Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePOPENCT02119494
Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe
An observational study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Zuzana Zbožínková, M.Sc. at 81 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the representation of COPD patients in terms of categories and phenotypes of the disease in selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The results of The POPE study will allow for evaluation of the differences in clinical approaches and treatment practices. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- How many people
- 3,504 participants
- Where
- 81 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Dec 2015
- How long will I take part?
- 7 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with COPD who visit selected specialised pulmonology clinics in the given time period.
Who may be able to join
- Age > 40 years
- Clinical diagnosis of COPD with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7
- Smoking burden ≥ 10 pack-years in smokers (group A). Evidence of exposure to at least one other typical inhaled COPD risk factor: environmental tobacco smoke, professional exposures, etc. (group B) Each country will include 300 COPD subjects with positive history of smoking (at least 10 pack-years). Consecutive non-smokers with COPD can be enrolled above this limit. Institute for Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, The Czech Republic will analyze both COPD groups (A and B) separately
- Stable disease for at least 4 weeks
- Outpatient status
- Informed Consent
Who cannot join
- Exacerbation of COPD and/or instable co-morbid condition
- Patient during hospital stay for whatever reason (lung or co-morbidities)
- Patient is not able and willing to participate
Trial locations and contacts
81 sites in 11 countries.
81 sites in 11 countries
Latvia19 sites
Health Centre Balvi
Balvi
Bauska Hospital
Bauska
Regional Hospital of Jekabpils
Jēkabpils
Ambulatory Clinic Jelgava
Jelgava
Ambulatory Clinic Dubulti
Jūrmala
Kuldīga Hospital
Kuldīga
Regional Hospital of Liepaja
Liepāja
Madona Hospital
Madona
Privat practice Viktorija Vevere
Rēzekne
Health Centre 4, Ltd
Riga
LU MPI Institute privat practice
Riga
Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Riga
Riga 1st Hospital
Riga
Riga East Clinical University Hospital, In-patient Department "Centre of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases
Riga
UniClinic
Riga
Health Centre
Talsi
rivat practice Ilona Uzbeka
Valka
Privat practice Dace Harasimjuka
Valmiera
Sia "Bini"
Ventspils
Hungary10 sites
Baja St. Rókus Hospital Patient Lung Care Institute
Baja
IZO PULM Health Service Ltd.
Budapest
Újpest Non-Profit Health Care Services Ltd.
Budapest
Csongrád County Hospital for Chest Diseases
Deszk
Medical Institution of Dr. Laszlo Romics Pulmonary Care
Érd
Elizabeth House Care Ltd.
Gödöllő
St. Elizabeth Hospital Pulmonary Care Institute
Jászberény
Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County Hospitals and University Teaching Hospital
Nyíregyháza
Federated Institutes of Health Institute of Pulmonary Care
Pécs
Szarvas Respiratory Ltd.
Szarvas
Slovakia10 sites
FNsP F.D. Roosevelta
Banská Bystrica, 97517
NsP Sv. Jakuba
Bardejov, 085 01
Klinika pneumológie a ftizeológie LF SZU a UNB,
Bratislava, 821 01
Zdravotné stredisko Fedinova
Bratislava, 85101
Ambulancia pneumológie a ftizeológie, ZAPA JJ s.r.o.,
Levice, 934 01
Klinika tubekulózy a respiračných chorôb JLF UK a UNM
Martin, 036 59
Dionea, s.r.o.
