Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaPhase 3NCT02128061
Efficacy of Lenalidomide in Combination With Subcutaneous Rituximab + miniCHOP in DLBCL Patients of 80 y/o or+
A Phase 3 study testing Lenalidomide and Rituximab in people with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, run by The Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation at 97 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + lenalidomide) and R-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP) in patients aged 80 years old or more with not previously treated cluster of differentiation antigen 20 positive (CD20+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 80 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- Lenalidomide and Rituximab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 97 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2014to Jan 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 80 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with histologically proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (WHO classification 2008) including all clinical subtypes (primary mediastinal, intravascular, etc…), with all age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI).
- May also be included: De Novo transformed DLBCL from low grade lymphoma (Follicular, other...) and DLBCL associated with some small cell Infiltration in bone marrow or lymph node; or CD20+ B-cell lymphoma, with intermediate features between DLBCL and Burkitt or with intermediate features between DLBCL and classical Hodgkin lymphoma; or CD20+ Follicular lymphoma grade 3B (according to WHO classification); or CD20+ Aggressive B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable.
- With a Cluster of Differentiation antigen 10 (CD10) immunostaining performed by the participating center pathologist
- Aged ≥ 80 years old
- Ann Arbor stage II, III or IV
- Patient previously untreated for DLBCL Lymphoma
Show all 13Show fewer
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2
- With a minimum life expectancy of 3 months
- Negative HIV, HBV and HCV serologies test within 4 weeks before inclusion (except after hepatitis B vaccination or for patients who are HBs Ag negative, anti-HBs positive and/or anti-HBc positive but viral DNA negative)
- Patient able to give his consent and having signed a written Informed consent
- Patient affiliated to social security system, if applicable
- Male patients must practice complete abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions, and for 3 months following study drug discontinuation, even if they have undergone a successful vasectomy.
- All patients must agree to fulfill the global Lenalidomide Pregnancy Prevention Risk Management Plan as applicable according to the randomization arm (randomization arm)
Who cannot join
- Any other histological type of lymphoma, Burkitt included
- Any history of treated or non-treated small-B cell lymphoma
- Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma
- Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens ; for anthracycline use, ejection fraction should be > 50%
- Any serious active disease (according to the investigator's decision)
- History of deep venous thrombosis or arterial thromboembolism events within the past 12 months before inclusion
Show all 18Show fewer
- Poor renal function (creatinine clearance < 40 ml/min, according to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula)
- Poor hepatic function (total bilirubin level >30mmol/l, transaminases >2.5 maximum normal level) unless these abnormalities are related to the lymphoma
- Poor bone marrow reserve as defined by neutrophils <1.5 G/l or platelets <100 G/l, unless related to bone marrow infiltration
- Any history of cancer during the last 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma Patients previously diagnosed with prostate cancer are eligible if (1) their disease was T1-T2a, N0, M0, with a Gleason score ≤7, and a prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/mL prior to initial therapy, (2) they had definitive curative therapy (i.e., prostatectomy or radiotherapy) 2 years before Day 1 of Cycle 1, and (3) at a minimum 2 years following therapy they had no clinical evidence of prostate cancer, and their PSA was undetectable if they underwent prostatectomy or <1 ng/mL if they did not undergo prostatectomy
- Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before planned first cycle of chemotherapy and during the study
- Prior treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody or alemtuzumab within 3 months prior to start of therapy
- Prior use of lenalidomide
- Prior ≥ Grade 3 allergic reaction/hypersensitivity to thalidomide
- Prior ≥ Grade 3 rash or any desquamating (blistering) rash while taking thalidomide
- Subjects with ≥ Grade 2 neuropathy
- Adult patient under tutelage
- Female of childbearing potential are excluded. (Note: Females are defined as not of childbearing potential if there is documentation of "natural menopause for at least 24 consecutive months, a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy")
Trial locations and contacts
97 sites in 2 countries.
