CholelithiasisNCT02149797
Comparison of "Pick'n Roll" Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Technique, and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
A study testing Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) and SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II) in people with Cholelithiasis, run by Samsun Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Cholecystectomy is one of the most common operation performed by general surgeons. Since, first video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard treatment for benign biliary disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cholelithiasis
- What is being tested?
- Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) and SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Apr 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Symptomatic cholelithiasis
Who cannot join
- Acute cholecystitis (diagnosed on ultrasound or elevated inflammatory serum markers)
- Choledocholithiasis
- Less than 18 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grade IV or V.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Samsun, Turkey
Samsun, 55200
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of New Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Technique, "Pick'n Roll", Versus Conventional Four-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy is one of the most common operation performed by general surgeons. Since, first video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard treatment for benign biliary disease. In daily practice, LC has increased general surgeons familiarity to video-laparoscopic operations and has become the first step to search more minimally invasive techniques and to perform advanced laparoscopic operations. In order to move forward the minimal invasive surgery concept with less surgical trauma and better cosmetic results, surgeons firstly reduced the number of incision and ports, then the idea of totally eliminating skin incisions through the use of natural orifices was implemented in selected cases.
In theory, minimal incision must provide minimal postoperative pain and better cosmetic results. With the use of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), this purpose is achieved by means of cosmesis but providing minimal postoperative pain is still controversial. Recent reports on, LC vs. SILC showed significantly favorable cosmetic benefit, comparable complication rate and hospital stay with SILC, but the mean operation time was significantly longer. Today, lack of standardized operation technique, the need for specialized instruments, the fear of inability to apply safe cholecystectomy principles, longer operation time, cost-effectivity and advanced laparoscopic experience are still limiting factor to performing SILC.
The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare gold standard LC and SILC using our new technique called "Pick'n roll" (SILC-PR). Our goal was to provide critical view of safety and safe cholecystectomy principles on SILC, improve operator ergonomics and shorten operation time while eliminating the need for specialized instruments.
Read the detailed description
A pilot study was conducted, with ten patients who were planned to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy after approval by the ethics committee of Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Among ten patients, five patients were undergone LC, and another five were undergone SILC-PR.
The sample size was calculated from the pilot study. Simple consecutive allocation method was used to randomly divide the subjects into LC (classical four port technique), and SILC-"Pick'n roll" (PR) beginning and experienced groups. Each group contained 20 patients. The randomization was achieved regardless of demographic characteristics, by Dr. N. O.
One surgeon was performed all operation (Dr. R. A.). Patient's data were recorded by Dr. K. Y. At the end of the study, the data were analysed by Dr. S. C. and Dr. E. C. in a blinded manner to avoid bias
Surgical Procedures The technique used for LC was the conventional four-trocar approach (10-mm optic at the umbilicus, 10-mm trocar in the epigastrium and two 5-mm trocars in the right upper abdomen).
For SILC-PR, the patient was positioned supine on the operating table, once the access is gained into the abdomen, the patient re-positioned to reverse trendelenburg and left tilt. The surgeon stands on the left side of the patient and the assistant stands opposite him during the placement of the single-port device. SILC-PR was performed by the single-incision, single port technique using The OCTOTMPort (Dalimsurg, Seoul, Korea). The OCTOTMPort is a re-usable single-port device that contains two 5-mm, one 10-mm and one 12-mm port through the same port. Surgical access to the abdomen was obtained through an intraumbilical 2.5 cm incision from 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock. The OCTOTMPort was inserted and pneumoperitoneum was created up to an abdominal pressure of 15 mmHg. A 10-mm, 30º traditional scope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was inserted through inferior placed 10-mm port, by the assistant who positioned on the patient's left side, and the peritoneal cavity was examined. If the stomach was distended, a nasogastric tube insertion was requested from the anesthesiologist. The surgeon introduced an Endo Grasp™ (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) with left hand and elevated gallbladder fundus to assess the mobility of the gallbladder infindibulum, constant fundus retraction was used in whole operation by this instrument. In the presence of omental attachments, the gallbladder infindibulum was freed with monopolar hook device which holding by the surgeon's right hand, under the traction of the fundus. Once the gallbladder infindibulum freed from the attachments or clearly seen in first examination next step of the operation was launched. A 2.0 multifilament straight atraumatic needle was inserted through the surgeon's left of the falciform ligament with simultaneous palpation of the abdominal wall for optimum insertion site. The needle was grasped with a laparoscopic needleholder using by surgeon's right hand, and the needle was passed through the Hartmann's pouch at the lowest accessible point. To allow infindibulum retraction, wide triangulation and free Hartmann's pouch manipulation like "puppeteer movement", the passing suture with needle was turned around the afferent suture and a "half-knot" was created. The needle was passed back of the abdomen from the surgeon's left of the midclavicular line, with simultaneous palpation of the abdominal wall for optimum site. After this point, an assistant or a nurse was grasped two ends of the suspensory suture with clamps. With the help of fundus retraction and assistant's right or left hand dominant pulling tension on the suture, classical Hartmann's pouch retraction similar to LC technique was provided. Dissection of Calot's triangle and removal of gallbladder from the liver bed are possible in almost all cases with the use of aforementioned "Pick'n roll technique" and a hook diathermy.
