Peripheral Arterial DiseaseSINGA-PACLINCT02129634
Singapore INfra-Genicular Angioplasty With PAclitaxel-eluting Balloon for Critical Limb Ischaemia (SINGA-PACLI) Trial
A study testing CB-PTA and DEB-PTA in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Singapore General Hospital at 2 sites in Singapore.
Trial summary
Background In patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI), the infragenicular arteries are often involved. Without revascularisation, amputation often is imperative. There is a high technical success rate of endovascular revascularisation of infragenicular arteries with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), but… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- What is being tested?
- CB-PTA and DEB-PTA
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 136 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSingapore
- Study dates
- 27 Dec 2013to 6 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent
- Age > 21 years
- If female patient with child bearing potential, patient may not be pregnant at the study entry and must utilize reliable birth control for the duration of her participation into the study
- Patient is willing and able to comply with the specified follow-up evaluation
- Critical Limb Ischaemia, Rutherford category 4 (ischaemic rest pain), 5 (minor tissue loss) or 6 (major tissue loss)
- Stenosis (>50% luminal loss) or occlusion of infra-genicular arteries (defined as: distal to the infra-popliteal artery), including the tibiofibular trunk, the anterior tibial artery, the posterior tibial artery and the peroneal artery
Show all 9Show fewer
- Infragenicular arterial lesions with length of <20cm
- At least one crural (anterior tibial, posterior tibial or peroneal) artery with expected unobstructed runoff to ankle level after treatment
- Successful guidewire crossing of the trial lesion
Who cannot join
- Acute limb ischaemia
- Subacute limb ischaemia which requires thrombolysis as first treatment modality
- Previous major amputation of the affected limb (at or above the level of the ankle)
- Concurrent iliac or femoropopliteal artery disease not suitable for endovascular or surgical revascularisation
- Concurrent iliac or femoropopliteal artery occlusion of >10cm, even if suitable for surgical or endovascular revascularization
- Patients without (expected) distal runoff to the index site
Show all 21Show fewer
- Revascularization involving the same site within 30 days prior to the index procedure or planned revascularization of the same limb within 30 days of the index procedure
- Previous implanted stent at the index site
- Life expectancy of less than 6 months
- Factors making clinical follow-up very difficult or impossible
- Known allergy to paclitaxel
- Known allergy to contrast media
- Patients on Warfarin or any other anti-coagulants
- Known allergy to anti-platelet drugs (Aspirin/ Clopidogrel) (or) unable to tolerate dual anti-platelet drugs therapy
- Active history of gastritis and other bleeding tendencies precluding use of dual anti-platelet therapy
- Known heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type 2)
- Patient unable or unwilling to tolerate contrast media
- eGFR less than 50 ml/min/1.73m2 unless patient is on dialysis.
- If the patient has significant heart disease and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Percentage (LVEF%) is less than 35 %.
- Either PT/PTT of >1.5 times the median of normal that cannot be corrected for the time of the procedure (or ) INR >1.6 that cannot be corrected for the time of the procedure
- Thrombocytopenia of platelet count <50,000 /µL (50 X 109/L) which cannot be corrected for the time of the procedure
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Singapore2 sites
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, 308433
About this study
Background
- In patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI), the infragenicular arteries are often involved. Without revascularisation, amputation often is imperative. There is a high technical success rate of endovascular revascularisation of infragenicular arteries with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), but mid- and long-term results are disappointing as restenosis frequently occurs. Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) PTA has been shown to improve patency rates after PTA of coronary arteries.
Read more
Aim
- To study the results of DEB-PTA compared to conventional balloon CB-PTA for the treatment of infragenicular lesions in patients with CLI.
- To evaluate cost-effectiveness of DEB-PTA versus CB-PTA in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) by quantifying the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Hypothesis
- DEB PTA results in improved patency rates compared to CB-PTA for treatment of infragenicular arterial lesions in patients with CLI.
- DEB-PTA is a cost-effective strategy in patients with CLI compared with CB-PTA.
Methodology Multi-center, prospective, randomised parallel-group trial. Patients are eligible for enrolment if they have CLI and at least one infragenicular lesion with a maximal total lesion length of 20cm. Randomisation will be performed on a 1:1 ratio to either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA. Patients will be assessed prior and directly after the intervention, at 3, 6 and 12 months by Rutherford classification, ankle-brachial index, toe pressure and adverse events. Duplex will be performed at 3 months. Angiography will be performed before and directly after PTA and at 6 months. Primary end-point will be primary patency of the treated lesions at 6 months on angiography (defined as <50% stenosis, without re-intervention in the interim). Secondary end-points are limb salvage at 3, 6 and 12 months, primary patency of the treated lesion on Duplex at 3 months (defined as patency of the treated artery with peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≤2.0 m/sec), Rutherford classification, minor and major amputation, infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention, patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (if applicable), infrapopliteal surgical bypass, peri-procedural complications and death at 3, 6 and 12 months.
