AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine TumorsNCT02125929

Comparative Study of Robotic, Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Enucleation of Benign Pancreatic Neoplasms

A study testing Robotic surgery, Laparoscopic surgery and Open surgery in people with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine the efficacy and safety of robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for enucleation of benign pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
What is being tested?
Robotic surgery, Laparoscopic surgery and Open surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
156 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Apr 2014to Dec 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18-80 years old
  • Body Mass Index<30
  • Preoperative diagnosis of resectable benign Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Tumor type: Non-functional pancreatic endocrine tumours and insulinomas
  • largest diameter < 4cm
  • Preoperative CT showed no evidence that tumor was connected with main pancreatic duct

Who cannot join

  • Severe cardio/pulmonary complications
  • Other pancreatic diseases, including pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer
  • Multiple pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
  • Distant metastasis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of General Surgery, Peking Union medical school hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Robotic, Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Enucleation of Benign Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

To determine the efficacy and safety of robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for enucleation of benign pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Read the detailed description

The study was prospective and retrospective, non-randomized study included patients with benign pancreatic neoplasms. The robotic arm consecutively includes patients underwent robotic enucleation surgery and expected number in this arm is 50. The laparoscopic and open surgery arms retrospectively include case from the year 2004. The number of patients for laparoscopic and open surgery arms are 50 and 100, respectively.

Being tested
Robotic surgery, Laparoscopic surgery, Open surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Robotic surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Robotic surgery: enucleation benign Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

  • Laparoscopic surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Laparoscopic surgery: enucleation benign Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

  • Open surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Open surgery: enucleation benign Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Study groups in NCT02125929
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
robotic armExperimentalrobotic surgery for enucleation benign Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Case number = 50
Receives: Procedure: Robotic surgery
Laparoscopic surgeryExperimentallaparoscopic surgery for enucleation benign Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Case number = 50
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic surgery
Open surgeryExperimentalOpen surgery for enucleation benign Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Case number = 100
Receives: Procedure: Open surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pancreatic fistula rate

    Measured: up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Mortality rate

    Measured: up to 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
156 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02125929
Sponsor's protocol ID
PUMCHGS2013
Other IDs
ENRLO
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
26 Apr 2014
Last updated
6 Aug 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Tian F, Hong XF, Wu WM, Han XL, Wang MY, Cong L, Dai MH, Liao Q, Zhang TP, Zhao YP. Propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open surgical enucleation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Surg. 2016 Sep;103(10):1358-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10220. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

    PubMed 27480993

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Robotic surgery, Laparoscopic surgery and Open surgery in people with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pancreatic fistula rate (time frame: up to 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02125929, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in