RECTAL CANCERPhase 3NERATEMNCT02127645
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Followed by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for T1-T2 Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing SRT-TEM, LRT-TEM and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) in people with RECTAL CANCER, run by European Association for Endoscopic Surgery at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Objective: Recent randomized and non-randomized studies suggest that neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) show comparative results to abdominal resection in pT2 extraperitoneal cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- RECTAL CANCER
- What is being tested?
- SRT-TEM, LRT-TEM and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to May 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with a large rectal sessile or flat lesion (type 0-Is, 0-II or 0-III according to the Paris Classification) with the largest diameter of 2 cm or larger11 (estimated by an opened resection snare).
- lower and upper borders of the rectal neoplasm located between 2 and 12 cm from the anal verge, respectively.
- Biopsies of the lesion showed neoplastic tissue adenocarcinoma G1-G2 on histopathological evaluation.
- Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) of the rectal lesion confirmed invasion into the submucosal layer (uT1sm) >1 mm or the muscle layer (uT2) and ruled out the presence of lymph nodes >1 cm.
- Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (or Computer Tomography (CT) when MRI was contraindicated) ruled outlymph nodes >1 cm.
- ASA (America Society of Anesthesiologists)- status I-III.
Who cannot join
- previous anorectal surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino
Turin, Piedmont, 10126
About this study
Official title: PILOT OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF NEOADJUVANT 5 x 5 RADIOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY FOR T1-T2 EXTRAPERITONEAL RECTAL CANCER WITH CURATIVE INTENT
Objective: Recent randomized and non-randomized studies suggest that neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) show comparative results to abdominal resection in pT2 extraperitoneal cancer. As the risk of lymphnode metastases is significant already for T1 invasive cancers with submucosa infiltration >1 mm it is our intention to investigate in both T1sm2-3 and T2 rectal adenocarcinomas the effectiveness of this combined treatment in a case series comparing results of this pilot study to an historical series of patients affected by T1-T2 rectal cancer who underwent anterior resection (AR) or total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without abdomino-perineal resection (APR) with no neoadjuvant therapy.
If equally effective, TEM offers a further reduction in invasiveness of treatment, which should correspond to a lower morbidity, mortality and a better quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Study design: This is a single centre case series pilot study which oncologic results will be compared to historical data collected consisting of patients treated by anterior resection (AR) or total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without abdomino-perineal resection (APR) with no neoadjuvant radiotherapy.
Study population: Patients with T1sm2-3 and T2, N0, G1-G2, located between 2 and 12 cm from the anal verge, in a health condition that permits general anesthesia.
Interventions: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy at a dose of 25 Gy (5 Gy per day for 5 consecutive days) is administered to the patient. Within 10 days after the end of radiotherapy TEM will be performed.
Primary Endpoint: incidence of recurrence at 36 months
Primary outcome measure (for non-inferiority):
Local recurrence of neoplasia, defined as the presence of histologically proven neoplastic tissue in either visible recurrent lesions or in random biopsies, taken at surveillance endoscopies after the intervention strategy has been completed. Patients will undergo surveillance endoscopies at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months by an independent endoscopist. During each surveillance endoscopy local recurrence will objectively be defined by the Higaki criteria for recurrence: tumor appearing within a clear resection scar; tumors with convergent folds; and tumors nearby a clear resection scar (within 5 mm) (39). Targeted biopsies will be taken for histological confirmation; in case of an apparently healed normal scar without evidence of recurrence, biopsies will be taken from the basis and 3 from the edges of the scar to detect occult recurrent neoplasia.
Loco-regional recurrence will be investigated by MRI (CT when MRI contraindicated) which will be performed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Distant metastases will be investigated by standard follow-up according to local policy.
Additional outcome measures:
- Complications: subdivided into procedural (during treatment) and delayed complications (after ending the procedure); and further subdivided into major (requiring additional surgery) and minor (requiring endoscopic or medical intervention) complications. During admission patients will be monitored for complications. The following standardized discharge criteria will be applied: normal intake of nutrition; normal mobility; absence of fever (<38°C); and stable hemoglobin level during 1 day (<1 mmol/L) in case of rectal blood loss. Two weeks after the intervention, a research fellow will contact the patient by telephone again and ask for occurred complications.