A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from a societal perspective will be performed in parallel with the randomized clinical trial with a 12-month time horizon.
Read the detailed description
Methodology
- Study design: This is an investigator-initiated multi-center, prospective, randomised, controlled, two-arm parallel-group study. The participating centers will be Singapore General Hospital and Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Patients are eligible for enrolment if they have CLI and at least one infragenicular lesion with a maximal total lesion length of 20cm. Randomisation will be performed on a 1:1 ratio to either DEB PTA or CB PTA. Patients will be assessed prior and directly after the intervention, at 3, 6 and 12 months by Rutherford classification, ankle-brachial index, toe pressure and adverse events. Duplex will be performed at 3 months. Angiography will be performed before and directly after PTA and at 6 months. Primary end-point will be primary patency of the treated lesions at 6 months on angiography (defined as <50% stenosis, without re-intervention in the interim). Secondary end-points are limb salvage at 3, 6 and 12 months, primary patency of the treated lesion on Duplex at 3 months (defined as patency of the treated artery with peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≤2.0 m/sec), Rutherford classification, minor and major amputation, infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention, patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (if applicable), infrapopliteal surgical bypass, peri-procedural complications and death at 3, 6 and 12 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed alongside the 3-year randomized clinical trial of DEB PTA versus the CB- PTA. Both cost and utility outcomes will be determined from data sampled from the patient enrolled in the study and will be estimated using comparable time horizons. The time horizon of the economic analysis is 12 months, from the patient's study inclusion up to 12 months after PTA. Analysis will be performed from a societal perspective. Direct healthcare and non-health care costs incurred will be presented in 2013 Singapore dollars (SGD). Hospitalization costs will be determined from cumulative hospital billing data. Other healthcare costs outside SGH/TTSH and indirect costs will be determined by patient surveys at 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. Information on Qualify of Life (QoL) will be measured using the EQ-5D-3L (at baseline, 3 months-, 6 months- and 12- months) and used to calculate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) after incorporating mortality.
- Participants: Patients with critical limb ischaemia who meet all of the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled. Participation is entirely voluntary and eligible subjects should be competent to understand the implications of participation in the study. Informed consent forms are designed to assure the protection of patient's rights. Before enrolment all patients will have to give their written informed consent. The centre's local investigator ensures that the patient will be informed on the basis of the Informed Consent Form.
- Outcome Measurement (3.1) Primary outcome: Primary patency of the treated (index) site at 6 months. Primary patency is defined as less than or equal to 50% loss of luminal diameter at the treated site on angiography without re-intervention in the interim. (3.2) Secondary outcomes: • Limb-salvage rate of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Primary patency on duplex sonography of the treated (index) site at 3 months.
- Clinical categorisation of the treated ischemic leg by means of the Rutherford classification at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Minor amputation (below the ankle excluding the toes) of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites, if applicable.
- Peri-procedural (within 30 days) complications.
- Death.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) , i.e., the mean difference in costs divided by the mean difference in QALY
- Investigational product: (4.1) Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel inhibits SMC replication in the G2/M phases, SMC migration and extracellular matrix formation, thus inhibiting neointima formation. Neointima formation causes restenosis. (4.2) Drug eluting balloon: A drug-eluting balloon (DEB) is a paclitaxel-coated peripheral angioplasty balloon catheter specifically designed for PTA of small peripheral atherosclerotic obstructed arteries. DEBs are available in different sizes of 2mm, 2.5mm, 3mm, 3.5mm and 4mm in diameter and 40mm, 80mm and 120mm in length. The DEBs are coated with a proprietary hydrophilic formulation of paclitaxel with a matrix substance. Paclitaxel coated DEB are currently registered in Singapore for use.
Protocol
- Randomisation: Patients will be randomized to either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA after the lesion has been crossed with the guidewire. The allocation ratio will be 1:1. Randomization will be stratified by diabetes and renal failure status. Patients will be blinded to the assigned treatment. The operators from SGH and TTSH site will perform the angioplasty and angiogram procedures. The operators who perform angiogram at 6 month follow-up will be blinded to the treatment arm to prevent bias. For the reading of the images, the radiologists who read those images will also be blinded to prevent bias.
