OsteoarthritisNCT02141529
Intraarticular Pulse Radiofrequency to Treat Chronic Knee Pain
A study testing Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation and Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Cukurova University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether bipolar intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency method has a superiority to unipolar mode in the treatment of chronic knee pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation and Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- May 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 20-70 years
- Patients with osteoarthritis having knee pain over 3 months
Who cannot join
- Chronic knee pain caused by infection, inflammation, tumors, and fractures
- A history of acute knee pain, previous knee surgery, connective tissue diseases, neurologic or psychiatric disorders,
- The administration of steroids or hyaluronic acids within the last three months
- Coagulation disorders
- Local infection at the site of intervention planned
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Research Hospital
Adana, 01130
About this study
Official title: Bipolar Versus Unipolar Intraarticular Pulsed Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Chronic Knee Pain Treatment: A Prospective Randomized Study
The purpose of this study is to determine whether bipolar intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency method has a superiority to unipolar mode in the treatment of chronic knee pain.
Read the detailed description
After obtaining written informed consent and ethics committee approval, 100 patients aged 20-70 years with osteoarthritis having knee pain over 3 months are recruited to the randomized, double-blind study. Exclusion criteria are a chronic knee pain caused by infection, inflammation, tumors, and fractures or a history of acute knee pain, previous knee surgery, connective tissue diseases, neurologic or psychiatric disorders, administration of steroids or hyaluronic acids within the last three months, coagulation disorders and local infection at the site of intervention planned.
Patients are admitted to the preoperative unit 15 minutes before the procedure. After intravenous access is established by a 20 gauge cannula, all patients are monitored with non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), electrocardiogram (ECG) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) (Drager-Primus Anesthesia Device Monitor, Drager Medical Systems, Inc 16 Electronics Avenue, Denver, MA 01923 USA) in the operating room before the beginning of procedure. Patients are randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio by a computer-generated list. Allocation is provided with sealed envelopes containing group named paper.
After patients are positioned to supine, a pillow is placed to support below their knee to be treated. Anteroposterior (AP) fluoroscopic image of the knee joint is obtained with C-arm fluoroscopy. 1% of lidocaine is injected 2 ml under the skin at locations corresponding to joint space both of sides of the patellar ligament and A 10 cm 22-gauge two radiofrequency electrode needles with a 5 mm active tip (NeuroTherm® RF Cannula) are bilaterally inserted at the same points and advanced under fluoroscopic guidance entering the cavity of the knee joint at the both medial and lateral sites until needle tips are in the middle of the joint space. Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) is bilaterally performed in 42oC of temperature during ten minutes. After positioned to supine, a pillow is placed to support below their knee at the planned procedure site. Anteroposterior (AP) fluoroscopic image of the knee joint is obtained with C-arm fluoroscopy. Under fluoroscopy at locations corresponding to joint space both of sides of the patellar ligament, 1% of lidocaine is injected 2 ml under the skin and at the same points with 22 gauge of thickness, 10 cm in length, 5 mm of length active tipped two radiofrequency electrode needles (NeuroTherm® RF Cannula) are bilaterally inserted and advanced under fluoroscopy entering the cavity of the knee joint at the both medial and lateral sites until needle tips are in the middle of the joint space. PRF is bilaterally performed with a unipolar mode, 45V voltage, 2 Hz frequency, at a temperature of 42oC, 10 msec pulse width for 10 minutes in group U. The same procedure is bilaterally performed with a bipolar mode for 10 minutes in group B. All procedures are performed by one practitioner who is not informed about the type of procedure (unipolar or bipolar mode) and also patients are not aware of which type of treatment received.
If any complication is not observed for one hour after the procedure, the patients are discharged. Paracetamol is prescribed for the supplemental analgesic requirement.
The degree of pain is assessed with a 10-cm VAS. "0" identifies the least possible pain and "10" determines the most severe pain that can be considered. We evaluate the health status of patients by the WOMAC index which is valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire including 24 items divided into 3 subscales (pain, stiffness, and physical function).(1,2) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index LK 3.1 (WOMAC) and supplemental analgesic requirements, any side effects and complications such as a motor or sensorial loss are recorded in both groups at before the procedure and at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure. We assess the patients when they are requested to our clinic for clinical examination. We also call them by telephone to any further advice.
The primary outcomes are VAS scores measuring knee pain at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure. Secondary outcomes are WOMAC scores to evaluate the quality of life and the functional response of treatment of patients and the incidence of adverse effects.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation
- Keywords
- Intraarticular, pulsed radiofrequency, osteoarthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulationProcedure or surgery
Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticular administration into the knee joint
Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulationProcedure or surgery
Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticular administration into the knee joint
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unipolar PRF | Active comparator | Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticularly in knee joint, 42oC of temperature during ten minutes Receives: Procedure: Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation |
| Bipolar PRF | Experimental | Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticularly in knee joint, 42oC of temperature during ten minutes Receives: Procedure: Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analog Scale scores to measure the pain degree
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
WOMAC scores to measure the degree of quality of life and the functional response of treatment of patients
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cukurova UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cukurova University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ersel GULEC, Cukurova University
- Investigators
- Ersel Gulec, Assist.Prof., Principal investigator, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02141529
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IAPRF01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 15 May 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40.
PubMed 3068365Tuzun EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daskapan A, Bayramoglu M. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jan;13(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.010.
PubMed 15639634Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, Shin JW. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
PubMed 21055873Sluijter ME, Teixeira A, Serra V, Balogh S, Schianchi P. Intra-articular application of pulsed radiofrequency for arthrogenic pain--report of six cases. Pain Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):57-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00172.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 18211593Gulec E, Ozbek H, Pektas S, Isik G. Bipolar Versus Unipolar Intraarticular Pulsed Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Chronic Knee Pain Treatment: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):197-206.