- Generic and disease-specific health related quality of life will be measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 and year follow-up by the SF-36, EORTC Q30, EORTC Q38 and Wexner score (for incontinence) questionnaires.
- Measurement of anorectal functional outcome by anal manometry and rectal volumetry (barostat) before and 3 months after treatment.
Sample size: As a pilot study, sample size is not available
Economic evaluation: A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of neoadjuvant RT followed by TEM for extraperitoneal rectal cancer with respectively the costs per recurrence free patient and the cost per quality adjusted life year as primary outcome measures, compared to the historical series of patients who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant radiotherapy, will be performed.
Time schedule: 36 months for inclusion (June 1st 2011 - May 31st 2014), 36 months minimum follow-up.
- Conditions
- RECTAL CANCER
- Being tested
- SRT-TEM, LRT-TEM, Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)
- Keywords
- RADIOTHERAPY, TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY, LOCAL EXCISION
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SRT-TEMProcedure or surgery
Also called Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), Neoadjuvant Short course Radio-Therapy
SRT-TEM underwent 25 Gy RT followed by TEM
LRT-TEMProcedure or surgery
Also called Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), Neoadjuvant Long Term Radio-therapy 46 Gy
TEM following 46 Gy RT
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM)Procedure or surgery
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM)
Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)Procedure or surgery
Also called Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision
Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early Rectal Cancer | Experimental | patients with T1 - T2, N0, G1-2 rectal cancer Receives: Procedure: SRT-TEM; Procedure: LRT-TEM; Procedure: Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM); Procedure: Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
incidence of local and distant recurrence
Measured: 36 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
morbidity, subdivided into major (requiring surgery) and minor (requiring endoscopic or medical intervention)
Measured: 30 days
disease specific and general quality of life
Measured: 30 days
anorectal function
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for RECTAL CANCERStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- European Association for Endoscopic Surgery
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alberto Arezzo, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery
- Investigators
- Alberto Arezzo, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Principal investigator, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02127645
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EAES-4
- Acronym
- NERATEM
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PILOT OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF NEOADJUVANT 5 x 5 RADIOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY FOR T1-T2 EXTRAPERITONEAL RECTAL CANCER WITH CURATIVE INTENT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02127645
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NERATEM / EAES-4
- Conditions
- RECTAL CANCER
- Keywords
- RADIOTHERAPY, TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY, LOCAL EXCISION
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- European Association for Endoscopic SurgeryUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: Recent randomized and non-randomized studies suggest that neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) show comparative results to abdominal resection in pT2 extraperitoneal cancer. As the risk of lymphnode metastases is significant already for T1 invasive cancers with submucosa infiltration >1 mm it is our intention to investigate in both T1sm2-3 and T2 rectal adenocarcinomas the effectiveness of this combined treatment in a case series comparing results of this pilot study to an historical series of patients affected by T1-T2 rectal cancer who underwent anterior resection (AR) or total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without abdomino-perineal resection (APR) with no neoadjuvant therapy.
If equally effective, TEM offers a further reduction in invasiveness of treatment, which should correspond to a lower morbidity, mortality and a better quality of life.
Detailed description
Study design: This is a single centre case series pilot study which oncologic results will be compared to historical data collected consisting of patients treated by anterior resection (AR) or total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without abdomino-perineal resection (APR) with no neoadjuvant radiotherapy.
Study population: Patients with T1sm2-3 and T2, N0, G1-G2, located between 2 and 12 cm from the anal verge, in a health condition that permits general anesthesia.
Interventions: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy at a dose of 25 Gy (5 Gy per day for 5 consecutive days) is administered to the patient. Within 10 days after the end of radiotherapy TEM will be performed.