Nové Zámky, 94001
Pľúcna ambulancia
Poprad, 05801
NsP
Považská Bystrica, 017 26
Zdravotné stredisko Rimava
Rimavská Sobota, 979 01
Russia9 sites
State Budget Educational Institution of High Professional Education "Kazan State Medical University"
Kazan'
I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, University Hospital #1, Outpatient Department
Moscow
Moscow State City Clinical Hospital No. 24
Moscow
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A.I.Evdokimov
Moscow
Pulmonology Research Institute
Moscow
Clinic of Pulmonology of Scientific and Clinical Center of Interstitial and Orphan Lung Diseases
Saint Petersburg
GBOU VPO Samara State Medical University
Samara
Ufa State City Clinical Hospital
Ufa
Vladivostok Clinical Hospital No.1
Vladivostok
Poland7 sites
Oddział Chorób Płuc i Niewydolności Oddychania, Kujawsko - Pomorskie; Centrum Pulmonologii w Bydgoszczy
Bydgoszcz, 85-326
Klinika Alergologii i Pneumonologii, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne, Szpital Gdańskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego,
Gdansk, 80-211
Oddział Chorób Płuc, Wojewódzkie Centrum Szpitalne Kotliny Jeleniogórskiej,
Jelenia Góra, 58-506
Katedra i Klinika Pneumonologii, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny
Katowice, 40-752
Szpital Uniwersytecki, Oddział Kliniczny Kliniki Pulmonologii
Krakow, 31-066
Katedra i Klinika Pulmonologii, Alergologii i Onkologii Pulmonologicznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
Poznan, 60-569
Katedra i Klinika Chorób Wewnętrznych, Pneumonologii i Alergologii, Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny,
Warsaw, 02-097
Austria5 sites
Department of Internal Medicine, University Innsbruck
Innsbruck, A-6020
AKH Linz, Department of Pulmonary Medicine
Linz, 1090
SKA der PV Weyer/Enns
Mühlein
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Centre, Therme Wien
Vienna, 1100
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute
Vienna
Croatia5 sites
Clinical Hospital
Osijek
University Hospital Centre
Rijeka
University Hospital Centre
Split
University Hospital Centre
Zagreb
University Hospital Dubrava
Zagreb
Serbia5 sites
Clinic for Pulmonary Diseases, Clinical Centre of Serbia
Belgrade
Municipal Institute for Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis
Belgrade
Clinic for Pulmonary Diseases, Clinical Centre Kragujevac
Kragujevac
Clinic for Pulmonary Diseases, Clinical Center of Nis
Niš
Institute for Pulmonary Diseases and TB, Clinical Centre Vojvodina
Novi Sad
Bulgaria4 sites
Clinic for pneumonology and phisiatry, UMHAT "Dr. Georgi Stranski"
Pleven
Department of Respiratory Diseases, Medical University
Plovdiv
Pulmonary Diseases Clinic, Military Medical Academy
Sofia
Clinic of Pulmonology, MHAT "st. Marina"
Varna
Czechia4 sites
Pulmonary Outpatient Clinic, University Hospital Hradec Králové
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Plicní ambulance Karlovy Vary
Karlovy Vary, 36066
Plicní ambulance Ostrava Poruba
Ostrava
Plicní ambulance Teplice
Teplice
Slovenia3 sites
Alveola, d.o.o.
Maribor, 3326
Zdravstveni dom Murska Sobota
Murska Sobota, 9000
Bolnišnica Topolšica
Topolšica, 3326
About this study
Official title: POPE-Study: Phenotypes Of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe Study
The purpose of this study is to assess the representation of COPD patients in terms of categories and phenotypes of the disease in selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The results of The POPE study will allow for evaluation of the differences in clinical approaches and treatment practices. The following countries are represented in The POPE study: Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Poland, Hungary, Russia, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia and Bulgaria.
Read the detailed description
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Europe and a major consumer of resources in both primary and secondary healthcare (1,2). Both clinical features of disease severity and quality of COPD patient care may have substantial influence on disease outcomes. Traditionally, COPD has been categorized using the FEV1 (forced expiratory volume at one second ) - based GOLD (The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) classification . Other factors independently associated with survival include age, dyspnoea, health status, hyperinflation, gas exchange abnormalities, exacerbation frequency, exercise capacity, pulmonary hemodynamic, and nutritional status (3). Together these factors explain some of the existent heterogeneity within each GOLD stage in terms of symptoms, exacerbations, quality of life and exercise capacity (4).
Recently, interest has emerged for the identification of clinical COPD phenotypes, as defined by ''a single or combination of disease attributes that describe difference between individuals with COPD as they relate to clinically meaningful outcomes'' (5). Many previous studies have attempted to identify and quantify the prevalence of different phenotypes of COPD using populations of various sources, severities, and particularities. Yet there is no consensus on the number and definition of different phenotypes. However, there must be a compromise between the oversimplification of the term COPD as a definition that encompasses the entire spectrum of patients with incompletely reversible airflow obstruction caused largely by smoking and the complexity of considering each patient individually as an orphan disease.
