Teaching CPRNCT02120573
Efficacy of CPR Teaching in Mass Training
A study testing Workshop using Lecture and human model, Workshop using Educational Film and Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film in people with Teaching CPR, run by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
Trial summary
This prospective study evaluate teaching efficacy of CPR training using different methods in general population, medical students and non medical students with the 12 months evaluation of its recall Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Teaching CPR
- What is being tested?
- Workshop using Lecture and human model, Workshop using Educational Film and Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIran
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Aug 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- all participant take part in workshop
Who cannot join
- refuse to take part in exams
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Teaching Methods in Mass CPR Training in Different Groups of the Society
This prospective study evaluate teaching efficacy of CPR training using different methods in general population, medical students and non medical students with the 12 months evaluation of its recall
Read the detailed description
In a prospective and observational study of 2000 individuals in three different groups including medical students, non-medical students and general populations four different protocols of CPR training were applied and their efficacy were compared between the groups. Meanwhile, 12 months after the study course, 460 participants from three groups were asked to take part in a theoretical and practical exam to evaluate the long term efficacy of the four protocols.
- Conditions
- Teaching CPR
- Being tested
- Workshop using Lecture and human model, Workshop using Educational Film, Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film, Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference book
- Keywords
- Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Training
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Workshop using Lecture and human modelOther
workshop to teach CPR with lecture and human models
Workshop using Educational FilmOther
workshops using film review about CPR
Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational FilmOther
using educational films and human model and lecture for training
Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference bookOther
training volunteers with lecture, films, and human models and giving them reference book for referral
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| medical students | Active comparator | medical students took part in workshop Receives: Other: Workshop using Lecture and human model; Other: Workshop using Educational Film; Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film; Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference book |
| general population | Active comparator | general population took part in workshop Receives: Other: Workshop using Lecture and human model; Other: Workshop using Educational Film; Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film; Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference book |
| nonmedical students | Active comparator | all students from different subjects, non medical and paramedical Receives: Other: Workshop using Lecture and human model; Other: Workshop using Educational Film; Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film; Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference book |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
teaching efficacy
pre test and post test exam before and after workshop
Measured: 24 hours
late post workshop practical test
practical exam about general measures of CPR
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
trainee satisfaction
questionaire showing their satisfaction about the workshop
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionJul 2013
- Study completionAug 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Teaching CPRStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Shiraz education development center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Javad Kojuri, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02120573
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 93-1345
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hasani H, Bahrami M, Malekpour A, Dehghani M, Allahyary E, Amini M, Abdorahimi M, Khani S, Kalantari Meibodi M, Kojuri J. Evaluation of Teaching Methods in Mass CPCR Training in Different Groups of the Society, an Observational Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e859. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000859.
PubMed 26020392
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Teaching Methods in Mass CPR Training in Different Groups of the Society
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02120573
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 93-1345
- Conditions
- Teaching CPR
- Keywords
- Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shiraz University of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Shiraz education development center
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective study evaluate teaching efficacy of CPR training using different methods in general population, medical students and non medical students with the 12 months evaluation of its recall
Detailed description
In a prospective and observational study of 2000 individuals in three different groups including medical students, non-medical students and general populations four different protocols of CPR training were applied and their efficacy were compared between the groups. Meanwhile, 12 months after the study course, 460 participants from three groups were asked to take part in a theoretical and practical exam to evaluate the long term efficacy of the four protocols.
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| medical students | Active comparator | Other: Workshop using Lecture and human model, Other: Workshop using Educational Film, Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film, Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference bookmedical students took part in workshop |
| general population | Active comparator | Other: Workshop using Lecture and human model, Other: Workshop using Educational Film, Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film, Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference bookgeneral population took part in workshop |
| nonmedical students | Active comparator | Other: Workshop using Lecture and human model, Other: Workshop using Educational Film, Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film, Other: Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference bookall students from different subjects, non medical and paramedical |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all participant take part in workshop
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- refuse to take part in exams
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Workshop using Lecture and human modelworkshop to teach CPR with lecture and human models | Other | general population, medical students, nonmedical students |
| Workshop using Educational Filmworkshops using film review about CPR | Other | general population, medical students, nonmedical students |
| Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Filmusing educational films and human model and lecture for training | Other | general population, medical students, nonmedical students |
| Workshop using Lecture, human model, Educational Film as well as reference booktraining volunteers with lecture, films, and human models and giving them reference book for referral | Other | general population, medical students, nonmedical students |
Primary outcome
teaching efficacy
Time frame: 24 hours
pre test and post test exam before and after workshop
late post workshop practical test
Time frame: 12 months
practical exam about general measures of CPR
1 secondary outcome
trainee satisfaction
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26020392Hasani H, Bahrami M, Malekpour A, Dehghani M, Allahyary E, Amini M, Abdorahimi M, Khani S, Kalantari Meibodi M, Kojuri J. Evaluation of Teaching Methods in Mass CPCR Training in Different Groups of the Society, an Observational Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e859. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000859.
Related trials for Teaching CPR
Recruiting
Comparing the Effectiveness of Large Language Model-Based and Video-Based Refresher Education on Knowledge Retention After Simulation-Based Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: A Six-Month Follow-Up Study
Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS)
Active, not recruiting
The Feasibility of Using the PulsePoint to Facilitate Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution
Carrying Naloxone/Narcan on Their Person or in Their Vehicle, Being Trained to Respond to an Opioid Overdose
Recruiting
Virtual vs. Traditional CPR Training: Effects on Stress
Heart Rate Variability, Biomarker of Stress, Stress and Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Airway Obstruction During BLS
Education Advancement
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Workshop using Lecture and human model, Workshop using Educational Film and Workshop using Lecture, human model as well as Educational Film in people with Teaching CPR, run by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
teaching efficacy (time frame: 24 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02120573, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2014.