AzTrials
AzTrials

InsomniaNCT02153086

Ramelteon 8 mg Tablets Specified Drug-use Survey: <Long-term Survey on Insomnia Accompanied by Difficulty Falling Asleep> - Transitional Survey From the Preceding Drug-use Survey -

An observational study of Insomnia, run by Takeda at 2 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this survey is to examine the safety and efficacy of long-term use of ramelteon tablets (Rozerem 8 mg Tablets) in participants with difficulty falling asleep associated with insomnia in daily medical practice. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Insomnia
What is being tested?
Ramelteon
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
236 participants
Where
2 sitesJapan
Study dates
Mar 2011to Jun 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Insomnia

Who may be able to join

  • -Participants with difficulty falling asleep associated with insomnia who have completed a 4-week follow-up in the preceding drug use surveillance and are able to receive continuous administration of Rozerem Tablets

Who cannot join

  • Participants with contraindications to Rozerem Tablets.
  • Participants with previous history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in Rozerem Tablets.
  • Participants with severe liver dysfunction.
  • Participants taking fluvoxamine maleate

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Japan2 sites
  • Study site

    Osaka

  • Study site

    Tokyo

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: Rozerem 8 mg Tablets Specified Drug-use Survey: <Long-term Survey on Insomnia Associated With Sleep-onset Difficulty > - Transitional Survey From the Preceding Drug-use Survey -

The purpose of this survey is to examine the safety and efficacy of long-term use of ramelteon tablets (Rozerem 8 mg Tablets) in participants with difficulty falling asleep associated with insomnia in daily medical practice.

Read the detailed description

This survey was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of long-term use of ramelteon tablets (Rozerem 8 mg Tablets) in participants with difficulty falling asleep associated with insomnia in daily medical practice.The usual dosage for adults is 8 mg of ramelteon administered orally once daily at bedtime.

Conditions
Insomnia
Being tested
Ramelteon
Keywords
Pharmacological therapy
Medical subject headings
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RamelteonDrug

    Also called Rozerem 8 mg Tablets

    Ramelteon tablets 8 mg

Study groups in NCT02153086
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ramelteon 8 mg TabletsNot described
Receives: Drug: Ramelteon

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

    Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Sleep Status: Sleep Onset Latency

    Sleep status was determined by measuring the sleep onset latency, defined as the length of time taken from lying down for the night until sleep onset. The data was assessed at baseline, Week 4 and final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4 and Month 12

  2. Sleep Status: Total Sleep Time

    Sleep status was determined by measuring the total sleep time, defined as the amount of actual sleep time during a sleep episode. The data was assessed at baseline, Week 4 and final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4 and Month 12

  3. Sleep Status: Number of Awakenings

    Sleep status of participants was assessed and summarized by calculating the number of times participants had awaken from the time of start of the investigation. The data was assessed at baseline, Week 4 and final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4 and Month 12

  4. Percentage of Participants Reported With Improvement on the Patient Global Impression (PGI) Scale for Sleep Onset

    Sleep onset was defined as the transition from wakefulness into sleep. PGI is a participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale. Participants provide their response on a PGI questionnaire. Total score range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Percentage of participants with improvement rated as "much better" or "a little better" were reported. The data was assessed at Week 4, Week 52 and final visit (follow up visit up to Month 12).

    Measured: At Week 4, 52, and final assessment (up to 12 months)

  5. Percentage of Participants Reported With Improvement on the PGI Scale for Sleep Duration

    Sleep duration was defined as the total amount of sleep obtained. PGI is a participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale. Participants provide their response on a PGI questionnaire. Total score range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Percentage of participants with improvement rated as "much better" or "a little better" were reported. The data was assessed at Week 4, Week 52 and final visit (follow up visit up to Month 12).

    Measured: At Week 4, 52, and final assessment (up to 12 months)

  6. Percentage of Participants Reported With Improvement on the PGI Scale for Sleep Quality

    Sleep quality was defined as participants satisfaction of the sleep experience, integrating aspects of sleep initiation, sleep maintenance, sleep quantity, and refreshment upon awakening. PGI is a participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale. Participants provide their response on a PGI questionnaire. Total score range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Percentage of participants with improvement rated as "much better" or "a little better" were reported. The data was assessed at Week 4, Week 52 and final visit (follow up visit up to Month 12).

    Measured: At Week 4, 52, and final assessment (up to 12 months)

  7. Percentage of Participants Reported With Improvement on the PGI Scale for Morning Awakening

    Morning awakening was defined as the return to the awaked state from any non-rapid eye movement (NREM) to rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stages in the morning. PGI is a participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale. Participants provide their response on a PGI questionnaire. Total score range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Percentage of participants with improvement rated as "much better" or "a little better" were reported. The data was assessed at Week 4, Week 52 and final visit (follow up visit up to Month 12).

    Measured: At Week 4, 52, and final assessment (up to 12 months)

  8. Percentage of Participants Reported With Improvement on the PGI Scale for Remaining Tiredness in the Morning

    Remaining tiredness in the morning was defined as an experience of fatigue after complete or adequate sleep duration. PGI is a participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale. Participants provide their response on a PGI questionnaire. Total score range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Percentage of participants with improvement rated as "much better" or "a little better" were reported. The data was assessed at Week 4, Week 52 and final visit (follow up visit up to Month 12).

    Measured: At Week 4, 52, and final assessment (up to 12 months)

  9. Percentage of Participants Reported With Improvement on the PGI Scale for Daytime Somnolence

    Daytime somnolence was defined as excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), characterized by general lack of energy, even after adequate or prolonged night time sleep. PGI is a participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale. Participants provide their response on a PGI questionnaire. Total score range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Percentage of participants with improvement rated as "much better" or "a little better" were reported. The data was assessed at Week 4, Week 52 and final visit (follow up visit up to Month 12).

    Measured: At Week 4, 52, and final assessment (up to 12 months)

  10. Percentage of Participants Reported With Improvement on the PGI Scale for Daytime Physical Condition/Function

    Daytime physical condition/function was defined as general condition of participant throughout the day after adequate or prolonged night time sleep. PGI is a participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale. Participants provide their response on a PGI questionnaire. Total score range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Percentage of participants with improvement rated as "much better" or "a little better" were reported. The data was assessed at Week 4, Week 52 and final visit (follow up visit up to Month 12).

    Measured: At Week 4, 52, and final assessment (up to 12 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
236 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02153086
Sponsor's protocol ID
293-011
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
29 May 2014
Last updated
13 Oct 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Insomnia, run by Takeda at 2 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions (time frame: Baseline up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in