Chronic Idiopathic ConstipationPhase 3CICNCT02122471
12-Week Study of Plecanatide for CIC (The National CIC3 Study)
A Phase 3 study testing Plecanatide in people with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 167 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to confirm that the investigational medication, plecanatide, is safe and effective in treating chronic idiopathic constipation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
- What is being tested?
- Plecanatide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,410 participants
- Where
- 167 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female aged 18-80, inclusive
- Meets modified Rome III criteria for functional chronic idiopathic constipation for at least 3 months with symptom onset for at least 6 months
- Completed a colonoscopy in accordance with American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) colon cancer screening guidelines (5 years), with no clinically significant findings
- Willing to maintain a stable diet during the study
Who cannot join
- Loose stool (mushy) or watery (Bristol score 6 or 7) stool in the absence of any laxative or prohibited medicine for > 25% of Bowel Movements (BMs) during the 3 months prior to screening visit OR during the 14 day pre-treatment assessment
- Active peptic ulcer disease, diabetes or hypertension not adequately treated or not stable
- History of cathartic colon, laxative, enema abuse, or ischemic colitis
- Fecal impaction within 3 months of screening
- Patient has had /has any: diseases or conditions associated with constipation (GI or CNS), structural abnormality of the GI tract or gastric bypass surgery, pelvic floor dysfunction, pseudo-obstruction, active infectious gastritis, diverticulitis, anal fissures or any disease or condition that can affect GI motility or defecation or can be associated with abdominal pain
- Unexplained and clinically significant "alarm symptoms" including lower GI bleeding, iron-deficiency anemia, weight loss or systemic signs of infection or colitis
- Major surgery, stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) within 60 days of screening
- Participated in a previous plecanatide clinical trial
Trial locations and contacts
167 sites in 1 country.
167 sites in 1 country
United States167 sites
Synergy Research Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Synergy Research Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
Synergy Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92801
Synergy Research Site
Anniston, Alabama, 36207
Synergy Research Site
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Synergy Research Site
Artesia, California, 90701
Synergy Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Synergy Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78705
Synergy Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
Synergy Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78735
Synergy Research Site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Synergy Research Site
Blackfoot, Idaho, 83221
Synergy Research Site
Blackwood, New Jersey, 08012
Synergy Research Site
Boise, Idaho, 83709
Synergy Research Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Synergy Research Site
Bradenton, Florida, 34208
Synergy Research Site
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Synergy Research Site
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620
Synergy Research Site
Brooksville, Florida, 34601
Synergy Research Site
Buckley, Michigan, 49620
Synergy Research Site
Carmichael, California, 95608
Synergy Research Site
Carrollton, Texas, 75007
Synergy Research Site
Carrollton, Texas, 75010
Synergy Research Site
Cary, North Carolina, 27518
Synergy Research Site
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Synergy Research Site
Channelview, Texas, 77530
Synergy Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60602
Synergy Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224
Synergy Research Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Synergy Research Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Synergy Research Site
Columbia, Maryland, 21045
Synergy Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Synergy Research Site
Concord, North Carolina, 28025
Synergy Research Site
Corona, California, 92879
Synergy Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75224
Synergy Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Synergy Research Site
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Synergy Research Site
Denver, Colorado, 80209
Synergy Research Site
Draper, Utah, 84020
Synergy Research Site
Elmsford, New York, 10523
Synergy Research Site
Encino, California, 91436
Synergy Research Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Synergy Research Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33312
Synergy Research Site
Franklin, Tennessee, 37064
Synergy Research Site
Gainesville, Florida, 32607
Synergy Research Site
Garden Grove, California, 92843
Synergy Research Site
Garden Grove, California, 92844
Synergy Research Site
Glendale, California, 91204
Synergy Research Site
Gonzales, Texas, 78629
Synergy Research Site
Goodyear, Arizona, 85395
Synergy Research Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Synergy Research Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Synergy Research Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33013
Synergy Research Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
Synergy Research Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33106
Synergy Research Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
Synergy Research Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
Synergy Research Site
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Synergy Research Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33024
Synergy Research Site
Homestead, Florida, 33030
Synergy Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77015
Synergy Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77025
Synergy Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77054
Synergy Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77062
Synergy Research Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Synergy Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Synergy Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32277
Synergy Research Site
Jefferson City, Tennessee, 37760
Synergy Research Site
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, 19046
Synergy Research Site
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
Synergy Research Site
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
Synergy Research Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37919
