AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisNCT02141529

Intraarticular Pulse Radiofrequency to Treat Chronic Knee Pain

A study testing Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation and Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Cukurova University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether bipolar intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency method has a superiority to unipolar mode in the treatment of chronic knee pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation and Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
May 2014to Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 20-70 years
  • Patients with osteoarthritis having knee pain over 3 months

Who cannot join

  • Chronic knee pain caused by infection, inflammation, tumors, and fractures
  • A history of acute knee pain, previous knee surgery, connective tissue diseases, neurologic or psychiatric disorders,
  • The administration of steroids or hyaluronic acids within the last three months
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Local infection at the site of intervention planned

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Research Hospital

    Adana, 01130

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Bipolar Versus Unipolar Intraarticular Pulsed Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Chronic Knee Pain Treatment: A Prospective Randomized Study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether bipolar intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency method has a superiority to unipolar mode in the treatment of chronic knee pain.

Read the detailed description

After obtaining written informed consent and ethics committee approval, 100 patients aged 20-70 years with osteoarthritis having knee pain over 3 months are recruited to the randomized, double-blind study. Exclusion criteria are a chronic knee pain caused by infection, inflammation, tumors, and fractures or a history of acute knee pain, previous knee surgery, connective tissue diseases, neurologic or psychiatric disorders, administration of steroids or hyaluronic acids within the last three months, coagulation disorders and local infection at the site of intervention planned.

Patients are admitted to the preoperative unit 15 minutes before the procedure. After intravenous access is established by a 20 gauge cannula, all patients are monitored with non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), electrocardiogram (ECG) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) (Drager-Primus Anesthesia Device Monitor, Drager Medical Systems, Inc 16 Electronics Avenue, Denver, MA 01923 USA) in the operating room before the beginning of procedure. Patients are randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio by a computer-generated list. Allocation is provided with sealed envelopes containing group named paper.

After patients are positioned to supine, a pillow is placed to support below their knee to be treated. Anteroposterior (AP) fluoroscopic image of the knee joint is obtained with C-arm fluoroscopy. 1% of lidocaine is injected 2 ml under the skin at locations corresponding to joint space both of sides of the patellar ligament and A 10 cm 22-gauge two radiofrequency electrode needles with a 5 mm active tip (NeuroTherm® RF Cannula) are bilaterally inserted at the same points and advanced under fluoroscopic guidance entering the cavity of the knee joint at the both medial and lateral sites until needle tips are in the middle of the joint space. Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) is bilaterally performed in 42oC of temperature during ten minutes. After positioned to supine, a pillow is placed to support below their knee at the planned procedure site. Anteroposterior (AP) fluoroscopic image of the knee joint is obtained with C-arm fluoroscopy. Under fluoroscopy at locations corresponding to joint space both of sides of the patellar ligament, 1% of lidocaine is injected 2 ml under the skin and at the same points with 22 gauge of thickness, 10 cm in length, 5 mm of length active tipped two radiofrequency electrode needles (NeuroTherm® RF Cannula) are bilaterally inserted and advanced under fluoroscopy entering the cavity of the knee joint at the both medial and lateral sites until needle tips are in the middle of the joint space. PRF is bilaterally performed with a unipolar mode, 45V voltage, 2 Hz frequency, at a temperature of 42oC, 10 msec pulse width for 10 minutes in group U. The same procedure is bilaterally performed with a bipolar mode for 10 minutes in group B. All procedures are performed by one practitioner who is not informed about the type of procedure (unipolar or bipolar mode) and also patients are not aware of which type of treatment received.

If any complication is not observed for one hour after the procedure, the patients are discharged. Paracetamol is prescribed for the supplemental analgesic requirement.

The degree of pain is assessed with a 10-cm VAS. "0" identifies the least possible pain and "10" determines the most severe pain that can be considered. We evaluate the health status of patients by the WOMAC index which is valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire including 24 items divided into 3 subscales (pain, stiffness, and physical function).(1,2) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index LK 3.1 (WOMAC) and supplemental analgesic requirements, any side effects and complications such as a motor or sensorial loss are recorded in both groups at before the procedure and at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure. We assess the patients when they are requested to our clinic for clinical examination. We also call them by telephone to any further advice.

The primary outcomes are VAS scores measuring knee pain at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure. Secondary outcomes are WOMAC scores to evaluate the quality of life and the functional response of treatment of patients and the incidence of adverse effects.

Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Being tested
Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation
Keywords
Intraarticular, pulsed radiofrequency, osteoarthritis
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulationProcedure or surgery

    Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticular administration into the knee joint

  • Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulationProcedure or surgery

    Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticular administration into the knee joint

Study groups in NCT02141529
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Unipolar PRFActive comparatorUnipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticularly in knee joint, 42oC of temperature during ten minutes
Receives: Procedure: Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation
Bipolar PRFExperimentalBipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation, intraarticularly in knee joint, 42oC of temperature during ten minutes
Receives: Procedure: Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analog Scale scores to measure the pain degree

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. WOMAC scores to measure the degree of quality of life and the functional response of treatment of patients

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02141529
Sponsor's protocol ID
IAPRF01
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
15 May 2014
Last updated
17 Mar 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40.

    PubMed 3068365
  • Tuzun EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daskapan A, Bayramoglu M. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jan;13(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.010.

    PubMed 15639634
  • Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, Shin JW. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

    PubMed 21055873
  • Sluijter ME, Teixeira A, Serra V, Balogh S, Schianchi P. Intra-articular application of pulsed radiofrequency for arthrogenic pain--report of six cases. Pain Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):57-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00172.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18211593
  • Gulec E, Ozbek H, Pektas S, Isik G. Bipolar Versus Unipolar Intraarticular Pulsed Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Chronic Knee Pain Treatment: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):197-206.

    PubMed 28339432

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Unipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation and Bipolar pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Cukurova University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analog Scale scores to measure the pain degree (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02141529, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in