AzTrials
AzTrials

Microvascular AnginaPhase 2MARINANCT02147067

Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis (MARINA)

A Phase 2 study testing Ranolazine in people with Microvascular Angina, run by Emory University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to look at the effects of the drug Ranolazine compared to Placebo on symptoms of chest pain or chest tightness (known as angina), exercise endurance and ability, and changes in blood flow to the very small arteries of the heart (known as coronary microvascular function) in patients who do… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Microvascular Angina
What is being tested?
Ranolazine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2014to Jun 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • History of typical angina or effort-induced anginal symptoms and are currently experiencing angina at least once per week
  • Abnormal stress ECG, exercise stress imaging, or pharmacological stress imaging
  • Non-obstructive coronary artery disease as defined by lesion stenosis ≤ 50% in any artery as visualized by diagnostic angiography

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Active Myocardial Infarction
  • History of coronary artery bypass grafting
  • Diagnosis of other specific cardiac disease such as severe valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or variant angina
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 30%
  • Known renal insufficiency (CrCl < 30 mL/min) or on dialysis
  • Contraindications to the use of Ranolazine

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis

The purpose of this study is to look at the effects of the drug Ranolazine compared to Placebo on symptoms of chest pain or chest tightness (known as angina), exercise endurance and ability, and changes in blood flow to the very small arteries of the heart (known as coronary microvascular function) in patients who do not have significant blockages in their major heart arteries. Ranolazine is a drug that is already approved by the FDA for angina, but it may be particularly effective in people with disease in their tiny heart vessels (known as coronary microvascular disease).

This trial aims to enroll 50 patients with angina who undergo baseline bicycle exercise testing with monitoring of the heart's electrical activity and oxygen consumption (known as cardiopulmonary exercise test) and coronary angiogram (taking pictures of the heart arteries through small hollow tubes placed through the wrist or groin). If severe blockages in the main arteries are not found then testing for coronary microvascular function will be performed. Subsequently, participants will then be randomized 50/50 to either Ranolazine or Placebo. After taking the study drug for 12 weeks, they will then repeat the cardiopulmonary exercise test and the coronary angiogram with testing for microvascular function.

Read the detailed description

Heart disease is the most common cause of death in the world. Most of our understanding of heart disease has involved the large heart arteries (epicardial arteries); however, disease of the very small heart arteries (coronary microvasculature) likely precedes the development of epicardial disease and represents the "base of the iceberg" of cardiovascular disease. Yet, we do not understand how dysfunctional microvasculature leads to reduced blood flow, symptoms and adverse outcomes.

Coronary microvascular disease results from a combination of structural and functional abnormalities, so it is important to have reliable diagnostic tools that do not rely solely on imaging. The gold-standard for testing involves hemodynamic (blood circulation) measurements such as coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperemic microcirculatory resistance (HMR) that take place in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Ranolazine is a relatively new U.S Food and Drug Administration-approved medicine to help with angina (chest pain). There are no publications on the effect of Ranolazine on HMR.

Being tested
Ranolazine, Placebo
Keywords
microvascular angina, coronary microvascular disease, coronary physiology, ranolazine
Medical subject headings
Microvascular Angina

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RanolazineDrug

    Also called Ranexa

    Ranolazine 1,000 mg twice daily

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo

Study groups in NCT02147067
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RanolazineExperimentalRanolazine 1,000 mg twice daily
Receives: Drug: Ranolazine
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo twice daily
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Angina Frequency

    The change in scores of the angina frequency dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the angina frequency dimension means that the participants are experiencing fewer episodes of angina at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Physical Limitation

    The change in scores of the physical limitation dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the physical limitation dimension means that the participants are experiencing less limitation at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  2. Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Angina Stability

    The change in scores of the angina stability dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the angina stability dimension means that the participants are experiencing fewer changes in their angina at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  3. Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Treatment Satisfaction

