL2012 as a reference. There are 3 or more episodes of marked expiratory wheezing, regardless of the presence of respiratory tract infection. It is also needed to confirm that there is asymptomatic period for about a week between each episode. In addition to this finding, if there is at least one of following findings, it is more helpful to diagnose infantile asthma: At least one of parents is diagnosed with bronchial asthma by a physician (including past history); Specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody for inhalation antigen is detected in at least one of parents; Diseased child is diagnosed with atopic dermatitis by a physician (including past history); Specific IgE antibody for inhalation antigen is detected in diseased child; High serum IgE level in diseased child or his/her family (serum IgE level should be determined by considering age); Eosinophils and creola bodies found in sputum (examine nasal discharge eosinophilia and peripheral blood eosinophilia); Expiratory wheezing occurs when there is no airway infection; Expiratory wheezing and labored respiration or oxygen saturation are improved after beta-2 stimulant inhalation.
  • A patient who needs to be treated with Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/ Long-acting beta 2 agonist (LABA) and fulfill following all conditions: At least one documented exacerbation in that the patient treated with systemic glucocorticosteroids, aminophylline dose intravenous(d.i.v) or continuous isoproterenol inhalation in the 12 months prior to Visit 1. Or a well-documented regular treatment with ICS (FP 200-400 mcg daily or equivalent) continuous use in the 12 months prior to Visit 1; The patient has not received systemic glucocorticosteroids, aminophylline d.i.v., ICS (FP>200 mcg daily or equivalent) or continuous isoproterenol inhalation within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.

Who cannot join

  • A patient who has suffered from upper and lower respiratory tract infection and then received medication within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  • A patient who is diagnosed upper and lower respiratory tract infection at Visit 1. Or a patient who has or is suspected to have deep-seated mycosis or infection to which no effective antibacterial agent is available. Or a patient who is suspected to have respiratory syncytial (RS) virus infection and cannot be identified to be negative for RS virus antigen.
  • A patient who has respiratory disorder other than bronchial asthma, and the investigator judges the respiratory disorder affect the assessment of efficacy in this study.
  • A patient who has unstable liver disease or chronic stable hepatitis B receiving significant immunosuppressive agents due to risk of hepatitis B reactivation.
  • A patient who has malformation/foreign particle lodged in an airway. Or subjects who have known, pre-existing, clinically significant gastroesophageal reflux disease , endocrine, autoimmune, metabolic, neurological, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, haematological or any other system abnormalities that are uncontrolled with standard treatment.
  • A patient who has or is suspected to have hypersensitivity to study medications, the rescue medication or any ingredients of them.
Show all 16Show fewer
  • A patient who has been treated with another investigational product within 1 months prior to Visit 1 or within five half-lives (t-half) of the prior investigational study (whichever is the longer of the two).
  • As for the patients who has evaluable ECG data at Visit 1, QT interval corrected (Fridericia) for heart rate (QTc[F])>=450 milliseconds (msec). The QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) should be based on averaged QTc values of triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained over a brief recording period. As for the patients who don't has evaluable ECG data at Visit 1, if the patient has known prolonged QTc>=450 msec (any correction is valid), the patient will be excluded.
  • A patient who is child in care (including foster parent system), or whom the investigator judges inappropriate for the study.
  • Randomization Inclusion Criterion :
  • A patient who has asthma symptoms scores (total of daytime and night-time) both over >=6 in total and >=1 per day for >=3 days at the last 7 consecutive days of the run-in period (excluding the day of Visit 2). Completion of symptom scores (daytime and night-time) on 5 or more days out of the last 7 consecutive days during the run-in period is required.
  • Randomization Exclusion Criteria :
  • A patient who has received systemic steroids during run-in period.
  • A patient who has suffered from or is suspected to have upper and lower respiratory tract infection that may affect the assessment of the efficacy during the run-in period. Or a patient who has or is suspected to have deep-seated mycosis or infection to which no effective antibacterial agent is available during the run-in period. Or a patient who is suspected to have RS virus infection and cannot be identified to be negative for RS virus antigen during run-in period.
  • A patient who has no evaluable ECG data during the run-in period. As for the patients who has evaluable ECG data during the run-in period, QTc(F) >=450 msec. The QTc should be based on averaged QTc values of triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained over a brief recording period.
  • A patient who has not been able to appropriately record patient diary or inhale FP appropriately during the run-in period, in the opinion of the investigator.

Trial locations and contacts

69 sites in 1 country.

