Amputation StumpsPhase 4NCT02128451
The Value of Adding Either Meperdine or Fentanyl to Clonidine-bupivacaine
A Phase 4 study testing Meperdine and Fentanyl in people with Amputation Stumps, run by Tanta University at 2 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
The use of clonidine as an alternative to epidural opioids offers several potential benefits. Clonidine does not have respiratory depressant effects, and the incidence of vomiting and pruritus is less frequent compared with that seen after administration of epidural morphine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Amputation Stumps
- What is being tested?
- Meperdine and Fentanyl
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to Oct 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults ASA I, II.
- Elective orthopedic lower limb surgery
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded from the study if their preoperative medication included opioid or non-opioid analgesics, corticosteroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Coagulation disorders, pregnancy, age less than 18 year, patient refusal, and emergency re-operation within the first 24hours also were exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Egypt2 sites
Faculty of Medicine ,Tanta University.
Tanta, Algharbiya, 35217
Tanta University Hospitals
Tanta, Algharbyia, 35217
About this study
Official title: The Value of Adding Either Meperdine or Fentanyl to Clonidine-bupivacaine Mixture in Patients With Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery Using Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia
The use of clonidine as an alternative to epidural opioids offers several potential benefits. Clonidine does not have respiratory depressant effects, and the incidence of vomiting and pruritus is less frequent compared with that seen after administration of epidural morphine.
Epidural clonidine have focused on the optimal doses of clonidine to be used, rather than analyzing the potential advantage of using epidural clonidine versus opioids with respect to efficacy and incidence of side effects.
Read more
Epidural fentanyl has been used effectively as an alternative to morphine and has been shown to induce fewer complications when compared with epidural morphine. However, the incidence of vomiting in patients receiving epidural fentanyl still ranges between 28% and 52% depending on the study population and concentration used. The analgesic and side effects profile of epidural clonidine compared with epidural fentanyl are unknown.
The primary aim of this randomized double-blind trial is to test the hypothesis that epidural clonidine decreases the incidence of side effects compared with epidural fentanyl.
Therefore, we compared the hemodynamic effects of the epidural bupivacaine-clonidine- fentanyl combination with those of epidural bupivacaine- clonidine- meperdine. The secondary aim of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine-clonidine- fentanyl combination in comparison to bupivacaine- clonidine- meperdine combination.
Read the detailed description
A prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial design was used in a cohort of ninety patients of both genders, physical status American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) I and II who will undergo lower limb orthopedic surgery, will be enrolled into the present study.
Patients will divided randomly into two equal groups: Epidural Bupivacain-clonidine and fentanyl (BF) Group and Bupivacain-clonidine and meperdine (BM) Group, comprising of 45 patients each. Randomization will be performed by random numbers using sealed envelopes without sex stratification. Sealed envelopes indicate the group of assignment. An independent anesthesiologist, who did not participate in the study or data collection, will read the number contained in the envelope and made group assignments. Patients will be blindly randomized to the two groups; the process of inclusion into the study will go on until the requested number of patients will be reached.
Patients will be excluded from the study if their preoperative medication included opioid or non-opioid analgesics, corticosteroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Coagulation disorders, pregnancy, age less than 18 year, patient refusal, and emergency re-operation within the first 24hours also were exclusion criteria.
Under full aseptic conditions, the epidural space was identified at the L 2-3 or L 3-4 lumbar interspace using the loss-of-resistance to saline technique using 16-gauge Tuohy needle. An injection of 2 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine will be injected into the subarachnoid space through 25 gauge spinal needle, then 15ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 25 micrograms of fentanyl and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in fentanyl (F) Group, while 15ml 0.5% bupivacaine,25 mg of meperdine and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in meperdine (M) Group.
The injection will be given with unlabelled syringes prepared by independent anaesthologist not involved in the patients care or in pain assessment. The specific treatment given is unknown to the patient, anesthesiologist, surgeon, or nurses in charge of pain assessment. All patients and personnel involved in patient management and data collection are unaware of the group to which the patient will be assigned.
On the evening before surgery, patients will be instructed about the use of a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain).
