AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal Cell CarcinomaPhase 1NCT02133742

A Dose Finding Study To Evaluate Safety, Drug Interaction, Tumor Markers Of Axitinib In Combination With MK-3475 In Adult Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Cancer

A Phase 1 study testing Axitinib and MK-3475 in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Pfizer at 19 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite substantial improvements of patients outcome in advanced RCC, durable and complete response is uncommon. The majority of patients eventually develop resistance and exhibit disease progression. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Renal Cell Carcinoma
What is being tested?
Axitinib and MK-3475
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
19 sitesUnited States
Study dates
16 Sep 2014to 3 Jul 2019
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced RCC with predominantly clear-cell subtype with primary tumor resected
  • At least one measureable lesion as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1
  • Controlled hypertension

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment with systemic therapy for advanced RCC
  • Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy if disease progression or relapse has occurred during or within 12 months after the last dose of treatment
  • Prior treatment with any agent specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways
  • Active seizure disorder or evidence of brain metastases, spinal cord compression, or carcinomatous meningitis
  • Diagnosis of any non-RCC malignancy occurring within 2 years prior to the date of randomization except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, or carcinoma in situ of the breast or of the cervix or low grade prostate cancer with no plans for treatment intervention
  • In past 12 months: myocardial infarction, uncontrolled angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, symptomatic congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack
  • In past 6 months: deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

United States19 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Brigham & Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

  • Investigational Drug Services

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • James Cancer Hospital

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • The Ohio State University Brain and Spine Hospital

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • Martha Morehouse Medical Plaza

    Columbus, Ohio, 43221

  • Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Karmanos Cancer Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Henry-Joyce Cancer Clinic

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Vanderbilt Oncology Pharmacy

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Attn. Alicia Sammarco, RPh, NYU Investigational Pharmacy

    New York, New York, 10016

  • NYU Langone Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10016

  • NYU Langone

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Fox Chase Cancer Center

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111

  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Inc.

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Georgetown University Medical Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 1B, OPEN LABEL, DOSE FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF AXITINIB (AG-013736) IN COMBINATION WITH PEMBROLIZUMAB (MK-3475) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED RENAL CELL CANCER

Despite substantial improvements of patients outcome in advanced RCC, durable and complete response is uncommon. The majority of patients eventually develop resistance and exhibit disease progression. Combining a PD-1 inhibitor, which has shown single-agent efficacy with axitinib may provide additional clinical benefit compared to axitinib alone.

Being tested
Axitinib, MK-3475
Keywords
Axitinib and MK-3475, patients with advanced Renal Cell Cancer.
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AxitinibDrug

    Axitinib at starting dose of 5 mg and 3 mg BID.

  • MK-3475Drug

    MK-3475 with two dose levels: 2 mg/kg every three weeks to find the maximum tolerated dose and continue treatment in a dose expansion phase.

Study groups in NCT02133742
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dose finding phase and dose expansion phaseExperimentalTo test the maximum tolerated dose of MK-3475 at 2 mg/kg every three weeks intravenous infusion in combination with approved axitinib dose
Receives: Drug: Axitinib; Drug: MK-3475

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT): Dose Finding Phase

    DLT was defined as any of the following adverse events (AEs) occurring in the first two cycles of treatment which were attributable to one or both the study drugs: 1) Grade 4 neutropenia, 2) Febrile neutropenia lasting greater than (>) 1 hour, 3) Grade greater than or equal to (>=) 3 neutropenia with infection, 4) Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, 4) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, 5) Any grade >=3 non-hematologic: non-laboratory toxicities despite maximum supportive therapy or hypertension despite maximal medical therapy, 6) Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicities resulted in hospitalisation or medical intervention 7) Inability to complete at least 75 percent (%) of axitinib dosing or 2 infusions of pembrolizumab within the DLT observation period (up to 42 days) due to treatment related toxicity. Severity of AEs was graded according to NCI (National Cancer Institute) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 21 (up to 42 days)

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized the participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs are events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

    Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (approximately up to 1552 days)

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized the participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs are events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.

    Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (approximately up to 1552 days)

  3. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) According to Severity of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized the participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 and coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) as Grade 3: Severe, Grade 4: Life threatening, Grade 5: Death related to AE. Participants were counted once according to the maximum grade observed.

