AzTrials
AzTrials

DepressionAHHNCT02147522

A Helping Hand Among Low-Income Patients

A study testing Self-care management in people with Depression and Diabetes, run by University of Southern California at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study Hypotheses (Ho) and Research Questions (RQ): Ho1. AHH will significantly improve patient depression treatment acceptance/adherence and depression symptoms vs UC at 6 and 12 months post-baseline. Ho2. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Depression, Diabetes, Heart Disease
What is being tested?
Self-care management
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
348 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2013to Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age >=18 years, have a phone, meet PHQ-9 score of 10 or more, and have concurrent diabetes, CHD, or HF.

Who cannot join

  • current suicidal ideation,inability to speak either English or Spanish fluently, a score of 2 or greater on the CAGE 4M alcohol assessment,recent use of lithium or antipsychotic medication, and cognitive impairment precluding informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • El Monte Comprehensive Health Center

    El Monte, California, 91731

  • H. Claude Hudson Comprehensive Health Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90007

  • Edward R. Roybal Comprehensive Health Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90022

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Helping Hand (AHH) to Activate Patient-Centered Depression Care Among Low-Income Patients

Study Hypotheses (Ho) and Research Questions (RQ):

  • Ho1. AHH will significantly improve patient depression treatment acceptance/adherence and depression symptoms vs UC at 6 and 12 months post-baseline.
  • Ho2. A Helping Hand (AHH) will significantly improve and sustain patient self-care management in Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD) and Quality of Life vs UC at 6 and 12 months post-baseline.
  • RQ1. What is the association between depression symptoms and concurrent chronic illness self-care management over time by group?
  • RQ2. Will AHH reduce hospitalizations and Emergency Room visits and improve clinic appointment-keeping?
  • RQ3. Will patient care satisfaction and reported barriers to self-care management vary by study group?
  • RQ4. What factors are identified via qualitative assessments of patients, promotoras, Department of Health Services (DHS) medical and social work providers, and DHS clinic/organizational leadership regarding satisfaction with, sustainable uptake of, and suggested modifications of the AHH promotora delivery model?
  • RQ5. What potential technology applications would enhance promotoras delivering patient-centered self-care training and resource navigation, communicating and integrating care with DHS, and disseminating AHH?
Read the detailed description

Major depression, plus other chronic illness such as diabetes, coronary heart disease and heart failure is common among low-income, culturally diverse safety net care patients. Unfortunately, many of these patients are uncomfortable about either asking their doctor questions about their illness and treatment options and their illness self-care or informing their doctors about their treatment preferences. Lack of strong engagement with medical providers occurs because patients believe they lack the knowledge to ask questions or to understand and follow recommended self-care and their concern that their medical provider lacks understanding of their treatment preferences. These factors often result in patient worry, poor adherence to prescribed treatment, and worsening illness status and even early death. The study will be conducted by a university, the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (DHS) and a community health worker organization research team. The study will be conducted within two DHS Patient-Centered Medical Home clinics, with each patient having a designated primary care team of physician, nurse, social worker and medical assistant. Study patients with major depression and other illnesses face numerous self-care management barriers: managing concurrent symptoms (depression, pain, anxiety etc.) and cultural influences (depression stigma, diet), difficulty in navigating primary and specialty doctor and treatment plans, while at the same time experiencing daily social and economic stress. The randomized comparative effectiveness study plans to recruit 350 patients with major depression and a concurrent chronic illness (i.e., diabetes, heart failure, coronary heart disease) from two DHS PCMH community health centers. To enhance patient-centered research community partnerships, patients will be provided A Helping Hand (AHH) in which a community organization- based promotora aims to activate patient-centered depression self-care training and practical assistance to: a) improve and personalize major depression self-care (e.g., medication or psychotherapy preference, treatment adherence, fatigue, pain, diet, activity, stress management, family/caregiver communication); b) activate patient-provider communication, clinic appointment keeping and treatment coordination; and c) and facilitate patient navigation and receipt of needed community resources. AHH aims to improve patient self-care management and patient-provider care management relationships among underserved low-income patients, who must simultaneously cope with major depression and chronic co-morbid physical illness. Study objectives aim to determine: 1) whether community health worker promotora care management training improves patient-centered outcomes, such as self-care need and management, treatment adherence, symptom improvement, and care satisfaction over the usual team care; 2) depression symptom improvement; and 3) patient hospitalizations and ER visits frequency.

Being tested
Self-care management
Keywords
community health worker, promotoras, self-care behaviors activation, depression, low-income patients, safety-net care
Medical subject headings
Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self-care managementBehavioural

    AHH behavioral intervention is provided by promotoras

Study groups in NCT02147522
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A Helping Hand (AHH)ExperimentalParticipants receive DHS-PCMH usual care from their respective county health clinic providers plus the AHH intervention provided by study promotoras. AHH intervention includes 6 weekly in-person or via-telephone intervention sessions followed by 3 monthly telephone booster sessions aimed at reducing the burden and strain on patients, families, and care providers by assessing, enhancing, and facilitating patient depression and co-morbid illness self-care management, and activating patient communication with clinic medical providers.
Receives: Behavioral: Self-care management
Usual Care (UC)No interventionParticipants receive DHS Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) clinic team usual care from their respective county health clinic providers. PCMH model has available DHS medical providers and social workers for depression care and refer patients when indicated to community mental health clinics. Problem-Solving Therapy (PST) is available in some of participating clinics.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Response Rate - 50 Percent or Greater Reduction in Patient Health Survey-9 (PHQ-9) Score Since Baseline

    The PHQ-9, which establishes provisional depressive disorder diagnosis as well as grades depressive symptom severity, will be obtained from all study subjects at recruitment and during the four waves of data collection (up to 12 months). The PHQ-9 scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day), with possible scores ranging from 0 to 27, with cut points of 5,10,15, and 20 representing the thresholds for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression. A validated Spanish version of the PHQ-9 will be used. Clinically meaningful improvement of depressive symptoms was assessed as a ≥50% score reduction since baseline assessment.

    Measured: 6- and12-month follow-ups

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change From Baseline in MOS Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (PCS)

    The Physical Component Summary (PCS) is a norm-based score standardized to the general U.S. population with a mean of 50, and a SD of 10. Scores range from 0 to 100, a higher score indicating better physical health.

    Measured: baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-ups

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2013
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
348 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02147522
Sponsor's protocol ID
AD-1304-7364
Acronym
AHH
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
19 May 2014
Last updated
2 Aug 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Oh H, Ell K. Associations Between Changes in Depressive Symptoms and Social Support and Diabetes Management Among Low-Income, Predominantly Hispanic Patients in Patient-Centered Care. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1149-1156. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2000. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

    PubMed 29588293
  • Ell K, Aranda MP, Wu S, Oh H, Lee PJ, Guterman J. Promotora assisted depression and self-care management among predominantly Latinos with concurrent chronic illness: Safety net care system clinical trial results. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;61:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

    PubMed 28684357
  • Ell K, Aranda MP, Wu S, Oh H, Lee PJ, Guterman J. Promotora assisted depression care among predominately Hispanic patients with concurrent chronic illness: Public care system clinical trial design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jan;46:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

    PubMed 26600285

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self-care management in people with Depression and Diabetes, run by University of Southern California at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Response Rate - 50 Percent or Greater Reduction in Patient Health Survey-9 (PHQ-9) Score Since Baseline (time frame: 6- and12-month follow-ups). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02147522, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in