AzTrials
AzTrials

Proximal Humeral Fracture Fixated With PHILOS© PlateNCT02122315

Dry Needling in Post-operative Shoulder Pain

A study testing Physical therapy plus dry needling and Physical therapy in people with Proximal Humeral Fracture Fixated With PHILOS© Plate and Rotator Cuff Tear Surgical Repair, run by César Fernández-de-las-Peñas at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Fractures of the proximal humerus account for between 5% and 8% off all reported fractures. Post-operative shoulder pain is highly frequent. Due to either surgical procedure, soft tissues surrounding the shoulder area can be damaged. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Physical therapy plus dry needling and Physical therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Feb 2013to Apr 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • proximal humeral fracture
  • rotator cuff tear
  • open reduction and internal fixation with PHILOS© plate (Synthes, Switzerland)
  • rotator cuff tear repair
  • post-operative shoulder pain
  • active TrPs in the neck-shoulder muscles

Who cannot join

  • no active TrPs
  • multiple fracture
  • previous surgery
  • cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
  • diagnosis of fibromialgia
  • having undergone any physical therapy intervention in the year before the surgery
  • fear of needles
  • any contraindication for dry needling

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Jose Luis Arias Buría

    Madrid, Madrid

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INCLUSION OF TRIGGER POINT DRY NEEDLING INTO A MULTIMODAL PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM FOR POST-OPERATIVE SHOULDER PAIN

Fractures of the proximal humerus account for between 5% and 8% off all reported fractures. Post-operative shoulder pain is highly frequent. Due to either surgical procedure, soft tissues surrounding the shoulder area can be damaged. The purpose of the current clinical trial was to compare the effects of physiotherapy versus physiotherapy plus TrP-DN on pain and function in patients who exhibit post-operative shoulder pain after a PHILOS procedure for proximal humeral fixation or rotator cuff tear repair.

Being tested
Physical therapy plus dry needling, Physical therapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Physical therapy plus dry needlingOther

    Best-evidence physical therapy intervention in addition to a single session of TrP-DN targeted to active TrPs in the neck-shoulder muscles

  • Physical therapyOther

    Best-evidence physical therapy intervention

Study groups in NCT02122315
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Physical therapy plus dry needlingExperimentalBest-evidence physical therapy intervention in addition to a single session of TrP-DN targeted to active TrPs in the neck-shoulder muscles.
Receives: Other: Physical therapy plus dry needling
Physical therapyActive comparatorBest-evidence physical therapy intervention
Receives: Other: Physical therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in Constant-Murley score before and after the intervention

    The Constant-Murley score is a 100-point scoring system that is divided into 4 main sub-scales: pain (15 points); activities of daily living (20 points); range of motion (40 points); and strength (25 points). Higher score represents better function

    Measured: Baseline and one week after the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionApr 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02122315
Sponsor's protocol ID
CP13-060
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
19 Apr 2014
Last updated
24 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5.

    PubMed 35727196

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Physical therapy plus dry needling and Physical therapy in people with Proximal Humeral Fracture Fixated With PHILOS© Plate and Rotator Cuff Tear Surgical Repair, run by César Fernández-de-las-Peñas at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in Constant-Murley score before and after the intervention (time frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02122315, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in