    The change in scores of the treatment satisfaction dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the treatment satisfaction dimension means that the participants are experiencing greater satisfaction with their treatment at week 12 than they were at the baseline visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  4. Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Disease Perception

    The change in scores of the disease perception dimension of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine or placebo are presented. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Individual dimensions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire are transformed to be a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health. A positive number for the disease perception dimension means that the participants felt that their disease impacted their quality of life less at week 12 than at the baseline visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  5. Change in Peak Rate of Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max)

    The change in VO2, as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine compared with placebo. VO2 max is the maximum amount of oxygen the participants are utilizing during intense treatment. To standardize exercise stress testing, CPET was performed under the guidance of the MET-TEST CPET network in Atlanta, Georgia. The MET-TEST was created in 2003 and is a high-precision stress test with detailed physiological assessment, allowing accurate and reproducible measurements of peak VO2. Individuals may demonstrate an abnormal CPET response before they develop symptoms or present with cardiac events and abnormal CPET results are strong predictors of future adverse outcomes. Higher VO2 values indicate better oxygen utility and positive value for VO2 change means there was improvement from baseline at the week 12 visit. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  6. Change in Time to Angina

    Change in time to angina as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing after 12 weeks therapy with Ranolazine compared with placebo. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  7. Change in Metabolic Equivalents of Task (METs) at Peak

    Change in exercise was measured as Metabolic Equivalents of Task (METs) at Peak by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine compared with placebo. METs are used to describe functional aerobic capacity and harder physical tasks require a higher number of METs. METs at a peak level of exercise was determined for each participant. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. A positive value for change in METs at Peak of exercise indicates that the participant has improved their aerobic capacity from baseline at the week 12 visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  8. Change in Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)

    The changes in Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine compared with placebo are presented here. CFR is a measurement of the maximum increase of blood flow through the coronary arteries during exercise. Average peak velocity (APV) was assessed over a 3- to 5-beats period. CFR was defined as the ratio of hyperemic to basal APV. A low CFR is an indication of coronary artery disease. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. A positive value for the change in CFR suggests improvement in coronary artery blood flow between the baseline and week 12 visits.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  9. Change in Hyperemic Microcirculatory Resistance (HMR)

    Change in Hyperemic Microcirculatory Resistance (HMR) after 12 weeks therapy with ranolazine compared with placebo. Average peak velocity (APV) was assessed over a 3- to 5-beats period. HMR was measured as the ratio of distal pressure to APV. Change at 12 weeks was calculated as (Endpoint Value at 12 weeks - Endpoint Value at Baseline)/Endpoint Value at Baseline. Higher HMR is associated with myocardial ischemia and a positive value for change in HMR indicates increased risk for cardiac events at the week 12 visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  10. Percent Change in Coronary Blood Flow

    Coronary endothelial function will also be evaluated by measurement of coronary blood flow during infusion of intracoronary acetylcholine. Coronary blood flow (CBF) is defined as diameter (D)2 x APV / 8. Percent change in CBF (%ΔCBF) is calculated by (CBFACh - CBFbaseline) / CBFbaseline x 100%, where a >50% increase in CBF in response to acetylcholine is considered normal.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionMar 2018
  4. Study completionJun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02147067
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00072996
Acronym
MARINA
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
22 May 2014
Last updated
21 May 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Koh JS, Hung OY, Eshtehardi P, Kumar A, Rabah R, Raad M, Kumar S, Chaudhry S, Gupta S, Hosseini H, Brilakis E, Corban M, Sabbak N, Burnett GM, Liu C, Mehta PK, Quyyumi AA, Samady H. Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis: The MARINA Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Pilot Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;13(12):e008204. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008204. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

    PubMed 33272036
  • Titterington JS, Hung OY, Wenger NK. Microvascular angina: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Future Cardiol. 2015 Mar;11(2):229-42. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.79.

    PubMed 25760881

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Ranolazine in people with Microvascular Angina, run by Emory University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Regarding Angina Frequency (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02147067, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in