Aseptic Hip NecrosisPhase 3NCT02114489
Study Comparing Ibandronate Versus Placebo in Hip Osteonecrosis
A Phase 3 study testing ibandronate in people with Aseptic Hip Necrosis and Hip Necrosis, run by Brigitte Jolles, MD at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Aseptic osteonecrosis of the hip (AOH) concern 1 Swiss young adult to 1000 (30-40 years old). They are responsible to a severe joint destruction and in the majority of cases a joint replacement. To the hip, we can distinguish 4 stages of osteonecrosis according to Ficat: 1, 2, 3, 4. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Aseptic Hip Necrosis, Hip Necrosis
- What is being tested?
- ibandronate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed consent form
- Male and female between 18 - 50 years old
- AOH stage 1 or 2 according to Ficat
- Pain VAS scale >40 mm (0-100)
Who cannot join
- Specific aetiology of AOH already known
- Cardiac and lung uncontrolled diseases
- Active malignancy untreated
- Hyper sensibility or allergy already known to ibandronate
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Severe kidney insufficiency (cl<30 ml/min)
- Contra-Indications to an MRI (Pacemaker, cochlear implant...)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Lausanne University Hospital
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1005
About this study
Official title: Double Blind Randomized Study Comparing Ibandronate Versus Placebo in Hip Osteonecrosis Stage 1 and 2
Aseptic osteonecrosis of the hip (AOH) concern 1 Swiss young adult to 1000 (30-40 years old). They are responsible to a severe joint destruction and in the majority of cases a joint replacement. To the hip, we can distinguish 4 stages of osteonecrosis according to Ficat: 1, 2, 3, 4. Stage 3 and 4 AOH management are unanimous surgical. But management of stage 1 and 2 are unclear. Bisphophonates are mainly used for bone and osteoporosis diseases. They decrease the bone turn over, and the risk of fracture. They also decrease the bone marrow oedema and the pain associated to this oedema. Ibandronate is a bisphosphonate with a rapid effect, a short half-life, easy to manage, and with few side effects. We designed a double-blind prospective randomized trial aiming to evaluate the efficacy of an infusion of ibandronate versus placebo on pain and AOH progression in patients with stage 1 and 2 AOH. Our hypothesis is that there will be a pain reduction >=20 mm on the VAS scale (SD 10mm) in the ibandronate group versus placebo, and a non radiological progression in the treated group.
Read the detailed description
Aseptic osteonecrosis of the hip (AOH) concern 1 Swiss young adult to 1000 (30-40 years old). They are responsible to a severe joint destruction and in the majority of cases a joint replacement. AOH represented 10% of the hip replacement in Switzerland. It could be multiple. In this situation, they can be associated with a specific disease, justifying more collaboration between surgeon and specialist on bone diseases or rheumatologist.
Initially patient with AOH presents mechanical pain and dysfunction. Either surgeon or rheumatologist can suspect the diagnosis. To the hip, we can distinguish 4 stages of osteonecrosis according to Ficat: 1, 2, 3, 4. The unfavourable evolution to a worst stage is common and depend on the necrosis surface: less than 10% at 3 years if the surface is small, 25% if the surface is moderate, 84% if the surface is extended. In case of fortuitous discovery, natural evolution to the collapse from stage 1 is 55%, from stage 2 56% and from stage 3 96% with a median time of 39 months.
Mainly, in case of early Ficat stage (1), the final diagnosis is supported by a specific image on MRI. It could be confounding with a differential diagnosis of transient osteoporosis. Stage 3 and 4 AOH management are unanimous surgical. But management of stage 1 and 2 are unclear. Based on the physiopathology, associating 2 hypothesis (one vascular, one osseous), bisphosphonates could be interesting to decrease the pain and the bone defect whom evaluated to a joint collapse.
Bisphophonates are mainly used for bone and osteoporosis diseases. They decrease the bone turn over, and the risk of fracture. They decrease the bone marrow oedema and the pain associated to this oedema. Ibandronate is a bisphosphonate with a rapid effect, a short half-life, easy to manage, and with few side effects.
