AzTrials
AzTrials

CholelithiasisNCT02149797

Comparison of "Pick'n Roll" Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Technique, and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A study testing Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) and SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II) in people with Cholelithiasis, run by Samsun Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cholecystectomy is one of the most common operation performed by general surgeons. Since, first video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard treatment for benign biliary disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cholelithiasis
What is being tested?
Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) and SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
Jan 2014to Apr 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Symptomatic cholelithiasis

Who cannot join

  • Acute cholecystitis (diagnosed on ultrasound or elevated inflammatory serum markers)
  • Choledocholithiasis
  • Less than 18 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grade IV or V.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Samsun, Turkey

    Samsun, 55200

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of New Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Technique, "Pick'n Roll", Versus Conventional Four-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Cholecystectomy is one of the most common operation performed by general surgeons. Since, first video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard treatment for benign biliary disease. In daily practice, LC has increased general surgeons familiarity to video-laparoscopic operations and has become the first step to search more minimally invasive techniques and to perform advanced laparoscopic operations. In order to move forward the minimal invasive surgery concept with less surgical trauma and better cosmetic results, surgeons firstly reduced the number of incision and ports, then the idea of totally eliminating skin incisions through the use of natural orifices was implemented in selected cases.

In theory, minimal incision must provide minimal postoperative pain and better cosmetic results. With the use of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), this purpose is achieved by means of cosmesis but providing minimal postoperative pain is still controversial. Recent reports on, LC vs. SILC showed significantly favorable cosmetic benefit, comparable complication rate and hospital stay with SILC, but the mean operation time was significantly longer. Today, lack of standardized operation technique, the need for specialized instruments, the fear of inability to apply safe cholecystectomy principles, longer operation time, cost-effectivity and advanced laparoscopic experience are still limiting factor to performing SILC.

The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare gold standard LC and SILC using our new technique called "Pick'n roll" (SILC-PR). Our goal was to provide critical view of safety and safe cholecystectomy principles on SILC, improve operator ergonomics and shorten operation time while eliminating the need for specialized instruments.

Read the detailed description

A pilot study was conducted, with ten patients who were planned to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy after approval by the ethics committee of Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Among ten patients, five patients were undergone LC, and another five were undergone SILC-PR.

The sample size was calculated from the pilot study. Simple consecutive allocation method was used to randomly divide the subjects into LC (classical four port technique), and SILC-"Pick'n roll" (PR) beginning and experienced groups. Each group contained 20 patients. The randomization was achieved regardless of demographic characteristics, by Dr. N. O.

One surgeon was performed all operation (Dr. R. A.). Patient's data were recorded by Dr. K. Y. At the end of the study, the data were analysed by Dr. S. C. and Dr. E. C. in a blinded manner to avoid bias

Surgical Procedures The technique used for LC was the conventional four-trocar approach (10-mm optic at the umbilicus, 10-mm trocar in the epigastrium and two 5-mm trocars in the right upper abdomen).