Synergy Research Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37938
Synergy Research Site
La Mirada, California, 90638
Synergy Research Site
Laguna Hills, California, 92653
Synergy Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103
Synergy Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Synergy Research Site
Levittown, Pennsylvania, 19056
Synergy Research Site
Littleton, Colorado, 80128
Synergy Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Synergy Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90036
Synergy Research Site
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431
Synergy Research Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33014
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33015
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33032
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33122
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33125
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33126
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33142
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33144
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33155
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33157
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33165
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33173
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33175
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33176
Synergy Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33185
Synergy Research Site
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016
Synergy Research Site
Miami Springs, Florida, 33166
Synergy Research Site
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Synergy Research Site
Moncks Corner, South Carolina, 29461
Synergy Research Site
Monroe, Louisiana, 71201
Synergy Research Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211
Synergy Research Site
New Hyde Park, New York, 11040
Synergy Research Site
New Port Richey, Florida, 34653
Synergy Research Site
New York, New York, 10016
Synergy Research Site
New York, New York, 10018
Synergy Research Site
Newington, New Hampshire, 03801
Synergy Research Site
Newport Beach, California, 92663
Synergy Research Site
Newport News, Virginia, 23606
Synergy Research Site
North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162
Synergy Research Site
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60453
Synergy Research Site
Oceanside, California, 92056
Synergy Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Synergy Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Synergy Research Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Synergy Research Site
Orange, California, 92868
Synergy Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Synergy Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32807
Synergy Research Site
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Synergy Research Site
Owensboro, Kentucky, 42303
Synergy Research Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026
Synergy Research Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028
Synergy Research Site
Pharr, Texas, 78577
Synergy Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206
Synergy Research Site
Plano, Texas, 75024
Synergy Research Site
Plano, Texas, 75075
Synergy Research Site
Plano, Texas, 75093
Synergy Research Site
Plano, Texas, 75903
Synergy Research Site
Plant City, Florida, 33563
Synergy Research Site
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Synergy Research Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Synergy Research Site
Richland, Washington, 99352
Synergy Research Site
Sacramento, California, 95821
Synergy Research Site
Sacramento, California, 95831
Synergy Research Site
Saint Cloud, Florida, 34769
Synergy Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78205
Synergy Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Synergy Research Site
San Bernardino, California, 92408
Synergy Research Site
San Diego, California, 92103
Synergy Research Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34242
Synergy Research Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Synergy Research Site
Schaumburg, Illinois, 60194
Synergy Research Site
Seminole, Florida, 33777
Synergy Research Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105
Synergy Research Site
Snellville, Georgia, 30078
Synergy Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Synergy Research Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
Synergy Research Site
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
Synergy Research Site
Stateline, Nevada, 89449
Synergy Research Site
Sterling, Virginia, 20166
Synergy Research Site
Sylvania, Ohio, 43560
Synergy Research Site
Tamarac, Florida, 33319
Synergy Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Synergy Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85710
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85715
Synergy Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85745
Synergy Research Site
Upland, California, 91786
Synergy Research Site
Upper Saint Clair, Pennsylvania, 15241
Synergy Research Site
Ventura, California, 93003
Synergy Research Site
Wadsworth, Ohio, 44203
Synergy Research Site
Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472
Synergy Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
About this study
Official title: A National, Randomized, 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Plecanatide (3.0 and 6.0 mg) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
The purpose of this study is to confirm that the investigational medication, plecanatide, is safe and effective in treating chronic idiopathic constipation.
Read the detailed description
This is a national, randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study in approximately 1350 adult male and female patients with CIC comparing 2 doses of plecanatide to placebo. The study will be conducted at approximately 180 clinical study sites in the United States. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3.0 and 6.0 mg of plecanatide administered once daily (QD) for 12 weeks in a population of patients with CIC. The study population will include only patients without other causes of constipation or other chronic conditions that could interfere with study assessments. Patients may not take laxatives (with the exception of the study-provided rescue medication, bisacodyl 5mg tablets), or a number of prohibited drugs that are known to cause constipation or diarrhea, during study participation.
There are 6 scheduled study visits, including the screening and follow-up visits. The planned duration of participation in this study will be 112 days and up to 155 days, with washout and all visit windows considered.