Postoperative pain will be assessed by independent physicians who will completely blinded to patients group assignment not sharing in the study design or data collection, visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Pain level will be recorded at PACU every 3 h for the first 24h. All patients received 15 mg/kg i.v. acetaminophen every 6 h; the first dose will be given 40 min before the end of surgery. Supplementary doses of acetaminophen i.v. will be given to patients with a VAS higher than 4. Any episodes of bradycardia (HR< 50 beats/min), hypotension (SBP< 90 mmHg), nausea, vomiting, and excessive sedation were recorded.
The primary outcome is the degree of postoperative pain score using VAS in the two groups. The secondary outcomes measures are analgesic requirement of the two groups during the first 24 h after surgery. All adverse events related to surgery and the regional anesthetic technique will be recorded.
- Conditions
- Amputation Stumps
- Being tested
- Meperdine, Fentanyl
- Keywords
- meperdine ,fentanyl, clonidine, orthopedic surgery .
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MeperdineDrug
Also called Pethedine
15ml 0.5% bupivacaine,25 mg of meperdine and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in meperdine Group.
FentanylDrug
Also called fenta vera
15ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 25 micrograms of fentanyl and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in fentanyl Group
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Meperdine group | Active comparator | 15ml 0.5% bupivacaine,25 mg of meperdine and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in meperdine Group. Receives: Drug: Meperdine |
| Fentanyl group | Active comparator | 15ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 25 micrograms of fentanyl and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in fentanyl Group Receives: Drug: Fentanyl |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the hemodynamic effects
the hemodynamic parameter (heart rate and blood pressure)
Measured: 1 hour after epidural application
Secondary outcomes (1)
the analgesic efficacy
the analgesic efficacy using visual analogue scale (VAS)
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completionOct 2014
- Study completionOct 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Amputation StumpsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tanta UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ayman Abd Al-maksoud Yousef, Tanta University
- Investigators
- Ayman A Yousef, MD, Principal investigator, Assistant Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02128451
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1350/14
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Yousef AA, Atef AM, Awais WM. Comparison of fentanyl versus meperidine as supplements to epidural clonidine-bupivacaine in patients with lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 14;15:146. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0126-5.
PubMed 26468074
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Value of Adding Either Meperdine or Fentanyl to Clonidine-bupivacaine Mixture in Patients With Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery Using Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02128451
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1350/14
- Conditions
- Amputation Stumps
- Keywords
- meperdine ,fentanyl, clonidine, orthopedic surgery .
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The use of clonidine as an alternative to epidural opioids offers several potential benefits. Clonidine does not have respiratory depressant effects, and the incidence of vomiting and pruritus is less frequent compared with that seen after administration of epidural morphine.
Epidural clonidine have focused on the optimal doses of clonidine to be used, rather than analyzing the potential advantage of using epidural clonidine versus opioids with respect to efficacy and incidence of side effects.
Epidural fentanyl has been used effectively as an alternative to morphine and has been shown to induce fewer complications when compared with epidural morphine. However, the incidence of vomiting in patients receiving epidural fentanyl still ranges between 28% and 52% depending on the study population and concentration used. The analgesic and side effects profile of epidural clonidine compared with epidural fentanyl are unknown.
The primary aim of this randomized double-blind trial is to test the hypothesis that epidural clonidine decreases the incidence of side effects compared with epidural fentanyl.
Therefore, we compared the hemodynamic effects of the epidural bupivacaine-clonidine- fentanyl combination with those of epidural bupivacaine- clonidine- meperdine. The secondary aim of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine-clonidine- fentanyl combination in comparison to bupivacaine- clonidine- meperdine combination.
Detailed description
A prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial design was used in a cohort of ninety patients of both genders, physical status American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) I and II who will undergo lower limb orthopedic surgery, will be enrolled into the present study.
Patients will divided randomly into two equal groups: Epidural Bupivacain-clonidine and fentanyl (BF) Group and Bupivacain-clonidine and meperdine (BM) Group, comprising of 45 patients each. Randomization will be performed by random numbers using sealed envelopes without sex stratification. Sealed envelopes indicate the group of assignment. An independent anesthesiologist, who did not participate in the study or data collection, will read the number contained in the envelope and made group assignments. Patients will be blindly randomized to the two groups; the process of inclusion into the study will go on until the requested number of patients will be reached.