For SILC-PR, the patient was positioned supine on the operating table, once the access is gained into the abdomen, the patient re-positioned to reverse trendelenburg and left tilt. The surgeon stands on the left side of the patient and the assistant stands opposite him during the placement of the single-port device. SILC-PR was performed by the single-incision, single port technique using The OCTOTMPort (Dalimsurg, Seoul, Korea). The OCTOTMPort is a re-usable single-port device that contains two 5-mm, one 10-mm and one 12-mm port through the same port. Surgical access to the abdomen was obtained through an intraumbilical 2.5 cm incision from 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock. The OCTOTMPort was inserted and pneumoperitoneum was created up to an abdominal pressure of 15 mmHg. A 10-mm, 30º traditional scope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was inserted through inferior placed 10-mm port, by the assistant who positioned on the patient's left side, and the peritoneal cavity was examined. If the stomach was distended, a nasogastric tube insertion was requested from the anesthesiologist. The surgeon introduced an Endo Grasp™ (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) with left hand and elevated gallbladder fundus to assess the mobility of the gallbladder infindibulum, constant fundus retraction was used in whole operation by this instrument. In the presence of omental attachments, the gallbladder infindibulum was freed with monopolar hook device which holding by the surgeon's right hand, under the traction of the fundus. Once the gallbladder infindibulum freed from the attachments or clearly seen in first examination next step of the operation was launched. A 2.0 multifilament straight atraumatic needle was inserted through the surgeon's left of the falciform ligament with simultaneous palpation of the abdominal wall for optimum insertion site. The needle was grasped with a laparoscopic needleholder using by surgeon's right hand, and the needle was passed through the Hartmann's pouch at the lowest accessible point. To allow infindibulum retraction, wide triangulation and free Hartmann's pouch manipulation like "puppeteer movement", the passing suture with needle was turned around the afferent suture and a "half-knot" was created. The needle was passed back of the abdomen from the surgeon's left of the midclavicular line, with simultaneous palpation of the abdominal wall for optimum site. After this point, an assistant or a nurse was grasped two ends of the suspensory suture with clamps. With the help of fundus retraction and assistant's right or left hand dominant pulling tension on the suture, classical Hartmann's pouch retraction similar to LC technique was provided. Dissection of Calot's triangle and removal of gallbladder from the liver bed are possible in almost all cases with the use of aforementioned "Pick'n roll technique" and a hook diathermy.

Conditions
Cholelithiasis
Being tested
Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I), SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)
Medical subject headings
Cholelithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomyProcedure or surgery

    Classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I)Procedure or surgery

    SILC-PR was performed by the intraumbilical single port technique. A 10-mm, 30º scope was used. The surgeon was elevated gallbladder fundus with left hand using grasper in whole operation. If required, infindibulum was freed with monopolar hook. A 2.0 straight needle was inserted through the right of the falciform ligament, grasped with a laparoscopic needleholder using by surgeon's right hand, and passed through the Hartmann's pouch at the lowest point. To allow free manipulation, the passing suture with needle was turned around the suture to form a "half-knot". The needle was passed back out from the right of the midclavicular line. An assistant was grasped two ends of the suture and with the help of right or left hand dominant pulling tension, critical view of safety was provided

  • SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)Procedure or surgery

    Similar technique of SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) was used

Study groups in NCT02149797
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomyActive comparatorThis group of patients undergone classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Receives: Procedure: Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I)Active comparatorThis group of patients undergone single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using our new technique called "Pick'n roll", this group was designed new intervention's beginning arm.
Receives: Procedure: SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I)
SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)Active comparatorThis group of patients undergone single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using our new technique called "Pick'n roll", this group was designed new intervention's experienced arm.
Receives: Procedure: SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operation time

    Measured: Up to 1.5 hours

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Conversion to open or classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Measured: Up to 1.5 hours

  2. Insertion of additional port/ports.

    Measured: Up to 1.5 hours

  3. Intraoperative complication

    Measured: Up to 1.5 hours

  4. Lenght of hospital stay

    Measured: Up to 3 days

  5. Postoperative complication rate

    Measured: Up to 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionApr 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02149797
Sponsor's protocol ID
SILC-PR vs. LC
Status last verified
May 2014
First submitted
21 May 2014
Last updated
29 May 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, Hutson KK, Singh KK, Sayegh M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2644-53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1719-5.

    PubMed 22855214
  • Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov;209(5):632-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.020. Epub 2009 Sep 11.

    PubMed 19854405
  • Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, Yih PC, Chan OC, Li MK. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011 Sep;202(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009.

    PubMed 21871979

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, SILC-Pick'n roll-Beginning (group I) and SILC-Pick'n roll-Experienced (group II) in people with Cholelithiasis, run by Samsun Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operation time (time frame: Up to 1.5 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02149797, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in