AzTrials
AzTrials

Hemodialysis, HomeNCT02128347

Effectiveness of an Online Portal for Delivery of Care to Home Dialysis Patients

A study testing Electronic Patient Portal in people with Hemodialysis, Home and Peritoneal Dialysis, run by Karthik Tennankore at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Home dialysis has many potential benefits compared to in-center hemodialysis including improved quality of life, reduced hospital admission and reduced cost. However, some patients perceive that home modalities are associated with increased isolation from the healthcare system, substandard care or higher risk of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hemodialysis, Home, Peritoneal Dialysis
What is being tested?
Electronic Patient Portal
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
39 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Oct 2014to Feb 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Prevalent (>=3 months) home dialysis patients (peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis)

Who cannot join

  • Does not provide consent
  • On home dialysis for less than 3 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Capital Health

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Home dialysis has many potential benefits compared to in-center hemodialysis including improved quality of life, reduced hospital admission and reduced cost. However, some patients perceive that home modalities are associated with increased isolation from the healthcare system, substandard care or higher risk of catastrophic events. Providing better support for home dialysis patients may enhance their ability to maintain at home, improve their health outcomes, increase quality of life and improve satisfaction with care. In other chronic disease populations a secure, online communication portal between physicians and patients has proven useful in enhancing care for patients. Thus far, the utility of an online portal communication system has not been tested in a cohort of home dialysis patients. The investigators hypothesize that this novel form of communication will improve care and outcomes for home dialysis patients. Therefore, in a cohort of home dialysis patients, the purposes of this study are as follows: 1) Does an online patient-portal improve patient satisfaction with home dialysis care? 2) Does an online patient-portal improve quality of life? 3) Does an online patient-portal reduce hospitalization and health service utilization?

Read the detailed description

Home dialysis (including peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) has a number of potential benefits over in-center hemodialysis (including lower healthcare costs and improved quality of life for patients). However, overall quality of life remains low compared to the general population. Furthermore, home dialysis patients (primarily those on peritoneal dialysis) continue to experience a high rate of hospitalization. Finally, there can be improvement in patient satisfaction with home dialysis, particularly in the areas of shared decision making and handling of patient requests.

Regarding satisfaction with care, peritoneal dialysis patients have identified that "attentiveness to concerns", and clarity of recommendations is important. Improved satisfaction in turn, may be associated with improvements in quality of life. Therefore, identifying novel communication systems for home dialysis patients is crucial. The use of eHealth online portals that support online communication between patients and healthcare workers is increasing. An interface that allows patients to discuss treatment plans and address clinical problems while obviating the need for telephone communication has been shown to be beneficial in some studies. Such a system may improve patient satisfaction, reduce health service utilization, and potentially improve health outcomes.

Thus far, the feasibility and potential benefit of an eHealth online portal to facilitate communication has not been evaluated in home dialysis. Therefore, in a cohort of home dialysis patients, the purpose of this study is to identify the following: 1) Does an online portal improve patient satisfaction with home dialysis care? 2) Does an online portal improve quality of life? 3) Does an online portal reduce hospitalization and health service utilization? Overall, we hope that this study will inform the need to pursue a larger, multicenter trial to more rigorously evaluate the utility of this novel form of communication for home dialysis patients.

We will conduct a prospective pilot study of prevalent (receiving home dialysis for at least three months) home dialysis patients (including both peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) at Capital Health. Consecutive patients that are evaluated in the home dialysis clinic over a 4-month period will be enrolled in the study if they provide consent.

Being tested
Electronic Patient Portal
Keywords
Hemodialysis, Home, Peritoneal Dialysis, Telemedicine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electronic Patient PortalOther

    RelayHealth is a web-based application that allows patients and clinicians to communicate through a secure, password protected online electronic portal with data transfer capabilities. The system allows physicians and nurses to view patient questions, patient data and transmit messages to patients in response to questions or after clinic visits in an electronic message. In addition, patients can be made aware of upcoming investigations or clinic visits. Patients can also use the interface to identify any proposed changes (which would minimize recall mistakes after clinic visits) and submit queries pertaining to dialysis. Both patients and clinicians are made aware of new messages through email prompt, which moderates the asynchronous nature of electronic communication. Telephone communication can be maintained, but reserved for more urgent issues that require immediate assistance.

Study groups in NCT02128347
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Electronic Patient PortalOtherRelayHealth is a web-based application that allows patients and healthcare workers to communicate through a secure, password protected online portal with data transfer capabilities. Effectiveness of the portal in improving several health outcomes from baseline-12 months will be assessed in this study.
Receives: Other: Electronic Patient Portal

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be examined in all patients at 0, 6 and 12 months using the Consumer Quality index (CQI) instrument (van der Veer SN, Jager KJ, Visserman E, Beekman RJ, Boeschoten EW, de Keizer NF, Heuveling L, Stronks K, Arah OA. Development and validation of the Consumer Quality index instrument to measure the experience and priority of chronic dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Aug;27(8):3284-91. This Dutch-language tool will be translated to English using a validated translation procedure.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in Quality of Life

    Patient quality of life will be measured in all patients at 0, 6 and 12 months after initiating the study. Specifically, change from baseline in the EuroQol-5D will be evaluated at 6 and 12 months after initiation of the patient portal.

    Measured: 12 Months

  2. Hospitalization and Health-Care Utilization Rates

    Healthcare service utilization will consist of number and duration of hospitalizations, number of emergency room visits (for both dialysis and non-dialysis related complaints), number of non-advised drop-in visits to the home dialysis unit and number/duration and type of telephone contacts with the home dialysis unit. All utilization measures will be retrospectively assessed over the preceding three to twelve months (depending on available data) to get a baseline rate.

    Measured: 12 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionFeb 2016
  4. Study completionFeb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02128347
Sponsor's protocol ID
eportal 2014-316
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
29 Apr 2014
Last updated
26 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kiberd J, Khan U, Stockman C, Radhakrishnan A, Phillips M, Kiberd BA, West KA, Soroka S, Chan C, Tennankore KK. Effectiveness of a Web-Based eHealth Portal for Delivery of Care to Home Dialysis Patients: A Single-Arm Pilot Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Sep 7;5:2054358118794415. doi: 10.1177/2054358118794415. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30210802

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electronic Patient Portal in people with Hemodialysis, Home and Peritoneal Dialysis, run by Karthik Tennankore at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Patient Satisfaction (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02128347, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in