The most frequently reported phenotypes are emphysema and chronic bronchitis, along with a subset of asthma sufferers. Recently, an extended list of proposed phenotypes have been proposed (6) including: (A) infrequent exacerbators with either chronic bronchitis or emphysema; (B) overlap COPD-asthma; (C) frequent exacerbators with emphysema predominant; and (D) frequent exacerbators with chronic bronchitis predominant. While there is consensus of substantial, but not complete, overlap among these phenotypes, the distribution of these phenotypes may differ widely between different countries and healthcare systems.
Thus, the objectives of this study are to better understand the patient characteristics and treatment patterns of those diagnosed with COPD between different CEE countries. Knowledge of this information may provide insight into the variability of phenotypes between different healthcare systems and may subsequently contribute to a better understanding of the factors associated with patient outcomes and have the potential to improve the care of COPD patients.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, phenotypes, categories, stage, GOLD, treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2011 grades
The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 classifies patients according to airflow limitation into four grades: GOLD1, Mild; GOLD 2, Moderate; GOLD 3, Severe; GOLD 4, Very severe
Measured: 7 months
The distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2011 categories of risk (A. B, C, D)
Measured: 7 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
The prevalence of various COPD phenotypes
The COPD phenotypes are: bronchitis, emphysema phenotype, frequent exacerbators, pulmonary cachexia, COPD and asthma overlap, and COPD and bronchiectasis overlap
Measured: 7 months
The prevalence various medication prescription
Measured: 7 months
The prevalence of long term oxygen therapy use
Measured: 7 months
The prevalence of surgical treatments in COPD patients
Measured: 7 months
The use of body plethysmography, bronchodilator test, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity testing, bronchial challenge test and FeNO test in ambulatory care
Measured: 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 3,504 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 7 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zuzana Zbožínková, M.Sc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Zuzana Zbožínková, M.Sc., Masaryk University
- Investigators
- Arschang Valipour, Assoc. Prof., MD, PhD, Study director, Vienna Hospital AssociationVladimir Koblizek, MD, Ph.D, Study director, University Hospital Hradec KraloveRuzena Tkacova, Prof., MD, PhD, Study director, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in KošiceNeven Tudoric, Prof., MD, Ph.D, Study director, University of Zagreb, Clinical Hospital DubravaKyrill Zykov, MD, PhD, Study director, Moscow State University of Medicine and DentistryAttila Somfay, Prof., MD, PhD, Study director, University of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of PulmonologyAdam Barczyk, MD, PhD, Study director, Katedra i Klinika Pneumonologii, Śląski Uniwersytet MedycznyMarc Miravitlles, Prof., MD, PhD, Study director, Hospital Universitari Vall d'hebron Barcelona, Spain
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02119494
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 205.529
- Acronym
- POPE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Gershon AS, Wang C, Wilton AS, Raut R, To T. Trends in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence, incidence, and mortality in ontario, Canada, 1996 to 2007: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 22;170(6):560-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.17.
PubMed 20308643Menn P, Heinrich J, Huber RM, Jorres RA, John J, Karrasch S, Peters A, Schulz H, Holle R; KORA Study Group. Direct medical costs of COPD--an excess cost approach based on two population-based studies. Respir Med. 2012 Apr;106(4):540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
PubMed 22100535Dolan S, Varkey B. Prognostic factors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2005 Mar;11(2):149-52. doi: 10.1097/01.mcp.0000153548.36054.8f.
PubMed 15699788Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli B, Coxson HO, Edwards LD, Lomas DA, MacNee W, Miller BE, Rennard S, Silverman EK, Tal-Singer R, Wouters E, Yates JC, Vestbo J; Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) investigators. Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Res. 2010 Sep 10;11(1):122. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-122.
PubMed 20831787Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli BR, Criner G, Curtis JL, Fabbri LM, Goldin JG, Jones PW, Macnee W, Make BJ, Rabe KF, Rennard SI, Sciurba FC, Silverman EK, Vestbo J, Washko GR, Wouters EF, Martinez FJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: the future of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep 1;182(5):598-604. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200912-1843CC. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
PubMed 20522794Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluna JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, Trigueros JA, Pinera P, Simon A, Riesco JA, Ancochea J, Soriano JB. A new approach to grading and treating COPD based on clinical phenotypes: summary of the Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC). Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Mar;22(1):117-21. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00016.