- Conditions
- Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
- Being tested
- Plecanatide, Placebo
- Keywords
- CIC, Constipation, Chronic Constipation, Synergy, Plecanatide
- Medical subject headings
- Constipation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlecanatideDrug
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Plecanatide 3.0 mg | Experimental | Plecanatide tablets 3.0 mg QD for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Plecanatide |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matching placebo tablets QD for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Plecanatide 6.0 mg | Experimental | Plecanatide tablets 6.0 mg QD for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Plecanatide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Durable Overall CSBM Responders, Mean Replacement Approach
The primary efficacy endpoint was measured by the number of durable overall CSBM responders over the 12-week Treatment Period. A durable overall CSBM responder was defined as a weekly CSBM responder for at least 9 of the 12 treatment weeks, including at least 3 of the last 4 weeks. A CSBM weekly responder was defined as a patient who has ≥ 3 Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements (CSBMs) per week and an increase from baseline of ≥1 CSBM for that week. A CSBM was a bowel movement that occurred in the absence of laxative use within 24 hours and was associated with the feeling of complete evacuation.
Measured: 12-Week Treatment Period
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in CSBMs (CSBMs/Week) Over the 12-week Treatment Period , Mean Replacement Approach
The change from baseline in the number of Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements (CSBMs) over the 12-week Treatment Period was analyzed. Baseline was the mean number of CSBMs recorded during the 2-week baseline diary assessment period prior to the first dose of study drug. A CSBM was a bowel movement that occurred in the absence of laxative use within 24 hours and was associated with the feeling of complete evacuation.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in SBMs (SBMs/Week) Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
The change from baseline in the number of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) over the 12-week Treatment Period was analyzed. Baseline was the mean number of SBMs recorded during the 2-week baseline diary assessment period prior to the first dose of study drug. The weekly SBM totals were derived from the daily diary entries reported during the Treatment Period.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly SBM Stool Consistency Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
The change from baseline in the stool consistency score (i.e. BSFS) over the 12-week Treatment Period was analyzed. Baseline was the mean BSFS score recorded during the 2-week baseline diary assessment period prior to the first dose of study drug. The weekly mean BSFS score per patient was derived from the BSFS entries reported during the Treatment Period in the Daily Symptom Diary.
The stool consistency of each bowel movement (BM) was assessed by patients using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale [BSFS] from 1 to 7.
- = separate hard lumps like nuts (difficult to pass)
- = sausage shaped but lumpy
- = like a sausage but with cracks on its surface
- = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft
- = soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily)
- = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool
- = watery, no solid pieces (entirely liquid)
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Straining Score Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
The change from baseline in the straining score over the 12-week Treatment Period was analyzed. Baseline was the mean of non-missing straining scores recorded during the 2-week baseline diary assessment period prior to the first dose of study drug. The weekly average straining score was derived from the straining scores reported during the Treatment Period in the Daily Symptom Diary. The severity of straining during bowel movements was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, and 4 = very severe.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Idiopathic ConstipationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,410 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mary Beth Layton, Study director, Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02122471
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SP304203-03
- Acronym
- CIC
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 28 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Cash BD, Sharma A, Walker A, Laitman AP, Chang L. Plecanatide for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: Post hoc analyses of placebo-controlled trials in adults with severe constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Sep;35(9):e14632. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14632. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
PubMed 37332239Moshiree B, Schoenfeld P, Franklin H, Rezaie A. The Effect of Acid Suppression Therapy on the Safety and Efficacy of Plecanatide: Analysis of Randomized Phase III Trials. Clin Ther. 2022 Jan;44(1):98-110.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.11.009. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
PubMed 35086735Menees SB, Franklin H, Chey WD. Evaluation of Plecanatide for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation in Patients 65 Years or Older. Clin Ther. 2020 Jul;42(7):1406-1414.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
PubMed 32660770DeMicco M, Barrow L, Hickey B, Shailubhai K, Griffin P. Randomized clinical trial: efficacy and safety of plecanatide in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;10(11):837-851. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17734697. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
PubMed 29147135
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A National, Randomized, 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Plecanatide (3.0 and 6.0 mg) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02122471
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIC / SP304203-03
- Conditions
- Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
- Keywords
- CIC, Constipation, Chronic Constipation, Synergy, Plecanatide
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,410 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Mar 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to confirm that the investigational medication, plecanatide, is safe and effective in treating chronic idiopathic constipation.
Detailed description
This is a national, randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study in approximately 1350 adult male and female patients with CIC comparing 2 doses of plecanatide to placebo. The study will be conducted at approximately 180 clinical study sites in the United States. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3.0 and 6.0 mg of plecanatide administered once daily (QD) for 12 weeks in a population of patients with CIC. The study population will include only patients without other causes of constipation or other chronic conditions that could interfere with study assessments. Patients may not take laxatives (with the exception of the study-provided rescue medication, bisacodyl 5mg tablets), or a number of prohibited drugs that are known to cause constipation or diarrhea, during study participation.
