Microvascular AnginaPhase 2MARINANCT02147067
Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis (MARINA)
A Phase 2 study testing Ranolazine in people with Microvascular Angina, run by Emory University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to look at the effects of the drug Ranolazine compared to Placebo on symptoms of chest pain or chest tightness (known as angina), exercise endurance and ability, and changes in blood flow to the very small arteries of the heart (known as coronary microvascular function) in patients who do… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Microvascular Angina
- What is being tested?
- Ranolazine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Jun 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- History of typical angina or effort-induced anginal symptoms and are currently experiencing angina at least once per week
- Abnormal stress ECG, exercise stress imaging, or pharmacological stress imaging
- Non-obstructive coronary artery disease as defined by lesion stenosis ≤ 50% in any artery as visualized by diagnostic angiography
Who cannot join
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Active Myocardial Infarction
- History of coronary artery bypass grafting
- Diagnosis of other specific cardiac disease such as severe valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or variant angina
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 30%
- Known renal insufficiency (CrCl < 30 mL/min) or on dialysis
- Contraindications to the use of Ranolazine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis
The purpose of this study is to look at the effects of the drug Ranolazine compared to Placebo on symptoms of chest pain or chest tightness (known as angina), exercise endurance and ability, and changes in blood flow to the very small arteries of the heart (known as coronary microvascular function) in patients who do not have significant blockages in their major heart arteries. Ranolazine is a drug that is already approved by the FDA for angina, but it may be particularly effective in people with disease in their tiny heart vessels (known as coronary microvascular disease).
This trial aims to enroll 50 patients with angina who undergo baseline bicycle exercise testing with monitoring of the heart's electrical activity and oxygen consumption (known as cardiopulmonary exercise test) and coronary angiogram (taking pictures of the heart arteries through small hollow tubes placed through the wrist or groin). If severe blockages in the main arteries are not found then testing for coronary microvascular function will be performed. Subsequently, participants will then be randomized 50/50 to either Ranolazine or Placebo. After taking the study drug for 12 weeks, they will then repeat the cardiopulmonary exercise test and the coronary angiogram with testing for microvascular function.
Read the detailed description
Heart disease is the most common cause of death in the world. Most of our understanding of heart disease has involved the large heart arteries (epicardial arteries); however, disease of the very small heart arteries (coronary microvasculature) likely precedes the development of epicardial disease and represents the "base of the iceberg" of cardiovascular disease. Yet, we do not understand how dysfunctional microvasculature leads to reduced blood flow, symptoms and adverse outcomes.
Coronary microvascular disease results from a combination of structural and functional abnormalities, so it is important to have reliable diagnostic tools that do not rely solely on imaging. The gold-standard for testing involves hemodynamic (blood circulation) measurements such as coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperemic microcirculatory resistance (HMR) that take place in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Ranolazine is a relatively new U.S Food and Drug Administration-approved medicine to help with angina (chest pain). There are no publications on the effect of Ranolazine on HMR.