PubMed 23443227Miravitlles M, Koblizek V, Esquinas C, Milenkovic B, Barczyk A, Tkacova R, Somfay A, Zykov K, Tudoric N, Kostov K, Zbozinkova Z, Svoboda M, Sorli J, Krams A, Valipour A. Determinants of CAT (COPD Assessment Test) scores in a population of patients with COPD in central and Eastern Europe: The POPE study. Respir Med. 2019 Apr;150:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
PubMed 30961941Tudoric N, Koblizek V, Miravitlles M, Valipour A, Milenkovic B, Barczyk A, Somfay A, Zykov K, Kostov K, Zbozinkova Z, Svoboda M, Sorli J, Krams A, Tkacova R. GOLD 2017 on the way to a phenotypic approach? Analysis from the Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) Cohort. Eur Respir J. 2017 Apr 26;49(4):1602518. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02518-2016. Print 2017 Apr. No abstract available.
PubMed 28446560Zbozinkova Z, Barczyk A, Tkacova R, Valipour A, Tudoric N, Zykov K, Somfay A, Miravitlles M, Koblizek V. POPE study: rationale and methodology of a study to phenotype patients with COPD in Central and Eastern Europe. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Mar 22;11:611-22. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S88846. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27042048
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- POPE-Study: Phenotypes Of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02119494
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- POPE / 205.529
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, phenotypes, categories, stage, GOLD, treatment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,504 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zuzana Zbožínková, M.Sc.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the representation of COPD patients in terms of categories and phenotypes of the disease in selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The results of The POPE study will allow for evaluation of the differences in clinical approaches and treatment practices. The following countries are represented in The POPE study: Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Poland, Hungary, Russia, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia and Bulgaria.
Detailed description
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Europe and a major consumer of resources in both primary and secondary healthcare (1,2). Both clinical features of disease severity and quality of COPD patient care may have substantial influence on disease outcomes. Traditionally, COPD has been categorized using the FEV1 (forced expiratory volume at one second ) - based GOLD (The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) classification . Other factors independently associated with survival include age, dyspnoea, health status, hyperinflation, gas exchange abnormalities, exacerbation frequency, exercise capacity, pulmonary hemodynamic, and nutritional status (3). Together these factors explain some of the existent heterogeneity within each GOLD stage in terms of symptoms, exacerbations, quality of life and exercise capacity (4).
Recently, interest has emerged for the identification of clinical COPD phenotypes, as defined by ''a single or combination of disease attributes that describe difference between individuals with COPD as they relate to clinically meaningful outcomes'' (5). Many previous studies have attempted to identify and quantify the prevalence of different phenotypes of COPD using populations of various sources, severities, and particularities. Yet there is no consensus on the number and definition of different phenotypes. However, there must be a compromise between the oversimplification of the term COPD as a definition that encompasses the entire spectrum of patients with incompletely reversible airflow obstruction caused largely by smoking and the complexity of considering each patient individually as an orphan disease.
The most frequently reported phenotypes are emphysema and chronic bronchitis, along with a subset of asthma sufferers. Recently, an extended list of proposed phenotypes have been proposed (6) including: (A) infrequent exacerbators with either chronic bronchitis or emphysema; (B) overlap COPD-asthma; (C) frequent exacerbators with emphysema predominant; and (D) frequent exacerbators with chronic bronchitis predominant. While there is consensus of substantial, but not complete, overlap among these phenotypes, the distribution of these phenotypes may differ widely between different countries and healthcare systems.