97 sites in 2 countries
France83 sites
CH d'Abbeville
Abbeville, 80142
CH du Pays d'Aix
Aix-en-Provence, 13606
CHU d'Amiens
Amiens, 80054
CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49000
CH Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil, 95107
CH d'Arras
Arras, 62022
CH d Avignon - Hopital Henri Duffaut
Avignon, 84902
CH Côte Basque
Bayonne, 64100
CHU Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25030
CH de Blois
Blois, 41000
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, 33076
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord
Bordeaux, 33300
CH de Boulogne-sur-Mer
Boulogne-sur-Mer, 62321
CH de Bourg en Bresse
Bourg-en-Bresse, 01000
CHU Morvan
Brest, 29609
CH de Brive
Brivé, 19190
IHBN
Caen
CH de Cannes
Cannes, 06401
Clinique Du Parc
Castelnau-le-Lez, 34170
Médipôle de Savoie
Challes-les-Eaux, 73191
CHU de Châlon sur Sâone
Chalon-sur-Sâone
CH Métropole Savoie
Chambéry, 73011
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy
Clamart, 92141
CHU Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Pôle Santé République
Clermont-Ferrand, 63050
CH Sud Francilien de Corbeil
Corbeil-Essonnes, 91108
APHP - Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
CHU de Dijon - Hôpital le Bocage
Dijon, 21034
CH de Dunkerque
Dunkirk, 59385
CH Eure Seine
Évreux, 27015
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, 38000
Institut Daniel Hollard
Grenoble, 38028
CH Départemental de Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon
Hôpital St Louis
La Rochelle, 17019
CH de Versailles - Hopital André Mignot
Le Chesnay, 78157
Hôpital Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275
CH du Mans
Le Mans, 72000
Clinique Victor Hugo
Le Mans, 72000
CHRU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, 59037
Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul
Lille
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, 87042
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon
CH des Chanaux
Mâcon, 71018
Institut Paoli Calmette
Marseille, 13273
Hôpital de la conception
Marseille, 13385
CH de Meaux
Meaux, 77104
Hôpital de Mercy
Metz, 57038
Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois
Metz-Tessy, 74374
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier
CHU de Mulhouse
Mulhouse, 68070
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, 44093
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, 30029
CHR de la Source
Orléans, 45100
Hopital Saint Antoine
Paris, 75012
APHP - Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris, 75475
Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, 75651
APHP - Hôpital Necker
Paris, 75743
Clinique Francheville
Périgueux, 24004
CH Périgueux
Périgueux, 24019
CH de Perpigan
Perpignan, 66000
CHU du Haut Leveque
Pessac, 33604
Chu Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, 96021
CH René Dubos
Pontoise, 95301
CH de Cornouaille
Quimper, 29107
CHU Robert Debre
Reims, 51092
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, 35033
CH de Roubaix
Roubaix, 59100
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
CH de Saint Brieuc
Saint-Brieuc, 22000
Centre René Huguenin - Institut Curie
Saint-Cloud, 92210
Groupe Hospitalier Sud Réunion
Saint-Pierre, 97448
CH Saint Quentin
Saint-Quentin, 02321
CHU de Saint Malo
St-Malo, 35400
Strasbourg Oncologie Libérale
Strasbourg, 67000
CHU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67098
CHI Toulon La Seyne-sur-mer
Toulon, 83056
CHU Purpan - Toulouse
Toulouse, 31059
CHRU Bretonneau
Tours, 37044
Hôpital de Valence
Valence, 26953
CHU de Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
CH de Bretagne Atlantique
Vannes, 56017
Belgium14 sites
ZNA Stuivenberg
Antwerp
A. Z. Sint-Jan
Bruges, 8000
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, 1000
Université Catholique de Louvain Saint Luc
Brussels, 1200
Hôpital Erasme
Brussels
Grand Hôpital de Charleroi
Charleroi, 6000
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent
AZ Groeninge
Kortrijk, 8500
CHR Citadelle
Liège, 4000
CHU de Liège
Liège, 4000
Hôpital Sainte Elisabeth
Namur, 5000
Clinique Saint Pierre
Ottignies, 1340
CHR Peltzer La Tourelle
Verviers, 4800
CHRU Mont Godinne
Yvoir
About this study
Official title: Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP Versus Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + Lenalidomide (R2-miniCHOP) in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma for Patients of 80 Years Old or More. A Multicentric Phase III Study of the LYSA Association
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + lenalidomide) and R-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP) in patients aged 80 years old or more with not previously treated cluster of differentiation antigen 20 positive (CD20+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as measured by the overall survival (OS).The SENIOR trial will evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of the combination of the R2-miniCHOP regimen and compare this experimental arm to the standard R-miniCHOP regimen.The statistical plan is based on the hypothesis of an increase by 15% of the 2y-OS in favor of the experimental arm, as compared to the reference arm (R-miniCHOP).
