AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastrointestinal InjuryNCT02127164

Vacuum Assisted Therapy in Emergent Contaminated Abdominal Surgeries

A study testing "Veraflo" device, Dakin's solution in people with Gastrointestinal Injury and Complicated Diverticulitis, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Emergent abdominal surgeries have very high rate of wound contamination due to exposure to bacteria from GI tract. There are several different approaches to wound management in these patients including wet-to-dry dressing or application vacuum assisted device on the wound. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
"Veraflo" device, Dakin's solution
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2014to Jun 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Emergent surgery involving hollow viscus perforation or necrotic bowel
  • Admitted to the University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, AZ

Who cannot join

  • Prisoners
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with allergy to Dakin's (sodium hypochlorite) solution.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Arizona Medical Center

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Prospective Evaluation of Wound Management Using Vacuum Assisted Instillation Therapy in Emergent Contaminated Abdominal Surgeries

Emergent abdominal surgeries have very high rate of wound contamination due to exposure to bacteria from GI tract. There are several different approaches to wound management in these patients including wet-to-dry dressing or application vacuum assisted device on the wound. The investigators propose using the vacuum assisted device with Dakin's solution on patients undergoing emergency surgery for hollow viscus perforation installed immediately at the end of operation and remained there for the first 3 postoperative days, followed by delayed primary closure on postoperative day 4. The investigators believe this technique can achieve earlier wound closure, decrease patient discomfort, improve cost savings, and potentially standardize and revolutionize the investigators management of heavily contaminated wounds.

Being tested
"Veraflo" device, Dakin's solution

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • "Veraflo" device, Dakin's solutionDevice

    Veraflo device will be installed on the wound to create negative pressure after surgery. Dakin's solution will be instilled through this device into the wound at the regular intervals.

Study groups in NCT02127164
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
"Veraflo" device, Dakin's solutionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: "Veraflo" device, Dakin's solution

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Surgical Site Infection

    Surgical site infection is defined as the presence of localized inflammatory signs such as hyperthermia, erythema, tenderness, or purulent discharge that results in positive cultures, along with positive wound cultures. Surgical site can also be regarded as infected based on the individual discretion of the treating physician. Surgical sites with >10^5 colonization in swab will be considered contaminated.

    Measured: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale

    The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating scale is used to grade pain related to the presence/manipulation of the device. The Wong-Baker scale range is from 0 (No Hurt) to 10 (Hurts Worst) with numbers increasing by 2 (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10) and associated face images showing increased pain and sadness. Higher scores indicate increased pain, a worse outcome.

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionMay 2017
  4. Study completionJun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02127164
Sponsor's protocol ID
UAKCI2014
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
4 Apr 2014
Last updated
30 Jan 2024
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing "Veraflo" device, Dakin's solution in people with Gastrointestinal Injury and Complicated Diverticulitis, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jan 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Surgical Site Infection (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in