Thus, the objectives of this study are to better understand the patient characteristics and treatment patterns of those diagnosed with COPD between different CEE countries. Knowledge of this information may provide insight into the variability of phenotypes between different healthcare systems and may subsequently contribute to a better understanding of the factors associated with patient outcomes and have the potential to improve the care of COPD patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Target follow-up
- 7 Months
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with COPD who visit selected specialised pulmonology clinics in the given time period.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age > 40 years
- Clinical diagnosis of COPD with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7
- Smoking burden ≥ 10 pack-years in smokers (group A). Evidence of exposure to at least one other typical inhaled COPD risk factor: environmental tobacco smoke, professional exposures, etc. (group B) Each country will include 300 COPD subjects with positive history of smoking (at least 10 pack-years). Consecutive non-smokers with COPD can be enrolled above this limit. Institute for Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, The Czech Republic will analyze both COPD groups (A and B) separately
- Stable disease for at least 4 weeks
- Outpatient status
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Exacerbation of COPD and/or instable co-morbid condition
- Patient during hospital stay for whatever reason (lung or co-morbidities)
- Patient is not able and willing to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2011 grades
Time frame: 7 months
The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 classifies patients according to airflow limitation into four grades: GOLD1, Mild; GOLD 2, Moderate; GOLD 3, Severe; GOLD 4, Very severe
The distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2011 categories of risk (A. B, C, D)
Time frame: 7 months
5 secondary outcomes
The prevalence of various COPD phenotypes
Time frame: 7 months
The prevalence various medication prescription
Time frame: 7 months
The prevalence of long term oxygen therapy use
Time frame: 7 months
The prevalence of surgical treatments in COPD patients
Time frame: 7 months
The use of body plethysmography, bronchodilator test, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity testing, bronchial challenge test and FeNO test in ambulatory care
Time frame: 7 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2016.
- Background: PubMed 20308643Gershon AS, Wang C, Wilton AS, Raut R, To T. Trends in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence, incidence, and mortality in ontario, Canada, 1996 to 2007: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 22;170(6):560-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.17.
- Background: PubMed 22100535Menn P, Heinrich J, Huber RM, Jorres RA, John J, Karrasch S, Peters A, Schulz H, Holle R; KORA Study Group. Direct medical costs of COPD--an excess cost approach based on two population-based studies. Respir Med. 2012 Apr;106(4):540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
- Background: PubMed 15699788Dolan S, Varkey B. Prognostic factors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2005 Mar;11(2):149-52. doi: 10.1097/01.mcp.0000153548.36054.8f.
- Background: PubMed 20831787Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli B, Coxson HO, Edwards LD, Lomas DA, MacNee W, Miller BE, Rennard S, Silverman EK, Tal-Singer R, Wouters E, Yates JC, Vestbo J; Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) investigators. Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Res. 2010 Sep 10;11(1):122. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-122.
- Background: PubMed 20522794Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli BR, Criner G, Curtis JL, Fabbri LM, Goldin JG, Jones PW, Macnee W, Make BJ, Rabe KF, Rennard SI, Sciurba FC, Silverman EK, Vestbo J, Washko GR, Wouters EF, Martinez FJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: the future of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep 1;182(5):598-604. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200912-1843CC. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
- Background: PubMed 23443227Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluna JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, Trigueros JA, Pinera P, Simon A, Riesco JA, Ancochea J, Soriano JB. A new approach to grading and treating COPD based on clinical phenotypes: summary of the Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC). Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Mar;22(1):117-21. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30961941Miravitlles M, Koblizek V, Esquinas C, Milenkovic B, Barczyk A, Tkacova R, Somfay A, Zykov K, Tudoric N, Kostov K, Zbozinkova Z, Svoboda M, Sorli J, Krams A, Valipour A. Determinants of CAT (COPD Assessment Test) scores in a population of patients with COPD in central and Eastern Europe: The POPE study. Respir Med. 2019 Apr;150:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28446560Tudoric N, Koblizek V, Miravitlles M, Valipour A, Milenkovic B, Barczyk A, Somfay A, Zykov K, Kostov K, Zbozinkova Z, Svoboda M, Sorli J, Krams A, Tkacova R. GOLD 2017 on the way to a phenotypic approach? Analysis from the Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) Cohort. Eur Respir J. 2017 Apr 26;49(4):1602518. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02518-2016. Print 2017 Apr. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27042048Zbozinkova Z, Barczyk A, Tkacova R, Valipour A, Tudoric N, Zykov K, Somfay A, Miravitlles M, Koblizek V. POPE study: rationale and methodology of a study to phenotype patients with COPD in Central and Eastern Europe. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Mar 22;11:611-22. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S88846. eCollection 2016.
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arschang Valipour, Assoc. Prof., MD, PhD study director
Vienna Hospital Association
Vladimir Koblizek, MD, Ph.D study director
University Hospital Hradec Kralove
Ruzena Tkacova, Prof., MD, PhD study director
Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice
81 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Zuzana Zbožínková, M.Sc. at 81 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 81 sites in Latvia, Hungary, Slovakia, Russia, Poland and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The distribution of COPD patients according to GOLD 2011 grades (time frame: 7 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02119494, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2016.