- Procedure
Following antegrade or retrograde femoral puncture and insertion of an arterial sheath with a haemostatic valve, angiography is performed. Angiographic features of the lesion(s) are then assessed. If endovascular treatment is not considered feasible, the patient is excluded from the study.
The lesion is crossed under fluoroscopic guidance with the combination of a catheter and guidewire according to the choice of the operator. Following lesion crossing the patient will be randomised to receive either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA. If crossing of the lesion is unsuccessful, the patient will not be randomized.
(3) DEB-PTA arm
After successful crossing of the target lesion, angioplasty with a conventional angioplasty balloon is performed before DEB-PTA. A conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter 0.5mm less than the intended DEB balloon is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. A DEB with a diameter matching the target vessel and lesion length is then advanced over the 0.018 inch guidewire and inflated at the target lesion site for 60 seconds. If the lesion length is longer than the length of the balloon, a second inflation with another DEB will be required. The maximal total lesion length of the treated lesions will not exceed 20cm, as this is the maximal length that can be treated with two DEBs. Comparisons of pre- and post-implantation percent stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). Whenever stent placement is required as 'bail-out' in cases of post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, a bare metal (non-drug eluting) stent will be used.
(4) CB-PTA arm
After successful crossing of the target lesion, a conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the target vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the target lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. Comparisons of pre- and post-implantation percent stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). Whenever stent placement is required as a 'bail-out' in cases of post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, a bare metal (non-drug eluting) stent will be used.
(5) Morphologic lesion classification:
Morphologic lesion classification on angiography will be performed according to the Transatlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) document on management of peripheral arterial disease:
TASC Type A infrapopliteal lesions:
- Single stenoses shorter than 1 cm in the tibial or peroneal vessels. TASC Type B infrapopliteal lesions:
- Multiple focal stenoses of the tibial or peroneal vessel, each less than 1 cm in length.
- One or two focal stenoses, each less than 1 cm long, at the tibial trifurcation.
- Short tibial or peroneal stenosis in conjunction with femoropopliteal PTA. TASC Type C infrapopliteal lesions:
- Stenoses 1-4 cm in length.
- Occlusions 1-2 cm in length of the tibial or peroneal vessels.
- Extensive stenoses of the tibial trifurcation. TASC Type D infrapopliteal lesions:
- Tibial or peroneal occlusions longer than 2 cm.
- Diffusely diseased tibial or peroneal vessels.
TASC classification is done for investigational purposes only and it does not influence treatment in this study.
(6) The following information relating to the procedure is collected:
- General participant demographics (initials, subject-number, date of birth, gender)
- Number of lesions
- Location of each lesion
- TASC morphology classification
- Contrast medium type and amount administered
- Type and size of sheaths, guidewires and catheters
- Diameters of non-diseased arterial lumen proximal and distal to the target site for each treated lesion
- Percentage stenosis of the lesion before and after treatment for each lesion
- Lesion length prior to treatment for each treated lesion
- Quality of runoff (number of vessels and presence of stenoses or occlusion) distal to the target site before and after treatment
- Type, size, length and number of balloon used/ Numbers of stents used
- Presence or absence of complications
- Use of closure-device (if used, type) (7) Escape procedure: In case stent placement is required to treat dissections proximal, distal or at the site of the treated lesion, the operator must consider the best interest of the patient. Patients should receive bare metal (non-drug eluting) stents if 'bail-out' stenting is required due to post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, as is common practice.
In cases of acute arterial thrombosis or embolism, on table or infusional thrombolysis (using urokinase or rTPA) or mechanical thrombectomy is permitted according to the preference of the operator and the local hospital protocol.
(8) End of the procedure The procedure is considered complete once all the delivery material including catheter sheath introducer has been removed.
(9) Anti-platelet medication The following anti-thrombotic medications are to be administered.
- During the procedure, at least 2000 units of heparin are administered intravenously or intra-arterially. If necessary this dose may be increased or repeated in cases of prolonged procedures
- Overnight treatment with heparin is permitted
- Clopidogrel 75 mg daily should be administered for at least 6 months following the procedure
- Aspirin 100 mg daily should be administered for at least 12 months following the procedure.
Follow Up
All patients will be evaluated prior to hospital discharge, at 3 months (± 14 days), 6 months (± 14 days) and at 12 months (± 30 days) post-procedure, or upon return of complaints.
All patients will be followed during a 12 month follow-up period. They will be seen for duplex sonography at 3 months or upon return of complaints. Angiography is performed at 6 months.
All reported AEs and SAEs will be followed-up and closed. SCRI will keep an electronic SAE tracking log at SCRI to track all reported SAEs. This is to ensure that the SAE is followed until it is resolved and reported to the accredited IRB.