Regarding these considerations, a study gathering surgeons, specialist in bone diseases and radiologist is necessary. An interdisciplinary approach is needed to increase the knowledge in this pathology and to well manage patients. The exact diagnosis of AOH needs a radiologic expertise, the well management of movement and staging evolution needs an orthopaedic management, the deliverance of treatment and bone efficacy of it needs a bone diseases expertise.
A prospective randomized double blind with placebo study was designed. All consecutive patients (18-50 yo) seen in OTP and RHU/CMO units of the CHUV with a confirmed diagnosis of a single stage 1 or 2 according to Ficat AOH by an MRI could be included. After informed and signed consent, they will be randomized to receive either placebo or 3 mg of ibandronate. Infusion will be performed in 15 minutes. Size effect (pain VAS, Harris, Womac, EQ5D, gait parameters, blood analysis) and side effects will be record at day 3, 7, month 1, 3, and 6. If a patient has a persistent pain (same or worse VAS) at M3, a second infusion will be performed, only with ibandronate.
At M1 and M3 an MRI will be performed to confirm the stage 1 (DD transient osteoporosis) only for the stage 1 previous diagnosed patients.
At M3 and M6 an X ray and an MRI will be performed for all patients to analyze the stage progression.
The primary end point will be at M6 for pain VAS and radiological progression. Patients who need a second infusion at 3 months would be considered as not survival.
We hypothesize a reduction of 20 mm on the VAS scale (SD 10mm) in the ibandronate group versus placebo, and a non radiological progression in the treated group. With a power to 90% and an alpha of 0.05 we want to include 50 patients. Drugs: Patients will be allowed to have pain killers or NSAI prescribe by the investigator or the GP. All drugs have to be noted in the diary. All patients will receive a physiotherapy prescription of one treatment per week, over a period of 3 months. Moreover, the patient may freely choose any physiotherapist. The prescription will be given by the investigator. Furthermore, the sessions can be spaced out during the last three months, at the investigators discretion. On one hand participants will be asked to not overwork. On other hand, participants will be asked to not adapt a non weight-bearing status either.
From the economical point of view, looking at the CHUV scale only, 10% of the hip arthroplasties made for AOH means 30 patients each year. If the treatment allows postponing 10 years the need of an arthroplasty as one study published with a lower methodology suggests, it means an economy of CHF 1'200'000 each year.
- Conditions
- Aseptic Hip Necrosis, Hip Necrosis
- Being tested
- ibandronate, Placebo
- Keywords
- AOH, ibandronate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ibandronateDrug
Also called Bonviva
Unique perfusion of ibandronate 3 mg IV
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ibandronate | Experimental | Unique perfusion of ibandronate 3 mg IV Receives: Drug: ibandronate |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Unique perfusion of NaCl 3mg IV Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VAS pain
Pain using a visual analogue scale
Measured: up to 6th months after the intervention
Imagery assessment
MRI protocol consisting of a coronal T1-weighted, a coronal fat-suppressed (FS) T2-weighted, axial and sagittal FS proton density (PD)-weighted sequences and a sagittal PD-weighted sequence, all without intravenous administration of Gadolinium-based contrast medium. All these sequences will have a small field-of-view (FOV) in order to improve spatial resolution.
Measured: up to 6th months after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (4)
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (Womac scale)
Common tools used in the literature to assess mobility, daily life function level and pain.
