HealthyPhase 1NCT02125292
Taste Assessment Study of SHP429 in Healthy Adult Subjects
A Phase 1 study testing Mesalamine in people with Healthy, run by Shire at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the palatability of SHP429 capsule contents delivered via 3 means of administration (sprinkled on yogurt, sprinkled on applesauce, and emptied into a cup and administered with water). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Mesalamine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Jun 2014to 19 Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- normal, healthy, adult male and female volunteers, without evidence of active or chronic disease
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Clinical Pharmacology of Miami, Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33014
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1, Open-label, Randomized, 3-period Crossover Taste Assessment Study to Characterize the Palatability of SHP429 When the Contents Are Sprinkled Onto Soft Foods or Emptied Into a Cup and Administered With Water in Healthy Adult Subjects
The purpose of this study is to compare the palatability of SHP429 capsule contents delivered via 3 means of administration (sprinkled on yogurt, sprinkled on applesauce, and emptied into a cup and administered with water).
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Mesalamine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MesalamineDrug
Also called Pentasa, SHP429
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine (Vanilla Yogurt) | Experimental | One 500mg capsule contents sprinkled onto 1 tablespoon of low-fat vanilla yogurt Receives: Drug: Mesalamine |
| Mesalamine (Applesauce) | Experimental | One 500mg capsule contents sprinkled onto 1 tablespoon of applesauce Receives: Drug: Mesalamine |
| Mesalamine (Dosing Cup) | Experimental | One 500mg capsule contents emptied into a dosing cup and taken with water Receives: Drug: Mesalamine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Positive Responses to Palatability Assessment of The Taste of Mesalamine
A taste assessment was completed immediately after investigational product was administered to assess the subject's taste/liking of the formulation. The assessment consisted of a 5-point rating scale. Participants were asked to choose one of the following responses to the statement "The taste was acceptable": strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree. The number of participants who chose either of the top two responses (strongly agree, agree) is reported.
Measured: Immediately post-dose
Number of Participants Who Detected an Aftertaste of Mesalamine
An aftertaste assessment was completed 5 minutes after administration of investigational product to assess whether the participants detected an aftertaste. The participants answered "Yes" or "No" to the following question: "Was there an aftertaste?" The number of participants who answered "Yes" is reported.
Measured: 5 minutes post-dose
Number of Participants With Positive Responses to Palatability Assessment of The Aftertaste of Mesalamine
An aftertaste assessment was completed 5 minutes after administration of investigational product to assess the subject's rating of aftertaste and means of administration. The assessment consisted of a 5-point rating scale. The participants were asked to choose one of the following responses to the statement "The aftertaste (if present) was acceptable": strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree. The number of participants who chose either of the top two responses (strongly agree, agree) is reported.
Measured: 5 minutes post-dose
Number of Participants Willing to Take Mesalamine Via Treatment Method on a Regular Basis
The participants were asked to answer "Yes" or "No" to the following question: "Would you be willing to take medicine this way on a regular basis if necessary?" The number of participants who answered "Yes" is reported.
Measured: Immediately post-dose
Secondary outcomes (4)
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event
Participants were monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events through the follow-up assessment, which occurred 2 days +/- 1 day post-dose.
Measured: 4 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Laboratory Results
Clinical laboratory assessments included hematology, chemistry and urinalysis parameters, all measured 6 hours post-dose. All clinical laboratory assays were performed according to the laboratory's normal procedures. Reference ranges were supplied by the laboratory and were used to assess the clinical laboratory data for clinical significance and out-of-range pathological changes. The investigator assessed out-of-range clinical laboratory values for clinical significance and indicated whether or not the values were clinically significant.
Measured: 1 day
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Vital Signs
Vital sign assessments included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate and body temperature measurements, all measured 6 hours post-dose. Study personnel used both absolute values and change from baseline values to determine if the vital sign was potentially clinically important. Criteria for the potential clinical importance of both absolute and change from baseline values were pre-specified. A participant's vital sign had to meet both the absolute and change from baseline criteria to be considered as potentially clinically important.
Measured: 1 day
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results
Subjects underwent a standard 12-lead ECG 6 hours post-dose. The investigator assessed if the ECG tracing was normal or abnormal; if abnormal, the investigator made a determination of whether or not the abnormality was clinically significant.
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study start2 Jun 2014
- Primary completion19 Jun 2014
- Study completion19 Jun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shire
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Study Director, Study director, Takeda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02125292
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHP429-102
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 3 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1, Open-label, Randomized, 3-period Crossover Taste Assessment Study to Characterize the Palatability of SHP429 When the Contents Are Sprinkled Onto Soft Foods or Emptied Into a Cup and Administered With Water in Healthy Adult Subjects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02125292
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHP429-102
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ShireIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 2 Jun 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Apr 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the palatability of SHP429 capsule contents delivered via 3 means of administration (sprinkled on yogurt, sprinkled on applesauce, and emptied into a cup and administered with water).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine (Vanilla Yogurt) | Experimental | Drug: MesalamineOne 500mg capsule contents sprinkled onto 1 tablespoon of low-fat vanilla yogurt |
| Mesalamine (Applesauce) | Experimental | Drug: MesalamineOne 500mg capsule contents sprinkled onto 1 tablespoon of applesauce |
| Mesalamine (Dosing Cup) | Experimental | Drug: MesalamineOne 500mg capsule contents emptied into a dosing cup and taken with water |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- normal, healthy, adult male and female volunteers, without evidence of active or chronic disease
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MesalamineAlso: Pentasa, SHP429 | Drug | Mesalamine (Applesauce), Mesalamine (Dosing Cup), Mesalamine (Vanilla Yogurt) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Positive Responses to Palatability Assessment of The Taste of Mesalamine
Time frame: Immediately post-dose
A taste assessment was completed immediately after investigational product was administered to assess the subject's taste/liking of the formulation. The assessment consisted of a 5-point rating scale. Participants were asked to choose one of the following responses to the statement "The taste was acceptable": strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree. The number of participants who chose either of the top two responses (strongly agree, agree) is reported.
Number of Participants Who Detected an Aftertaste of Mesalamine
Time frame: 5 minutes post-dose
An aftertaste assessment was completed 5 minutes after administration of investigational product to assess whether the participants detected an aftertaste. The participants answered "Yes" or "No" to the following question: "Was there an aftertaste?" The number of participants who answered "Yes" is reported.
Number of Participants With Positive Responses to Palatability Assessment of The Aftertaste of Mesalamine
Time frame: 5 minutes post-dose
An aftertaste assessment was completed 5 minutes after administration of investigational product to assess the subject's rating of aftertaste and means of administration. The assessment consisted of a 5-point rating scale. The participants were asked to choose one of the following responses to the statement "The aftertaste (if present) was acceptable": strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree. The number of participants who chose either of the top two responses (strongly agree, agree) is reported.
Number of Participants Willing to Take Mesalamine Via Treatment Method on a Regular Basis
Time frame: Immediately post-dose
The participants were asked to answer "Yes" or "No" to the following question: "Would you be willing to take medicine this way on a regular basis if necessary?" The number of participants who answered "Yes" is reported.
4 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event
Time frame: 4 days
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Laboratory Results
Time frame: 1 day
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Vital Signs
Time frame: 1 day
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jun 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Study Director study director
Takeda
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Mesalamine in people with Healthy, run by Shire at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Apr 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Positive Responses to Palatability Assessment of The Taste of Mesalamine (time frame: Immediately post-dose). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2021.