AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Arterial DiseaseSINGA-PACLINCT02129634

Singapore INfra-Genicular Angioplasty With PAclitaxel-eluting Balloon for Critical Limb Ischaemia (SINGA-PACLI) Trial

A study testing CB-PTA and DEB-PTA in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Singapore General Hospital at 2 sites in Singapore.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background In patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI), the infragenicular arteries are often involved. Without revascularisation, amputation often is imperative. There is a high technical success rate of endovascular revascularisation of infragenicular arteries with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), but… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Arterial Disease
What is being tested?
CB-PTA and DEB-PTA
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
2 sitesSingapore
Study dates
27 Dec 2013to 6 Oct 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent
  • Age > 21 years
  • If female patient with child bearing potential, patient may not be pregnant at the study entry and must utilize reliable birth control for the duration of her participation into the study
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the specified follow-up evaluation
  • Critical Limb Ischaemia, Rutherford category 4 (ischaemic rest pain), 5 (minor tissue loss) or 6 (major tissue loss)
  • Stenosis (>50% luminal loss) or occlusion of infra-genicular arteries (defined as: distal to the infra-popliteal artery), including the tibiofibular trunk, the anterior tibial artery, the posterior tibial artery and the peroneal artery
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Infragenicular arterial lesions with length of <20cm
  • At least one crural (anterior tibial, posterior tibial or peroneal) artery with expected unobstructed runoff to ankle level after treatment
  • Successful guidewire crossing of the trial lesion

Who cannot join

  • Acute limb ischaemia
  • Subacute limb ischaemia which requires thrombolysis as first treatment modality
  • Previous major amputation of the affected limb (at or above the level of the ankle)
  • Concurrent iliac or femoropopliteal artery disease not suitable for endovascular or surgical revascularisation
  • Concurrent iliac or femoropopliteal artery occlusion of >10cm, even if suitable for surgical or endovascular revascularization
  • Patients without (expected) distal runoff to the index site
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Revascularization involving the same site within 30 days prior to the index procedure or planned revascularization of the same limb within 30 days of the index procedure
  • Previous implanted stent at the index site
  • Life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Factors making clinical follow-up very difficult or impossible
  • Known allergy to paclitaxel
  • Known allergy to contrast media
  • Patients on Warfarin or any other anti-coagulants
  • Known allergy to anti-platelet drugs (Aspirin/ Clopidogrel) (or) unable to tolerate dual anti-platelet drugs therapy
  • Active history of gastritis and other bleeding tendencies precluding use of dual anti-platelet therapy
  • Known heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type 2)
  • Patient unable or unwilling to tolerate contrast media
  • eGFR less than 50 ml/min/1.73m2 unless patient is on dialysis.
  • If the patient has significant heart disease and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Percentage (LVEF%) is less than 35 %.
  • Either PT/PTT of >1.5 times the median of normal that cannot be corrected for the time of the procedure (or ) INR >1.6 that cannot be corrected for the time of the procedure
  • Thrombocytopenia of platelet count <50,000 /µL (50 X 109/L) which cannot be corrected for the time of the procedure

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Singapore2 sites
  • Singapore General Hospital

    Singapore, 169608

  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital

    Singapore, 308433

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Background

  • In patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI), the infragenicular arteries are often involved. Without revascularisation, amputation often is imperative. There is a high technical success rate of endovascular revascularisation of infragenicular arteries with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), but mid- and long-term results are disappointing as restenosis frequently occurs. Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) PTA has been shown to improve patency rates after PTA of coronary arteries.
Read more

Aim

  • To study the results of DEB-PTA compared to conventional balloon CB-PTA for the treatment of infragenicular lesions in patients with CLI.
  • To evaluate cost-effectiveness of DEB-PTA versus CB-PTA in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) by quantifying the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Hypothesis

  • DEB PTA results in improved patency rates compared to CB-PTA for treatment of infragenicular arterial lesions in patients with CLI.
  • DEB-PTA is a cost-effective strategy in patients with CLI compared with CB-PTA.