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + lenalidomide) and R-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP) in patients aged 80 years old or more with not previously treated cluster of differentiation antigen 20 positive (CD20+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as measured by the overall survival (OS).
Primary endpoint of the study is to compare the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + lenalidomide) and R-miniCHOP ((Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP) in patients of 80 years old or more with not previously treated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as measured by the overall survival (OS).
Secondary endpoints are:
- To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of R2-miniCHOP as measured by the PFS (Progression Free Survival), EFS (Event Free Survival), the DoR (duration of response), the DFS (disease free survival), response rate at the end of the treatment, the additional toxicities
- To evaluate the simplified scale prognostic impact (IADL, MNA, G8, CIRS-G)
- To assess the quality of life before and after treatment This study is a multicentric, phase III, open-label, randomized (1:1) trial evaluating the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP in patients aged of 80 years or more with non-previously treated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (age-adjusted IPI= 0 to 3), Ann Arbor stage II to IV with a performance status ECOG from 0 to 2.
This study includes a run in phase to assess feasibility, safety and tolerance of subcutaneous rituximab injections and oral lenalidomide (10 mg D1-D14) in combination with dose-reduced intensity CHOP regimen.
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Lenalidomide, Rituximab
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LenalidomideDrug
Also called Revlimid
RituximabDrug
Also called Mabthera
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| R-miniCHOP | Active comparator | All patients will be treated with R-miniCHOP at a three-weeks interval for 6 cycles CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IV: 400 mg/m² Day 1 (D1) DOXORUBICINE IV : 25 mg/m² D1 VINCRISTINE IV : 1 mg Total Dose (TD) D1 PREDNISONE PO : 40 mg/m² D1 to D5 RITUXIMAB SC* : 1400 mg TD D1
*The first cycle of rituximab is delivered by IV at the dose of 375 mg/m2 Receives: Drug: Rituximab |
| R2-miniCHOP | Experimental | All patients will be treated with R2-miniCHOP at a three-weeks interval for 6 cycles CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IV: 400 mg/m² D1 - DOXORUBICINE IV : 25 mg/m² D1 - VINCRISTINE IV : 1 mg TD D1 - PREDNISONE PO : 40 mg/m² D1 to D5 - RITUXIMAB SC* : 1400 mg TD D1 LENALIDOMIDE PO** :10 mg TD D1 to D14
*The first cycle of rituximab is delivered by IV at the dose of 375 mg/m2 Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide; Drug: Rituximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The overall survival (OS)
OS will be measured from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Alive patients will be censored at their last contact.
Measured: OS rates at 2 years
Secondary outcomes (8)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization into the study to the first observation of documented disease progression/relapse or death due to any cause. If a subject has not progressed or died, PFS will be censored at the time of last visit with adequate assessment.
Measured: PFS rates at 2 years
Event-Free Survival (EFS)
EFS will be measured from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression/relapse (Cheson 1999), initiation of new anti-lymphoma therapy or death from any cause. Patients without documented event at the time of analysis will be censored at their visit with adequate assessment.
Measured: EFS rates at 2 years
Duration of Response (DoR)
DoR will be measured from the time of attainment of Complete Response/unconfirmed Complete Response (CR/CRu) or Partial Response (PR) to the date of first documented disease progression/relapse or death from any cause. Patients alive and free of progression will be censored at their last visit with adequate assessment.