PubMed 28339432
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bipolar Versus Unipolar Intraarticular Pulsed Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Chronic Knee Pain Treatment: A Prospective Randomized Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02141529
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IAPRF01
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Intraarticular, pulsed radiofrequency, osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cukurova UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether bipolar intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency method has a superiority to unipolar mode in the treatment of chronic knee pain.
Detailed description
After obtaining written informed consent and ethics committee approval, 100 patients aged 20-70 years with osteoarthritis having knee pain over 3 months are recruited to the randomized, double-blind study. Exclusion criteria are a chronic knee pain caused by infection, inflammation, tumors, and fractures or a history of acute knee pain, previous knee surgery, connective tissue diseases, neurologic or psychiatric disorders, administration of steroids or hyaluronic acids within the last three months, coagulation disorders and local infection at the site of intervention planned.
Patients are admitted to the preoperative unit 15 minutes before the procedure. After intravenous access is established by a 20 gauge cannula, all patients are monitored with non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), electrocardiogram (ECG) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) (Drager-Primus Anesthesia Device Monitor, Drager Medical Systems, Inc 16 Electronics Avenue, Denver, MA 01923 USA) in the operating room before the beginning of procedure. Patients are randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio by a computer-generated list. Allocation is provided with sealed envelopes containing group named paper.
After patients are positioned to supine, a pillow is placed to support below their knee to be treated. Anteroposterior (AP) fluoroscopic image of the knee joint is obtained with C-arm fluoroscopy. 1% of lidocaine is injected 2 ml under the skin at locations corresponding to joint space both of sides of the patellar ligament and A 10 cm 22-gauge two radiofrequency electrode needles with a 5 mm active tip (NeuroTherm® RF Cannula) are bilaterally inserted at the same points and advanced under fluoroscopic guidance entering the cavity of the knee joint at the both medial and lateral sites until needle tips are in the middle of the joint space. Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) is bilaterally performed in 42oC of temperature during ten minutes. After positioned to supine, a pillow is placed to support below their knee at the planned procedure site. Anteroposterior (AP) fluoroscopic image of the knee joint is obtained with C-arm fluoroscopy. Under fluoroscopy at locations corresponding to joint space both of sides of the patellar ligament, 1% of lidocaine is injected 2 ml under the skin and at the same points with 22 gauge of thickness, 10 cm in length, 5 mm of length active tipped two radiofrequency electrode needles (NeuroTherm® RF Cannula) are bilaterally inserted and advanced under fluoroscopy entering the cavity of the knee joint at the both medial and lateral sites until needle tips are in the middle of the joint space. PRF is bilaterally performed with a unipolar mode, 45V voltage, 2 Hz frequency, at a temperature of 42oC, 10 msec pulse width for 10 minutes in group U. The same procedure is bilaterally performed with a bipolar mode for 10 minutes in group B. All procedures are performed by one practitioner who is not informed about the type of procedure (unipolar or bipolar mode) and also patients are not aware of which type of treatment received.
If any complication is not observed for one hour after the procedure, the patients are discharged. Paracetamol is prescribed for the supplemental analgesic requirement.
The degree of pain is assessed with a 10-cm VAS. "0" identifies the least possible pain and "10" determines the most severe pain that can be considered. We evaluate the health status of patients by the WOMAC index which is valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire including 24 items divided into 3 subscales (pain, stiffness, and physical function).(1,2) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index LK 3.1 (WOMAC) and supplemental analgesic requirements, any side effects and complications such as a motor or sensorial loss are recorded in both groups at before the procedure and at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure. We assess the patients when they are requested to our clinic for clinical examination. We also call them by telephone to any further advice.
The primary outcomes are VAS scores measuring knee pain at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure. Secondary outcomes are WOMAC scores to evaluate the quality of life and the functional response of treatment of patients and the incidence of adverse effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unipolar PRF | Active comparator | Procedure: Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulationUnipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticularly in knee joint, 42oC of temperature during ten minutes |
| Bipolar PRF | Experimental | Procedure: Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulationBipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticularly in knee joint, 42oC of temperature during ten minutes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients aged 20-70 years
- Patients with osteoarthritis having knee pain over 3 months
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Chronic knee pain caused by infection, inflammation, tumors, and fractures
- A history of acute knee pain, previous knee surgery, connective tissue diseases, neurologic or psychiatric disorders,
- The administration of steroids or hyaluronic acids within the last three months
- Coagulation disorders
- Local infection at the site of intervention planned
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulationUnipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticular administration into the knee joint | Procedure or surgery | Unipolar PRF |
| Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulationBipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticular administration into the knee joint | Procedure or surgery | Bipolar PRF |
Primary outcome
Visual Analog Scale scores to measure the pain degree
Time frame: 12 weeks
1 secondary outcome
WOMAC scores to measure the degree of quality of life and the functional response of treatment of patients
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 3068365Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40.
- Results publication: PubMed 15639634Tuzun EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daskapan A, Bayramoglu M. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jan;13(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.010.
- Results publication: PubMed 21055873Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, Shin JW. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 18211593Sluijter ME, Teixeira A, Serra V, Balogh S, Schianchi P. Intra-articular application of pulsed radiofrequency for arthrogenic pain--report of six cases. Pain Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):57-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00172.x. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28339432Gulec E, Ozbek H, Pektas S, Isik G. Bipolar Versus Unipolar Intraarticular Pulsed Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Chronic Knee Pain Treatment: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):197-206.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ersel Gulec, Assist.Prof. principal investigator
Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation and Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Cukurova University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analog Scale scores to measure the pain degree (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02141529, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2016.