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Being tested
- CB-PTA, DEB-PTA
- Keywords
- Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty, Limb-salvage, Randomized Controlled Trial, Paclitaxel
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CB-PTADevice
Also called Conventional Balloon-Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
DEB-PTADevice
Also called Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon-Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CB-PTA arm | Active comparator | After successful crossing of the trial lesion, a conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the trial vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. Comparisons of pre- and post-angioplasty percentage stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). Receives: Device: CB-PTA |
| DEB-PTA arm | Experimental | After successful crossing of the trial lesion, angioplasty with a conventional angioplasty balloon is performed before DEB-PTA. This is because the paclitaxel coating may be scrapped off the balloon if the DEB is used to cross the trial lesion. A conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the trial vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. A DEB with a diameter matching the trial vessel and lesion length is then advanced over the 0.018 inch guidewire and inflated at the trial lesion site for 60 seconds. If the lesion length is longer than the length of the balloon, a second inflation with another DEB will be required. The maximal total lesion length of the treated lesions will not exceed 20cm. Comparisons of pre- and post-angioplasty percentage stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). Receives: Device: CB-PTA; Device: DEB-PTA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary patency of the treated (index) site at 6 months
Primary patency is defined as less than or equal 50% loss of luminal diameter at the treated site on angiography without re-intervention in the interim.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Limb-salvage rate
Limb-salvage rate of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Primary patency of the treated (index) site
Primary patency on duplex sonography of the treated (index) site at 3 months
Measured: at 3 months
Clinical categorisation of the treated ischemic leg
Clinical categorisation of the treated ischemic leg by means of the Rutherford classification at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Minor amputation
Minor amputation of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg
Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg
Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites
Primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites
Measured: From the date of randomization until the date of end of primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (asscessed up to 12 months)
Peri-procedural complications
Peri-procedural (within 30 days) complications
Measured: (within 30 days)
Death
Death
Measured: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (asscessed up to 12 months)
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), i.e., the mean difference in costs divided by the mean difference in QALY
Measured: at 3 month, 6 month and 12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study start27 Dec 2013
- Primary completion6 Oct 2018
- Study completion6 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (27)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peripheral Arterial DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Singapore General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 136 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Singapore General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore Clinical Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bien Soo Tan, MBBS, FRCR, FAMS, Principal investigator, Singapore General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02129634
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SINGA-PACLI_01
- Acronym
- SINGA-PACLI
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 9 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillepsie I, Ruckley CV, Raab G, Storkey H; BASIL trial participants. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67704-5.
PubMed 16325694Peregrin JH, Koznar B, Kovac J, Lastovickova J, Novotny J, Vedlich D, Skibova J. PTA of infrapopliteal arteries: long-term clinical follow-up and analysis of factors influencing clinical outcome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Aug;33(4):720-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9881-3. Epub 2010 May 11.
PubMed 20458587Pell JP, Donnan PT, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV. Quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993 Jul;7(4):448-51. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80265-8.
PubMed 8359304Sum CF, Lim SC, Tavintharan S. Peripheral arterial disease and diabetes foot care. Singapore Med J. 2008 Feb;49(2):93-4. No abstract available.
PubMed 18301831Met R, Koelemay MJ, Bipat S, Legemate DA, van Lienden KP, Reekers JA. Always contact a vascular interventional specialist before amputating a patient with critical limb ischemia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):469-74. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9687-3. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
PubMed 19688364Klevsgard R, Hallberg IR, Risberg B, Thomsen MB. The effects of successful intervention on quality of life in patients with varying degrees of lower-limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Mar;19(3):238-45. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0995.
PubMed 10753686Singh S, Evans L, Datta D, Gaines P, Beard JD. The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 Oct;12(3):359-62. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80257-7.
PubMed 8896481Beard JD. Should we save critically ischaemic legs at any cost? Acta Chir Belg. 2008 Nov-Dec;108(6):651-5. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2008.11680310. No abstract available.
PubMed 19241912Tsetis D, Belli AM. The role of infrapopliteal angioplasty. Br J Radiol. 2004 Dec;77(924):1007-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/97382129.
PubMed 15569642Wiskirchen J, Schober W, Schart N, Kehlbach R, Wersebe A, Tepe G, Claussen CD, Duda SH. The effects of paclitaxel on the three phases of restenosis: smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration, and matrix formation: an in vitro study. Invest Radiol. 2004 Sep;39(9):565-71. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000133815.22434.55.
PubMed 15308939Serruys PW, Kutryk MJ, Ong AT. Coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 2;354(5):483-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra051091. No abstract available.