Measured: DoR rates at 2 years
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
DFS will be measured from the date of attainment of a complete or unconfirmed complete response (at the end of treatment or at permanent treatment discontinuation evaluation) to the date of first observation of documented disease progression or death due to any cause. Complete Response/unconfirmed Complete Response (CR/CRu) patients who have not progressed or died will be censored at the time of last visit with adequate assessment.
Measured: DFS rates at 2 years
OS according to GCB/non-GCB phenotype
OS will be described for the R2-miniCHOP group according to Hans algorithm (GCB/non-GCB phenotype).
Measured: OS according to GCB/non-GCB phenotype rates at 2 years
Response Rate at the end of treatment
Disease response evaluation at end of treatment (after 6 cycles) will be used to determine the Response Rate. Response will be assessed at end of treatment (after end of the 6th cycle of treatment or at permanent treatment discontinuation).
Assessment of response will be based on the International Workshop to Standardize Response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (Criteria for evaluation of response in NHL (Cheson, 1999)).
Measured: 22 weeks (28 days after the end of the 6, three-weeks interval, cycles of treatment) or within 28 days following permanent treatment discontinuation
Simplified Geriatric Scales
Four geriatric tools will be performed before any chemotherapy administration (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), G8, and Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G) scales). Each scale will be analyzed in order to have a picture of the population at baseline. Thereafter, the prognosis impact in OS and PFS of each scale will be evaluated using univariate (Kaplan Meier) and multivariate analyses (Cox model). Safety analyses will also be performed according to each scale in order to evaluate the toxicity predictive power of these scales.
Measured: At baseline
Health related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
HRQOL will be assessed by the Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 and Elderly14 (QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-ELD14) at randomization and at end of treatment. The improvement or not of the QoL will therefore be assessed.
The QLQ-ELD14 was developed to supplement the QLQ-C30 for measuring HRQoL in patients aged >70 years in oncology studies.
Measured: At randomization and 22 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 1 of R-miniCHOP or R2-miniCHOP (28 days after the end of the 6, three-weeks interval, cycles of treatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2014
- Primary completion5 Nov 2018
- Study completionJan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centre Henri Becquerel
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fabrice Jardin, MD,Professor, Principal investigator, The Lymphoma Study Association - LYSA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02128061
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SENIOR
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP Versus Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + Lenalidomide (R2-miniCHOP) in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma for Patients of 80 Years Old or More. A Multicentric Phase III Study of the LYSA Association
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02128061
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SENIOR
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Lymphoma Academic Research OrganisationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centre Henri Becquerel
- Study start
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + lenalidomide) and R-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP) in patients aged 80 years old or more with not previously treated cluster of differentiation antigen 20 positive (CD20+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as measured by the overall survival (OS).The SENIOR trial will evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of the combination of the R2-miniCHOP regimen and compare this experimental arm to the standard R-miniCHOP regimen.The statistical plan is based on the hypothesis of an increase by 15% of the 2y-OS in favor of the experimental arm, as compared to the reference arm (R-miniCHOP).
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + lenalidomide) and R-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP) in patients aged 80 years old or more with not previously treated cluster of differentiation antigen 20 positive (CD20+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as measured by the overall survival (OS).
Primary endpoint of the study is to compare the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP (Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP + lenalidomide) and R-miniCHOP ((Sub-cutaneous Rituximab-miniCHOP) in patients of 80 years old or more with not previously treated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as measured by the overall survival (OS).
Secondary endpoints are:
- To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of R2-miniCHOP as measured by the PFS (Progression Free Survival), EFS (Event Free Survival), the DoR (duration of response), the DFS (disease free survival), response rate at the end of the treatment, the additional toxicities
- To evaluate the simplified scale prognostic impact (IADL, MNA, G8, CIRS-G)
- To assess the quality of life before and after treatment This study is a multicentric, phase III, open-label, randomized (1:1) trial evaluating the efficacy of R2-miniCHOP in patients aged of 80 years or more with non-previously treated CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (age-adjusted IPI= 0 to 3), Ann Arbor stage II to IV with a performance status ECOG from 0 to 2.