69 sites in 1 country

Japan69 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aichi, 451-0052

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aichi, 470-1192

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 260-0001

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 273-0032

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 284-0003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ehime, 790-8524

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukui, 910-0833

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukui, 910-8526

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukui, 918-8205

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 802-8533

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 811-1394

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 811-3195

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 813-0017

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 814-0123

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gifu, 500-8717

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gunma, 370-0841

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gunma, 372-0817

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hiroshima, 720-8520

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hiroshima, 730-0844

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hiroshima, 730-8518

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hiroshima, 734-0023

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hiroshima, 737-0023

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hiroshima, 738-8503

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 006-0831

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 064-0821

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 069-0816

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 070-0832

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 070-8530

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 078-8211

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 078-8811

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hyōgo, 650-0047

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hyōgo, 653-0021

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hyōgo, 674-0068

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ibaraki, 300-0028

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ibaraki, 302-0022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ibaraki, 312-0057

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ishikawa, 920-8616

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kagawa, 765-0033

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 216-0006

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 221-0014

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 222-0012

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 224-0001

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 231-8682

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 238-8567

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 250-8558

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kumamoto, 861-8520

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mie, 514-0125

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miyagi, 983-0816

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Okayama, 700-8607

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 556-0005

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 565-0862

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 583-8588

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saga, 840-8571

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saitama, 344-0011

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saitama, 351-0102

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saitama, 360-0018

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saitama, 360-0812

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tochigi, 321-0293

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 152-0021

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 154-0002

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 154-0017

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 157-0066

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 158-0094

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 173-0015

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 176-0012

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 190-0023

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 196-0003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 202-0004

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wakayama, 646-8558

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Clinical Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate/ Salmeterol Xinafoate HFA MDI in 6-month to 4-year-old Japanese Patients With Bronchial Asthma

This study is a multicenter, stratified, randomized, active control, double-blinded, parallel-group comparative study with an open-label extension period. The study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 microgram (mcg) one or two inhalation twice daily (BID) for 8 weeks in comparison with FP HFA MDI 50 mcg one or two inhalation BID, in 6-month to 4-year-old Japanese patients with bronchial asthma. The study is also designed to evaluate the safety of long-term treatment of FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 mcg one or two BID for 16 weeks.

The subjects meeting the eligibility criteria will enter the run-in period of 2 weeks and receive FP 50 mcg 1 or 2 inhalation bid (FP 100 or 200 mcg/day), before randomization. The subjects under 2 years of age at Visit 1 will receive only 1 inhalation bid during the run-in period. The subjects who meet the eligibility criteria for randomization will be stratified according to their age (<2 or >=2 year-old) at Visit 1 and randomized to one of the two treatment groups.

The total duration of participation in the study will be 10 weeks for a comparison period completion and 27 weeks for a completion.

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 mcg, FP HFA MDI 50 mcg
Keywords
FP/SLM, Asthma, Infant, Efficacy, Safety
Medical subject headings
Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 mcgDrug

    Metered-dose aerosol product containing 50 mcg of fluticasone propionate and 25 mcg of salmeterol per inhalation

  • FP HFA MDI 50 mcgDrug

    Metered-dose aerosol product containing 50 mcg of fluticasone propionate per inhalation

Study groups in NCT02113436
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fluticasone propionate (FP)/ Salmeterol xinafoate (SLM)ExperimentalSubject will receive 1 or 2 inhalation of SLM 25mcg plus FP 50mcg twice daily in the first treatment period for 8 weeks and will continue to receive SLM 25mcg plus FP 50mcg one or two inhalation twice daily for 16 weeks in the second treatment period.
Receives: Drug: FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 mcg
Fluticasone propionate (FP)Active comparatorSubject will receive 1 or 2 inhalation of FP 50mcg twice daily in the first treatment period for 8 weeks and will receive SLM 25mcg plus FP 50mcg one or two inhalation twice daily for 16 weeks in the second treatment period.
Receives: Drug: FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 mcg; Drug: FP HFA MDI 50 mcg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score (Daytime Plus Night Time) at the End of the Treatment Period 1 (TP1)

    The participant's parent or legally acceptable representative made entries asthma symptom experienced by the participant in a patient diary twice daily (day time and night time) in the form of scores on a 4-point rating scale from Baseline (Week -1) until end of TP1 (Week 8). Scores ranged from 0 to 3(0: one, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe) and maximum score is 6 per day. The Baseline value is a mean value of the last 7 consecutive days during the run-in period (excluding the day of Visit 2 [Randomization]). The end of the TP1 value is a mean value of the last 7 consecutive days during the TP1 (excluding the last day of the TP1). Change from Baseline is the difference between the value of the endpoint at the time point of interest and the Baseline value. Participants who completed TP1 and completed their diary were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Night-time Asthma Symptoms Score at the End of Treatment Period 1 (TP1)

    The participant's parent or legally acceptable representative recorded asthma symptoms experienced by the participant during the night in a patient diary in the form of scores on a 4-point rating scale from Baseline (Week -1) until end of TP1 (Week 8). Scores ranged from 0 to 3(0: one, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe) and maximum score is 3 per day. Change from Baseline in the asthma symptom scores at night time at the end of TP1 was analyzed. The Baseline value is a mean value of the last 7 consecutive days during the run-in period (excluding the day of Visit 2 [Randomization]). The end of the TP1 value is a mean value of the last 7 consecutive days during the TP1 (excluding the last day of the TP1). Change from Baseline is the difference between the value of the endpoint at the time point of interest and the Baseline value. Participants who completed TP1 and completed their diary were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Asthma Symptoms Score at the End of Treatment Period 1 (TP1)

