AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical DystoniaPhase 1/2SAFE-PER-CDNCT02131467

Safety and Tolerability of Perampanel in Cervical Dystonia

A Phase 1/2 study testing Perampanel in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 5 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common focal dystonia. Currently there are no effective oral medications for the treatment of CD. While botulinum toxin injections improve symptoms, they require repeated injections by a trained physician and some patients stop responding to injections or never respond at all. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Dystonia
What is being tested?
Perampanel
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
5 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Sep 2017to 28 Feb 2020
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • • 18-65 year old male and female patients with primary cervical dystonia.
  • Subject may be untreated with botulinum toxin; treated with botulinum toxin but who are at least 8 weeks (+ 1 week) from a previous injection; or who have experienced an insufficient response to botulinum toxin in the opinion of the enrolling investigator. Note: We will aim to include subjects who have a stable response that lasts 12 weeks or longer.
  • Subjects may be on stable anti-dystonia treatment (for at least one month) including anticholinergics, baclofen, and anxiolytics including benzodiazepines.

Who cannot join

  • Secondary cervical dystonia,
  • Significant dystonia in body areas other than cervical region,
  • Cognitive impairment (e.g., Montreal Cognitive assessment (MOCA) < 26);
  • Active psychosis;
  • History of aggression;
  • Active depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score ≥ 12).
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Current abuse of alcohol or subjects who do not agree to avoid alcohol during treatment,
  • Substance abuse (current or prior);
  • Active infection,
  • Hypersensitivity to perampanel,
  • Significant renal dysfunction (Creatinine clearance < 50ml/min),
  • Significant laboratory abnormalities (ALT or AST greater than twice normal value; elevated bilirubin, active liver disease: hepatitis, cholestasis, cirrhosis, etc.),
  • Significant medical illness,
  • Women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant, women who are breastfeeding,
  • Subjects who do not agree to avoid consumption of grapefruit or grapefruit-containing products throughout the study,
  • Galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Use of prohibited medications known to be inducers of CYP3A including, but not limited to: rifampicin, troglitazone, St John's Wort, efavirenz, nevirapine, barbiturates, glucocorticoids (other than topical usage), modafinil, pioglitazone, and rifabutin; and any other interactions as per Product Monograph

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 2 countries.

5 sites in 2 countries

United States4 sites
  • Emory University School of Medicine

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Beth Israel Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10003

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • Toronto Western Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: An Open-label Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Perampanel (E2007) in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia (SAFE-Per CD)

Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common focal dystonia. Currently there are no effective oral medications for the treatment of CD. While botulinum toxin injections improve symptoms, they require repeated injections by a trained physician and some patients stop responding to injections or never respond at all. Therefore, alternative treatment options for CD are needed. One new agent is a drug that targets glutamate receptors that are thought to be involved dystonia. This drug, perampanel, was originally developed for epilepsy and is licensed for use in the USA and Canada for treating epilepsy. The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of perampanel in treating the symptoms of CD.

Read the detailed description

Idiopathic cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common form of focal dystonia with a prevalence of approximately 60 cases per million population.(Nutt et al.,1988). Current oral medical treatments for CD have variable efficacy and often with marked side effects. Botulinum toxin injections may be more effective than pharmacological therapies, and are currently the best available therapeutic option. However, repeat injections, administered by a physician trained in this area are required every 3-4 months.(Brans et al.,1996) This can often be difficult and costly for patients. Furthermore, there are subgroups of patients who simply do not respond to this treatment and between 5-20% of patients may become secondary non responders due to the development of blocking antibodies to the botulinum toxin.(Mejia et al., 2005) Thus, new therapeutic options are required.

The neural mechanisms underlying idiopathic dystonia are not well known. Classical basal ganglia circuitry models predict underactivity of the output regions of the basal ganglia, the medial globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulata (;Mitchell et al 1990). In subjects with dystonia undergoing DBS, intraoperative recordings have demonstrated underactivity of the medial globus pallidus (Vitek et al, 1999, Lozano et al 1997). One mechanism responsible for these basal ganglia output changes may be overactivity of corticostriatal glutamatergic pathways, as similar neural mechanism are thought to underlie other hyperkinetic movements (Brotchie 2005). The best studied hyperkinetic movement disorder is levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease in which dystonia, often of the head and neck, may occur. In animal models of levodopa-induced dyskinesia, increased striatal glutamatergic signaling via alpha-amino-2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-oxo-4-isoxazolepropanoic acid (AMPA) receptors has been demonstrated (Perier et al 2002, Silverdale et al 2010). To date there are few validated animal models of idiopathic dystonia. However, one model that has been use for pharmacological studies, and the results extrapolated to idiopathic dystonia, is the paroxysmal dt(sz) dystonic hamster (Loscher and Richter 1998). In this model, intrastriatal and systemic injection of NBQX a selective AMPA receptor antagonist reduced dystonic severity (Richter et al 1993, Sander and Richter 2002, Kohling et al 2004). Other studies have suggested that cerebellar outflow pathways, using AMPA receptors may also mediate dystonic symptoms. Thus the excitatory amino-acid kainite injected into rodent cerebellar vermis resulted in dystonic symptoms, an effect revered by NBQX, suggesting an action on AMPA receptors (Pizoli et al 2002). Thus AMPA receptor antagonists may alleviate dystonia.

To date, clinical studies using glutamate antagonists in CD have been limited due to lack of available drugs. A single 6-week open-label pilot study of the non-selective glutamate antagonist riluzole (50 mg twice a day) in six patients with cervical dystonia (CD) reported a 26% improvement in CD with no side-effects (Muller et al 2002).

The aim of this study is to conduct a multicentre phase I/IIa open label study to determine the safety and tolerability of the AMPA antagonist, perampanel in subjects with primary cervical dystonia. Exploratory analysis will determine effects on dystonia disability and subjective measures including quality of life and global impression of change. The importance of such an initial safety study is due to the lack of knowledge related to the use of this class of drug (AMPA antagonist) in this population of patients. The longer term aim is thus to generate preliminary data for further randomised controlled efficacy studies.

Being tested
Perampanel
Medical subject headings
Torticollis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PerampanelDrug

    oral drug

Study groups in NCT02131467
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PerampanelExperimentalPerampanel 2 mg tablets will be initiated once daily at bedtime. The dose will be titrated over 6 weeks starting at 2 mg OD at baseline visit for 1 week, followed by 2mg increases every 1 week to a maximum of 12 mg/day. If side effects occur then patients will be decreased to previous dose level. If unable to tolerate increases, patients will enter the maintenance phase at previously tolerated dose, for minimum 4 weeks. Patients reaching 12 mg (maximal dose) will be maintained at that dose for 4 weeks. Taper will be over 2 weeks 1 tablet every 2 days from a maximum of 6 tablets per day to stop.
Receives: Drug: Perampanel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of subjects able to remain on study drug for minimum of 4 weeks.

    Tolerability will be assessed by counting number of subjects able to remain on drug

    Measured: Measured at week 12.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Safety will be evaluated as the cumulative number of new adverse events collected at each visit from Baseline to visit 4

    Adverse events will be assessed at each visit by direct questioning patients, measuring weight, vital signs, Hamilton depression scale and laboratory tests and ECG

    Measured: Adverse events at study visits weeks 0, 2, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02131467
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-5864.4
Acronym
SAFE-PER-CD
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
23 Apr 2014
Last updated
7 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Perampanel in people with Cervical Dystonia, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 5 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of subjects able to remain on study drug for minimum of 4 weeks. (time frame: Measured at week 12.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in