Measured: up to 6 months
Gait Analysis
Gait parameters analysis using a portable accelerometer system (Physilog)
Measured: up to 6 months
Hip Harris score
Measured: up to 6 months
Health-related quality of life EQ5D questionnaire
Measured: up to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionMar 2017
- Study completionMar 2017
Why it stopped: Troubles recruiting patients
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Aseptic Hip NecrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigitte Jolles, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Brigitte Jolles, MD, University of Lausanne Hospitals
- Investigators
- Bérengère Aubry-Rpzier, Dr, Study director, University of Lausanne Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02114489
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SwissMedic 136/13
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 17 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Double Blind Randomized Study Comparing Ibandronate Versus Placebo in Hip Osteonecrosis Stage 1 and 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02114489
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SwissMedic 136/13
- Conditions
- Aseptic Hip Necrosis, Hip Necrosis
- Keywords
- AOH, ibandronate
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Troubles recruiting patients
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigitte Jolles, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aseptic osteonecrosis of the hip (AOH) concern 1 Swiss young adult to 1000 (30-40 years old). They are responsible to a severe joint destruction and in the majority of cases a joint replacement. To the hip, we can distinguish 4 stages of osteonecrosis according to Ficat: 1, 2, 3, 4. Stage 3 and 4 AOH management are unanimous surgical. But management of stage 1 and 2 are unclear. Bisphophonates are mainly used for bone and osteoporosis diseases. They decrease the bone turn over, and the risk of fracture. They also decrease the bone marrow oedema and the pain associated to this oedema. Ibandronate is a bisphosphonate with a rapid effect, a short half-life, easy to manage, and with few side effects. We designed a double-blind prospective randomized trial aiming to evaluate the efficacy of an infusion of ibandronate versus placebo on pain and AOH progression in patients with stage 1 and 2 AOH. Our hypothesis is that there will be a pain reduction >=20 mm on the VAS scale (SD 10mm) in the ibandronate group versus placebo, and a non radiological progression in the treated group.
Detailed description
Aseptic osteonecrosis of the hip (AOH) concern 1 Swiss young adult to 1000 (30-40 years old). They are responsible to a severe joint destruction and in the majority of cases a joint replacement. AOH represented 10% of the hip replacement in Switzerland. It could be multiple. In this situation, they can be associated with a specific disease, justifying more collaboration between surgeon and specialist on bone diseases or rheumatologist.
Initially patient with AOH presents mechanical pain and dysfunction. Either surgeon or rheumatologist can suspect the diagnosis. To the hip, we can distinguish 4 stages of osteonecrosis according to Ficat: 1, 2, 3, 4. The unfavourable evolution to a worst stage is common and depend on the necrosis surface: less than 10% at 3 years if the surface is small, 25% if the surface is moderate, 84% if the surface is extended. In case of fortuitous discovery, natural evolution to the collapse from stage 1 is 55%, from stage 2 56% and from stage 3 96% with a median time of 39 months.
Mainly, in case of early Ficat stage (1), the final diagnosis is supported by a specific image on MRI. It could be confounding with a differential diagnosis of transient osteoporosis. Stage 3 and 4 AOH management are unanimous surgical. But management of stage 1 and 2 are unclear. Based on the physiopathology, associating 2 hypothesis (one vascular, one osseous), bisphosphonates could be interesting to decrease the pain and the bone defect whom evaluated to a joint collapse.
Bisphophonates are mainly used for bone and osteoporosis diseases. They decrease the bone turn over, and the risk of fracture. They decrease the bone marrow oedema and the pain associated to this oedema. Ibandronate is a bisphosphonate with a rapid effect, a short half-life, easy to manage, and with few side effects.
Regarding these considerations, a study gathering surgeons, specialist in bone diseases and radiologist is necessary. An interdisciplinary approach is needed to increase the knowledge in this pathology and to well manage patients. The exact diagnosis of AOH needs a radiologic expertise, the well management of movement and staging evolution needs an orthopaedic management, the deliverance of treatment and bone efficacy of it needs a bone diseases expertise.
A prospective randomized double blind with placebo study was designed. All consecutive patients (18-50 yo) seen in OTP and RHU/CMO units of the CHUV with a confirmed diagnosis of a single stage 1 or 2 according to Ficat AOH by an MRI could be included. After informed and signed consent, they will be randomized to receive either placebo or 3 mg of ibandronate. Infusion will be performed in 15 minutes. Size effect (pain VAS, Harris, Womac, EQ5D, gait parameters, blood analysis) and side effects will be record at day 3, 7, month 1, 3, and 6. If a patient has a persistent pain (same or worse VAS) at M3, a second infusion will be performed, only with ibandronate.