Methodology Multi-center, prospective, randomised parallel-group trial. Patients are eligible for enrolment if they have CLI and at least one infragenicular lesion with a maximal total lesion length of 20cm. Randomisation will be performed on a 1:1 ratio to either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA. Patients will be assessed prior and directly after the intervention, at 3, 6 and 12 months by Rutherford classification, ankle-brachial index, toe pressure and adverse events. Duplex will be performed at 3 months. Angiography will be performed before and directly after PTA and at 6 months. Primary end-point will be primary patency of the treated lesions at 6 months on angiography (defined as <50% stenosis, without re-intervention in the interim). Secondary end-points are limb salvage at 3, 6 and 12 months, primary patency of the treated lesion on Duplex at 3 months (defined as patency of the treated artery with peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≤2.0 m/sec), Rutherford classification, minor and major amputation, infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention, patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (if applicable), infrapopliteal surgical bypass, peri-procedural complications and death at 3, 6 and 12 months.

A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from a societal perspective will be performed in parallel with the randomized clinical trial with a 12-month time horizon.

Read the detailed description

Methodology

  1. Study design: This is an investigator-initiated multi-center, prospective, randomised, controlled, two-arm parallel-group study. The participating centers will be Singapore General Hospital and Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Patients are eligible for enrolment if they have CLI and at least one infragenicular lesion with a maximal total lesion length of 20cm. Randomisation will be performed on a 1:1 ratio to either DEB PTA or CB PTA. Patients will be assessed prior and directly after the intervention, at 3, 6 and 12 months by Rutherford classification, ankle-brachial index, toe pressure and adverse events. Duplex will be performed at 3 months. Angiography will be performed before and directly after PTA and at 6 months. Primary end-point will be primary patency of the treated lesions at 6 months on angiography (defined as <50% stenosis, without re-intervention in the interim). Secondary end-points are limb salvage at 3, 6 and 12 months, primary patency of the treated lesion on Duplex at 3 months (defined as patency of the treated artery with peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≤2.0 m/sec), Rutherford classification, minor and major amputation, infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention, patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (if applicable), infrapopliteal surgical bypass, peri-procedural complications and death at 3, 6 and 12 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed alongside the 3-year randomized clinical trial of DEB PTA versus the CB- PTA. Both cost and utility outcomes will be determined from data sampled from the patient enrolled in the study and will be estimated using comparable time horizons. The time horizon of the economic analysis is 12 months, from the patient's study inclusion up to 12 months after PTA. Analysis will be performed from a societal perspective. Direct healthcare and non-health care costs incurred will be presented in 2013 Singapore dollars (SGD). Hospitalization costs will be determined from cumulative hospital billing data. Other healthcare costs outside SGH/TTSH and indirect costs will be determined by patient surveys at 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. Information on Qualify of Life (QoL) will be measured using the EQ-5D-3L (at baseline, 3 months-, 6 months- and 12- months) and used to calculate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) after incorporating mortality.
  2. Participants: Patients with critical limb ischaemia who meet all of the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled. Participation is entirely voluntary and eligible subjects should be competent to understand the implications of participation in the study. Informed consent forms are designed to assure the protection of patient's rights. Before enrolment all patients will have to give their written informed consent. The centre's local investigator ensures that the patient will be informed on the basis of the Informed Consent Form.
  3. Outcome Measurement (3.1) Primary outcome: Primary patency of the treated (index) site at 6 months. Primary patency is defined as less than or equal to 50% loss of luminal diameter at the treated site on angiography without re-intervention in the interim. (3.2) Secondary outcomes: • Limb-salvage rate of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
  • Primary patency on duplex sonography of the treated (index) site at 3 months.
  • Clinical categorisation of the treated ischemic leg by means of the Rutherford classification at 3, 6 and 12 months.
  • Minor amputation (below the ankle excluding the toes) of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
  • Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
  • Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
  • Primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites, if applicable.
  • Peri-procedural (within 30 days) complications.
  • Death.
  • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) , i.e., the mean difference in costs divided by the mean difference in QALY
  1. Investigational product: (4.1) Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel inhibits SMC replication in the G2/M phases, SMC migration and extracellular matrix formation, thus inhibiting neointima formation. Neointima formation causes restenosis. (4.2) Drug eluting balloon: A drug-eluting balloon (DEB) is a paclitaxel-coated peripheral angioplasty balloon catheter specifically designed for PTA of small peripheral atherosclerotic obstructed arteries. DEBs are available in different sizes of 2mm, 2.5mm, 3mm, 3.5mm and 4mm in diameter and 40mm, 80mm and 120mm in length. The DEBs are coated with a proprietary hydrophilic formulation of paclitaxel with a matrix substance. Paclitaxel coated DEB are currently registered in Singapore for use.