Primary Endpoint: incidence of recurrence at 36 months
Primary outcome measure (for non-inferiority):
Local recurrence of neoplasia, defined as the presence of histologically proven neoplastic tissue in either visible recurrent lesions or in random biopsies, taken at surveillance endoscopies after the intervention strategy has been completed. Patients will undergo surveillance endoscopies at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months by an independent endoscopist. During each surveillance endoscopy local recurrence will objectively be defined by the Higaki criteria for recurrence: tumor appearing within a clear resection scar; tumors with convergent folds; and tumors nearby a clear resection scar (within 5 mm) (39). Targeted biopsies will be taken for histological confirmation; in case of an apparently healed normal scar without evidence of recurrence, biopsies will be taken from the basis and 3 from the edges of the scar to detect occult recurrent neoplasia.
Loco-regional recurrence will be investigated by MRI (CT when MRI contraindicated) which will be performed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Distant metastases will be investigated by standard follow-up according to local policy.
Additional outcome measures:
- Complications: subdivided into procedural (during treatment) and delayed complications (after ending the procedure); and further subdivided into major (requiring additional surgery) and minor (requiring endoscopic or medical intervention) complications. During admission patients will be monitored for complications. The following standardized discharge criteria will be applied: normal intake of nutrition; normal mobility; absence of fever (<38°C); and stable hemoglobin level during 1 day (<1 mmol/L) in case of rectal blood loss. Two weeks after the intervention, a research fellow will contact the patient by telephone again and ask for occurred complications.
- Generic and disease-specific health related quality of life will be measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 and year follow-up by the SF-36, EORTC Q30, EORTC Q38 and Wexner score (for incontinence) questionnaires.
- Measurement of anorectal functional outcome by anal manometry and rectal volumetry (barostat) before and 3 months after treatment.
Sample size: As a pilot study, sample size is not available
Economic evaluation: A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of neoadjuvant RT followed by TEM for extraperitoneal rectal cancer with respectively the costs per recurrence free patient and the cost per quality adjusted life year as primary outcome measures, compared to the historical series of patients who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant radiotherapy, will be performed.
Time schedule: 36 months for inclusion (June 1st 2011 - May 31st 2014), 36 months minimum follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early Rectal Cancer | Experimental | Procedure: SRT-TEM, Procedure: LRT-TEM, Procedure: Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), Procedure: Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)patients with T1 - T2, N0, G1-2 rectal cancer |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosed with a large rectal sessile or flat lesion (type 0-Is, 0-II or 0-III according to the Paris Classification) with the largest diameter of 2 cm or larger11 (estimated by an opened resection snare).
- lower and upper borders of the rectal neoplasm located between 2 and 12 cm from the anal verge, respectively.
- Biopsies of the lesion showed neoplastic tissue adenocarcinoma G1-G2 on histopathological evaluation.
- Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) of the rectal lesion confirmed invasion into the submucosal layer (uT1sm) >1 mm or the muscle layer (uT2) and ruled out the presence of lymph nodes >1 cm.
- Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (or Computer Tomography (CT) when MRI was contraindicated) ruled outlymph nodes >1 cm.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- previous anorectal surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SRT-TEMAlso: Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), Neoadjuvant Short course Radio-TherapySRT-TEM underwent 25 Gy RT followed by TEM | Procedure or surgery | Early Rectal Cancer |
| LRT-TEMAlso: Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), Neoadjuvant Long Term Radio-therapy 46 GyTEM following 46 Gy RT | Procedure or surgery | Early Rectal Cancer |
| Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM)Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) | Procedure or surgery | Early Rectal Cancer |
| Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)Also: Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal ExcisionLaparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision | Procedure or surgery | Early Rectal Cancer |
Primary outcome
incidence of local and distant recurrence
Time frame: 36 months
3 secondary outcomes
morbidity, subdivided into major (requiring surgery) and minor (requiring endoscopic or medical intervention)
Time frame: 30 days
disease specific and general quality of life
Time frame: 30 days
anorectal function
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2018.
Related trials for RECTAL CANCER
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alberto Arezzo, Assistant Professor of Surgery principal investigator
European Association of Endoscopic Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing SRT-TEM, LRT-TEM and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) in people with RECTAL CANCER, run by European Association for Endoscopic Surgery at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
incidence of local and distant recurrence (time frame: 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2018.