There are 6 scheduled study visits, including the screening and follow-up visits. The planned duration of participation in this study will be 112 days and up to 155 days, with washout and all visit windows considered.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Plecanatide 3.0 mg | Experimental | Drug: PlecanatidePlecanatide tablets 3.0 mg QD for 12 weeks |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboMatching placebo tablets QD for 12 weeks |
| Plecanatide 6.0 mg | Experimental | Drug: PlecanatidePlecanatide tablets 6.0 mg QD for 12 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female aged 18-80, inclusive
- Meets modified Rome III criteria for functional chronic idiopathic constipation for at least 3 months with symptom onset for at least 6 months
- Completed a colonoscopy in accordance with American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) colon cancer screening guidelines (5 years), with no clinically significant findings
- Willing to maintain a stable diet during the study
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Loose stool (mushy) or watery (Bristol score 6 or 7) stool in the absence of any laxative or prohibited medicine for > 25% of Bowel Movements (BMs) during the 3 months prior to screening visit OR during the 14 day pre-treatment assessment
- Active peptic ulcer disease, diabetes or hypertension not adequately treated or not stable
- History of cathartic colon, laxative, enema abuse, or ischemic colitis
- Fecal impaction within 3 months of screening
- Patient has had /has any: diseases or conditions associated with constipation (GI or CNS), structural abnormality of the GI tract or gastric bypass surgery, pelvic floor dysfunction, pseudo-obstruction, active infectious gastritis, diverticulitis, anal fissures or any disease or condition that can affect GI motility or defecation or can be associated with abdominal pain
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Plecanatide | Drug | Plecanatide 3.0 mg, Plecanatide 6.0 mg |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Durable Overall CSBM Responders, Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame: 12-Week Treatment Period
The primary efficacy endpoint was measured by the number of durable overall CSBM responders over the 12-week Treatment Period. A durable overall CSBM responder was defined as a weekly CSBM responder for at least 9 of the 12 treatment weeks, including at least 3 of the last 4 weeks. A CSBM weekly responder was defined as a patient who has ≥ 3 Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements (CSBMs) per week and an increase from baseline of ≥1 CSBM for that week. A CSBM was a bowel movement that occurred in the absence of laxative use within 24 hours and was associated with the feeling of complete evacuation.
4 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in CSBMs (CSBMs/Week) Over the 12-week Treatment Period , Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in SBMs (SBMs/Week) Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly SBM Stool Consistency Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Straining Score Over the 12-week Treatment Period, Mean Replacement Approach
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37332239Cash BD, Sharma A, Walker A, Laitman AP, Chang L. Plecanatide for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: Post hoc analyses of placebo-controlled trials in adults with severe constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Sep;35(9):e14632. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14632. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35086735Moshiree B, Schoenfeld P, Franklin H, Rezaie A. The Effect of Acid Suppression Therapy on the Safety and Efficacy of Plecanatide: Analysis of Randomized Phase III Trials. Clin Ther. 2022 Jan;44(1):98-110.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.11.009. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32660770Menees SB, Franklin H, Chey WD. Evaluation of Plecanatide for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation in Patients 65 Years or Older. Clin Ther. 2020 Jul;42(7):1406-1414.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29147135DeMicco M, Barrow L, Hickey B, Shailubhai K, Griffin P. Randomized clinical trial: efficacy and safety of plecanatide in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;10(11):837-851. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17734697. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Related trials for Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
This is a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Weight-based Treatment Groups of Plecanatide Versus Placebo in Children and Adolescent Participants 6 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With FC
Functional Constipation (FC)
Active, not recruiting
Do the Symptoms of Chronic Constipation Improve With a Primary Care Programme Based on Behavioural Re-education and Abdominal Massage?
Constipation Chronic Idiopathic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Post-Marketing Study of Prucalopride Safety In Pregnancy
Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A 26-Wk Study to Assess Safety & Efficacy of Tenapanor for T/t of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation in Adults
Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of Prucalopride in Breastfeeding Women With Constipation
Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mary Beth Layton study director
Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
167 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Plecanatide in people with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation, run by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. at 167 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 167 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Mar 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Durable Overall CSBM Responders, Mean Replacement Approach (time frame: 12-Week Treatment Period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02122471, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2019.