AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaNCT02150174

Testing Effect and Schizophrenia

A study testing Retrieval practice effect using word pairs and cued recall tests with feedback in people with Schizophrenia and Episodic Memory Deficits, run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France at 2 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

When people are tested on a previously learned material, they will latter remember it better even when compared to a condition where they can re-study it. This phenomenon is called retrieval practice and is supported by an extensive research literature mostly carried out in normal students. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia, Episodic Memory Deficits
What is being tested?
Retrieval practice effect using word pairs and cued recall tests with feedback
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
Jul 2014to Aug 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • French is the native language, or acquired before 5 years old
  • People must be able to understand and follow the trial instructions
  • Specific inclusion criteria (for patients) :
  • Diagnostic of schizophrenia, according to the DSM -5, clinically stable
  • The treatment must remain unchanged during the trial

Who cannot join

  • Severe or acute cerebral disease
  • Other actual psychiatric disorder
  • Use of drugs with high anticholinergic effect
  • Irregular use of benzodiazepines medication, or high dose of benzodiazepin (more than 2 mg of lorazepam per day or equivalent)
  • Inappropriate use of drugs
  • Specific exclusion criteria (for healthy subjects) :
  • Diagnostic of schizophrenia of a relative up to the third degree

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • Centre Psychothérapique de Nancy

    Laxou, 54521

  • Service de psychiatrie - Hôpital Civil - CHRU Strasbourg

    Strasbourg, 67091 Cedex

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Retrieval Practice in Patients With Schizophrenia : an Exploratory Study Using Word Pairs

When people are tested on a previously learned material, they will latter remember it better even when compared to a condition where they can re-study it. This phenomenon is called retrieval practice and is supported by an extensive research literature mostly carried out in normal students. This paradigm begins to be used in cognitive remediation programs in patients suffering from memory difficulties.

The objective of this study is to investigate whether retrieval practice is spared in patients with schizophrenia.

Read more

If effective, this method could be used in cognitive remediation programs.

Since episodic memory difficulties are supposed to be secondary to deficits in the initiation/elaboration of efficient encoding and retrieval strategies our hypothesis is that retrieval practice is spared in schizophrenia

Being tested
Retrieval practice effect using word pairs and cued recall tests with feedback
Keywords
Schizophrenia, Episodic memory deficits
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Retrieval practice effect using word pairs and cued recall tests with feedbackBehavioural

    In the first phase (encoding), people study a list of 48 word pairs non semantically associated.

    Then (initial test), they recall half of word pairs or restudy the other half.

    In the second phase (final test) which takes place 2 days later, they recall all the 48 the word pairs.

Study groups in NCT02150174
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with schizophreniaExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Retrieval practice effect using word pairs and cued recall tests with feedback
Healthy subjectsActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Retrieval practice effect using word pairs and cued recall tests with feedback

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of word pairs properly recalled

    • The aim is to investigate the retrieval practice effect using word pairs and cued recall tests with feedback in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.

    In the first phase (encoding), people study a list of 48 word pairs non semantically associated, then half of the pairs are presented in its completed form for two times, and for the other half the two subsequent re-exposure trials are framed as cued recall tests (the first word is presented and the subject has to remember and give orally the second word, and a feedback is given).

    In the second phase (final test) which takes place 2 days later, all the 48 word pairs are presented as a cued recall test.

    • We will compare in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls final performance recall for information studied and recalled ("test" condition) to those for information studied and then re-studied ("re-study" condition).

    Measured: Final test : 2 days after the first experimental session

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Difference between final performance recall and memory span score

    In each group (patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls) :

    Difference between the final performance recall (see primary outcome measure) in "test" condition and "re-study" condition AND memory span score.

    Measured: Final test : 2 days after the first experimental session

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2014
  3. Primary completion6 May 2015
  4. Study completionAug 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02150174
Sponsor's protocol ID
5806
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
26 May 2014
Last updated
22 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Jantzi C, Mengin AC, Serfaty D, Bacon E, Elowe J, Severac F, Meyer N, Berna F, Vidailhet P. Retrieval practice improves memory in patients with schizophrenia: new perspectives for cognitive remediation. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2341-y.

    PubMed 31711448

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Retrieval practice effect using word pairs and cued recall tests with feedback in people with Schizophrenia and Episodic Memory Deficits, run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of word pairs properly recalled (time frame: Final test : 2 days after the first experimental session). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02150174, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in