PubMed 16452560Aoki J, Colombo A, Dudek D, Banning AP, Drzewiecki J, Zmudka K, Schiele F, Russell ME, Koglin J, Serruys PW; TAXUS II Study Group. Peristent remodeling and neointimal suppression 2 years after polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: insights from serial intravascular ultrasound analysis in the TAXUS II study. Circulation. 2005 Dec 20;112(25):3876-83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.558601. Epub 2005 Dec 12.
PubMed 16344384Dawkins KD, Grube E, Guagliumi G, Banning AP, Zmudka K, Colombo A, Thuesen L, Hauptman K, Marco J, Wijns W, Popma JJ, Koglin J, Russell ME; TAXUS VI Investigators. Clinical efficacy of polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of complex, long coronary artery lesions from a multicenter, randomized trial: support for the use of drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice. Circulation. 2005 Nov 22;112(21):3306-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.552190. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
PubMed 16286586Colombo A, Cosgrave J. Paclitaxel-eluting stents in complex lesions. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1268-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1268. No abstract available.
PubMed 16160136Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O'Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):221-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032441.
PubMed 14724301
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Singapore INfra-Genicular Angioplasty With PAclitaxel-eluting Balloon for Critical Limb Ischaemia (SINGA-PACLI) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02129634
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SINGA-PACLI / SINGA-PACLI_01
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Keywords
- Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty, Limb-salvage, Randomized Controlled Trial, Paclitaxel
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 136 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Singapore General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore Clinical Research Institute
- Study start
- 27 Dec 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background
- In patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI), the infragenicular arteries are often involved. Without revascularisation, amputation often is imperative. There is a high technical success rate of endovascular revascularisation of infragenicular arteries with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), but mid- and long-term results are disappointing as restenosis frequently occurs. Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) PTA has been shown to improve patency rates after PTA of coronary arteries.
Aim
- To study the results of DEB-PTA compared to conventional balloon CB-PTA for the treatment of infragenicular lesions in patients with CLI.
- To evaluate cost-effectiveness of DEB-PTA versus CB-PTA in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) by quantifying the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Hypothesis
- DEB PTA results in improved patency rates compared to CB-PTA for treatment of infragenicular arterial lesions in patients with CLI.
- DEB-PTA is a cost-effective strategy in patients with CLI compared with CB-PTA.
Methodology Multi-center, prospective, randomised parallel-group trial. Patients are eligible for enrolment if they have CLI and at least one infragenicular lesion with a maximal total lesion length of 20cm. Randomisation will be performed on a 1:1 ratio to either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA. Patients will be assessed prior and directly after the intervention, at 3, 6 and 12 months by Rutherford classification, ankle-brachial index, toe pressure and adverse events. Duplex will be performed at 3 months. Angiography will be performed before and directly after PTA and at 6 months. Primary end-point will be primary patency of the treated lesions at 6 months on angiography (defined as <50% stenosis, without re-intervention in the interim). Secondary end-points are limb salvage at 3, 6 and 12 months, primary patency of the treated lesion on Duplex at 3 months (defined as patency of the treated artery with peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≤2.0 m/sec), Rutherford classification, minor and major amputation, infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention, patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (if applicable), infrapopliteal surgical bypass, peri-procedural complications and death at 3, 6 and 12 months.
A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from a societal perspective will be performed in parallel with the randomized clinical trial with a 12-month time horizon.
Detailed description
Methodology
- Study design: This is an investigator-initiated multi-center, prospective, randomised, controlled, two-arm parallel-group study. The participating centers will be Singapore General Hospital and Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Patients are eligible for enrolment if they have CLI and at least one infragenicular lesion with a maximal total lesion length of 20cm. Randomisation will be performed on a 1:1 ratio to either DEB PTA or CB PTA. Patients will be assessed prior and directly after the intervention, at 3, 6 and 12 months by Rutherford classification, ankle-brachial index, toe pressure and adverse events. Duplex will be performed at 3 months. Angiography will be performed before and directly after PTA and at 6 months. Primary end-point will be primary patency of the treated lesions at 6 months on angiography (defined as <50% stenosis, without re-intervention in the interim). Secondary end-points are limb salvage at 3, 6 and 12 months, primary patency of the treated lesion on Duplex at 3 months (defined as patency of the treated artery with peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≤2.0 m/sec), Rutherford classification, minor and major amputation, infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention, patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (if applicable), infrapopliteal surgical bypass, peri-procedural complications and death at 3, 6 and 12 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed alongside the 3-year randomized clinical trial of DEB PTA versus the CB- PTA. Both cost and utility outcomes will be determined from data sampled from the patient enrolled in the study and will be estimated using comparable time horizons. The time horizon of the economic analysis is 12 months, from the patient's study inclusion up to 12 months after PTA. Analysis will be performed from a societal perspective. Direct healthcare and non-health care costs incurred will be presented in 2013 Singapore dollars (SGD). Hospitalization costs will be determined from cumulative hospital billing data. Other healthcare costs outside SGH/TTSH and indirect costs will be determined by patient surveys at 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. Information on Qualify of Life (QoL) will be measured using the EQ-5D-3L (at baseline, 3 months-, 6 months- and 12- months) and used to calculate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) after incorporating mortality.