Protocol

  1. Randomisation: Patients will be randomized to either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA after the lesion has been crossed with the guidewire. The allocation ratio will be 1:1. Randomization will be stratified by diabetes and renal failure status. Patients will be blinded to the assigned treatment. The operators from SGH and TTSH site will perform the angioplasty and angiogram procedures. The operators who perform angiogram at 6 month follow-up will be blinded to the treatment arm to prevent bias. For the reading of the images, the radiologists who read those images will also be blinded to prevent bias.
  2. Procedure

Following antegrade or retrograde femoral puncture and insertion of an arterial sheath with a haemostatic valve, angiography is performed. Angiographic features of the lesion(s) are then assessed. If endovascular treatment is not considered feasible, the patient is excluded from the study.

The lesion is crossed under fluoroscopic guidance with the combination of a catheter and guidewire according to the choice of the operator. Following lesion crossing the patient will be randomised to receive either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA. If crossing of the lesion is unsuccessful, the patient will not be randomized.

(3) DEB-PTA arm

After successful crossing of the target lesion, angioplasty with a conventional angioplasty balloon is performed before DEB-PTA. A conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter 0.5mm less than the intended DEB balloon is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. A DEB with a diameter matching the target vessel and lesion length is then advanced over the 0.018 inch guidewire and inflated at the target lesion site for 60 seconds. If the lesion length is longer than the length of the balloon, a second inflation with another DEB will be required. The maximal total lesion length of the treated lesions will not exceed 20cm, as this is the maximal length that can be treated with two DEBs. Comparisons of pre- and post-implantation percent stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). Whenever stent placement is required as 'bail-out' in cases of post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, a bare metal (non-drug eluting) stent will be used.

(4) CB-PTA arm

After successful crossing of the target lesion, a conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the target vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the target lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. Comparisons of pre- and post-implantation percent stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). Whenever stent placement is required as a 'bail-out' in cases of post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, a bare metal (non-drug eluting) stent will be used.

(5) Morphologic lesion classification:

Morphologic lesion classification on angiography will be performed according to the Transatlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) document on management of peripheral arterial disease:

TASC Type A infrapopliteal lesions:

  1. Single stenoses shorter than 1 cm in the tibial or peroneal vessels. TASC Type B infrapopliteal lesions:
  2. Multiple focal stenoses of the tibial or peroneal vessel, each less than 1 cm in length.
  3. One or two focal stenoses, each less than 1 cm long, at the tibial trifurcation.
  4. Short tibial or peroneal stenosis in conjunction with femoropopliteal PTA. TASC Type C infrapopliteal lesions:
  5. Stenoses 1-4 cm in length.
  6. Occlusions 1-2 cm in length of the tibial or peroneal vessels.
  7. Extensive stenoses of the tibial trifurcation. TASC Type D infrapopliteal lesions:
  8. Tibial or peroneal occlusions longer than 2 cm.
  9. Diffusely diseased tibial or peroneal vessels.

TASC classification is done for investigational purposes only and it does not influence treatment in this study.