This study includes a run in phase to assess feasibility, safety and tolerance of subcutaneous rituximab injections and oral lenalidomide (10 mg D1-D14) in combination with dose-reduced intensity CHOP regimen.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| R-miniCHOP | Active comparator | Drug: RituximabAll patients will be treated with R-miniCHOP at a three-weeks interval for 6 cycles CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IV: 400 mg/m² Day 1 (D1) DOXORUBICINE IV : 25 mg/m² D1 VINCRISTINE IV : 1 mg Total Dose (TD) D1 PREDNISONE PO : 40 mg/m² D1 to D5 RITUXIMAB SC* : 1400 mg TD D1 *The first cycle of rituximab is delivered by IV at the dose of 375 mg/m2 |
| R2-miniCHOP | Experimental | Drug: Lenalidomide, Drug: RituximabAll patients will be treated with R2-miniCHOP at a three-weeks interval for 6 cycles CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IV: 400 mg/m² D1 - DOXORUBICINE IV : 25 mg/m² D1 - VINCRISTINE IV : 1 mg TD D1 - PREDNISONE PO : 40 mg/m² D1 to D5 - RITUXIMAB SC* : 1400 mg TD D1 LENALIDOMIDE PO** :10 mg TD D1 to D14 *The first cycle of rituximab is delivered by IV at the dose of 375 mg/m2 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 80 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patient with histologically proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (WHO classification 2008) including all clinical subtypes (primary mediastinal, intravascular, etc…), with all age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI).
- May also be included: De Novo transformed DLBCL from low grade lymphoma (Follicular, other...) and DLBCL associated with some small cell Infiltration in bone marrow or lymph node; or CD20+ B-cell lymphoma, with intermediate features between DLBCL and Burkitt or with intermediate features between DLBCL and classical Hodgkin lymphoma; or CD20+ Follicular lymphoma grade 3B (according to WHO classification); or CD20+ Aggressive B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable.
- With a Cluster of Differentiation antigen 10 (CD10) immunostaining performed by the participating center pathologist
- Aged ≥ 80 years old
- Ann Arbor stage II, III or IV
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Any other histological type of lymphoma, Burkitt included
- Any history of treated or non-treated small-B cell lymphoma
- Central nervous system or meningeal involvement by lymphoma
- Contra-indication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimens ; for anthracycline use, ejection fraction should be > 50%
- Any serious active disease (according to the investigator's decision)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LenalidomideAlso: Revlimid | Drug | R2-miniCHOP |
| RituximabAlso: Mabthera | Drug | R-miniCHOP, R2-miniCHOP |
Primary outcome
The overall survival (OS)
Time frame: OS rates at 2 years
OS will be measured from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Alive patients will be censored at their last contact.
8 secondary outcomes
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: PFS rates at 2 years
Event-Free Survival (EFS)
Time frame: EFS rates at 2 years
Duration of Response (DoR)
Time frame: DoR rates at 2 years
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
Time frame: DFS rates at 2 years
OS according to GCB/non-GCB phenotype
Time frame: OS according to GCB/non-GCB phenotype rates at 2 years
Response Rate at the end of treatment
Time frame: 22 weeks (28 days after the end of the 6, three-weeks interval, cycles of treatment) or within 28 days following permanent treatment discontinuation
Simplified Geriatric Scales
Time frame: At baseline
Health related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
Time frame: At randomization and 22 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 1 of R-miniCHOP or R2-miniCHOP (28 days after the end of the 6, three-weeks interval, cycles of treatment)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
The CARDIOPROTECT Trial
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Cardiotoxicity
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
QLS4131 Plus Isa-V-CHOP in Newly Diagnosed, HIV-Negative PBL: A Single-Center, Single-Arm, Phase II Study
Plasmablastic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of a Combination Targeted Therapy (ViPOR) for Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma
High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL6 Rearrangements, Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fabrice Jardin, MD,Professor principal investigator
The Lymphoma Study Association - LYSA
97 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lenalidomide and Rituximab in people with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, run by The Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation at 97 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 97 sites in France, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The overall survival (OS) (time frame: OS rates at 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2021.