Parkinson DiseaseRACE-PDNCT02144220
Remote Access to Care, Everywhere, for Parkinson Disease
A study testing Virtual care visit in people with Parkinson Disease, run by University of Rochester at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and the value of providing care to individuals with Parkinson disease directly into their homes. The specific aims are: 1. To demonstrate the feasibility of conducting remote evaluations of patients with Parkinson disease nationally; 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Virtual care visit
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 277 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age greater than 30
- Self reported diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease
- Ability to converse in English
- Ability and willingness to provide informed consent and complete study requirements
- Access to a non-public computer or similar devices with broadband internet.
- Located in New York, Maryland, Delaware, California, or Florida at time of virtual visit (or veterans with Parkinson disease anywhere in the U.S.)
Who cannot join
- Any condition (e.g.prominent psychosis) that in the investigator's or coordinator's judgment would preclude participation.
- Concurrent enrollment in another telemedicine study.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32607
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of California San Francisco/San Francisco VA Medical Center
San Francisco, California
About this study
Official title: Remote Access to Care, Everywhere: Using Telemedicine to Deliver Patient-centered Care to Patients With Parkinson Disease
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and the value of providing care to individuals with Parkinson disease directly into their homes. The specific aims are:
- To demonstrate the feasibility of conducting remote evaluations of patients with Parkinson disease nationally;
- To measure the impact of remote care on each patient's ability to improve his or her quality of life (QoL) and better manage his or her Parkinson disease; and
- To assess the long-term acceptability to patients in receiving ongoing care remotely via telemedicine.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Virtual care visit
- Keywords
- Telemedicine, Virtual care visit, Remote visit, Video-conferencing
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual care visitOther
Also called Telemedicine visit, Virtual house call
Video-conferencing visit with a Parkinson disease specialist
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual care visit | Experimental | One-time virtual care visit for Parkinson disease. Receives: Other: Virtual care visit |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility
The percent of telemedicine visits completed as scheduled. (Goal >80%)
Measured: 6 months
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the PDQ-39 Assessment Tool
The impact on Quality of life (QoL) as measured by the change in PDQ-39 score from baseline to 6 months. The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality over the last month. 5-point ordinal scoring system: 0 = never, 1 = occasionally, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = always. Each dimension total score range from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). Lower scores reflect better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Acceptability
- The percent of patients participated who stated that they are interested in receiving ongoing care for their PD via telemedicine. (Goal >80%)
Measured: 6 months
Feasibility (Descriptive)
Percentage of physician visits where the physician was were satisfied or very satisfied with the virtual visit overall.
Measured: 6 months
Percentage of Patients Who Felt That the Recommendations Improved Their Health
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of RochesterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 277 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rochester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Davis Phinney Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ray Dorsey, University of Rochester
- Investigators
- E. Ray Dorsey, MD, MBA, Principal investigator, University of Rochester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02144220
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RSRB-50627
- Acronym
- RACE-PD
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 19 May 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dorsey ER, Venkataraman V, Grana MJ, Bull MT, George BP, Boyd CM, Beck CA, Rajan B, Seidmann A, Biglan KM. Randomized controlled clinical trial of "virtual house calls" for Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013 May;70(5):565-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.123.
PubMed 23479138Venkataraman V, Donohue SJ, Biglan KM, Wicks P, Dorsey ER. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A case series. Neurol Clin Pract. 2014 Apr;4(2):146-152. doi: 10.1212/01.CPJ.0000437937.63347.5a.
PubMed 24790799Dorsey ER, Constantinescu R, Thompson JP, Biglan KM, Holloway RG, Kieburtz K, Marshall FJ, Ravina BM, Schifitto G, Siderowf A, Tanner CM. Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology. 2007 Jan 30;68(5):384-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247740.47667.03. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
PubMed 17082464Dorsey ER, George BP, Leff B, Willis AW. The coming crisis: obtaining care for the growing burden of neurodegenerative conditions. Neurology. 2013 May 21;80(21):1989-96. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318293e2ce. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
PubMed 23616157Willis AW, Schootman M, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist care in Parkinson disease: a utilization, outcomes, and survival study. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):851-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c9123. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
PubMed 21832214Willis AW, Schootman M, Tran R, Kung N, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist-associated reduction in PD-related hospitalizations and health care expenditures. Neurology. 2012 Oct 23;79(17):1774-80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182703f92. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
PubMed 23054239The European Parkinson's Disease Association. The european parkinson's disease standards of care consensus statement. http://www.kompetenznetzparkinson.de/EPDA_Parkinson_s_Standard_nsus_Statement_Vol_I.pdf>2013.
Biglan KM, Voss TS, Deuel LM, Miller D, Eason S, Fagnano M, George BP, Appler A, Polanowicz J, Viti L, Smith S, Joseph A, Dorsey ER. Telemedicine for the care of nursing home residents with Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2009 May 15;24(7):1073-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.22498.
PubMed 19353687Dorsey ER, Deuel LM, Voss TS, Finnigan K, George BP, Eason S, Miller D, Reminick JI, Appler A, Polanowicz J, Viti L, Smith S, Joseph A, Biglan KM. Increasing access to specialty care: a pilot, randomized controlled trial of telemedicine for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1652-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23145.