    Measured: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (approximately up to 1552 days)

  4. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities of Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03: Biochemistry and Hematology

    Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry parameters. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia. Hematology parameters included anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count increased, lymphopenia, neutrophils (absolute), platelets and white blood cells. Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Baseline up to a maximum of 1083 days

  5. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities: Urinalysis

    Urinalysis parameter included urine protein, urine blood/hemoglobin and urine glucose. Test abnormalities was defined as deviation from normal range. Normal range of 24-hour urine protein test: less than 150 mg of protein per day, urine glucose: 0 to 0.8 mmol/L (millimoles per liter), urine protein: 0 to 20 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). Urine blood/hemoglobin abnormality was defined as presence and absence of blood/hemoglobin in urine of participants.

    Measured: Baseline up to a maximum of 1083 days

  6. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

    Vital signs included blood pressure, pulse rate and weight. Change from baseline values were considered to be clinically significant based on investigator's judgement.

    Measured: Baseline up to a maximum of 1083 days

  7. Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] Performance Status Score

    ECOG performance status was used to assess how disease affect the daily living abilities of a participant. It was measured on a scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0=fully active (able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction); 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory (able to carry out light/sedentary work); 2=ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities (for more than 50% of waking hours); 3=capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair (for >50% of waking hours); 4=completely disabled, not capable of any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair. Higher scores signified =more functional impairment of a participant.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 43 (up to 1083 days)

  8. Objective Response Rate

    Objective response rate was defined as percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR), as assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Confirmed responses were those that persist on repeated imaging for at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and the reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes to <10 mm. PR was defined as a 30% or more decrease in the sum of longest dimensions of the target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest dimensions.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death due to any cause, up to a maximum of 1083 days

  9. Duration of Response (DR)

    DR:date of first documentation of objective tumour response(OR) confirmed to date of first documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.PD per RECIST 1.1:>=20%increase in sum of longest dimensions(LD) of target lesions,reference to smallest sum of LD recorded since treatment started/appearance of 1 or more new lesions/increase of at least 5mm addition to relative increase of 20%.DR calculated only for participants with confirmed OR.Participants lacking evaluation of tumour response after date of first study drug dose was censored on date of first dose unless death occurred prior to 18 weeks.If participants had at least 1 on-study assessment,PFS was censored on date of last evaluable tumour disease assessment documenting absence of PD for participants who were alive and progression free at time of analysis/had documentation of PD/death after>=2 consecutive missed tumour assessments/given anti-tumour treatment other than study drug prior to documented PD/death.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death due to any cause, up to a maximum of 1083 days

  10. Time to Response (TTR)

    TTR was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death due to any cause, up to a maximum of 1083 days

  11. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS: time from date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documented PD or death on study due to any cause. PD as per RECIST v1.1 defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions, reference to smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions or increase of at least 5 mm in addition to relative increase of 20%. Participants lacking an evaluation of tumor response after date of first study drug dose had event time censored on date of first dose unless death occurred prior to 18 weeks. If participants had at least 1 on-study assessment, PFS data was censored on date of last evaluable tumor disease assessment documenting absence of PD for participants who were alive and progression free at the time of analysis or had documentation of PD or had death after >=2 consecutive missed tumor assessments or were given anti-tumor treatment other than study drug prior to documented PD or death.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death due to any cause, up to a maximum of 1083 days

  12. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death due to any cause, up to a maximum of 1552 days

  13. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Axitinib

    Measured: Dose Finding Phase:Pre-dose,1,2,3,4,6,8 hours (hrs) post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1;Dose Expansion Phase:Pre dose,1,2,3,4,6,8 hrs post dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1

  14. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Axitinib

    Measured: Dose Finding Phase:Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1; Dose Expansion Phase:Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1

  15. Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-12) of Axitinib

    Measured: Dose Finding Phase:Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4,6,8, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1; Dose Expansion Phase:Pre-dose, 1,2,3,4,6,8,12 hrs post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1

  16. Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Axitinib

    Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood (rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes).