- Conditions
- Cholelithiasis
- Being tested
- Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I), SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)
- Medical subject headings
- Cholelithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomyProcedure or surgery
Classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I)Procedure or surgery
SILC-PR was performed by the intraumbilical single port technique. A 10-mm, 30º scope was used. The surgeon was elevated gallbladder fundus with left hand using grasper in whole operation. If required, infindibulum was freed with monopolar hook. A 2.0 straight needle was inserted through the right of the falciform ligament, grasped with a laparoscopic needleholder using by surgeon's right hand, and passed through the Hartmann's pouch at the lowest point. To allow free manipulation, the passing suture with needle was turned around the suture to form a "half-knot". The needle was passed back out from the right of the midclavicular line. An assistant was grasped two ends of the suture and with the help of right or left hand dominant pulling tension, critical view of safety was provided
SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)Procedure or surgery
Similar technique of SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) was used
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Active comparator | This group of patients undergone classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy Receives: Procedure: Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) | Active comparator | This group of patients undergone single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using our new technique called "Pick'n roll", this group was designed new intervention's beginning arm. Receives: Procedure: SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) |
| SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II) | Active comparator | This group of patients undergone single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using our new technique called "Pick'n roll", this group was designed new intervention's experienced arm. Receives: Procedure: SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Operation time
Measured: Up to 1.5 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Conversion to open or classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Measured: Up to 1.5 hours
Insertion of additional port/ports.
Measured: Up to 1.5 hours
Intraoperative complication
Measured: Up to 1.5 hours
Lenght of hospital stay
Measured: Up to 3 days
Postoperative complication rate
Measured: Up to 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionApr 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CholelithiasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samsun Education and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Recep Aktimur, Samsun Education and Research Hospital
- Investigators
- Recep Aktimur, Principal investigator, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02149797
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SILC-PR vs. LC
- Status last verified
- May 2014
- First submitted
- 21 May 2014
- Last updated
- 29 May 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, Hutson KK, Singh KK, Sayegh M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2644-53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1719-5.
PubMed 22855214Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov;209(5):632-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.020. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
PubMed 19854405Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, Yih PC, Chan OC, Li MK. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011 Sep;202(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009.
PubMed 21871979
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of New Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Technique, "Pick'n Roll", Versus Conventional Four-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02149797
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SILC-PR vs. LC
- Conditions
- Cholelithiasis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Samsun Education and Research HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cholecystectomy is one of the most common operation performed by general surgeons. Since, first video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard treatment for benign biliary disease. In daily practice, LC has increased general surgeons familiarity to video-laparoscopic operations and has become the first step to search more minimally invasive techniques and to perform advanced laparoscopic operations. In order to move forward the minimal invasive surgery concept with less surgical trauma and better cosmetic results, surgeons firstly reduced the number of incision and ports, then the idea of totally eliminating skin incisions through the use of natural orifices was implemented in selected cases.
In theory, minimal incision must provide minimal postoperative pain and better cosmetic results. With the use of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), this purpose is achieved by means of cosmesis but providing minimal postoperative pain is still controversial. Recent reports on, LC vs. SILC showed significantly favorable cosmetic benefit, comparable complication rate and hospital stay with SILC, but the mean operation time was significantly longer. Today, lack of standardized operation technique, the need for specialized instruments, the fear of inability to apply safe cholecystectomy principles, longer operation time, cost-effectivity and advanced laparoscopic experience are still limiting factor to performing SILC.
The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare gold standard LC and SILC using our new technique called "Pick'n roll" (SILC-PR). Our goal was to provide critical view of safety and safe cholecystectomy principles on SILC, improve operator ergonomics and shorten operation time while eliminating the need for specialized instruments.
Detailed description
A pilot study was conducted, with ten patients who were planned to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy after approval by the ethics committee of Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Among ten patients, five patients were undergone LC, and another five were undergone SILC-PR.
The sample size was calculated from the pilot study. Simple consecutive allocation method was used to randomly divide the subjects into LC (classical four port technique), and SILC-"Pick'n roll" (PR) beginning and experienced groups. Each group contained 20 patients. The randomization was achieved regardless of demographic characteristics, by Dr. N. O.
One surgeon was performed all operation (Dr. R. A.). Patient's data were recorded by Dr. K. Y. At the end of the study, the data were analysed by Dr. S. C. and Dr. E. C. in a blinded manner to avoid bias
Surgical Procedures The technique used for LC was the conventional four-trocar approach (10-mm optic at the umbilicus, 10-mm trocar in the epigastrium and two 5-mm trocars in the right upper abdomen).