PubMed 20533449Korn RE, Wagle Shukla A, Katz M, Keenan HT, Goldenthal S, Auinger P, Zhu W, Dodge M, Rizer K, Achey MA, Byrd E, Barbano R, Richard I, Andrzejewski KL, Schwarz HB, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM, Kang G, Kanchana S, Rodriguez R, Tanner CM, Galifianakis NB. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A multicenter noncontrolled cohort. Neurol Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;7(4):283-295. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000371.
PubMed 28840919
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Remote Access to Care, Everywhere: Using Telemedicine to Deliver Patient-centered Care to Patients With Parkinson Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02144220
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RACE-PD / RSRB-50627
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- Telemedicine, Virtual care visit, Remote visit, Video-conferencing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 277 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of RochesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Davis Phinney Foundation
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and the value of providing care to individuals with Parkinson disease directly into their homes. The specific aims are:
- To demonstrate the feasibility of conducting remote evaluations of patients with Parkinson disease nationally;
- To measure the impact of remote care on each patient's ability to improve his or her quality of life (QoL) and better manage his or her Parkinson disease; and
- To assess the long-term acceptability to patients in receiving ongoing care remotely via telemedicine.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual care visit | Experimental | Other: Virtual care visitOne-time virtual care visit for Parkinson disease. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age greater than 30
- Self reported diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease
- Ability to converse in English
- Ability and willingness to provide informed consent and complete study requirements
- Access to a non-public computer or similar devices with broadband internet.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Any condition (e.g.prominent psychosis) that in the investigator's or coordinator's judgment would preclude participation.
- Concurrent enrollment in another telemedicine study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual care visitAlso: Telemedicine visit, Virtual house callVideo-conferencing visit with a Parkinson disease specialist | Other | Virtual care visit |
Primary outcome
Feasibility
Time frame: 6 months
The percent of telemedicine visits completed as scheduled. (Goal >80%)
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the PDQ-39 Assessment Tool
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The impact on Quality of life (QoL) as measured by the change in PDQ-39 score from baseline to 6 months. The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality over the last month. 5-point ordinal scoring system: 0 = never, 1 = occasionally, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = always. Each dimension total score range from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). Lower scores reflect better quality of life.
3 secondary outcomes
Acceptability
Time frame: 6 months
Feasibility (Descriptive)
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of Patients Who Felt That the Recommendations Improved Their Health
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 23479138Dorsey ER, Venkataraman V, Grana MJ, Bull MT, George BP, Boyd CM, Beck CA, Rajan B, Seidmann A, Biglan KM. Randomized controlled clinical trial of "virtual house calls" for Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013 May;70(5):565-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.123.
- Background: PubMed 24790799Venkataraman V, Donohue SJ, Biglan KM, Wicks P, Dorsey ER. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A case series. Neurol Clin Pract. 2014 Apr;4(2):146-152. doi: 10.1212/01.CPJ.0000437937.63347.5a.
- Background: PubMed 17082464Dorsey ER, Constantinescu R, Thompson JP, Biglan KM, Holloway RG, Kieburtz K, Marshall FJ, Ravina BM, Schifitto G, Siderowf A, Tanner CM. Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology. 2007 Jan 30;68(5):384-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247740.47667.03. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
- Background: PubMed 23616157Dorsey ER, George BP, Leff B, Willis AW. The coming crisis: obtaining care for the growing burden of neurodegenerative conditions. Neurology. 2013 May 21;80(21):1989-96. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318293e2ce. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 21832214Willis AW, Schootman M, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist care in Parkinson disease: a utilization, outcomes, and survival study. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):851-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c9123. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 23054239Willis AW, Schootman M, Tran R, Kung N, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist-associated reduction in PD-related hospitalizations and health care expenditures. Neurology. 2012 Oct 23;79(17):1774-80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182703f92. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
- BackgroundThe European Parkinson's Disease Association. The european parkinson's disease standards of care consensus statement. http://www.kompetenznetzparkinson.de/EPDA_Parkinson_s_Standard_nsus_Statement_Vol_I.pdf>2013.
- Background: PubMed 19353687Biglan KM, Voss TS, Deuel LM, Miller D, Eason S, Fagnano M, George BP, Appler A, Polanowicz J, Viti L, Smith S, Joseph A, Dorsey ER. Telemedicine for the care of nursing home residents with Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2009 May 15;24(7):1073-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.22498.
- Background: PubMed 20533449Dorsey ER, Deuel LM, Voss TS, Finnigan K, George BP, Eason S, Miller D, Reminick JI, Appler A, Polanowicz J, Viti L, Smith S, Joseph A, Biglan KM. Increasing access to specialty care: a pilot, randomized controlled trial of telemedicine for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1652-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23145.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28840919Korn RE, Wagle Shukla A, Katz M, Keenan HT, Goldenthal S, Auinger P, Zhu W, Dodge M, Rizer K, Achey MA, Byrd E, Barbano R, Richard I, Andrzejewski KL, Schwarz HB, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM, Kang G, Kanchana S, Rodriguez R, Tanner CM, Galifianakis NB. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A multicenter noncontrolled cohort. Neurol Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;7(4):283-295. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000371.
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
E. Ray Dorsey, MD, MBA principal investigator
University of Rochester
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual care visit in people with Parkinson Disease, run by University of Rochester at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02144220, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.