Major Depressive DisorderPhase 2NCT02133001
A Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Participants Who Are Assessed to be at Imminent Risk for Suicide
A Phase 2 study testing Esketamine in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 14 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal esketamine 84 milligram (mg) compared with intranasal placebo along with standard care treatment, in reducing the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) (an affective disorder manifested by either a dysphoric mood or loss of interest or pleasure… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Esketamine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 May 2014to 1 Feb 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder
- Participants must have current suicidal ideation with intent
- In the Investigator's opinion, participant must be in need of acute psychiatric hospitalization due to imminent risk of suicide
- Participant has a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of greater than or equal to (>=) 22 predose on Day 1
- As part of standard of care treatment, participant agrees to be hospitalized voluntarily for a recommended period of 5 days after randomization (that is, through Day 5), and take prescribed non-investigational antidepressant therapy(ies) for at least the duration of the double-blind treatment phase (Day 25)
Who cannot join
- Participant has a current clinical diagnosis of bipolar or related disorders, intellectual disability, or cluster b personality disorder (example, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, and narcissistic personality disorder)
- Participant meets DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder, based on clinical interview
- Participant has a current or prior diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychosis, or obsessive compulsive disorder
- Participant with a history or current signs and symptoms of liver or renal insufficiency; significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, or metabolic disturbances
- Participant has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than [>] 160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg] or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg) despite diet, exercise or a stable dose of an allowed anti-hypertensive treatment at Screening; or any past history of hypertensive crisis
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
United States14 sites
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Hartford, Connecticut
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Iowa City, Iowa
Study site
New Haven, Connecticut
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Study site
Rochester, Minnesota
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
Towson, Maryland
About this study
Official title: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Subjects Who Are Assessed to be at Imminent Risk for Suicide
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal esketamine 84 milligram (mg) compared with intranasal placebo along with standard care treatment, in reducing the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) (an affective disorder manifested by either a dysphoric mood or loss of interest or pleasure in usual activities, the mood disturbance is prominent and relatively persistent), including the risk for suicide as assessed by the Investigator, in participants who will be assessed to be at imminent risk for suicide.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither physician nor participant knows assigned study treatment), placebo-controlled (participants are randomly assigned to a test treatment or to an identical-appearing treatment that does not contain the test drug), and multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team works on a medical research study), study of esketamine in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in participants who will be assessed to be at imminent risk for suicide, as measured by the change from Baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at 4 hours postdose on Day 1. The duration of study will be approximately 81 days per participant. The study consists of 3 parts: Screening (that is, with in 1 day before study commences on Day 1) and double-blind Treatment (from Day 1-25) and Follow-up (from Day 26 up to Day 81). All the eligible participants will be provided standard care treatment and will be randomly assigned to either esketmaine or placebo treatment. Esketamine/placebo will be administered by intranasal route (delivery of medications through the nasal mucosa) two times per week for 4 weeks. Efficacy of the participants will be primarily evaluated through MADRS. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- Esketamine, Placebo
- Keywords
- Major Depressive Disorder, Esketamine, Intranasal esketamine, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EsketamineDrug
Also called Esketamine hydrochloride
Esketamine 84 mg will be self-administered by participants as intranasal spray as two times a week, for 4 weeks (that is, Day 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25). Dose may be reduced to 56 mg per day based on Investigator's discretion.
PlaceboDrug
Matching placebo will be self-administered by participants as intranasal spray as two times a week, for 4 weeks (that is, Day 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Esketamine | Experimental | Esketamine hydrochloride solution (containing 14 milligram (mg) of esketamine base per 100 microliter [mcl] of intranasal spray) will be administered by intranasal route using nasal spray pump as two times a week, for 4 weeks. Dose may be reduced to 56 mg per day based on Investigator's discretion. Receives: Drug: Esketamine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matching Placebo solution will be administered by intranasal route using nasal spray pump as two times a week, for 4 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hour Post-dose in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-Predose) to Day 1: 4-hours post-dose
Secondary outcomes (19)
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Response Based on MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Sustained response is defined as a reduction from baseline in MADRS total score of greater than or equal to 50 percent, with onset on Day 1 that is maintained through the end of the double-blind phase (Day 25). The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Day 1 to Day 25
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25) in MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" for the double-blind phase.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25)
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on MADRS Total Score During the Double-Blind Phase
Percentage of participants with response (greater than or equal to (>=) 50% improvement from baseline in MADRS total score) during the double- blind phase was assessed. The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.
