AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Organ ProlapseReCOUPNCT02138487

Restricted Convalescence: Outcomes Following Urogynecologic Procedures

A study testing liberal postoperative activity and Restricted postoperative activity in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Northwestern University at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators are conducting a study to better understand the relationship between activity restrictions and women's satisfaction following urogynecologic surgery for prolapse. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What is being tested?
liberal postoperative activity and Restricted postoperative activity
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
105 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2014to Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ambulatory women undergoing surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse
  • Prolapse > to Stage II on POP-Q
  • Age >18 yrs
  • Completed childbearing
  • All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration on study
  • All subjects must be able to read and complete study documents

Who cannot join

  • Wheelchair-bound women
  • Women with neurologic disease (Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease)
  • Abdominal approach with laparotomy

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • University of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine

    Roanoke, Virginia, 24016

Other trials in United States

About this study

The investigators are conducting a study to better understand the relationship between activity restrictions and women's satisfaction following urogynecologic surgery for prolapse. We hypothesize that women with less stringent postoperative restrictions will have higher levels of satisfaction 12 weeks following surgery with no difference in respect to anatomic outcome.

Read the detailed description

Pelvic floor disorders (PFD) dramatically affect millions of women's quality of life (QOL), and 30% of American women will undergo reconstructive surgery for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse to improve bothersome symptoms and quality of life. Surgical goals of women with PFD is often to resume their normal activities, which they have limited secondary to bothersome symptoms. Yet, traditionally surgeons placed strict postoperative restrictions on patient's activity levels for 3 months; sometimes even recommending life long lifting and activity restrictions. Activity restrictions are imposed on the premise that exercise can "weaken" surgical healing; however, emerging data from other fields suggests that increased activity may actually promote the healing process. We aim to determine whether satisfaction, recovery, and anatomic outcomes after surgery are related to type of postoperative activity recommendations (liberal versus restricted). Women having surgery for PFD will be randomized to receive either liberal or restricted postoperative activity recommendations and satisfaction, symptoms, QOL and anatomic outcomes will be measured after surgery. We hypothesize that women with liberal activity recommendations will recover more quickly and report higher satisfaction and QOL, have fewer symptoms, and have similar anatomic outcomes to women with restricted activity restrictions. These data will change paradigms of women's health and recovery after surgery.

Being tested
liberal postoperative activity, Restricted postoperative activity
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, reconstructive pelvic surgery, postoperative restrictions, patient satisfaction
Medical subject headings
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Patient Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • liberal postoperative activityOther

    Women will be given specific instructions regarding postoperative activities and will not have any limitations regarding activity.

  • Restricted postoperative activityOther

    Women in this group will be given instructions regarding postoperative activity and will need to abstain from heavy lifting, running, aerobics for 3 months.

Study groups in NCT02138487
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Restricted postoperative activityActive comparatorWomen in the "restricted postoperative activity" group must abstain from exercise and heavy lifting for 3 months postoperatively
Receives: Other: Restricted postoperative activity
Liberal postoperative activityExperimentalWomen in the "liberal postoperative activity" group will be allowed to resume their normal activities without restriction.
Receives: Other: liberal postoperative activity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Satisfaction

    Satisfaction will be assessed following reconstructive pelvic surgery for prolapse using a question which assesses a patient's global impression. Specifically, patients will be asked the question "how satisfied are you with your prolapse surgery?" at 12 wks to assess overall satisfaction. Possible responses include "completely satisfied," "mostly satisfied," "neutral," "mostly dissatisfied," and "completely dissatisfied."

    Measured: 12 weeks following surgery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Anatomic Outcomes

    Anatomic outcomes will be assessed on physical examination 12 weeks and 1-year following reconstructive pelvic surgery.

    Measured: 12 weeks and 1 year following surgery

  2. Quality of Life

    Quality of life will be assessed using several validated questionnaires at 12 weeks and 1 year following reconstructive pelvic surgery for prolapse.

    Measured: 12 weeks and 1 year following surgery

  3. Pain

    Pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale at 12 weeks and 1 year following reconstructive pelvic surgery.

    Measured: 12 weeks and 1 year following surgery

  4. Activity level

    Activity level will be assessed using a validated questionnaire at 12 weeks and 1 year following reconstructive pelvic surgery.

    Measured: 12 weeks and 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2014
  3. Primary completionJan 2020
  4. Study completionJan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
105 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02138487
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00084995
Acronym
ReCOUP
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
8 May 2014
Last updated
4 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Mueller MG, Collins SA, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Tavathia M, Kenton K. Restricted Convalescence Following Urogynecologic Procedures: 1-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):e336-e341. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000922.

    PubMed 32947549
  • Bochenska K, Hall E, Griffith JW, Kenton K, Alverdy A, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Mueller M. The Promise of PROMIS in Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov-Dec;25(6):426-429. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000685.

    PubMed 30570502
  • Mueller MG, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Collins SA, Abernethy MG, Alverdy A, Kenton K. Activity Restriction Recommendations and Outcomes After Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):608-614. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001924.

    PubMed 28277355

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing liberal postoperative activity and Restricted postoperative activity in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Northwestern University at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Satisfaction (time frame: 12 weeks following surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02138487, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in