For SILC-PR, the patient was positioned supine on the operating table, once the access is gained into the abdomen, the patient re-positioned to reverse trendelenburg and left tilt. The surgeon stands on the left side of the patient and the assistant stands opposite him during the placement of the single-port device. SILC-PR was performed by the single-incision, single port technique using The OCTOTMPort (Dalimsurg, Seoul, Korea). The OCTOTMPort is a re-usable single-port device that contains two 5-mm, one 10-mm and one 12-mm port through the same port. Surgical access to the abdomen was obtained through an intraumbilical 2.5 cm incision from 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock. The OCTOTMPort was inserted and pneumoperitoneum was created up to an abdominal pressure of 15 mmHg. A 10-mm, 30º traditional scope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was inserted through inferior placed 10-mm port, by the assistant who positioned on the patient's left side, and the peritoneal cavity was examined. If the stomach was distended, a nasogastric tube insertion was requested from the anesthesiologist. The surgeon introduced an Endo Grasp™ (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) with left hand and elevated gallbladder fundus to assess the mobility of the gallbladder infindibulum, constant fundus retraction was used in whole operation by this instrument. In the presence of omental attachments, the gallbladder infindibulum was freed with monopolar hook device which holding by the surgeon's right hand, under the traction of the fundus. Once the gallbladder infindibulum freed from the attachments or clearly seen in first examination next step of the operation was launched. A 2.0 multifilament straight atraumatic needle was inserted through the surgeon's left of the falciform ligament with simultaneous palpation of the abdominal wall for optimum insertion site. The needle was grasped with a laparoscopic needleholder using by surgeon's right hand, and the needle was passed through the Hartmann's pouch at the lowest accessible point. To allow infindibulum retraction, wide triangulation and free Hartmann's pouch manipulation like "puppeteer movement", the passing suture with needle was turned around the afferent suture and a "half-knot" was created. The needle was passed back of the abdomen from the surgeon's left of the midclavicular line, with simultaneous palpation of the abdominal wall for optimum site. After this point, an assistant or a nurse was grasped two ends of the suspensory suture with clamps. With the help of fundus retraction and assistant's right or left hand dominant pulling tension on the suture, classical Hartmann's pouch retraction similar to LC technique was provided. Dissection of Calot's triangle and removal of gallbladder from the liver bed are possible in almost all cases with the use of aforementioned "Pick'n roll technique" and a hook diathermy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Active comparator | Procedure: Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomyThis group of patients undergone classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) | Active comparator | Procedure: SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I)This group of patients undergone single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using our new technique called "Pick'n roll", this group was designed new intervention's beginning arm. |
| SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II) | Active comparator | Procedure: SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)This group of patients undergone single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using our new technique called "Pick'n roll", this group was designed new intervention's experienced arm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Symptomatic cholelithiasis
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Acute cholecystitis (diagnosed on ultrasound or elevated inflammatory serum markers)
- Choledocholithiasis
- Less than 18 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grade IV or V.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomyClassical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Procedure or surgery | Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I)SILC-PR was performed by the intraumbilical single port technique. A 10-mm, 30º scope was used. The surgeon was elevated gallbladder fundus with left hand using grasper in whole operation. If required, infindibulum was freed with monopolar hook. A 2.0 straight needle was inserted through the right of the falciform ligament, grasped with a laparoscopic needleholder using by surgeon's right hand, and passed through the Hartmann's pouch at the lowest point. To allow free manipulation, the passing suture with needle was turned around the suture to form a "half-knot". The needle was passed back out from the right of the midclavicular line. An assistant was grasped two ends of the suture and with the help of right or left hand dominant pulling tension, critical view of safety was provided | Procedure or surgery | SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) |
| SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)Similar technique of SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) was used | Procedure or surgery | SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II) |
Primary outcome
Operation time
Time frame: Up to 1.5 hours
5 secondary outcomes
Conversion to open or classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Time frame: Up to 1.5 hours
Insertion of additional port/ports.
Time frame: Up to 1.5 hours
Intraoperative complication
Time frame: Up to 1.5 hours
Lenght of hospital stay
Time frame: Up to 3 days
Postoperative complication rate
Time frame: Up to 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2014.
- Background: PubMed 22855214Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, Hutson KK, Singh KK, Sayegh M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2644-53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1719-5.
- Background: PubMed 19854405Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov;209(5):632-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.020. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
- Background: PubMed 21871979Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, Yih PC, Chan OC, Li MK. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011 Sep;202(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009.
Related trials for Cholelithiasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Prophylactic Dexamethasone vs Placebo on Airway Dimensions Assessed by Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Airway Edema, Postoperative Complications
Not yet recruiting
Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Analgesic Strategies for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC)
Gallstones, Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Electrosurgical Patterns and Learning Curve in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis
Recruiting
Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis
Acute Pancreatitis, Cholelithiasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Recep Aktimur principal investigator
Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) and SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II) in people with Cholelithiasis, run by Samsun Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Operation time (time frame: Up to 1.5 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02149797, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2014.