(6) The following information relating to the procedure is collected:

  • General participant demographics (initials, subject-number, date of birth, gender)
  • Number of lesions
  • Location of each lesion
  • TASC morphology classification
  • Contrast medium type and amount administered
  • Type and size of sheaths, guidewires and catheters
  • Diameters of non-diseased arterial lumen proximal and distal to the target site for each treated lesion
  • Percentage stenosis of the lesion before and after treatment for each lesion
  • Lesion length prior to treatment for each treated lesion
  • Quality of runoff (number of vessels and presence of stenoses or occlusion) distal to the target site before and after treatment
  • Type, size, length and number of balloon used/ Numbers of stents used
  • Presence or absence of complications
  • Use of closure-device (if used, type) (7) Escape procedure: In case stent placement is required to treat dissections proximal, distal or at the site of the treated lesion, the operator must consider the best interest of the patient. Patients should receive bare metal (non-drug eluting) stents if 'bail-out' stenting is required due to post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, as is common practice.

In cases of acute arterial thrombosis or embolism, on table or infusional thrombolysis (using urokinase or rTPA) or mechanical thrombectomy is permitted according to the preference of the operator and the local hospital protocol.

(8) End of the procedure The procedure is considered complete once all the delivery material including catheter sheath introducer has been removed.

(9) Anti-platelet medication The following anti-thrombotic medications are to be administered.

  • During the procedure, at least 2000 units of heparin are administered intravenously or intra-arterially. If necessary this dose may be increased or repeated in cases of prolonged procedures
  • Overnight treatment with heparin is permitted
  • Clopidogrel 75 mg daily should be administered for at least 6 months following the procedure
  • Aspirin 100 mg daily should be administered for at least 12 months following the procedure.

Follow Up

All patients will be evaluated prior to hospital discharge, at 3 months (± 14 days), 6 months (± 14 days) and at 12 months (± 30 days) post-procedure, or upon return of complaints.

All patients will be followed during a 12 month follow-up period. They will be seen for duplex sonography at 3 months or upon return of complaints. Angiography is performed at 6 months.

All reported AEs and SAEs will be followed-up and closed. SCRI will keep an electronic SAE tracking log at SCRI to track all reported SAEs. This is to ensure that the SAE is followed until it is resolved and reported to the accredited IRB.

Being tested
CB-PTA, DEB-PTA
Keywords
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty, Limb-salvage, Randomized Controlled Trial, Paclitaxel
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CB-PTADevice

    Also called Conventional Balloon-Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty

  • DEB-PTADevice

    Also called Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon-Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty

Study groups in NCT02129634
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CB-PTA armActive comparatorAfter successful crossing of the trial lesion, a conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the trial vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. Comparisons of pre- and post-angioplasty percentage stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s).
Receives: Device: CB-PTA
DEB-PTA armExperimentalAfter successful crossing of the trial lesion, angioplasty with a conventional angioplasty balloon is performed before DEB-PTA. This is because the paclitaxel coating may be scrapped off the balloon if the DEB is used to cross the trial lesion. A conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the trial vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. A DEB with a diameter matching the trial vessel and lesion length is then advanced over the 0.018 inch guidewire and inflated at the trial lesion site for 60 seconds. If the lesion length is longer than the length of the balloon, a second inflation with another DEB will be required. The maximal total lesion length of the treated lesions will not exceed 20cm. Comparisons of pre- and post-angioplasty percentage stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s).
Receives: Device: CB-PTA; Device: DEB-PTA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary patency of the treated (index) site at 6 months

    Primary patency is defined as less than or equal 50% loss of luminal diameter at the treated site on angiography without re-intervention in the interim.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Limb-salvage rate

    Limb-salvage rate of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.

    Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months

  2. Primary patency of the treated (index) site

    Primary patency on duplex sonography of the treated (index) site at 3 months

    Measured: at 3 months

  3. Clinical categorisation of the treated ischemic leg

    Clinical categorisation of the treated ischemic leg by means of the Rutherford classification at 3, 6 and 12 months.

    Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months

  4. Minor amputation

    Minor amputation of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.

    Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months

  5. Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg

    Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.

    Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg

    Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months

    Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months

  7. Primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites

    Primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites

    Measured: From the date of randomization until the date of end of primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (asscessed up to 12 months)

  8. Peri-procedural complications

    Peri-procedural (within 30 days) complications

    Measured: (within 30 days)

  9. Death

    Death

    Measured: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (asscessed up to 12 months)

  10. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), i.e., the mean difference in costs divided by the mean difference in QALY

    Measured: at 3 month, 6 month and 12 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Dec 2013
  3. Primary completion6 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion6 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02129634
Sponsor's protocol ID
SINGA-PACLI_01
Acronym
SINGA-PACLI
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
9 Apr 2014
Last updated
20 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillepsie I, Ruckley CV, Raab G, Storkey H; BASIL trial participants. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67704-5.

    PubMed 16325694
  • Peregrin JH, Koznar B, Kovac J, Lastovickova J, Novotny J, Vedlich D, Skibova J. PTA of infrapopliteal arteries: long-term clinical follow-up and analysis of factors influencing clinical outcome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Aug;33(4):720-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9881-3. Epub 2010 May 11.

    PubMed 20458587
  • Pell JP, Donnan PT, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV. Quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993 Jul;7(4):448-51. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80265-8.

    PubMed 8359304
  • Sum CF, Lim SC, Tavintharan S. Peripheral arterial disease and diabetes foot care. Singapore Med J. 2008 Feb;49(2):93-4. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18301831
  • Met R, Koelemay MJ, Bipat S, Legemate DA, van Lienden KP, Reekers JA. Always contact a vascular interventional specialist before amputating a patient with critical limb ischemia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):469-74. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9687-3. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

    PubMed 19688364
  • Klevsgard R, Hallberg IR, Risberg B, Thomsen MB. The effects of successful intervention on quality of life in patients with varying degrees of lower-limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Mar;19(3):238-45. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0995.

    PubMed 10753686
  • Singh S, Evans L, Datta D, Gaines P, Beard JD. The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 Oct;12(3):359-62. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80257-7.

    PubMed 8896481
  • Beard JD. Should we save critically ischaemic legs at any cost? Acta Chir Belg. 2008 Nov-Dec;108(6):651-5. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2008.11680310. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19241912
  • Tsetis D, Belli AM. The role of infrapopliteal angioplasty. Br J Radiol. 2004 Dec;77(924):1007-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/97382129.

    PubMed 15569642
  • Wiskirchen J, Schober W, Schart N, Kehlbach R, Wersebe A, Tepe G, Claussen CD, Duda SH. The effects of paclitaxel on the three phases of restenosis: smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration, and matrix formation: an in vitro study. Invest Radiol. 2004 Sep;39(9):565-71. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000133815.22434.55.

    PubMed 15308939
  • Serruys PW, Kutryk MJ, Ong AT. Coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 2;354(5):483-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra051091. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16452560
  • Aoki J, Colombo A, Dudek D, Banning AP, Drzewiecki J, Zmudka K, Schiele F, Russell ME, Koglin J, Serruys PW; TAXUS II Study Group. Peristent remodeling and neointimal suppression 2 years after polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: insights from serial intravascular ultrasound analysis in the TAXUS II study. Circulation. 2005 Dec 20;112(25):3876-83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.558601. Epub 2005 Dec 12.

    PubMed 16344384
  • Dawkins KD, Grube E, Guagliumi G, Banning AP, Zmudka K, Colombo A, Thuesen L, Hauptman K, Marco J, Wijns W, Popma JJ, Koglin J, Russell ME; TAXUS VI Investigators. Clinical efficacy of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of complex, long coronary artery lesions from a multicenter, randomized trial: support for the use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice. Circulation. 2005 Nov 22;112(21):3306-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.552190. Epub 2005 Nov 14.

    PubMed 16286586
  • Colombo A, Cosgrave J. Paclitaxel-eluting stents in complex lesions. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1268-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1268. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16160136
  • Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):221-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032441.

    PubMed 14724301

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CB-PTA and DEB-PTA in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Singapore General Hospital at 2 sites in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary patency of the treated (index) site at 6 months (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02129634, which also lists 27 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in