    Measured: Dose Finding Phase:Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1; Dose Expansion Phase:Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1

  17. Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Axitinib

    Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.

    Measured: Dose Finding Phase:Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1; Dose Expansion Phase:Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hrs post-dose on Day 7 of Lead-in (7 days prior Cycle 1 Day 1), Cycle 7 Day 1

  18. Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475)

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 up to Day 21 of Cycle 56 (up to 1176 days)

  19. Number of Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score

    PD-L1- tumor proportion score was defined as the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining at any intensity. Participants with positive or negative scores were reported. PD-L1 negative: if tumor proportion score was less than 1%; PD-L1 positive: if the tumor proportion score greater than or equal to 1%.

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 43 (up to 1083 days)

  20. Number of Participants With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGF-A) Tumor Proportion Score

    Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) promotes cancer progression by inducing angiogenesis via VEGF receptors, signals directly through receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. Change in biomarkers related to VEGFR signal transduction pathways after axitinib treatment was assessed. Plasma VEGF concentration evaluations were performed using samples from peripheral blood plasma, bone marrow aspirate, bone marrow (Core) biopsy and bone marrow clot. The VEGFR, axitinib and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus are used individually in subsequent lines of therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

    Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 64 (up to 1344 days)

  21. Concentration of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGF-A) in Serum

    Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes cancer progression by inducing angiogenesis via VEGF receptors, signals directly through receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. Change in biomarkers related to VEGFR signal transduction pathways after axitinib treatment was assessed. Mononuclear (MNC) cell VEGF receptor expression and phosphorylation was assessed by in situ western blot analysis. VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 evaluations were performed using samples from peripheral blood plasma, bone marrow aspirate, bone marrow (Core) biopsy and bone marrow clot. The VEGFR, axitinib and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus are used individually in subsequent lines of therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2 Pre-dose, Post end of treatment or Withdrawal whichever came first (maximum of 1344 days)

  22. Concentration of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) in Serum

    Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes cancer progression by inducing angiogenesis via VEGF receptors, signals directly through receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. Change in biomarkers related to VEGFR signal transduction pathways after axitinib treatment was assessed. Mononuclear (MNC) cell VEGF receptor expression and phosphorylation was assessed by in situ western blot analysis. VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 evaluations were performed using samples from peripheral blood plasma, bone marrow aspirate, bone marrow (Core) biopsy and bone marrow clot. The VEGFR, axitinib and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus are used individually in subsequent lines of therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2 Pre-dose, Post end of treatment or Withdrawal whichever came first (maximum of 1344 days)

  23. Concentration of Interleukin 8 (IL-8) in Serum

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2 Pre-dose, Post end of treatment or Withdrawal whichever came first (maximum of 1344 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Sep 2014
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2017
  4. Study completion3 Jul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02133742
Sponsor's protocol ID
A4061079
Other IDs
KN-035
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
6 May 2014
Last updated
28 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Atkins MB, Plimack ER, Puzanov I, Fishman MN, McDermott DF, Cho DC, Vaishampayan U, George S, Tarazi JC, Duggan W, Perini R, Thakur M, Fernandez KC, Choueiri TK. Axitinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety from a phase Ib trial. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Mar;145:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

    PubMed 33412465
  • Martini JF, Plimack ER, Choueiri TK, McDermott DF, Puzanov I, Fishman MN, Cho DC, Vaishampayan U, Rosbrook B, Fernandez KC, Tarazi JC, George S, Atkins MB. Angiogenic and Immune-Related Biomarkers and Outcomes Following Axitinib/Pembrolizumab Treatment in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Nov 1;26(21):5598-5608. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1408. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

    PubMed 32816890
  • Atkins MB, Plimack ER, Puzanov I, Fishman MN, McDermott DF, Cho DC, Vaishampayan U, George S, Olencki TE, Tarazi JC, Rosbrook B, Fernandez KC, Lechuga M, Choueiri TK. Axitinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell cancer: a non-randomised, open-label, dose-finding, and dose-expansion phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):405-415. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30081-0. Epub 2018 Feb 10.

    PubMed 29439857

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Axitinib and MK-3475 in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Pfizer at 19 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jun 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT): Dose Finding Phase (time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 21 (up to 42 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02133742, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in