    The participant's parent or legally acceptable representative recorded asthma symptoms experienced by the participant during the day in a patient diary in the form of scores on a 4-point rating scale from Baseline (Week -1) until end of TP1 (Week 8). Scores ranged from 0 to 3(0: one, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe) and maximum score is 3 per day. Change from Baseline in the asthma symptom scores at day time at the end of TP1 was analyzed. The Baseline value is a mean value of the last 7 consecutive days during the run-in period (excluding the day of Visit 2 [Randomization]). The end of the TP1 value is a mean value of the last 7 consecutive days during the TP1 (excluding the last day of the TP1). Change from Baseline is the difference between the value of the endpoint at the time point of interest and the Baseline value. Participants who completed TP1 and completed their diary were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  3. Number of Participants With at Least One Asthma Exacerbation in Treatment Period 1 (TP1)

    The definition of exacerbations was amended during the study. <Original> An exacerbation is defined as deterioration of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids (oral, parenteral, or depot) for at least 3 days or an in-patient hospitalization or emergency department visit due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids. <Amendment> An asthma exacerbation is defined as deterioration of asthma requiring the use of prednisone or hydrocortisone equivalent systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days, or requiring the use of dexamethasone or betametasone equivalent systemic corticosteroids (oral, intravenous or intramuscular), or requiring the use of systemic depot corticosteroids once, or an in-patient hospitalization that required treatment for respiratory symptom with wheezing, or emergency department visit due to asthma that required intravenous systemic corticosteroids.

    Measured: Up to 8 weeks

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Japanese Pediatric Asthma Control Program (JPAC) Score at the End of Treatment Period 1 (TP1)

    Severity and control statuses based on Japanese pediatric guideline for the treatment and management of asthma (JPGL) can be assessed according to JPAC. Theoretically range of JPAC score was 0 (poor control) to 18 (complete control) point. JPAC questionnaire was recorded at Baseline (Week -2) and Week 8 by the participant's parent or legally acceptable representative who knew the participant's asthma for the last month. Change from Baseline is the difference between the value of the endpoint at the time point of interest and the Baseline value. Participants who completed TP1 were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Use of Rescue Medication (Number of Occasions Used During a 24-hour Period) in Treatment Period 1 (TP1)

    The number of inhalations of rescue salbutamol inhalation aerosol (medication used to relieve symptoms immediately) used during the day and night was recorded by the participant's parent or legally acceptable representative twice daily in a patient diary from Baseline (Week -1) until Week 8. A 24-hour period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication was considered as rescue free. Participants who were rescue free for 24-hour periods during the 8 weeks in TP1 were assessed. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the patient diary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline is the difference between the value of the endpoint at the time point of interest and the Baseline value. Participants who completed TP1 and completed their diary were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Use of Rescue Medication (Percentage of Days With Rescue-free 24-hour Period) at the End of Treatment Period 1 (TP1)

    The number of inhalations of rescue salbutamol inhalation aerosol (medication used to relieve symptoms immediately) used during the day and night was recorded by the participant's parent or legally acceptable representative twice daily in a patient diary. A 24-hour period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication was considered as rescue free. Participants who were rescue free for 24-hour periods during the 8-week Treatment Period were assessed. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the patient diary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline is the difference between the value of the endpoint at the time point of interest and the Baseline value. Participants who completed TP1 and completed their diary were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score (Daytime Plus Night Time) at the End of the Treatment Period 2 (TP2)

    The participant's parent or legally acceptable representative recorded asthma symptoms experienced by the participant in a patient diary twice daily (daytime and night time) in the form of scores on a 4-point rating scale from Baseline (Week -1) until end of TP2 (Week 24). Scores ranged from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and maximum score is 6 per day. Change from Baseline in the asthma symptom scores at daytime plus night time at the end of TP2 was analyzed. The Baseline value is a mean value of the last 7 consecutive days during the run-in period (excluding the day of Visit 2 [Randomization]).The end of the TP2 value is a mean value of the last 7 consecutive days during the TP2 (excluding the last day of the TP2). Change from Baseline is the difference between the value of the endpoint at the time point of interest and the Baseline value. Participants who received at least one dose of open-label medication in the TP2 were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 May 2014
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2016
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02113436
Sponsor's protocol ID
200860
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
27 Mar 2014
Last updated
16 Jun 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Yoshihara S, Tsubaki T, Ikeda M, Lenney W, Tomiak R, Hattori T, Hashimoto K, Soutome T, Kato S. The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 Mar;30(2):195-203. doi: 10.1111/pai.13010. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

    PubMed 30556939

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing FP/ SLM HFA MDI 50/25 mcg and FP HFA MDI 50 mcg in people with Asthma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 69 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 69 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Asthma Symptom Score (Daytime Plus Night Time) at the End of the Treatment Period 1 (TP1) (time frame: Baseline and Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02113436, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in