- Conditions
- Microvascular Angina
- Being tested
- Ranolazine, Placebo
- Keywords
- microvascular angina, coronary microvascular disease, coronary physiology, ranolazine
- Medical subject headings
- Microvascular Angina
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RanolazineDrug
Also called Ranexa
Ranolazine 1,000 mg twice daily
PlaceboDrug
Placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ranolazine | Experimental | Ranolazine 1,000 mg twice daily Receives: Drug: Ranolazine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo twice daily Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Angina Frequency
The change in scores of the angina frequency dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the angina frequency dimension means that the participants are experiencing fewer episodes of angina at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Physical Limitation
The change in scores of the physical limitation dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the physical limitation dimension means that the participants are experiencing less limitation at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Angina Stability
The change in scores of the angina stability dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the angina stability dimension means that the participants are experiencing fewer changes in their angina at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Treatment Satisfaction
The change in scores of the treatment satisfaction dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the treatment satisfaction dimension means that the participants are experiencing greater satisfaction with their treatment at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Disease Perception
The change in scores of the disease perception dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the disease perception dimension means that the participants felt that their disease impacted their quality of life less at week 12 than at the baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Peak Rate of Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max)
The change in VO2, as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine compared with placebo. VO2 max is the maximum amount of oxygen the participants are utilizing during intense treatment. To standardize exercise stress testing, CPET was performed under the guidance of the MET-TEST CPET network in Atlanta, Georgia. The MET-TEST was created in 2003 and is a high-precision stress test with detailed physiological assessment, allowing accurate and reproducible measurements of peak VO2. Individuals may demonstrate an abnormal CPET response before they develop symptoms or present with cardiac events and abnormal CPET results are strong predictors of future adverse outcomes. Higher VO2 values indicate better oxygen utility and positive value for VO2 change means there was improvement from baseline at the week 12 visit. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Time to Angina
Change in time to angina as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing after 12 weeks therapy with Ranolazine compared with placebo. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Metabolic Equivalents of Task (METs) at Peak
Change in exercise was measured as Metabolic Equivalents of Task (METs) at Peak by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine compared with placebo. METs are used to describe functional aerobic capacity and harder physical tasks require a higher number of METs. METs at a peak level of exercise was determined for each participant. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. A positive value for change in METs at Peak of exercise indicates that the participant has improved their aerobic capacity from baseline at the week 12 visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)
The changes in Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine compared with placebo are presented here. CFR is a measurement of the maximum increase of blood flow through the coronary arteries during exercise. Average peak velocity (APV) was assessed over a 3- to 5-beats period. CFR was defined as the ratio of hyperemic to basal APV. A low CFR is an indication of coronary artery disease. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. A positive value for the change in CFR suggests improvement in coronary artery blood flow between the baseline and week 12 visits.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Hyperemic Microcirculatory Resistance (HMR)
Change in Hyperemic Microcirculatory Resistance (HMR) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine compared with placebo. Average peak velocity (APV) was assessed over a 3- to 5-beats period. HMR was measured as the ratio of distal pressure to APV. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Higher HMR is associated with myocardial ischemia and a positive value for change in HMR indicates increased risk for cardiac events at the week 12 visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Percent Change in Coronary Blood Flow
Coronary endothelial function will also be evaluated by measurement of coronary blood flow during infusion of intracoronary acetylcholine. Coronary blood flow (CBF) is defined as diameter (D)2 x APV / 8. Percent change in CBF (%ΔCBF) is calculated by (CBFACh - CBFbaseline) / CBFbaseline x 100%, where a >50% increase in CBF in response to acetylcholine is considered normal.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionMar 2018
- Study completionJun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Microvascular AnginaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Emory UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Emory University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gilead Sciences
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Habib Samady, Emory University
- Investigators
- Habib Samady, MD, Principal investigator, Emory University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02147067
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00072996
- Acronym
- MARINA
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 22 May 2014
- Last updated
- 21 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Koh JS, Hung OY, Eshtehardi P, Kumar A, Rabah R, Raad M, Kumar S, Chaudhry S, Gupta S, Hosseini H, Brilakis E, Corban M, Sabbak N, Burnett GM, Liu C, Mehta PK, Quyyumi AA, Samady H. Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis: The MARINA Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Pilot Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;13(12):e008204. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008204. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
PubMed 33272036Titterington JS, Hung OY, Wenger NK. Microvascular angina: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Future Cardiol. 2015 Mar;11(2):229-42. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.79.
PubMed 25760881
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02147067
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MARINA / IRB00072996
- Conditions
- Microvascular Angina
- Keywords
- microvascular angina, coronary microvascular disease, coronary physiology, ranolazine
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Emory UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gilead Sciences
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to look at the effects of the drug Ranolazine compared to Placebo on symptoms of chest pain or chest tightness (known as angina), exercise endurance and ability, and changes in blood flow to the very small arteries of the heart (known as coronary microvascular function) in patients who do not have significant blockages in their major heart arteries. Ranolazine is a drug that is already approved by the FDA for angina, but it may be particularly effective in people with disease in their tiny heart vessels (known as coronary microvascular disease).
