AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple TraumaNCT02132208

Evaluation of the TICCS Capacity to Identify Trauma Patients With Acute Coagulopathy and Massive Bleeding

An observational study of Multiple Trauma and Massive Bleeding, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective single-centre non-comparative non-interventional open study has been designed to validate, in a target number of 100 trauma patients, the correlation between TICCS evaluated on the site of injury and thromboelastography made on a whole blood sample taken at the latest 30 min after patient's arrival in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
How many people
82 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Jan 2012to Jun 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Severe trauma patients admitted in the resuscitation room of our emergency department.

Who may be able to join

  • Every trauma patients admitted in our resuscitation

Who cannot join

  • age under 12

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Pre-hospital Identification of Trauma Patients With Early Acute Coagulopathy and Massive Bleeding: Results of a Prospective Non-interventional Clinical Trial Evaluating the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS).

A prospective single-centre non-comparative non-interventional open study has been designed to validate, in a target number of 100 trauma patients, the correlation between TICCS evaluated on the site of injury and thromboelastography made on a whole blood sample taken at the latest 30 min after patient's arrival in the resuscitation room.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity to discriminate trauma patients suffering from active bleeding and arly acute coagulopathy of trauma and needing Damage control resuscitation from those without this aggravating combination with a new purely clinical easy-to-measure pre-hospital score: the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS).

Read the detailed description

It started in January 2012 and was completed in June 2013. The TICCS was to be calculated for each patient. The presence of coagulopathy was to be assessed by thromboelastography measured at the latest 30 minutes after patient's hospital entry or, if not available, by standard coagulation tests (International Normalized Ratio or Prothrombin Time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, platelets).

Haemorrhagic shock was to be assessed by the treating physician at hospital entry on the basis of persistent hypotension due to a demonstrated active bleeding.

Surgical procedures and transfusion needs (up to 24 hours) were to be recorded all along patients' hospitalization. The transfusion of more than 4 Red Blood Cells units and more than 3 Fresh Frozen Plasma units within the first hour of care was defined as a massive transfusion.

We defined two populations of patients. "Severe" patients were defined by associating all the following conditions: active bleeding + early acute coagulopathy of trauma + need for massive transfusion + need for emergent surgical or endovascular hemostasis; "non-severe" patients were defined as patients without this 4-conditions association. Patients meeting only three of the four criteria or less were thus recorded as "non-severe".

Quantitative variables were summarized as mean, standard deviation (SD) and range, while frequency tables were used for categorical findings. The cut-off value for TICCS was obtained by Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis based on the severity of the patients. Group comparisons were done by Student t-test for continuous variables and by the chi-square test (or Fisher exact test) for categorical variables. Each trauma score was characterized by its sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted values and area under the curve (AUC). Results were considered significant at the 5% critical level (P<0.05). Calculations were performed with the Statistical Analyses System statistical package for Windows (version 9.3).

Medical subject headings
Multiple Trauma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02132208
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TraumaSevere trauma patients admitted in the resuscitation room of our emergency department.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Thromboelastometric evaluation on whole blood sample

    Measured: baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of blood products transfused

    Measured: up to 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionJun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
82 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02132208
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHRcitadelle-trauma-01
Status last verified
Jun 2013
First submitted
29 Apr 2014
Last updated
7 May 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Tonglet ML, Poplavsky JL, Seidel L, Minon JM, D'Orio V, Ghuysen A. Thromboelastometry in trauma care: a place in the 2018 Belgian health care system? Acta Clin Belg. 2018 Aug;73(4):244-250. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2017.1422311. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

    PubMed 29299962
  • Tonglet ML, Minon JM, Seidel L, Poplavsky JL, Vergnion M. Prehospital identification of trauma patients with early acute coagulopathy and massive bleeding: results of a prospective non-interventional clinical trial evaluating the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS). Crit Care. 2014 Nov 26;18(6):648. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0648-0.

    PubMed 25425230

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Multiple Trauma and Massive Bleeding, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Thromboelastometric evaluation on whole blood sample (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02132208, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in