AzTrials
AzTrials

Abdominal PainLACTINEDAPNCT02146521

Limited Abdominal CT in ED Patients With Abdominal Pain

An observational study of Abdominal Pain, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the diagnosis and management (treatment and disposition) of adult emergency department patients with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain and tenderness, based on two CT techniques: 1. Standard (complete) abdominal-pelvic CT. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Abdominal Pain
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Nov 2017to May 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: Patients of the emergency department undergoing CT evaluation for acute abdominal pain and tenderness

Who may be able to join

  • emergency department's patients undergoing CT evaluation for acute abdominal pain and tenderness (acute is defined as onset of current episode within 7 days of emergency department presentation).

Who cannot join

  • neurological disorders
  • altered mental status
  • history of intra-abdominal surgery in the past 30 days
  • BMI higher than 35
  • immunocompromised patients
  • abdominal trauma in the past 30 days
Show all 11Show fewer
  • CT is ordered for the following indications:
  • isolated vomiting
  • fever without source
  • staging of malignancy
  • isolated flank pain or suspected renal colic

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Prospective Study of Z-axis-limited Abdominal CT Guided by Region of Tenderness in the Diagnosis and Management of Adult Emergency Department Patients With Acute Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain and Tenderness

The purpose of the study is to compare the diagnosis and management (treatment and disposition) of adult emergency department patients with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain and tenderness, based on two CT techniques:

  1. Standard (complete) abdominal-pelvic CT. The American College of Radiology calls for the cephalad limit of abdominal CT to begin at the dome of the diaphragm, and the caudad limit of pelvic CT to extend through the ischial tuberosities.
  2. A z-axis restricted subset of images digitally obtained from the original CT dataset, determined by the region of tenderness identified by the examining emergency physician and marked on the patient prior to the performance of the CT. This z-axis restricted CT does not require any additional radiation exposure to the patient, as it will be produced by computer extraction of data from the original standard abdominal-pelvic CT.

The investigators hypothesize that the diagnosis and management will not differ when guided by the two CT scan interpretations. Radiation doses will be calculated for each of the two techniques.

Read the detailed description

This will be a prospective study with informed consent from patient subjects.

Informed consent will be obtained prior to subject enrollment. The study protocol requires the following steps to be performed, each of which is described in more detail later in this document:

  1. Potential patient subject is identified by research staff, by virtue of abdominal-pelvic CT being ordered for clinical evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal pain and tenderness, as determined by a board-certified attending emergency physician.
  2. Research staff applies inclusion and exclusion criteria to confirm patient eligibility.
  3. Potential subjects who fail one or more inclusion or meet one or more exclusion criteria are recorded in electronic research log with reason for exclusion but are not asked to participate in study. Recorded information includes age (if greater than 89, will simply be recorded as "greater than 89"), gender, race/ethnicity, date, and reason for exclusion. No identifiers are recorded for these patients. The purpose of this information is to allow comparison of the enrolled group with all patients with abdominal pain undergoing CT. This will be part of a CONSORT flow diagram, allowing readers to understand potential selection bias and to understand the probable clinical population in the context of all emergency department's (ED) patients undergoing abdominal CT.
  4. Eligible potential subjects (meeting all inclusion and no exclusion criteria) are asked to participate in study with informed consent. The study will be introduced to potential subjects by the emergency physician caring for this patient. The study will be introduced only after CT for evaluation of abdominal pain and tenderness is ordered by the physicians caring for the patient, as this is a study inclusion criterion. Potential subjects who do not give informed consent to participate are recorded in electronic research log but not enrolled in study. No identifiers are recorded for these patients. Recorded information includes age (if greater than 89, will simply be recorded as "greater than 89"), gender, race/ethnicity, date, and reason for exclusion. No identifiers are recorded for these patients.
  5. Patients who give informed consent are enrolled in study as subjects.
  6. Attending board-certified emergency physician places skin surface markers delineating region of abdominal tenderness, using an examination technique described below. Patient is marked with stickers while in supine position with arms above head, as required for CT. Attending board-certified emergency physician also places additional markers to blind radiological interpretation with respect to actual area of tenderness. Attending board-certified emergency physician is also asked to report the working diagnosis, treatment and disposition plan prior to CT scan being performed. An electronic standardized reporting form will be used. Reporting forms are designed in a format of electronic surveys and will be stored on password-protected server, designed specifically for research purposes. The information to be collected will be the same as the information in the attached appendices.
  7. Patient undergoes CT scan of complete abdomen and pelvis following usual institutional protocol, concordant with American College of Radiology standard.1
  8. Images corresponding to the region of tenderness (z-axis restricted) are loaded onto a server. A board-certified attending radiologist blinded to the remaining CT images interprets the z-axis limited CT images and generates an electronic report, using a standardized research reporting system. The report is electronically time-stamped and cannot be altered.
  9. The attending board-certified emergency physician is immediately provided with the electronic CT report from the z-axis limited CT. That physician immediately completes a standardized electronic research reporting form, indicating the current clinical diagnosis, treatment plan, and disposition. The form is electronically time-stamped and cannot be altered.
  10. The board-certified attending radiologist who interpreted the z-axis restricted CT is then immediately contacted and interprets the complete CT, including all available images. A report is generated using similar standardized electronic research reporting system used for the z-axis restricted CT. The report is electronically time-stamped and cannot be altered.
  11. The attending board-certified emergency physician is immediately provided with the CT report from the complete CT. That physician immediately completes an electronic standardized research reporting form, indicating the current clinical diagnosis, treatment plan, and disposition. The form is electronically time-stamped and cannot be altered.
  12. Patient care then proceeds according to the usual clinical standard in the institution.
  13. Subject records are reviewed to determine final diagnosis and treatment.
Conditions
Abdominal Pain
Keywords
z-axis limited CT, computed tomography, CT, abdominal non-traumatic pain and tenderness, emergency patients
Medical subject headings
Abdominal Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02146521
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients undergoing CTEmergency department's patients undergoing CT scanning for evaluation of acute abdominal pain and tenderness

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnosis, treatment and disposition

    The diagnosis, treatment, and disposition plans based on the z-axis restricted CT and the full CT will be compared for agreement.

    Measured: Records will be reviewed from the ED visit date to the date of discharge from the hospital or up to 30 days following ED visit, whichever comes last

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. radiation reduction

    The radiation doses resulting from a z-axis restricted CT and the full CT will be compared using dose-length products.

    Measured: Records will be reviewed 30 days after the ED visit or date of discharge from the hospital, whichever comes first

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Nov 2017 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMay 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2019 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Lack of funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02146521
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00050303
Acronym
LACTINEDAP
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
15 May 2014
Last updated
1 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Abdominal Pain, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnosis, treatment and disposition (time frame: Records will be reviewed from the ED visit date to the date of discharge from the hospital or up to 30 days following ED visit, whichever comes last). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in