This trial aims to enroll 50 patients with angina who undergo baseline bicycle exercise testing with monitoring of the heart's electrical activity and oxygen consumption (known as cardiopulmonary exercise test) and coronary angiogram (taking pictures of the heart arteries through small hollow tubes placed through the wrist or groin). If severe blockages in the main arteries are not found then testing for coronary microvascular function will be performed. Subsequently, participants will then be randomized 50/50 to either Ranolazine or Placebo. After taking the study drug for 12 weeks, they will then repeat the cardiopulmonary exercise test and the coronary angiogram with testing for microvascular function.
Detailed description
Heart disease is the most common cause of death in the world. Most of our understanding of heart disease has involved the large heart arteries (epicardial arteries); however, disease of the very small heart arteries (coronary microvasculature) likely precedes the development of epicardial disease and represents the "base of the iceberg" of cardiovascular disease. Yet, we do not understand how dysfunctional microvasculature leads to reduced blood flow, symptoms and adverse outcomes.
Coronary microvascular disease results from a combination of structural and functional abnormalities, so it is important to have reliable diagnostic tools that do not rely solely on imaging. The gold-standard for testing involves hemodynamic (blood circulation) measurements such as coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperemic microcirculatory resistance (HMR) that take place in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Ranolazine is a relatively new U.S Food and Drug Administration-approved medicine to help with angina (chest pain). There are no publications on the effect of Ranolazine on HMR.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ranolazine | Experimental | Drug: RanolazineRanolazine 1,000 mg twice daily |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo twice daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- History of typical angina or effort-induced anginal symptoms and are currently experiencing angina at least once per week
- Abnormal stress ECG, exercise stress imaging, or pharmacological stress imaging
- Non-obstructive coronary artery disease as defined by lesion stenosis ≤ 50% in any artery as visualized by diagnostic angiography
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Active Myocardial Infarction
- History of coronary artery bypass grafting
- Diagnosis of other specific cardiac disease such as severe valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or variant angina
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 30%
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RanolazineAlso: RanexaRanolazine 1,000 mg twice daily | Drug | Ranolazine |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Angina Frequency
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The change in scores of the angina frequency dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the angina frequency dimension means that the participants are experiencing fewer episodes of angina at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.
10 secondary outcomes
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Physical Limitation
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Angina Stability
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Treatment Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Disease Perception
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Peak Rate of Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Time to Angina
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Metabolic Equivalents of Task (METs) at Peak
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in Hyperemic Microcirculatory Resistance (HMR)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Percent Change in Coronary Blood Flow
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33272036Koh JS, Hung OY, Eshtehardi P, Kumar A, Rabah R, Raad M, Kumar S, Chaudhry S, Gupta S, Hosseini H, Brilakis E, Corban M, Sabbak N, Burnett GM, Liu C, Mehta PK, Quyyumi AA, Samady H. Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis: The MARINA Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Pilot Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;13(12):e008204. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008204. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25760881Titterington JS, Hung OY, Wenger NK. Microvascular angina: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Future Cardiol. 2015 Mar;11(2):229-42. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.79.
Related trials for Microvascular Angina
Active, not recruiting
A Single Center Diagnostic, Cross-sectional Study of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Coronary Microvascular Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Recruiting
Invasive Evaluation and Phenotype-Guided Treatment of ANOCA in Women
ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries, Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Simultaneous Measurement of EpicArdial and Microvascular ResisTance Via Angiographic FLOW Study
Non-obstructive Coronary Disease, Acute or Chronic Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Mental Stress Reactivity in Women With CMD
Post-menopause
Active, not recruiting
Insulin Resistance and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Myocardial Ischemia and Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, Coronary Microvascular Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Habib Samady, MD principal investigator
Emory University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Ranolazine in people with Microvascular Angina, run by Emory University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Angina Frequency (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02147067, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2019.