Measured: Day 1 (4 hours postdose), Day 2 (double blind phase), Double blind phase -Endpoint (Day 25)
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on MADRS Total Score at Follow up Phase Endpoint
Percentage of participants with response (greater than or equal to (>=) 50% improvement from baseline in MADRS total score) during the follow up was assessed. The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.
Measured: Follow up phase-endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-hours Post-dose in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (CGJ-SR) Module 8 Score (Double-blind Phase)
SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates numerous clinical global impression (CGI) severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (SIBAT CGJ-SR) Module 8 Score (Double-blind Phase)
SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (SIBAT CGJ-SR) Module 8 (Double-blind Phase)
SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for the double-blind phase.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk Score (Follow-up Phase)
SIBAT CGJ-SR: Module 8 operates like numerous other CGI severity scales used in other psychiatric studies. Changes in CGJ-SR designed to categorize clinically meaningful changes in clinician rated suicide risk from 'not at all suicidal' to 'participant is at imminent risk of suicide and immediate need for strong intervention (hospitalization with 24 hour 1:1 observation).' Patient scores for clinician-rated suicide risk: 0 (not suicidal); 1(occasional suicidal ideas, no intervention required);2(some clear suicidal ideas present),3(suicidal risk requires scheduled outpatient follow-up,no immediate intervention),4(suicidal risk requires immediate intervention, no hospitalization). 5( suicidal risk requires immediate hospitalization, no suicide precautions),6 (suicide risk requires hospitalization with suicide precautions). LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for follow up phase.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4- Hours Postdose in SIBAT-Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double Blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for double-blind phase.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Follow-up Phase)
SIBAT was specifically developed to measure rapid change in suicidality, based on concerns that existing scales such as BSS are not designed to discriminate differences associated with rapid change. Patient-rated section includes following modules: Module 1 (M-1)(demographic information,suicide history), M-2(current suicidal thinking),M-3 (protective factors), M-4 (suicide behavior),M-5(suicide risk),M-6(suicide-implicit association test).Patient-reported global assessment of suicide risk summarizes patient's judgment of suicide risk (Module 6). Scores: 0(None), 1(Very weak), 2(Weak), 3(Moderately weak), 4(Mild), 5(Moderate), 6 (Moderately strong), 7(Strong), 8(Extremely strong), 9(Extremely strong,constant). Negative change in score indicates improvement. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses, last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" follow up phase.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hours Postdose in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes,attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide,level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation.BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. Last post baseline observation was carried forward as "End Point" for double-blind phase.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Total Score (Follow-up Phase)
BSS is 21-item self-reported instrument to detect and measure severity of suicidal ideation. BSS measures broad spectrum of attitudes and behaviors associated with risk of suicide. Items in scale assess respondent's suicidal plans, deterrents to suicide, level of openness to revealing suicidal thoughts. First 19 items of scale measure gradations of severity of suicidal wishes, attitude, plans.Statements reflect increasing gradations of this severity,are scored from 0 to 2. Final two items ask about number of suicide attempts, seriousness of intention to die associated with last attempt,they are not used in calculating BSS total score. Total BSS score represents severity of suicide ideation, calculated by summing ratings of first 19 items;total score ranges from 0 to 38, with higher score representing greater suicide ideation. LOCF approach used for missing visit data in ITT LOCF efficacy analyses, last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" follow up phase.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hours Postdose in Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
BHS is paper-based self-reported measure to assess one's level of negative expectations or pessimism regarding future. Consists of 20 true-false items that examine the respondent's attitude over past week by either endorsing a pessimistic statement or denying an optimistic statement; 9 are keyed false and 11 are keyed true. Items fall within 3 domains: feelings about future; loss of motivation; future expectations. each response is assigned a score of 0 or 1. Total BHS score is sum of item responses, with range from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing higher level of hopelessness. Total scores that range from 0 to 3 are (normal range), scores 4 to 8 (mild hopelessness, scores 9 to 14 (moderate hopelessness), scores <14 (severe hopelessness). Negative change in score indicates improvement. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Beck Hopelessness Scale Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