Patients will be excluded from the study if their preoperative medication included opioid or non-opioid analgesics, corticosteroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Coagulation disorders, pregnancy, age less than 18 year, patient refusal, and emergency re-operation within the first 24hours also were exclusion criteria.
Under full aseptic conditions, the epidural space was identified at the L 2-3 or L 3-4 lumbar interspace using the loss-of-resistance to saline technique using 16-gauge Tuohy needle. An injection of 2 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine will be injected into the subarachnoid space through 25 gauge spinal needle, then 15ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 25 micrograms of fentanyl and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in fentanyl (F) Group, while 15ml 0.5% bupivacaine,25 mg of meperdine and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in meperdine (M) Group.
The injection will be given with unlabelled syringes prepared by independent anaesthologist not involved in the patients care or in pain assessment. The specific treatment given is unknown to the patient, anesthesiologist, surgeon, or nurses in charge of pain assessment. All patients and personnel involved in patient management and data collection are unaware of the group to which the patient will be assigned.
On the evening before surgery, patients will be instructed about the use of a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain).
Postoperative pain will be assessed by independent physicians who will completely blinded to patients group assignment not sharing in the study design or data collection, visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Pain level will be recorded at PACU every 3 h for the first 24h. All patients received 15 mg/kg i.v. acetaminophen every 6 h; the first dose will be given 40 min before the end of surgery. Supplementary doses of acetaminophen i.v. will be given to patients with a VAS higher than 4. Any episodes of bradycardia (HR< 50 beats/min), hypotension (SBP< 90 mmHg), nausea, vomiting, and excessive sedation were recorded.
The primary outcome is the degree of postoperative pain score using VAS in the two groups. The secondary outcomes measures are analgesic requirement of the two groups during the first 24 h after surgery. All adverse events related to surgery and the regional anesthetic technique will be recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Meperdine group | Active comparator | Drug: Meperdine15ml 0.5% bupivacaine,25 mg of meperdine and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in meperdine Group. |
| Fentanyl group | Active comparator | Drug: Fentanyl15ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 25 micrograms of fentanyl and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in fentanyl Group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adults ASA I, II.
- Elective orthopedic lower limb surgery
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients will be excluded from the study if their preoperative medication included opioid or non-opioid analgesics, corticosteroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Coagulation disorders, pregnancy, age less than 18 year, patient refusal, and emergency re-operation within the first 24hours also were exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MeperdineAlso: Pethedine15ml 0.5% bupivacaine,25 mg of meperdine and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in meperdine Group. | Drug | Meperdine group |
| FentanylAlso: fenta vera15ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 25 micrograms of fentanyl and 1 ml of clonidine will be injected epidurally in fentanyl Group | Drug | Fentanyl group |
Primary outcome
the hemodynamic effects
Time frame: 1 hour after epidural application
the hemodynamic parameter (heart rate and blood pressure)
1 secondary outcome
the analgesic efficacy
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26468074Yousef AA, Atef AM, Awais WM. Comparison of fentanyl versus meperidine as supplements to epidural clonidine-bupivacaine in patients with lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 14;15:146. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0126-5.
Related trials for Amputation Stumps
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Role of Perineural Catheter in Pain Control and Opioid Consumption After Major Amputation of Lower Limb
Lower Limb Surgery, Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hypertrophic Scar Prosthetic Pressure in Burn Amputee
Amputation Stump, Burn Injury
Recruiting
Hemocoll, Avitene, or Bone Wax for Cancellous Bone Bleeding After Single-Ray Amputation
Hemostasis, Surgical Blood Loss
RecruitingPhase 2
Autologous Volar Fibroblast Injection Into the Stump Site of Amputees
Amputation, Skin Wound
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Post-Amputation Stump Infection as a Predictor of Persistent Residual Limb Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study
Residual Limb Pain, Stump Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ayman A Yousef, MD principal investigator
Assistant Professor
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Meperdine and Fentanyl in people with Amputation Stumps, run by Tanta University at 2 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the hemodynamic effects (time frame: 1 hour after epidural application). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02128451, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2015.