- Participants: Patients with critical limb ischaemia who meet all of the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled. Participation is entirely voluntary and eligible subjects should be competent to understand the implications of participation in the study. Informed consent forms are designed to assure the protection of patient's rights. Before enrolment all patients will have to give their written informed consent. The centre's local investigator ensures that the patient will be informed on the basis of the Informed Consent Form.
- Outcome Measurement (3.1) Primary outcome: Primary patency of the treated (index) site at 6 months. Primary patency is defined as less than or equal to 50% loss of luminal diameter at the treated site on angiography without re-intervention in the interim. (3.2) Secondary outcomes: • Limb-salvage rate of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Primary patency on duplex sonography of the treated (index) site at 3 months.
- Clinical categorisation of the treated ischemic leg by means of the Rutherford classification at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Minor amputation (below the ankle excluding the toes) of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites, if applicable.
- Peri-procedural (within 30 days) complications.
- Death.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) , i.e., the mean difference in costs divided by the mean difference in QALY
- Investigational product: (4.1) Paclitaxel: Paclitaxel inhibits SMC replication in the G2/M phases, SMC migration and extracellular matrix formation, thus inhibiting neointima formation. Neointima formation causes restenosis. (4.2) Drug eluting balloon: A drug-eluting balloon (DEB) is a paclitaxel-coated peripheral angioplasty balloon catheter specifically designed for PTA of small peripheral atherosclerotic obstructed arteries. DEBs are available in different sizes of 2mm, 2.5mm, 3mm, 3.5mm and 4mm in diameter and 40mm, 80mm and 120mm in length. The DEBs are coated with a proprietary hydrophilic formulation of paclitaxel with a matrix substance. Paclitaxel coated DEB are currently registered in Singapore for use.
Protocol
- Randomisation: Patients will be randomized to either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA after the lesion has been crossed with the guidewire. The allocation ratio will be 1:1. Randomization will be stratified by diabetes and renal failure status. Patients will be blinded to the assigned treatment. The operators from SGH and TTSH site will perform the angioplasty and angiogram procedures. The operators who perform angiogram at 6 month follow-up will be blinded to the treatment arm to prevent bias. For the reading of the images, the radiologists who read those images will also be blinded to prevent bias.
- Procedure
Following antegrade or retrograde femoral puncture and insertion of an arterial sheath with a haemostatic valve, angiography is performed. Angiographic features of the lesion(s) are then assessed. If endovascular treatment is not considered feasible, the patient is excluded from the study.
The lesion is crossed under fluoroscopic guidance with the combination of a catheter and guidewire according to the choice of the operator. Following lesion crossing the patient will be randomised to receive either DEB-PTA or CB-PTA. If crossing of the lesion is unsuccessful, the patient will not be randomized.
(3) DEB-PTA arm
After successful crossing of the target lesion, angioplasty with a conventional angioplasty balloon is performed before DEB-PTA. A conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter 0.5mm less than the intended DEB balloon is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. A DEB with a diameter matching the target vessel and lesion length is then advanced over the 0.018 inch guidewire and inflated at the target lesion site for 60 seconds. If the lesion length is longer than the length of the balloon, a second inflation with another DEB will be required. The maximal total lesion length of the treated lesions will not exceed 20cm, as this is the maximal length that can be treated with two DEBs. Comparisons of pre- and post-implantation percent stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). Whenever stent placement is required as 'bail-out' in cases of post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, a bare metal (non-drug eluting) stent will be used.
(4) CB-PTA arm
After successful crossing of the target lesion, a conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the target vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the target lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. Comparisons of pre- and post-implantation percent stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). Whenever stent placement is required as a 'bail-out' in cases of post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, a bare metal (non-drug eluting) stent will be used.
(5) Morphologic lesion classification:
Morphologic lesion classification on angiography will be performed according to the Transatlantic Intersociety Consensus (TASC) document on management of peripheral arterial disease:
TASC Type A infrapopliteal lesions:
- Single stenoses shorter than 1 cm in the tibial or peroneal vessels. TASC Type B infrapopliteal lesions:
- Multiple focal stenoses of the tibial or peroneal vessel, each less than 1 cm in length.