BHS is paper-based self-reported measure to assess one's level of negative expectations or pessimism regarding future. Consists of 20 true-false items that examine the respondent's attitude over past week by either endorsing a pessimistic statement or denying an optimistic statement; 9 are keyed false and 11 are keyed true. Items fall within 3 domains: feelings about future; loss of motivation; future expectations. each response is assigned a score of 0 or 1. Total BHS score is sum of item responses, with range from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing higher level of hopelessness. Total scores that range from 0 to 3 are (normal range), scores 4 to 8 (mild hopelessness, scores 9 to 14 (moderate hopelessness), scores <14 (severe hopelessness). Negative change in score indicates improvement. The LOCF approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses. The last post baseline observation was carried forward as the "End Point" for the double-blind phase.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study start23 May 2014
- Primary completion1 Feb 2016
- Study completion1 Feb 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02133001
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR103162
- Other IDs
- ESKETINSUI2001
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 6 May 2014
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
Publications
Perez-Ruixo C, Rossenu S, Zannikos P, Nandy P, Singh J, Drevets WC, Perez-Ruixo JJ. Population Pharmacokinetics of Esketamine Nasal Spray and its Metabolite Noresketamine in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Apr;60(4):501-516. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00953-4. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
PubMed 33128208Canuso CM, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Alphs L, Lane R, Lim P, Pinter C, Hough D, Sanacora G, Manji H, Drevets WC. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175(7):620-630. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060720. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
PubMed 29656663
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Subjects Who Are Assessed to be at Imminent Risk for Suicide
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02133001
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR103162
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- Major Depressive Disorder, Esketamine, Intranasal esketamine, Placebo
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal esketamine 84 milligram (mg) compared with intranasal placebo along with standard care treatment, in reducing the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) (an affective disorder manifested by either a dysphoric mood or loss of interest or pleasure in usual activities, the mood disturbance is prominent and relatively persistent), including the risk for suicide as assessed by the Investigator, in participants who will be assessed to be at imminent risk for suicide.
Detailed description
This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither physician nor participant knows assigned study treatment), placebo-controlled (participants are randomly assigned to a test treatment or to an identical-appearing treatment that does not contain the test drug), and multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team works on a medical research study), study of esketamine in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in participants who will be assessed to be at imminent risk for suicide, as measured by the change from Baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at 4 hours postdose on Day 1. The duration of study will be approximately 81 days per participant. The study consists of 3 parts: Screening (that is, with in 1 day before study commences on Day 1) and double-blind Treatment (from Day 1-25) and Follow-up (from Day 26 up to Day 81). All the eligible participants will be provided standard care treatment and will be randomly assigned to either esketmaine or placebo treatment. Esketamine/placebo will be administered by intranasal route (delivery of medications through the nasal mucosa) two times per week for 4 weeks. Efficacy of the participants will be primarily evaluated through MADRS. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Esketamine | Experimental | Drug: EsketamineEsketamine hydrochloride solution (containing 14 milligram (mg) of esketamine base per 100 microliter [mcl] of intranasal spray) will be administered by intranasal route using nasal spray pump as two times a week, for 4 weeks. Dose may be reduced to 56 mg per day based on Investigator's discretion. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboMatching Placebo solution will be administered by intranasal route using nasal spray pump as two times a week, for 4 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants must meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder
- Participants must have current suicidal ideation with intent
- In the Investigator's opinion, participant must be in need of acute psychiatric hospitalization due to imminent risk of suicide
- Participant has a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of greater than or equal to (>=) 22 predose on Day 1
- As part of standard of care treatment, participant agrees to be hospitalized voluntarily for a recommended period of 5 days after randomization (that is, through Day 5), and take prescribed non-investigational antidepressant therapy(ies) for at least the duration of the double-blind treatment phase (Day 25)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participant has a current clinical diagnosis of bipolar or related disorders, intellectual disability, or cluster b personality disorder (example, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder, and narcissistic personality disorder)
- Participant meets DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder, based on clinical interview
- Participant has a current or prior diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychosis, or obsessive compulsive disorder