At M1 and M3 an MRI will be performed to confirm the stage 1 (DD transient osteoporosis) only for the stage 1 previous diagnosed patients.
At M3 and M6 an X ray and an MRI will be performed for all patients to analyze the stage progression.
The primary end point will be at M6 for pain VAS and radiological progression. Patients who need a second infusion at 3 months would be considered as not survival.
We hypothesize a reduction of 20 mm on the VAS scale (SD 10mm) in the ibandronate group versus placebo, and a non radiological progression in the treated group. With a power to 90% and an alpha of 0.05 we want to include 50 patients. Drugs: Patients will be allowed to have pain killers or NSAI prescribe by the investigator or the GP. All drugs have to be noted in the diary. All patients will receive a physiotherapy prescription of one treatment per week, over a period of 3 months. Moreover, the patient may freely choose any physiotherapist. The prescription will be given by the investigator. Furthermore, the sessions can be spaced out during the last three months, at the investigators discretion. On one hand participants will be asked to not overwork. On other hand, participants will be asked to not adapt a non weight-bearing status either.
From the economical point of view, looking at the CHUV scale only, 10% of the hip arthroplasties made for AOH means 30 patients each year. If the treatment allows postponing 10 years the need of an arthroplasty as one study published with a lower methodology suggests, it means an economy of CHF 1'200'000 each year.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ibandronate | Experimental | Drug: ibandronateUnique perfusion of ibandronate 3 mg IV |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboUnique perfusion of NaCl 3mg IV |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Signed consent form
- Male and female between 18 - 50 years old
- AOH stage 1 or 2 according to Ficat
- Pain VAS scale >40 mm (0-100)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Specific aetiology of AOH already known
- Cardiac and lung uncontrolled diseases
- Active malignancy untreated
- Hyper sensibility or allergy already known to ibandronate
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ibandronateAlso: BonvivaUnique perfusion of ibandronate 3 mg IV | Drug | Ibandronate |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
VAS pain
Time frame: up to 6th months after the intervention
Pain using a visual analogue scale
Imagery assessment
Time frame: up to 6th months after the intervention
MRI protocol consisting of a coronal T1-weighted, a coronal fat-suppressed (FS) T2-weighted, axial and sagittal FS proton density (PD)-weighted sequences and a sagittal PD-weighted sequence, all without intravenous administration of Gadolinium-based contrast medium. All these sequences will have a small field-of-view (FOV) in order to improve spatial resolution.
4 secondary outcomes
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (Womac scale)
Time frame: up to 6 months
Gait Analysis
Time frame: up to 6 months
Hip Harris score
Time frame: up to 6 months
Health-related quality of life EQ5D questionnaire
Time frame: up to 6 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Troubles recruiting patients). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 May 2017.
Related trials for Aseptic Hip Necrosis
Active, not recruiting
Avenir Complete Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Avascular Necrosis of Hip
Recruiting
Safety and Effectiveness of the HIT Reverse HRS
Degenerative Joint Disease, Osteoarthritis, Hip
Recruiting
Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Treatment for Early-Stage Osteonecrosis
Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head, Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head
Active, not recruiting
G7 Acetabular System With Vivacit-E or Longevity Liner PMCF Study
Total Hip Arthroplasty, Degenerative Joint Disease of Hip
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Outcomes Following Hip Treatment
Hip Dysplasia, Legg-Calvâe-Perthes Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bérengère Aubry-Rpzier, Dr study director
University of Lausanne Hospitals
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ibandronate in people with Aseptic Hip Necrosis and Hip Necrosis, run by Brigitte Jolles, MD at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Troubles recruiting patients). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VAS pain (time frame: up to 6th months after the intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2017.