- One or two focal stenoses, each less than 1 cm long, at the tibial trifurcation.
- Short tibial or peroneal stenosis in conjunction with femoropopliteal PTA. TASC Type C infrapopliteal lesions:
- Stenoses 1-4 cm in length.
- Occlusions 1-2 cm in length of the tibial or peroneal vessels.
- Extensive stenoses of the tibial trifurcation. TASC Type D infrapopliteal lesions:
- Tibial or peroneal occlusions longer than 2 cm.
- Diffusely diseased tibial or peroneal vessels.
TASC classification is done for investigational purposes only and it does not influence treatment in this study.
(6) The following information relating to the procedure is collected:
- General participant demographics (initials, subject-number, date of birth, gender)
- Number of lesions
- Location of each lesion
- TASC morphology classification
- Contrast medium type and amount administered
- Type and size of sheaths, guidewires and catheters
- Diameters of non-diseased arterial lumen proximal and distal to the target site for each treated lesion
- Percentage stenosis of the lesion before and after treatment for each lesion
- Lesion length prior to treatment for each treated lesion
- Quality of runoff (number of vessels and presence of stenoses or occlusion) distal to the target site before and after treatment
- Type, size, length and number of balloon used/ Numbers of stents used
- Presence or absence of complications
- Use of closure-device (if used, type) (7) Escape procedure: In case stent placement is required to treat dissections proximal, distal or at the site of the treated lesion, the operator must consider the best interest of the patient. Patients should receive bare metal (non-drug eluting) stents if 'bail-out' stenting is required due to post-PTA occlusion or flow-limiting dissection, as is common practice.
In cases of acute arterial thrombosis or embolism, on table or infusional thrombolysis (using urokinase or rTPA) or mechanical thrombectomy is permitted according to the preference of the operator and the local hospital protocol.
(8) End of the procedure The procedure is considered complete once all the delivery material including catheter sheath introducer has been removed.
(9) Anti-platelet medication The following anti-thrombotic medications are to be administered.
- During the procedure, at least 2000 units of heparin are administered intravenously or intra-arterially. If necessary this dose may be increased or repeated in cases of prolonged procedures
- Overnight treatment with heparin is permitted
- Clopidogrel 75 mg daily should be administered for at least 6 months following the procedure
- Aspirin 100 mg daily should be administered for at least 12 months following the procedure.
Follow Up
All patients will be evaluated prior to hospital discharge, at 3 months (± 14 days), 6 months (± 14 days) and at 12 months (± 30 days) post-procedure, or upon return of complaints.
All patients will be followed during a 12 month follow-up period. They will be seen for duplex sonography at 3 months or upon return of complaints. Angiography is performed at 6 months.
All reported AEs and SAEs will be followed-up and closed. SCRI will keep an electronic SAE tracking log at SCRI to track all reported SAEs. This is to ensure that the SAE is followed until it is resolved and reported to the accredited IRB.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CB-PTA arm | Active comparator | Device: CB-PTAAfter successful crossing of the trial lesion, a conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the trial vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. Comparisons of pre- and post-angioplasty percentage stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). |
| DEB-PTA arm | Experimental | Device: CB-PTA, Device: DEB-PTAAfter successful crossing of the trial lesion, angioplasty with a conventional angioplasty balloon is performed before DEB-PTA. This is because the paclitaxel coating may be scrapped off the balloon if the DEB is used to cross the trial lesion. A conventional angioplasty balloon with a diameter matching the trial vessel is advanced over the guidewire and is inflated at the trial lesion site, according to the normal practice of the operator. A DEB with a diameter matching the trial vessel and lesion length is then advanced over the 0.018 inch guidewire and inflated at the trial lesion site for 60 seconds. If the lesion length is longer than the length of the balloon, a second inflation with another DEB will be required. The maximal total lesion length of the treated lesions will not exceed 20cm. Comparisons of pre- and post-angioplasty percentage stenosis will be made in the same angiographic projection(s). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Written informed consent
- Age > 21 years
- If female patient with child bearing potential, patient may not be pregnant at the study entry and must utilize reliable birth control for the duration of her participation into the study
- Patient is willing and able to comply with the specified follow-up evaluation
- Critical Limb Ischaemia, Rutherford category 4 (ischaemic rest pain), 5 (minor tissue loss) or 6 (major tissue loss)
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Acute limb ischaemia
- Subacute limb ischaemia which requires thrombolysis as first treatment modality
- Previous major amputation of the affected limb (at or above the level of the ankle)
- Concurrent iliac or femoropopliteal artery disease not suitable for endovascular or surgical revascularisation
- Concurrent iliac or femoropopliteal artery occlusion of >10cm, even if suitable for surgical or endovascular revascularization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CB-PTAAlso: Conventional Balloon-Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty | Device | CB-PTA arm, DEB-PTA arm |
| DEB-PTAAlso: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon-Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty | Device | DEB-PTA arm |
Primary outcome
Primary patency of the treated (index) site at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Primary patency is defined as less than or equal 50% loss of luminal diameter at the treated site on angiography without re-intervention in the interim.