- Participant with a history or current signs and symptoms of liver or renal insufficiency; significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, or metabolic disturbances
- Participant has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than [>] 160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg] or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg) despite diet, exercise or a stable dose of an allowed anti-hypertensive treatment at Screening; or any past history of hypertensive crisis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EsketamineAlso: Esketamine hydrochlorideEsketamine 84 mg will be self-administered by participants as intranasal spray as two times a week, for 4 weeks (that is, Day 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25). Dose may be reduced to 56 mg per day based on Investigator's discretion. | Drug | Esketamine |
| PlaceboMatching placebo will be self-administered by participants as intranasal spray as two times a week, for 4 weeks (that is, Day 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25). | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hour Post-dose in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-Predose) to Day 1: 4-hours post-dose
The MADRS consists of 10 items that cover all of the core depressive symptoms (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts). Each item is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptom). A total score (0 to 60) is calculated by adding the scores of all 10 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used for missing visit data in the ITT LOCF efficacy analyses.
19 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Response Based on MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 25
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25) in MADRS Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-End Point (Day 25)
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on MADRS Total Score During the Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: Day 1 (4 hours postdose), Day 2 (double blind phase), Double blind phase -Endpoint (Day 25)
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on MADRS Total Score at Follow up Phase Endpoint
Time frame: Follow up phase-endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-hours Post-dose in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (CGJ-SR) Module 8 Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (SIBAT CGJ-SR) Module 8 Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk (SIBAT CGJ-SR) Module 8 (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT)-Clinical Global Judgment of Suicide Risk Score (Follow-up Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4- Hours Postdose in SIBAT-Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double Blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool Patient-Reported Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (Module 6) Score (Follow-up Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hours Postdose in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours postdose
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 2
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-endpoint (Day 25)
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81) in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation Total Score (Follow-up Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Follow-up Phase-Endpoint (Day 81)
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hours Postdose in Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Day 1: 4-hours Postdose
Change From Baseline to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25) in Beck Hopelessness Scale Total Score (Double-blind Phase)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1-predose) to Double-blind Phase-Endpoint (Day 25)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33128208Perez-Ruixo C, Rossenu S, Zannikos P, Nandy P, Singh J, Drevets WC, Perez-Ruixo JJ. Population Pharmacokinetics of Esketamine Nasal Spray and its Metabolite Noresketamine in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Apr;60(4):501-516. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00953-4. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29656663Canuso CM, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Alphs L, Lane R, Lim P, Pinter C, Hough D, Sanacora G, Manji H, Drevets WC. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175(7):620-630. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060720. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
- A Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of the Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder, Including Suicidal Ideation, in Participants Who are Assessed to be at Imminent Risk for SuicideLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Affective Cognitive Training in Mood Disorders and High-risk Relatives
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Bipolar Disorder (BD)
Active, not recruiting
Feasibility of Home-Based Intermittent 60Hz Light Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Depression, MDD
RecruitingPhase 2
ACP-211 Monotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder With Inadequate Antidepressant Response
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Neuro-Cognitive Correlates of Pediatric Anxiety Disorders
Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Digital Interventions for Relapse Prevention in Adolescence
Major Depression Disorder, ANXIETY DISORDERS (or Anxiety and Phobic Neuroses)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Esketamine in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 14 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Day 1: 4-Hour Post-dose in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score (Double-blind Phase) (time frame: Baseline (Day 1-Predose) to Day 1: 4-hours post-dose). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02133001, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.