10 secondary outcomes
Limb-salvage rate
Time frame: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Primary patency of the treated (index) site
Time frame: at 3 months
Clinical categorisation of the treated ischemic leg
Time frame: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Minor amputation
Time frame: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Infrapopliteal surgical bypass of the trial leg
Time frame: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Infrapopliteal endovascular re-intervention of the trial leg
Time frame: at 3, 6 and 12 months
Primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of end of primary patency of treated femoropopliteal sites (asscessed up to 12 months)
Peri-procedural complications
Time frame: (within 30 days)
Death
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (asscessed up to 12 months)
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
Time frame: at 3 month, 6 month and 12 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2019.
- Background: PubMed 16325694Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillepsie I, Ruckley CV, Raab G, Storkey H; BASIL trial participants. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67704-5.
- Background: PubMed 20458587Peregrin JH, Koznar B, Kovac J, Lastovickova J, Novotny J, Vedlich D, Skibova J. PTA of infrapopliteal arteries: long-term clinical follow-up and analysis of factors influencing clinical outcome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Aug;33(4):720-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9881-3. Epub 2010 May 11.
- Background: PubMed 8359304Pell JP, Donnan PT, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV. Quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993 Jul;7(4):448-51. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80265-8.
- Background: PubMed 18301831Sum CF, Lim SC, Tavintharan S. Peripheral arterial disease and diabetes foot care. Singapore Med J. 2008 Feb;49(2):93-4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19688364Met R, Koelemay MJ, Bipat S, Legemate DA, van Lienden KP, Reekers JA. Always contact a vascular interventional specialist before amputating a patient with critical limb ischemia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):469-74. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9687-3. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 10753686Klevsgard R, Hallberg IR, Risberg B, Thomsen MB. The effects of successful intervention on quality of life in patients with varying degrees of lower-limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Mar;19(3):238-45. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0995.
- Background: PubMed 8896481Singh S, Evans L, Datta D, Gaines P, Beard JD. The costs of managing lower limb-threatening ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 Oct;12(3):359-62. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80257-7.
- Background: PubMed 19241912Beard JD. Should we save critically ischaemic legs at any cost? Acta Chir Belg. 2008 Nov-Dec;108(6):651-5. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2008.11680310. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15569642Tsetis D, Belli AM. The role of infrapopliteal angioplasty. Br J Radiol. 2004 Dec;77(924):1007-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/97382129.
- Background: PubMed 15308939Wiskirchen J, Schober W, Schart N, Kehlbach R, Wersebe A, Tepe G, Claussen CD, Duda SH. The effects of paclitaxel on the three phases of restenosis: smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration, and matrix formation: an in vitro study. Invest Radiol. 2004 Sep;39(9):565-71. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000133815.22434.55.
- Background: PubMed 16452560Serruys PW, Kutryk MJ, Ong AT. Coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 2;354(5):483-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra051091. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16344384Aoki J, Colombo A, Dudek D, Banning AP, Drzewiecki J, Zmudka K, Schiele F, Russell ME, Koglin J, Serruys PW; TAXUS II Study Group. Peristent remodeling and neointimal suppression 2 years after polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: insights from serial intravascular ultrasound analysis in the TAXUS II study. Circulation. 2005 Dec 20;112(25):3876-83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.558601. Epub 2005 Dec 12.
- The Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials; National Research Council (2010). The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials. National Academies PressLink provided by the sponsor.
- Drummond M, Schulpher M, Torrance G, O'Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Peripheral Arterial Disease
Active, not recruiting
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Reducing Adverse Vascular Outcomes With Factor XI Inhibition in Adult Participants With Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
Recruiting
The THOR IDE Study
Peripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Daily Stretching to Improve Walking in Older Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: The STRETCH PAD Study
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Intermittent Claudication
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bien Soo Tan, MBBS, FRCR, FAMS principal investigator
Singapore General Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CB-PTA and DEB-PTA in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Singapore General Hospital at 2 sites in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary patency of the treated (index) site at 6 months (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02129634, which also lists 27 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2019.